Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 79
Filter
1.
Int J Drug Policy ; : 104469, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880700

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of new direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, has enabled the formulation of a HCV elimination strategy led by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Guidelines for elimination of HCV target a reduction in incidence, but this is difficult to measure and needs estimating. METHODS: Serial cross-sectional bio-behavioural sero-surveys provide information on an individual's infection status and duration of exposure and how these change over time. These data can be used to estimate the rate of first infection through appropriate statistical models. This study utilised updated HCV seroprevalence information from the Unlinked Anonymous Monitoring survey, an annual survey of England, Wales and Northern Ireland monitoring the prevalence of blood borne viruses in people who inject drugs. Flexible parametric and semiparametric approaches, including fractional polynomials and splines, for estimating incidence rates by exposure time and survey year were implemented and compared. RESULTS: Incidence rates were shown to peak in those recently initiating injecting drug use at approximately 0.20 infections per person-year followed by a rapid reduction in the subsequent few years of injecting to approximately 0.05 infections per person-year. There was evidence of a rise in incidence rates for recent initiates between 2011 and 2020 from 0.17 infections per person-year (95 % CI, 0.16-0.19) to 0.26 infections per person-year (0.23-0.30). In those injecting for longer durations, incidence rates were stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Fractional polynomials provided an adequate fit with relatively few parameters, but splines may be preferable to ensure flexibility, in particular, to detect short-term changes in the rate of first infection over time that may be a result of treatment effects. Although chronic HCV prevalence has declined with treatment scale up over 2016-2020, there is no evidence yet of a corresponding fall in the rate of first infection. Seroprevalence and risk behaviour data can be used to estimate and monitor HCV incidence, providing insight into progress towards WHO defined elimination of HCV.

2.
J Perinat Med ; 52(5): 515-519, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640060

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Universal opt-out antenatal screening for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not currently recommened and it is recommended that maternity services offer risk-based testing. We aimed to investigate antenatal HCV testing and adherence to testing guidance. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was circulated to maternity service providers between November-December 2020 which included testing policy, training for healthcare staff, and management of women found to be HCV positive. Descriptive data are presented. RESULTS: A total of 75 questionnaires were returned, representing 48 % of English maternity service providers. 87 % of providers reported offering antenatal HCV risk-based testing. Risk factors used to identify pregnant women for testing varied. Less than 15 % of respondents considered women that were ever homeless or with history of incarceraton or from higher HCV prevalence areas as high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Current antenatal HCV testing practices are inadequate and HCV infection likely goes undiagnosed in pregnancy, especially among vulnerable population groups. In the absence of universal antenatal screening, re-framing antenatal HCV risk-based testing and management as a quality improvement initiative and developing HCV specific pathway guidance for maternity units is required.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cross-Sectional Studies , England/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/therapy , Prenatal Care/methods , Prenatal Care/standards , Maternal Health Services/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Prenatal Diagnosis/methods
3.
J Viral Hepat ; 31(3): 131-136, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178637

ABSTRACT

New case-finding opportunities are needed to achieve hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination in England by the year 2030. HCV antenatal testing is not offered universally in England but is recommended for women with risk factors for HCV (e.g. injecting drug use, being born in a high-prevalence country). The aim of this analysis was to investigate the missed opportunities for HCV antenatal testing among women who had given birth and were subsequently diagnosed with HCV at some time after childbirth. By linking data on live births (2010-2020) to laboratory reports of HCV diagnoses (1995-2021), we identified all women who were diagnosed with HCV after the date of their first childbirth. This group was considered to potentially have experienced a missed opportunity for HCV antenatal testing; HCV-RNA testing and treatment outcomes were also obtained for these women. Of the 32,295 women who gave birth between 2010 and 2020 with a linked diagnosis of HCV (median age: 34 years, 72.1% UK-born), over half (n = 17,123) were diagnosed after childbirth. In multivariable analyses, the odds of being diagnosed with HCV after childbirth were higher in those of Asian Bangladeshi, Black African or Chinese ethnicity and among those born in Africa. Over four-fifths (3510/4260) of those eligible for treatment were linked to treatment, 30.7% (747/2435) of whom had a liver scarring level of at least moderate and 9.4% (228/2435) had cirrhosis. Given the potential opportunity to identify cases of HCV with targeted case-finding through antenatal services, universal opt-out testing should be considered in these settings.


Subject(s)
Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Risk Factors , England/epidemiology , Liver Cirrhosis , Prevalence
5.
Lancet HIV ; 10(12): e790-e806, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV acquisition. To enable routine commissioning of PrEP in England, we aimed to establish population need, duration of need, PrEP uptake, and duration of use in attendees of sexual health services (SHS) in England. METHODS: The Impact Trial was a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicentre trial conducted at 157 SHS across England between Oct 13, 2017, and July 12, 2020. Clinicians assessed HIV-negative attendees for their risk of HIV acquisition to identify those who were eligible to participate and receive either daily or event-based oral PrEP (tenofovir disoproxil maleate with emtricitabine), as appropriate. Eligible participants were aged 16 years or older, considered HIV-negative on the day of enrolment, and willing to adhere to the trial procedures. Non-trial attendees are mutually exclusive of trial participants and included SHS attendees who were not recruited to the Impact Trial at any point. They include HIV-negative individuals aged 16 years or older who attended a participating SHS at least once after recruitment at that SHS had begun and before Feb 29, 2020. The main outcomes assessed were PrEP need, uptake, and use, and HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence. Data are presented up to Feb 29, 2020, before the introduction of COVID-19 control measures. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03253757. FINDINGS: In this analysis, we include 21 356 of 24 268 participants enrolled before Feb 29, 2020. 20 403 participants (95·5%) were men who have sex with men (MSM). Uptake of PrEP among SHS attendees clinically assessed and coded as eligible was 21 292 (57·1%) of 37 289. 18 400 trial participants had at least one post-enrolment visit and a median of 361 days of follow-up (IQR 143-638); 14 039 (75·9%) of these had enough PrEP prescribed to provide protection for 75% of their follow-up time. Among MSM, HIV incidence was 0·13 (95% CI 0·08-0·19) per 100 person-years in trial participants (27 seroconversions) and 0·95 (95% CI 0·88-1·03) per 100 person-years in non-trial attendees (587 seroconversions; proportionate reduction of 86·8%, 95% CI 80·2-91·6). 18 607 bacterial STIs were recorded (incidence 68·1 per 100 person-years in trial participants who were MSM). 4343 (24·4%) MSM participants were diagnosed with two or more STIs, accounting for 14 800 (79·5%) of all 18 607 diagnoses. INTERPRETATION: PrEP need was higher than initially estimated by an expert stakeholder group. The high proportion of follow-up time protected by PrEP suggests that the need for protection persisted throughout trial participation for most participants. HIV incidence among MSM trial participants was low. The large unmet need for PrEP suggests that greater provision is required to maximise the potential of a national programme. The high incidence of bacterial STIs among participants, concentrated within a subgroup of PrEP users, presents an opportunity for tailored STI control measures. FUNDING: NHS England.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Male , Humans , Female , Homosexuality, Male , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , England/epidemiology
6.
AIDS Res Ther ; 20(1): 81, 2023 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37964322

ABSTRACT

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) experience a high prevalence of psychosocial health problems, such as harmful substance use and depression, as well as being disproportionately affected by HIV. HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) may provide psychosocial benefits beyond its intended purpose of reducing HIV infection. We explore the psychosocial impact of oral PrEP use on gay men in England using qualitative data from the PROUD study. From February 2014 to January 2016, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 gay men and one trans woman. Participants were purposively recruited based on trial arm allocation, adherence, and sexual risk behaviours. By removing HIV risk from sex, PrEP improves users' wellbeing by reducing HIV-related anxiety and internalised stigma and increasing HIV prevention self-efficacy, sexual pleasure, and intimacy. In turn, these psychological changes may influence behaviour in the form of greater sexual freedom, reduced harmful drug use, and more protective sexual health behaviours. However, PrEP may create internal conflict for some gay men, due to its disruption of social norms around condom use and its perceived influence on their sexual behaviour leading to reduced condom self-efficacy. These findings provide a baseline of PrEP's psychosocial impact amongst some of the first PrEP users in England and supports calls to consider the psychosocial impact of PrEP in prescribing guidelines.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Substance-Related Disorders , Female , Humans , Male , England/epidemiology , Fear , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Clinical Trials as Topic
7.
Midwifery ; 127: 103863, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931465

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine associations with hepatitis C virus (HCV) positivity, new HCV diagnoses and subsequent linkage to HCV treatment services among pregnant women in England. METHOD: A retrospective cohort using routine laboratory tests for HCV-specific antibody (anti-HCV) and HCV-RNA undertaken during antenatal attendances England. All women receiving at least one anti-HCV test during an antenatal clinic attendance between 2015 and 2019 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate sociodemographic associations with anti-HCV test positivity among pregnant women who did (PWIDs) and did not (non-PWIDs) inject drugs, as well as to identify sociodemographic factors associated with being newly diagnosed during pregnancy. Linkage to antiviral treatment services and treatment outcomes were determined for those women who tested HCV-RNA positive. RESULTS: 32,088 women (median age 32 years, 19,664 (61 %) UK-born, 337 (1.1 %) PWID) received an anti-HCV test among whom 814 (2.5 %) had a positive anti-HCV test (95 % confidence interval [2.4-2.7 %]). Anti-HCV test positivity was 2.1 % [2.0-2.3 %] among non-PWIDs and 40 % [35-46 %] among PWIDs. In multivariable analyses among non-PWIDs, anti-HCV test positivity was associated with older age, living in more deprived areas, and varied by ethnicity and country of birth. Among PWIDs, anti-HCV test positivity was associated with older age only. Three hundred and twenty (39 %) of the women testing anti-HCV positive were new diagnoses; those who were newly diagnosed were younger and lived in less deprived than those with a prior diagnosis whereas PWIDs were less likely to be newly diagnosed. HCV-RNA positivity was 52 % (n = 330/640, 95 %CI[47.6-55.5 %]) among those with an HCV-RNA test within 30 days, and 75 % (n = 220/293, 95 %CI[69.7-79.9 %]) of those eligible for treatment had engaged in HCV treatment services after antenatal testing. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal testing for HCV provides an opportunity for new case findings and engagement with treatment services where needed. Therefore, universal opt-out testing for HCV antenatally should be reconsidered.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Hepacivirus/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/therapy , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/complications , England , Hepatitis C Antibodies , RNA
8.
Int J Drug Policy ; : 104262, 2023 Nov 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Crack use is higher in the United Kingdom (UK) than other European countries. Crack is a stimulant with a short half-life, requiring frequent injection to maintain its euphoric effects, thus increasing the risk of blood borne viruses (BBVs) and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). We assessed trends in the prevalence of current crack injection among people who inject drugs (PWID) and investigated harms and other factors associated with its use. METHODS: We used data from the annual Unlinked Anonymous Monitoring Survey of PWID, which recruits people who have ever injected psychoactive drugs through specialist services. Participants provide a biological sample and self-complete a questionnaire. We included participants from England and Wales who had injected in the past month. We examined trends in crack injection over time (2011-2021) and factors associated with crack injection using multivariable logistic regression (2019-2021). RESULTS: The proportion of people self-reporting crack injection in the past month almost doubled between 2011-2020/21, from 34 % (416/1237) to 57 % (483/850). Crack injection was more frequently reported by males than females (adjusted odds ratio 1.46, 95 % confidence interval: 1.15-1.87) and injected alongside heroin (6.67, 4.06-10.97) more frequently than alone. Crack injection was independently associated with injecting equipment sharing (1.64, 1.30-2.07), groin injection (2.03, 1.60-2.56) in the past month, overdosing in the past year (1.90, 1.42-2.53), homelessness in the past year (1.42, 1.14-1.77) and ever having hepatitis C infection (1.64, 1.31-2.06). CONCLUSION: Crack injection has increased significantly over the past decade in England and Wales. People injecting crack are more likely to engage in behaviours that increase the risk of BBV and SSTI acquisition, such as needle/syringe sharing, groin injection and polydrug use. Harm reduction and drug treatment services should adapt to support the needs of this growing population of people injecting stimulants.

9.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 7(11): 786-796, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37774733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An increase in acute severe hepatitis of unknown aetiology in previously healthy children in the UK in March, 2022, triggered global case-finding. We aimed to describe UK epidemiological investigations of cases and their possible causes. METHODS: We actively surveilled unexplained paediatric acute hepatitis (transaminase >500 international units per litre) in children younger than 16 years presenting since Jan 1, 2022, through notifications from paediatricians, microbiologists, and paediatric liver units; we collected demographic, clinical, and exposure information. Then, we did a case-control study to investigate the association between adenoviraemia and other viruses and case-status using multivariable Firth penalised logistic regression. Cases aged 1-10 years and tested for adenovirus were included and compared with controls (ie, children admitted to hospital with an acute non-hepatitis illness who had residual blood samples collected between Jan 1 and May 28, 2022, and without known laboratory-confirmed diagnosis or previous adenovirus testing). Controls were frequency-matched on sex, age band, sample months, and nation or supra-region with randomised selection. We explored temporal associations between frequency of circulating viruses identified through routine laboratory pathogen surveillance and occurrence of cases by linear regression. SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity of cases was examined against residual serum from age-matched clinical comparison groups. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1 and July 4, 2022, 274 cases were identified (median age 3 years [IQR 2-5]). 131 (48%) participants were male, 142 (52%) were female, and one (<1%) participant had sex data unknown. Jaundice (195 [83%] of 235) and gastrointestinal symptoms (202 [91%] of 222) were common. 15 (5%) children required liver transplantation and none died. Adenovirus was detected in 172 (68%) of 252 participants tested, regardless of sample type; 137 (63%) of 218 samples were positive for adenovirus in the blood. For cases that were successfully genotyped, 58 (81%) of 72 had Ad41F, and 57 were identified as positive via blood samples (six of these were among participants who had undergone a transplant). In the case-control analysis, adenoviraemia was associated with hepatitis case-status (adjusted OR 37·4 [95% CI 15·5-90·3]). Increases in the detection of adenovirus from faecal samples, but not other infectious agents, in routine laboratory pathogen surveillance correlated with hepatitis cases 4 weeks later, which independently suggested an association (ß 0·06 [95% CI 0·02-0·11]). No association was identified for SARS-CoV-2 antibody seropositivity. INTERPRETATION: We observed an association between adenovirus 41F viraemia and paediatric acute hepatitis. These results can inform diagnostic testing recommendations, clinical management, and exploratory in vitro or clinical studies of paediatric acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology. The role of potential co-factors, including other viruses and host susceptibility, requires further investigation. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Acute Disease , Case-Control Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
10.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 629, 2023 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37752434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the advent of direct acting antivirals, the World Health Organisation proposed eliminating Hepatitis C as a public health threat by 2030. To achieve this, countries need to diagnose, engage in care and treat their undiagnosed populations. This will require sensitisation campaigns. However previous media campaigns have had mixed impact. We conducted a scoping review to identify and understand the impact of previous Hepatitis C media campaigns. These findings could inform the delivery of future campaigns. METHODS: We searched five electronic databases for published literature on media campaigns conducted for Hepatitis C awareness, testing, and treatment in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries since 2010. Two independent reviewers screened citations for inclusion. Additionally, we spoke to stakeholders in the Hepatitis C field in the UK and conducted a Google search to identify any unpublished literature. A quantitative synthesis was conducted to identify targeted populations, strategies and media used, aims and impact of the campaigns. RESULTS: A title and year of publication screening of 3815 citations resulted in 113 papers that had a full abstract screen. This left 50 full-text papers, 18 were included of which 9 (50%) were from Europe. 5 (27.8%) of campaigns targeted minority ethnicities, and 9 (50%) aimed to increase testing. A Google search identified 6 grey literature sources. Most campaigns were not evaluated for impact. Discussions with stakeholders identified several barriers to successful campaigns including lack of targeted messaging, stigmatising or accusatory messaging, and short-lived or intermittent campaign strategies. CONCLUSION: Future campaigns will likely need to be multifaceted and have multiple tailored interventions. Campaigns will need to be sizeable and robust, integrated into health systems and viewed as an ongoing service rather than one-offs.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Humans , Developed Countries , Antiviral Agents , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Minority Groups
11.
Sex Transm Infect ; 99(7): 497-501, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550014

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Females who engage in sex work (FSW) are at high risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and are eligible for HBV vaccination. The objective of this analysis was to explore coverage, uptake and correlates of HBV vaccination among FSW who attend sexual health services (SHS) in England. METHODS: Data on all attendances at SHS in England were obtained from the GUMCAD STI Surveillance System. Attendees were eligible for inclusion if they were female, had not been previously diagnosed with HIV and sex work was recorded between 2015 and 2019. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate sociodemographic factors (age, ethnicity, region of birth and region of residence) associated with having received an HBV vaccination on or after an attendance where sex work was reported. RESULTS: There were 13 769 FSW attending SHS in England between 2015 and 2019 (median age 30 years, 71% white ethnicity). HBV vaccination coverage was 37% (n=5050/13 751, 95% CI 35.9%-37.5%). Among those that first reported sex work between 2015 and 2019, HBV vaccination uptake was 30% (n=3249/10 681, 95% CI 29.6%-31.3%). In multivariable analyses, HBV vaccination uptake was associated with younger age (5-year increase: OR=0.87, 95% CI 0.85, 0.89) and being born in South America (37%, adjusted OR (aOR)=1.40, 95% CI 1.18, 1.66) compared with being born in the UK. Being of Asian ethnicity (19%, aOR=0.63, 95% CI 0.45, 0.89) compared with white ethnicity was associated with reduced odds of HBV vaccination. Sixteen FSW were diagnosed with HBV after their first attendance where sex work was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve the WHO goals of elimination of HBV as a public health threat by the year 2030, further research is needed to understand the individual and structural barriers to the offering and uptake of HBV vaccination among FSW, as well as using health promotion methods to improve uptake.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B , Humans , Female , Adult , Male , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Sex Work , Retrospective Studies , Hepatitis B virus , England/epidemiology , Vaccination , World Health Organization , Hepatitis B Vaccines
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(3): 338-345, 2023 08 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36916065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infections cause substantial pain and disability among people who inject drugs. We described time trends in hospital admissions for injecting-related infections in England. METHODS: We analyzed hospital admissions in England between January 2002 and December 2021. We included patients with infections commonly caused by drug injection, including cutaneous abscesses, cellulitis, endocarditis, or osteomyelitis, and a diagnosis of opioid use disorder. We used Poisson regression to estimate seasonal variation and changes associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response. RESULTS: There were 92 303 hospital admissions for injection-associated infections between 2002 and 2021. Eighty-seven percent were skin, soft-tissue, or vascular infections; 72% of patients were male; and the median age increased from 31 years in 2002 to 42 years in 2021. The rate of admissions reduced from 13.97 per day (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.59-14.36) in 2003 to 8.94 (95% CI, 8.64-9.25) in 2011, then increased to 18.91 (95% CI, 18.46-19.36) in 2019. At the introduction of COVID-19 response in March 2020, the rate of injection-associated infections reduced by 35.3% (95% CI, 32.1-38.4). Injection-associated infections were also seasonal; the rate was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.18-1.24) times higher in July than in February. CONCLUSIONS: This incidence of opioid injection-associated infections varies within years and reduced following COVID-19 response measures. This suggests that social and structural factors such as housing and the degree of social mixing may contribute to the risk of infection, supporting investment in improved social conditions for this population as a means to reduce the burden of injecting-related infections.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Seasons , Analgesics, Opioid , Time Factors , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/complications , England/epidemiology
13.
J Viral Hepat ; 30(8): 646-655, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36929670

ABSTRACT

England has committed to the World Health Organization target to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a public threat by the year 2030. Given successful treatments for HCV in recent years, it is unclear whether HCV reinfection will impact England's ability to achieve HCV elimination. We aimed to estimate the HCV reinfection rate among a cohort of patients receiving antiviral treatment using available surveillance data. Linkage between a treatment dataset from 2015 to 2019 and an HCV RNA testing dataset were used to identify people who experienced reinfection using three criteria. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine risk factors associated with HCV reinfection among a cohort who received treatment and had follow-up HCV RNA testing. The reinfection rate among those receiving HCV treatment was 7.91 per 100 person-years (PYs, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.37-8.49) and highest among current injecting drug users (22.55 per 100 PYs, 95% CI 19.98-25.46) and people who had been in prison (20.42 per 100 PYs, 95% CI 17.21-24.24). In the adjusted model, women had a significantly reduced risk of reinfection. Being of younger age, current injecting drug users, and receipt of first treatment in prison were each significantly associated with increased risk of reinfection. Two-fifths of those with reinfection (43%, n = 329/767) were linked to treatment after reinfection, and of those starting treatment, three quarters (75%, n = 222/296) achieved a sustained virologic response. Guidance for testing groups at risk of reinfection and harm reduction strategies to minimize transmission should be implemented if England is to achieve HCV elimination targets.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Humans , Female , Hepacivirus/genetics , Reinfection , Recurrence , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/complications , Risk Factors , RNA , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications
14.
Clin Exp Emerg Med ; 10(2): 224-229, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718486

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2011, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine was among the first schools to implement a 4-year ultrasound curriculum. We aimed to find the point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) utilization pattern among University of California, Irvine alumni. METHODS: We surveyed University of California, Irvine alumni from the class of 2011 and beyond. Survey questions included POCUS reliance, frequency of use, and comfort with image acquisition and interpretation compared with peers. The primary outcomes were self-reported comfort and reliance on POCUS. RESULTS: We received 93 responses from 624 surveyed alumni (response rate, 14.9%), of which 87 were analyzed. Although 46 respondents (52.9%) reported more reliance on POCUS, three (3.4%) relied on it less than their peers. At the same time, 72 (82.7%) and 67 (77.0%) felt more comfortable than their colleagues in obtaining and interpreting POCUS, respectively. No respondents felt less comfortable obtaining or interpreting POCUS than their peers. The frequency of POCUS use correlated directly with the frequency with which POCUS changed the responder's case management (rho, 0.860; P<0.001). POCUS reliance also correlated with respondents' comfort level in obtaining (rho, 0.321; P<0.001) and interpreting (rho, 0.378; P<0.001) POCUS results. CONCLUSION: University of California, Irvine graduates had higher reliance on POCUS than peers in their respective specialties. Their POCUS findings frequently changed their case management.

15.
HIV Med ; 24(1): 6-26, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35702813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blood-borne viruses (BBVs) cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Emergency departments (EDs) offer a point of contact for groups at increased risk of BBVs who may be less likely to engage with primary care. We reviewed the literature to evaluate whether BBV testing in this setting might be a viable option to increase case finding and linkage to care. METHODS: We searched PubMed database for English language articles published until June 2019 on BBV testing in EDs. Studies reporting seroprevalence surveys, feasibility, linkage to care, enablers and barriers to testing were included. Additional searches for grey literature were performed. RESULTS: Eight-nine articles met inclusion criteria, of which 14 reported BBV seroprevalence surveys in EDs, 54 investigated feasibility and acceptability, and 36 investigated linkage to care. Most studies were HIV-focused and conducted in the USA. Seroprevalence rates were in the range 1.5-17% for HCV, 0.7-1.6% for HBV, and 0.8-13% for HIV. For studies that used an opt-in study design, testing uptake ranged from 2% to 98% and for opt-out it ranged from 16% to 91%. There was a wide range of yield: 13-100% of patients received their test result, 21-100% were linked to care, and 50-91% were retained in care. Compared with individuals diagnosed with HIV, linkage to and retention in care were lower for those diagnosed with hepatitis C. Predictors of linkage to care was associated with certain patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Universal opt-out BBV testing in EDs may be feasible and acceptable, but linkage to care needs to be improved by optimizing implementation. Further economic evaluations of hepatitis testing in EDs are needed.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis C , Humans , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Feasibility Studies , Mass Screening , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepacivirus , Emergency Service, Hospital
16.
Int J Drug Policy ; 109: 103821, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission in the UK is driven by injecting drug use. We explore HCV testing uptake amongst people who inject drugs (PWID) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and identify factors associated with i) ever having an HCV test amongst people who have ever injected drugs, and ii) recently having an HCV test (within the current or previous year) amongst people who currently inject drugs (reported injecting drugs within the last year). METHODS: We analysed data from the 2019 'Unlinked Anonymous Monitoring Survey' of PWID, using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 3,127 PWID, 2,065 reported injecting drugs within the last year. Most (86.7%) PWID had a lifetime history of HCV testing. In multivariable analysis, higher odds of ever testing were associated with: female sex (aOR=1.54; 95%CI 1.11-2.14), injecting duration ≥3 years (aOR=2.94; 95%CI 2.13-4.05), ever receiving used needles/syringes (aOR=1.74; 95%CI 1.29-2.36), ever being on opioid agonist treatment (aOR=2.91; 95%CI 2.01-4.21), ever being imprisoned (aOR=1.86; 95%CI 1.40-2.48) and ever being homeless (aOR=1.54; 95%CI 1.14-2.07). Amongst PWID who had injected drugs within the last year, 49.9% had recently undertaken an HCV test. After adjustment, factors associated with higher odds of undertaking a recent HCV test included: injecting crack in the last year (aOR=1.29; 95%CI 1.03-1.61), experiencing a non-fatal overdose in the last year (aOR=1.39; 95%CI 1.05-1.85), ever being on opioid agonist treatment (aOR=1.48; 95%CI 0.97-2.25), receiving HCV information in the last year (aOR=1.99; 95%CI 1.49-2.65) and using a healthcare service in the last year (aOR=1.80; 95%CI 1.21-2.67). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that PWID who have experienced homelessness and incarceration - amongst the most vulnerable and marginalised in the PWID population - are engaging with HCV testing, but overall there remain missed testing opportunities. Recent initiates to injecting have highest HCV infection risk but lower odds of testing, and peer-education may help target this group.


Subject(s)
Drug Users , Hepatitis C , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Female , Humans , Hepacivirus , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Northern Ireland/epidemiology , Wales/epidemiology , Analgesics, Opioid , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/complications , England/epidemiology , Prevalence
17.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 18(9): e1553-e1561, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35776902

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe the implementation of an interdisciplinary supportive care program for treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) of patients with cancer in two ambulatory infusion centers affiliated with a major health system. METHODS: A management program of TRAEs was developed on the basis of the collaboration between oncologists, infusion center oncology nurses, and a board-certified oncology clinical pharmacist for patients with cancer in two outpatient infusion centers. Patients received multidisciplinary interventions or oncologist-driven interventions on the basis of their reported symptoms during their cancer treatments. They were followed prospectively at regular intervals for further symptom management interventions. To evaluate this program, a retrospective chart review was performed, and data were collected regarding the number and nature of these TRAEs. The outcomes of their interventions were assessed up to 3 months since initial encounters. Data for patient satisfaction were also collected before and after implementation of the program. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients received 469 interventions initiated either by the multidisciplinary team or by oncologists over a 3-year period. Compared with oncologist-led interventions, multidisciplinary interventions were statistically significant in the number of interventions (P = .004; 95% CI, 17.9 to 36.2) and in reducing occurrences of TRAEs (P = .03; 95% CI, 33.8 to 72.4) such as dermatological toxicities, diarrhea, immune-related adverse effects, mucositis, and nausea or vomiting after 1-month follow-up. Multidisciplinary team captured approximately 40% of TRAEs of all grades that were escalated to oncologists for further management, which led to an overall improvement in management of TRAEs. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary care for patients in infusion centers led to improvement in treatment-related toxicities.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Pharmacists , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Humans , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
18.
Addiction ; 117(9): 2471-2480, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mortality and drug treatment data suggest that the median age of people who inject drugs is increasing. We aimed to describe changes in the characteristics of people injecting drugs in the United Kingdom (UK). DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional surveys and modelling. SETTING: Low-threshold services in the United Kingdom such as needle and syringe programmes. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 79 900 people who recently injected psychoactive drugs in the United Kingdom, recruited as part of the Unlinked Anonymous Monitoring Survey (England, Wales, Northern Ireland, 1990-2019) and Needle Exchange Surveillance Initiative (Scotland, 2008-2019). MEASUREMENTS: Age of people currently injecting, age at first injection, duration of injecting (each 1990-2019) and estimates of new people who started injecting (1980-2019). FINDINGS: In England, Wales and Northern Ireland between 1990 and 2019, the median age of people injecting increased from 27 (interquartile range [IQR], 24-31) to 40 (IQR, 34-46); median age at first injection increased from 22 (IQR, 19-25) to 33 (IQR, 28-39); and median years of injecting increased from 7 (IQR, 3-11) to 18 (IQR, 9-23). Values in Scotland and England were similar after 2008. The estimated number that started injecting annually in England increased from 5470 (95% prediction interval [PrI] 3120-6940) in 1980 to a peak of 10 270 (95% PrI, 8980-12 780) in 1998, and then decreased to 2420 (95% PrI, 1320-5580) in 2019. The number in Scotland followed a similar pattern, increasing from 1220 (95% PrI, 740-2430) in 1980 to a peak of 3080 (95% PrI, 2160-3350) in 1998, then decreased to a 270 (95% PrI, 130-600) in 2018. The timing of the peak differed between regions, with earlier peaks in London and the North West of England. CONCLUSIONS: In the United Kingdom, large cohorts started injecting psychoactive drugs in the 1980s and 1990s and many still inject today. Relatively few people started in more recent years. This has led to changes in the population injecting drugs, including an older average age and longer injecting histories.


Subject(s)
Drug Users , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Incidence , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
20.
HIV Med ; 23(9): 978-989, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35352446

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: People who inject drugs are at high risk of blood-borne infections. We describe the epidemiology of HIV among people who inject drugs in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (EW&NI) since 1981. METHODS: National HIV surveillance data were used to describe trends in diagnoses (1981-2019), prevalence (1990-2019), and behaviours (1990-2019) among people who inject drugs aged ≥15 years in EW&NI. HIV care and treatment uptake were assessed among those attending in 2019. RESULTS: Over the past four decades, the prevalence of HIV among people who inject drugs in EW&NI remained low (range: 0.64%-1.81%). Overall, 4978 people who inject drugs were diagnosed with HIV (3.2% of cases). Diagnoses peaked at 234 in 1987, decreasing to 78 in 2019; the majority were among white men born in the UK/Europe (90%), though the epidemic diversified over time. Late diagnosis (CD4 <350 cells/µl) was common (2010-2019: 52% [429/832]). Of those who last attended for HIV care in 2019, 97% (1503/1550) were receiving HIV treatment and 90% (1375/1520) had a suppressed viral load (<200 copies/ml). HIV testing uptake has steadily increased among people who inject drugs (32% since 1990). However, in 2019, 18% (246/1404) of those currently injecting reported never testing. The proportion of people currently injecting reporting sharing needles/syringes decreased from 1999 to 2012, before increasing to 20% (288/1426) in 2019, with sharing of any injecting equipment at 37% (523/1429). CONCLUSION: The HIV epidemic among people who inject drugs in EW&NI has remained relatively contained compared with in other countries, most likely because of the prompt implementation of an effective national harm reduction programme. However, risk behaviours and varied access to preventive interventions among people who inject drugs indicate the potential for HIV outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Drug Users , HIV Infections , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , HIV Infections/complications , Humans , Male , Northern Ireland/epidemiology , Risk-Taking , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiology , Wales/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...