Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
2.
PNAS Nexus ; 2(10): pgad317, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37901442

ABSTRACT

Subcutaneous (subQ) injection is a common route for delivering biotherapeutics, wherein pharmacokinetics is largely influenced by drug transport in a complex subQ tissue microenvironment. The selection of good drug candidates with beneficial pharmacokinetics for subQ injections is currently limited by a lack of reliable testing models. To address this limitation, we report here a Subcutaneous Co-Culture Tissue-on-a-chip for Injection Simulation (SubCuTIS). SubCuTIS possesses a 3D coculture tissue architecture, and it allows facile quantitative determination of relevant scale independent drug transport rate constants. SubCuTIS captures key in vivo physiological characteristics of the subQ tissues, and it differentiates the transport behavior of various chemically distinct molecules. We supplemented the transport measurements with theoretical modeling, which identified subtle differences in the local absorption rate constants of seven clinically available mAbs. Accounting for first-order proteolytic catabolism, we established a mathematical framework to assess clinical bioavailability using the local absorption rate constants obtained from SubCuTIS. Taken together, the technology described here broadens the applicability of organs-on-chips as a standardized and easy-to-use device for quantitative analysis of subQ drug transport.

3.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 113(6): 1185-1198, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36477720

ABSTRACT

Typically, therapeutic proteins (TPs) have a low risk for eliciting meaningful drug interactions (DIs). However, there are select instances where TP drug interactions (TP-DIs) of clinical concern can occur. This white paper discusses the various types of TP-DIs involving mechanisms such as changes in disease state, target-mediated drug disposition, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), or antidrug antibodies formation. The nature of TP drug interaction being investigated should determine whether the examination is conducted as a standalone TP-DI study in healthy participants, in patients, or assessed via population pharmacokinetic analysis. DIs involving antibody-drug conjugates are discussed briefly, but the primary focus here will be DIs involving cytokine modulation. Cytokine modulation can occur directly by certain TPs, or indirectly due to moderate to severe inflammation, infection, or injury. Disease states that have been shown to result in indirect disease-DIs that are clinically meaningful have been listed (i.e., typically a twofold change in the systemic exposure of a coadministered sensitive cytochrome P450 substrate drug). Type of disease and severity of inflammation should be the primary drivers for risk assessment for disease-DIs. While more clinical inflammatory marker data needs to be collected, the use of two or more clinical inflammatory markers (such as C-reactive protein, albumin, or interleukin 6) may help broadly categorize whether the predicted magnitude of inflammatory disease-DI risk is negligible, weak, or moderate to strong. Based on current knowledge, clinical DI studies are not necessary for all TPs, and should no longer be conducted in certain disease patient populations such as psoriasis, which do not have sufficient systemic inflammation to cause a meaningful indirect disease-DI.


Subject(s)
Cytokines , Psoriasis , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Drug Interactions , Cytokines/metabolism , Drug Development , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Inflammation
4.
J Infect Public Health ; 14(11): 1733-1738, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34715427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2020 COVID-19 pandemic led to a strict lockdown in France from March 17 to May 11, 2020. After the lockdown, the French strategy to mitigate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 relied partly on investigations of all confirmed cases. Monitoring collective settings is particularly important since SARS-CoV-2 seems prone to superspreading events (SSEs). METHODS: Our study is based on data gathered in Paris from May 11 to December 31, 2020, by the Ile-de-France Regional Health Agency (RHA) to investigate cases occurring in collective and high-risk settings. Specific events in high-risk settings were systematically transmitted to the RHA, and screenings were organized by the facilities, while other settings were reported when three cases were identified within a short period. These settings were more difficult to identify through the surveillance system since no systematic screening was organized by the facility, leaving screenings to rely on the national contact-tracing programme. No official superspreading threshold has been set for SARS-CoV-2. We defined a SSE as an event involving ten cases. RESULTS: We analysed 15,706 events associated with 38,670 cases, representing an average of 2.70 cases per event. Most clusters occurred in educational facilities, workplace environments, social care settings, and healthcare facilities. SSEs represented 3.4% but accounted for 28% of all cases reported. The highest number of SSEs occurred in college settings (12.6%), followed by hospitals and retirement homes. Educational facilities had the lowest number of SSEs, with around 1% in preschools and elementary schools. CONCLUSIONS: We observed different SSE rates in each setting. Preschools and primary schools represented the majority of events but experiencing very few SSEs. Colleges were prone to SSEs and were associated with a high number of secondary cases. These findings provide some insights on contact tracing activities and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in different settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Child, Preschool , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Pandemics , Paris/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
5.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 109(6): 1395-1415, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757299

ABSTRACT

Various approaches to first-in-human (FIH) starting dose selection for new molecular entities (NMEs) are designed to minimize risk to trial subjects. One approach uses the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), which is a conservative method intended to maximize subject safety and designed primarily for NMEs having high perceived safety risks. However, there is concern that the MABEL approach is being inappropriately used for lower risk molecules with negative impacts on drug development and time to patient access. In addition, ambiguity exists in how MABEL is defined and the methods used to determine it. The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development convened a working group to understand current use of MABEL and its impact on FIH starting dose selection, and to make recommendations for FIH dose selection going forward. An industry-wide survey suggested the achieved or estimated maximum tolerated dose, efficacious dose, or recommended phase II dose was > 100-fold higher than the MABEL-based starting dose for approximately one third of NMEs, including trials in patients. A decision tree and key risk factor table were developed to provide a consistent, data driven-based, and risk-based approach for selecting FIH starting doses.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Drug Development/methods , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Drug Development/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Industry , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Humans , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Research Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Therapeutic Human Experimentation , Toxicology
7.
ERJ Open Res ; 6(4)2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is a primary global concern, and data are lacking concerning risk of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) environmental contamination. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination in COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective single centre 1-day study was carried out in an ICU. Four surfaces (the ventilator control screen, the control buttons of the syringe pump, the bed rails and the computer table located >1 m away from the patient) were systematically swabbed at least 8 h after any cleaning process. We analysed clinical, microbiological and radiological data to identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination. RESULTS: 40% of ICU patients were found to contaminate their environment. No particular trend emerged regarding the type of surface contaminated. Modality of oxygen support (high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation, invasive mechanical ventilation, standard oxygen mask) was not associated with the risk of environmental contamination. Univariate analysis showed that lymphopenia <0.7×109·L-1 was associated with environmental contamination. CONCLUSION: Despite small sample size, our study generated surprising results. Modality of oxygen support is not associated with risk of environmental contamination. Further studies are needed.

8.
Drug Metab Dispos ; 44(5): 617-23, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26669328

ABSTRACT

An antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a unique therapeutic modality composed of a highly potent drug molecule conjugated to a monoclonal antibody. As the number of ADCs in various stages of nonclinical and clinical development has been increasing, pharmaceutical companies have been exploring diverse approaches to understanding the disposition of ADCs. To identify the key absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) issues worth examining when developing an ADC and to find optimal scientifically based approaches to evaluate ADC ADME, the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development launched an ADC ADME working group in early 2014. This white paper contains observations from the working group and provides an initial framework on issues and approaches to consider when evaluating the ADME of ADCs.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/metabolism , Immunoconjugates/metabolism , Pharmaceutical Preparations/metabolism , Animals , Drug Industry/methods , Humans
9.
MAbs ; 6(4): 859-70, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24852950

ABSTRACT

Although there are currently more than 30 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) in clinical development for the treatment of blood cancers and solid tumors, comparison of their clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) is challenging because of the large number of, and differences between, the targets, ADC constructs, dosing regimens, and patient populations. In this review, we standardized the evaluation, using non-compartmental PK data reported at Cycle 1, i.e., following the first drug administration of what is usually a repeated-dose treatment, in monotherapy. We report ADC clinical PK properties, dosing regimen, determination of doses ranges and associated maximum tolerated doses. We also evaluated the effect of structural characteristics and target types (hematological vs. solid tumors) on PK. In addition, we discuss how integration of PK/pharmacodynamics approaches on top of classical dose escalation in first-in-human studies may improve dosing regimen determination for subsequent phases of clinical development.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Neoplasm/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents , Immunoconjugates , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Immunoconjugates/pharmacokinetics , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Male , Neoplasms/metabolism
10.
Eur J Cancer ; 49(8): 1799-807, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23485230

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: AVE1642, a humanised mAb, binds the human IGF-1R specifically and with high affinity. This study aimed to select the dose of AVE1642 alone and then combined with docetaxel 75mg/m(2) (D). MATERIAL AND METHODS: AVE1642 was administered alone at cycle (cy) 1 and then combined with D from cy2, q3w. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients received a median number of 5 cy (range, 1-10). The most common tumour types were sarcoma (18.5%), osseous tumours (11.1%) and colon cancer (11.1%). Two DLTs were reported in cy1 at dose level (DL) 18mg/kg and dose escalation was stopped. No major safety issue was observed. No anti-drug antibodies were detected. The Maximal Tolerated Dose of AVE1642 was 12mg/kg. The dose selected for further combinations is 6mg/kg, based on PK/PD data. Three objective responses, (two in sarcoma and one breast cancer) were observed but only one was confirmed. Eleven patients appeared to benefit from treatment with prolonged disease stabilisation ⩾4months. CONCLUSION: AVE1642 is well tolerated as a single agent and combined with D. The selected dose of AVE1642 combined with D is 6mg/kg. Promising activity was seen in sarcoma and breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Docetaxel , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Receptor, IGF Type 1/immunology , Receptor, IGF Type 1/metabolism , Sarcoma/drug therapy , Sarcoma/metabolism , Sarcoma/pathology , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Taxoids/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/chemically induced , Young Adult
11.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 55(11): 5325-30, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21859940

ABSTRACT

Cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) play important roles in host immune defenses. Plectasin is a defensin-like CAP isolated from the saprophytic fungus Pseudoplectania nigrella. NZ2114 is a novel variant of plectasin with potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria. In this study, we investigated (i) the in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics of NZ2114 and (ii) the in vivo efficacy of NZ2114 in comparison with those of two conventional antibiotics, vancomycin or daptomycin, in an experimental rabbit infective endocarditis (IE) model due to a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain (ATCC 33591). All NZ2114 regimens (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg of body weight, intravenously [i.v.], twice daily for 3 days) significantly decreased MRSA densities in cardiac vegetations, kidneys, and spleen versus those in untreated controls, except in one scenario (5 mg/kg, splenic MRSA counts). The efficacy of NZ2114 was clearly dose dependent in all target tissues. At 20 mg/kg, NZ2114 showed a significantly greater efficacy than vancomycin (P < 0.001) and an efficacy similar to that of daptomycin. Of importance, only NZ2114 (in 10- and 20-mg/kg regimens) prevented posttherapy relapse in cardiac vegetations, kidneys, and spleen, while bacterial counts in these target tissues continued to increase in vancomycin- and daptomycin-treated animals. These in vivo efficacies were equivalent and significantly correlated with three PK indices investigated: fC(max)/MIC (the maximum concentration of the free, unbound fraction of a drug in serum divided by the MIC), fAUC/MIC (where AUC is the area under the concentration-time curve), and f%T(>MIC) (%T(>MIC) is the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions), as analyzed by a sigmoid maximum-effect (E(max)) model (R(2) > 0.69). The superior efficacy of NZ2114 in this MRSA IE model suggests the potential for further development of this compound for treating serious MRSA infections.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/chemistry , Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides/therapeutic use , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Peptides/chemistry , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Animals , Endocarditis/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Rabbits , Random Allocation , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...