The role of rectal magnetic resonance imaging in accurate localization and designation of colorectal cancer for optimal management: Case study.

Colorectal cancer, developing from malignant transformation of the distal gut epithelium, is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. We present a gentleman in his 60s who was diagnosed with colorectal cancer during a routine screening colonoscopy with no evidence of distant metastasis on subsequent staging with positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT). The outside rectal MR (magnetic resonance) imaging report localized a mass to the upper rectum. Review of the MRI at an institutional, Multidisciplinary Tumor Board designated the tumor as "rectosigmoid," straddling the rectosigmoid junction at the level of the "sigmoid take-off" (STO) or alternatively at the level of the last sigmoid artery take-off (SAT) at the origin of the superior rectal artery. The anatomic differentiation between upper rectal and lower sigmoid colon cancers carries clinical importance which is highlighted in this case report and brief literature review. Optimal anatomic localization of colorectal cancers helps direct the clinical team to tailor an individualized patient care plan.

Clinical Tools for Rectal Cancer Response Assessment following Neoadjuvant Treatment in the Era of Organ Preservation.

Local tumor response evaluation following neoadjuvant treatment(s) in rectal adenocarcinoma requires a multi-modality approach including physical and endoscopic evaluations, rectal protocoled MRI, and cross-sectional imaging. Clinical tumor response exists on a spectrum from complete clinical response (cCR), defined as the absence of clinical evidence of residual tumor, to near-complete response (nCR), which assumes a significant reduction in tumor burden but with increased uncertainty of residual microscopic disease, to incomplete clinical response (iCR), which incorporates all responses less than nCR that is not progressive disease. This article aims to review the clinical tools currently routinely available to evaluate treatment response and offers a potential management approach based on the extent of local tumor response.

Return to intended oncologic therapy after colectomy for stage III colon adenocarcinoma: Does surgical approach matter?

AIM: Return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) is an important paradigm for surgically resected cancers requiring multimodal treatment. Benefits of minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) may allow earlier initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and have associated survival benefits. We sought to determine if operative approach affects RIOT timing in resected stage III colon cancer. METHODS: NCDB identified pathological stage III colon adenocarcinoma patients who underwent resection and received ACT. Propensity score matching and kernel density estimation compared operative approaches and conversion impact on intervals to RIOT. RESULTS: A total of 15,132 open colectomies (OC) versus 14,107 MIC were included. MIC patients had two-days shorter median length of stay (LOS) (4 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001), one-week shorter median time to RIOT (6 vs. 7 weeks; p = 0.015) comparing 12,867 matched pairs. There was no difference in time interval to RIOT between the LC versus RC, converted MIC vs. OC groups. MIC was a favourable predictor of earlier RIOT (HR 1.14 [1.07-1.22]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MIC in stage III colon cancer is associated with a shorter time to RIOT when compared to OC. Since timely initiation of ACT may influence cancer outcome, MIC may be oncologically preferable. Prospective studies are needed to assess RIOT and survival outcomes in stage III colon cancer.

A Novel Nomogram for Early Identification and Intervention in Colorectal Cancer Patients at Risk for Malnutrition.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is under-recognized in cancer patients and can lead to poor treatment outcomes. We aim to develop an outpatient-focused score based on the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) to help identify colorectal cancer (CRC) profiles at high risk for malnutrition. METHODS: 506 CRC patients during initial outpatient oncology consultation at our tertiary referral outpatient oncology clinic completed the MST. Objective and subjective data were collected through chart review. Data gathered are as follows: demographics, anthropometrics, laboratory values, patient-reported symptoms, MST score, cancer history, performance status, socioeconomic status, and Charlson Comorbidity. Predictors of malnutrition were identified by logistic regression. Receiver operating curve (ROC), area under the curve (AUC), and our model's predictability were determined. RESULTS: Significant predictors of malnutrition are as follows: younger age (20-39 vs >40 years) (P = .007), normal-to-low body mass index at presentation (P = .019), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification 2-3 (P = .012), metastatic disease (P = .046), albumin <3.0 g/dL (P = .033), fatigue (P < .001), and change in stool/bowel habits (P = .002). In our derived malnutrition score, risk of malnutrition increased from 11% for score 0, to 100% for scores 9-10. Receiver operating curve showed AUC .745 (95% CI, .697-.793). DISCUSSION: An outpatient clinic-derived malnutrition score obtained from objective and patient-reported variables may facilitate identification of CRC patients at highest risk for malnutrition. Rapid identification and intervention in high-risk patients may improve treatment recovery, therapy tolerance, and quality of life. Our tool requires external validation before application in clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant rectal score is prognostic for survival: A population-based propensity-matched analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score may serve as a surrogate short-term endpoint for overall survival (OS) in clinical trials. This study aims to test the NAR score using a large, national cancer registry. METHODS: National Cancer Database patients with clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery were selected and divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-NAR subgroups. OS outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 12 452 patients were selected, of which 5071 (40.7%) were in clinical stage II and 7381 (59.3%) were in clinical stage III; 15.2% had pathologic complete response. The mean NAR score was 10.01 ± 10.61. Six thousand nine hundred and forty-one (55.7%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and were propensity-matched across NAR subgroups (966 in each group). A significant difference in 5-year OS between low-, intermediate-, and high-NAR groups was observed (85% vs. 76% vs. 68%; p < 0.001). Five thousand five hundred and eleven (44.3%) received AC and 1045 triplets were propensity-matched per NAR groups. A significant difference was again observed for 5-year OS (93% vs. 88% vs. 75%; p < 0.001). Logistic regression confirmed NAR strata as a significant predictor of 5-year OS. CONCLUSION: NAR score, as a neoadjuvant response measure, is a strong predictor of 5-year OS, regardless of AC receipt in a heterogenous population of locally advanced RAC patients.

Management of Malignant Small Bowel Obstruction: Is Intestinal Bypass Effective Palliation?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Malignant small bowel obstruction (mSBO) is a common consequence of advanced malignancies. Surgical consultation is common, however data on the outcomes following an operation are lacking. We investigated a specific operative approach-intestinal bypass-to determine the outcomes associated with this intervention. METHODS: Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of mSBO who underwent intestinal bypass between 2015 and 2021 were included. Isolated colonic obstruction was excluded as was gastric outlet obstruction. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were measured, including complications, overall survival, return to oral intake, and return to intended oncologic therapy. Patients were additionally grouped as to whether the operation was performed as elective or as inpatient. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were identified, with a mean age of 61.2 ± 14 years. The most common primary malignancy was colorectal cancer (65.5%) and 80% of patients had a preoperative diagnosis of metastatic disease. Small bowel to colon was the most common bypass procedure (51%). Severe complications occurred in 25.5% of patients with three in-hospital mortalities (5.5%). Survival rates at 30, 90, and 180 days were 91%, 80%, and 62%, respectively. The majority of patients were discharged to home (85.5%) and were tolerating an oral diet (74.6%). Twenty-seven patients (49.1%) returned to some form of oncologic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mSBO face a potentially terminal condition. In this study, approximately 75% of patients who underwent intestinal bypass were able to regain the ability to eat, and 49% returned to oncologic therapy. Although retrospective, these data suggest the approach is efficacious for palliation of this difficult sequela of advanced cancer.

Phase I Study of Lenvatinib and Capecitabine with External Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with fluoropyrimidine followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard treatment of locally advanced stages II and III rectal cancer for many years. There is a high risk for disease recurrence; therefore, optimizing chemoradiation strategies remains an unmet need. Based on a few studies, there is evidence of the synergistic effect of VEGF/PDGFR blockade with radiation. METHODS: In this phase I, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study, we studied 3 different dose levels of lenvatinib in combination with capecitabine-based chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled, and 19 were eligible for assessment of efficacy. The combination was well tolerated, with an MTD of 24 mg lenvatinib. The downstaging rate for the cohort and the pCR was 84.2% and 37.8%, respectively. Blood-based protein biomarkers TSP-2, VEGF-R3, and VEGF correlated with NAR score and were also differentially expressed between response categories. The NAR, or neoadjuvant rectal score, encompasses cT clinical tumor stage, pT pathological tumor stage, and pN pathological nodal stage and provides a continuous variable for evaluating clinical trial outcomes. CONCLUSION: The combination of lenvatinib with capecitabine and radiation in locally advanced rectal cancer was found to be safe and tolerable, and potential blood-based biomarkers were identified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02935309.

Malignant colon polyps: predicting lymph node metastasis following endoscopic excision.

AIM: The risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of malignant colon polyps (MCPs) is partly estimated by histologic features of the sampled polyp. However, the routinely available histologic data is limited to tumor grade and status of lymphovascular invasion (LVI). METHODS: The NCDB for colon cancer 2004-2018 was utilized. Patients with pT1Nx adenocarcinoma arising in a polyp and undergoing partial colectomy with ≥ 12 retrieved nodes were selected. NCDB 2004-2017 was used as a training cohort to develop two scoring systems based on a multivariable regression for predictors of LNM including clinical characteristics, grade, and LVI: a nomogram scoring system (NSS) and a simplified scoring system (SSS). These models were internally validated using NCDB 2018 to calculate precision metrics for each model. RESULTS: Six thousand sixty-nine patients were selected in the training cohort. 64.5% of MCPs were in the sigmoid, and LNM rate was 11.2%. Multivariable regression identified younger age, females, hindgut location, higher grade, and LVI as significant predictors of LNM. LNM risk was 1.2% when all unfavorable predictors were absent and exceeded 10% when NSS > 70 or SSS ≥ 3. In the 2018 validation cohort, 723 patients were scored per NSS and SSS, and the negative predictive value for both was 96%. CONCLUSION: Estimating LNM risk in MCPs by applying clinical characteristics along with limited histologic data can help inform decision-making when considering formal oncologic resection. The NSS and SSS demonstrated comparable predictability of LNM among pT1Nx MCPs. The models require external validation and may be strengthened by incorporating additional endoscopic and pathologic characteristics.

Rectal tumor fragmentation as a response pattern following chemoradiation.

Background: Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is heterogenous and prognostically important for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma (LARC) patients. Commonly applied response classification approaches including tumor regression grading (TRG) and TN downstaging can be discordant. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic value of discordant tumor response measurement categorized according to the AJCC/CAP TRG schema and ypTN stage. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective review of 90 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) between 2007 and 2018. Two pathologists re-examined each case to assign a consensus AJCC TRG. A Cox proportional hazards ratio model assessed the effect of patient, tumor, and treatment factors on disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Median follow-up after surgery was 46 months (95% CI: 41-50 months). Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range: 27-80). Most patients were male (58%) and Caucasian (92%) with clinical stage III disease (68%). Seventy-three patients (81%) underwent low anterior resection (LAR), 17 (19%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). The median interval from completion of nCRT to surgery was 62 days (IQR: 56-70 days). The 4-year OS, DFS, and LC was 92.4%, 74.4%, and 90.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, ypTN downstaging was not prognostically significant; however, AJCC TRG score 3 (minimal tumor response to treatment) was strongly predictive for inferior DFS (3-year DFS 79% vs. 25%, P<0.001). Patients with TRG 3 had a significantly higher risk of both local (75% vs. 5%) and distant failure (75% vs. 19%). Conclusions: Minimal tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, AJCC TRG 3, irrespective of ypTN downstaging, is a pattern of residual disease that is at highest risk for recurrence. Response categorization discrepancies may be partly explained by alternative patterns of residual disease, including tumor fragmentation, and may be best reflected by TRG. The optimal tumor response categorization method requires further study to best stratify patient risk and management.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in the ColoCare Study: Differences by Age of Onset.

Early-onset colorectal cancer has been on the rise in Western populations. Here, we compare patient characteristics between those with early- (<50 years) vs. late-onset (≥50 years) disease in a large multinational cohort of colorectal cancer patients (n = 2193). We calculated descriptive statistics and assessed associations of clinicodemographic factors with age of onset using mutually-adjusted logistic regression models. Patients were on average 60 years old, with BMI of 29 kg/m2, 52% colon cancers, 21% early-onset, and presented with stage II or III (60%) disease. Early-onset patients presented with more advanced disease (stages III-IV: 63% vs. 51%, respectively), and received more neo and adjuvant treatment compared to late-onset patients, after controlling for stage (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) = 2.30 (1.82-3.83) and 2.00 (1.43-2.81), respectively). Early-onset rectal cancer patients across all stages more commonly received neoadjuvant treatment, even when not indicated as the standard of care, e.g., during stage I disease. The odds of early-onset disease were higher among never smokers and lower among overweight patients (1.55 (1.21-1.98) and 0.56 (0.41-0.76), respectively). Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage disease, to have received systemic treatments regardless of stage at diagnosis, and were less likely to be ever smokers or overweight.

The impact of socioeconomic status on survival in stage III colon cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study using the SEER census-tract dataset.

BACKGROUND: The impact of socioeconomic status (SES) has been described for screening and accessing treatment for colon cancer. However, little is known about the "downstream" effect in patients who receive guideline-concordant treatment. This study assessed the impact of SES on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for stage III colon cancer patients. METHODS: The SEER Census Tract-Level SES Dataset from 2004 to 2015 was used to identify stage III colon adenocarcinoma patients who received curative-intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The predictor variable was census tract SES. SES was analyzed as quintiles. The outcome variables were OR and CSS. Statistical analysis included chi square tests for association, Kaplan-Meier, Cox, Fine and Gray regression for survival analysis. RESULTS: In total, 27,222 patients met inclusion criteria. Lower SES was associated with younger age, Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, Medicaid/uninsured, higher T stage, and lower grade tumors. CSS at the 25th percentile was 54 months for the lowest SES quintile and 80 for the highest. Median OS was 113 months for the lowest SES quintile and not reached for highest. The 5-year CSS rate was 72.4% for the lowest SES quintile compared to 78.9% in the highest (p < 0.001). The 5-year OS rate was 66.5% for the lowest SES quintile and 74.6% in the highest (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate CSS and OS in an incidence-based cohort of stage III colon cancer patients using a granular, standardized measure of SES. Despite receipt of guideline-based treatment, SES was associated with disparities in CSS and OS.

Pretreatment CT and PET radiomics predicting rectal cancer patients in response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize pre-treatment non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) based radiomics signatures predictive of pathological response and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR T). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exploratory analysis was performed using pre-treatment non-contrast CT and PET imaging dataset. The association of tumor regression grade (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score with pre-treatment CT and PET features was assessed using machine learning algorithms. Three separate predictive models were built for composite features from CT + PET. RESULTS: The patterns of pathological response were TRG 0 (n = 13; 19.7%), 1 (n = 34; 51.5%), 2 (n = 16; 24.2%), and 3 (n = 3; 4.5%). There were 20 (30.3%) patients with low, 22 (33.3%) with intermediate and 24 (36.4%) with high NAR scores. Three separate predictive models were built for composite features from CT + PET and analyzed separately for clinical endpoints. Composite features with α = 0.2 resulted in the best predictive power using logistic regression. For pathological response prediction, the signature resulted in 88.1% accuracy in predicting TRG 0 vs. TRG 1-3; 91% accuracy in predicting TRG 0-1 vs. TRG 2-3. For the surrogate of DFS and OS, it resulted in 67.7% accuracy in predicting low vs. intermediate vs. high NAR scores. CONCLUSION: The pre-treatment composite radiomics signatures were highly predictive of pathological response in rectal cancer treated with NACR T. A larger cohort is warranted for further validation.

Patient Risk Subgroups Predict Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Rectal Cancer Patients Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Total Mesorectal Excision.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is unclear in stage II (cT3-T4 N0) rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME). We aim to identify pathologic factors that influence overall survival (OS) and stratify patients into risk profiles to assess the AC benefit within each profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database for rectal cancer was utilized to identify patients with stage II RAC who completed NCRT and TME. Cox multivariable analysis was used to identify pathologic predictors of 5-year OS, which were then used to construct a nomogram and stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups. Propensity score matching was applied for the receipt of AC within each risk stratum, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to measure 5-year OS. RESULTS: We identified 3570 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Inadequate lymphadenectomy (<12), poor differentiation, involved distal margin, involved circumferential margin, perineural invasion, and absence of T-downstaging after NCRT were identified as unfavorable predictors of 5-year OS and were used to construct the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the matched patients demonstrated the absolute 5-year survival benefits for each risk stratum as follows: 4% for low-risk patients (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.869; [0.651-1.021]; P = .062), 26% for intermediate-risk patients (HR, 0.249; [0.133-0.468]; P < .001), and 10% in high-risk patients (HR = 0.633 [0.427-0.940]; P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: The survival benefit of AC for clinical stage II RAC following NCRT and TME is most pronounced among intermediate- and high-risk patients as determined by our nomogram. Risk-adaptive AC may be appropriate for selected patients by integrating standard reported pathologic elements into the treatment plan.

The Impact of Histologic Subtype on Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT) on resected colon adenocarcinoma based on histologic subtype is poorly defined and extrapolated from patients with advanced disease. We evaluated the receipt and effect of AT on overall survival stratified by histologic subtype-mucinous, non-mucinous, and signet ring adenocarcinomas. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2004 to 2015 was conducted using the National Cancer Database. Patients with colon adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection with pathologic stage III were included. Appendiceal and rectal tumors were excluded. The predictor variable was histologic subtype, and outcome variables were overall survival and receipt of AT. RESULTS: Absolute survival was increased for mucinous, non-mucinous, and signet ring tumors with receipt of AT (88.1, 108.9, and 38.1 months, respectively). In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in overall survival for mucinous patients relative to non-mucinous patients. In subgroup analysis, a modest survival advantage for non-mucinous patients relative to the mucinous patients was observed (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.95). In multivariable modeling, non-mucinous and signet ring adenocarcinoma had decreased odds of receipt of AT relative to mucinous adenocarcinoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic subtype is an important prognostic factor for overall survival for stage III colon adenocarcinoma. Although the magnitude of the benefit of AT may vary in stage III curatively resected patients, it has a substantial survival benefit across all histologic subtypes. Based on these observations, there is no indication that patients with stage III mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon should not receive AT. All patients with resected stage III colon cancer should be referred for AT regardless of histologic subtype.

Endoscopic and MRI response evaluation following neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: a pictorial review with matched MRI, endoscopic, and pathologic examples.

A nonoperative management strategy, or Watch-and-Wait, following neoadjuvant therapies of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma is increasingly considered for select patients. Yet, standardized tumor response assessment to best select and surveil suitable patients remains an unmet clinical challenge. Endoscopic and MRI currently provide the most reliable tumor response estimations. However, resources illustrating variable tumor responses to neoadjuvant therapies remain limited. This pictorial review aims to provide detailed and annotated examples of common endoscopic and MRI findings of rectal cancer treatment response, while also emphasizing their respective diagnostic shortcomings and consequently, the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to optimally manage these patients.

CRS/HIPEC with Major Organ Resection in Peritoneal Mesothelioma Does not Impact Major Complications or Overall Survival: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the US HIPEC Collaborative.

INTRODUCTION: CRS/HIPEC is thought to confer a survival advantage for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). However, the impact of nonperitoneal organ resection is not clearly defined. We evaluated the impact of major organ resection (MOR) on postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The US HIPEC collaborative database (2000-2017) was reviewed for MPM patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC. MOR was defined as total or partial resection of diaphragm, stomach, spleen, pancreas, small bowel, colon, rectum, kidney, ureter, bladder, and/or uterus. MOR was categorized as 0, 1, or 2+ organs. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were identified. Median PCI was 16 (3-39). The distribution of patients with MOR-0, MOR-1, and MOR-2+ was 94, 45, and 35 patients, respectively. MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups had a higher frequency of any complication compared with MOR-0 (57.8%, 74.3%, and 48.9%, respectively, p = 0.035), but Clavien 3/4 complications were similar. Median length of stay was slightly higher in the MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups (10 and 11 days) compared with the MOR-0 cohort (9 days, p = 0.005). Incomplete cytoreduction, ASA class 4, and male gender were associated with increased mortality on unadjusted analysis; however, their impact on OS was attenuated on multivariable analysis. MOR was not associated with OS based on these data (MOR-1: HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.59-4.74; MOR-2+ : HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22-2.69). CONCLUSIONS: MOR was not associated with an increase in major complications or worse OS in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for MPM and should be considered, if necessary, to achieve complete cytoreduction for MPM patients.

The impact of HIPEC vs. EPIC for the treatment of mucinous appendiceal carcinoma: a study from the US HIPEC collaborative.

INTRODUCTION: Mucinous appendiceal carcinoma is a rare malignancy that commonly spreads to the peritoneum leading to peritoneal metastases. Complete cytoreduction with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) is the mainstay of treatment, administered as either hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). Our goal was to assess the perioperative and long term survival outcomes associated with these two PIC methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with mucinous appendiceal carcinoma were identified in the US HIPEC Collaborative database from 12 academic institutions. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes were compared among patients who underwent HIPEC vs. EPIC with inverse probability weighting (IPW) used for adjustment. RESULTS: Among 921 patients with mucinous appendiceal carcinoma, 9% underwent EPIC while 91% underwent HIPEC. There was no difference in Grade III-V complications between the two groups (18.5% for HIPEC vs. 15.0% for EPIC, p=.43) though patients who underwent HIPEC had higher rates of readmissions (21.2% vs. 8.8%, p<.01). Additionally, PIC method was not an independent predictor for overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) after adjustment on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mucinous appendiceal carcinoma, both EPIC and HIPEC appear to be associated with similar perioperative and long-term outcomes.

Comparison of open and closed hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Results from the United States hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis can be performed in two ways: Open or closed abdominal technique. AIM: To evaluate the impact of HIPEC method on post-operative and long-term survival outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC from 2000-2017 were identified in the United States HIPEC collaborative database. Post-operative, recurrence, and overall survival outcomes were compared between those who received open vs closed HIPEC. RESULTS: Of the 1812 patients undergoing curative-intent CRS and HIPEC, 372 (21%) patients underwent open HIPEC and 1440 (79%) underwent closed HIPEC. There was no difference in re-operation or severe complications between the two groups. Closed HIPEC had higher rates of 90-d readmission while open HIPEC had a higher rate of 90-d mortalities. On multi-variable analysis, closed HIPEC technique was not a significant predictor for overall survival (hazards ratio: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-1.10, P = 0.14) or recurrence-free survival (hazards ratio: 1.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.93, P = 0.05) in the entire cohort. These findings remained consistent in the appendiceal and the colorectal subgroups. CONCLUSION: In this multi-institutional analysis, the HIPEC method was not independently associated with relevant post-operative or long-term outcomes. HIPEC technique may be left to the discretion of the operating surgeon.

Predictors of Non-home Discharge after Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Using a national database of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) recipients, we sought to determine risk factors for nonhome discharge (NHD) in a cohort of patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC at any one of 12 participating sites between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Univariate analysis was used to compare the characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative complications of patients discharged home and patients with NHD. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors of NHD. RESULTS: The cohort included 1593 patients, of which 70 (4.4%) had an NHD. The median [range] peritoneal cancer index in our cohort was 14 [0-39]. Significant predictors of NHD identified in our regression analysis were advanced age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.12; P < 0.001), an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 4 (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.21-6.83; P = 0.017), appendiceal histology (OR, 3.14; 95% CI 1.57-6.28; P = 0.001), smoking history (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.70-6.12; P < 0.001), postoperative total parenteral nutrition (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.70-5.81; P < 0.001), respiratory complications (OR, 7.40; 95% CI, 3.36-16.31; P < 0.001), wound site infections (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.58-6.17; P = 0.001), preoperative hemoglobin (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006), and total number of complications (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16-1.73; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early identification of patients at high risk for NHD after CRS/HIPEC is key for preoperative and postoperative counseling and resource allocation, as well as minimizing hospital-acquired conditions and associated health care costs.