Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite as occlusal restorative material in primary molars: one-year results.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the 1 year clinical performances of a self-adhering flowable composite and a commercially available self-etch adhesive/composite system in occlusal restorations of primary second molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (10 male, 21 female) were recruited into the study. A total of 62 occlusal cavities were restored with either a universal composite or a self-adhering flowable composite according to manufacturers' instructions. The restorations were clinically evaluated 1 month after placement as baseline, and after 3, 6 months and 1 year post-operatively using modified USPHS criteria by two operators. RESULTS: Lack of retention was not observed in any of the restorations. With respect to color match, marginal adaptation, secondary caries and surface texture, no significant differences were found between two restorative materials tested after 1 year. None of the restorations had marginal discoloration and anatomic form loss on the 1 year follow-up. Restorations did not exhibit post-operative sensitivity at any evaluation period. CONCLUSION: The clinical assessment of self-adhering flowable composite exhibited good clinical results with predominating alpha scores after 1 year. Advantage of the application convenience for children is promising for self-adhered flowable composite materials in pediatric use.

Parent's report on oral health-related quality of life of children with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Among children with haemophilia and their caregivers; problems arising from the teeth and the surrounding tissues have an important role in the treatment of this disease and it affects the quality of life of children and their parents. AIM: Aim of this study is to evaluate the oral health-related quality of life of children with haemophilia from the perspective of their parents. METHODS: Paediatric oral health-related quality of life (POQL) instrument was used in this cross-sectional study for quality of life measurement. The research data collected by the questionnaire form were coded for scale items and personal information questions and transferred to SPSS, a multivariate statistical analysis program for social sciences. SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) package program was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: Primary dentition dmft scores of patients with haemophilia are higher than the control group; mean value of haemophilic group is 3.5 vs control group are 2.6, respectively (P = 0.034). In spite of higher dmft scores, the haemophilia and control groups have shown no significant difference in oral health-related quality of life scores; median scores were 63.9 in haemophilic group and 85.3 in control group (P = 0.336), respectively. CONCLUSION: In spite of lower oral health measures, children with haemophilia and their parents reported no difference in oral health-related quality of life from their healthy counterparts.

Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the reaction to pain during local injection and duration of numbness of soft tissue with 4% articaine or 3% mepivacaine in children. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study was used with a sample of 50 7- to 13-year-old children (25 boys and 25 girls; mean age=11.3 years old) that had similar operative procedure needs in symmetric primary teeth. The modified behavioral pain scale was used for objective evaluation of the children. The sensation after injection and treatment was evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale. Parents were instructed to ask the child and to record the time when feeling of numbness disappeared. RESULTS: The duration of soft tissue was longer for articaine (140.69 ± 49.76 minutes) than for mepivacaine (117.52 ± 42.99 minutes). No difference regarding efficacy of the anesthesia was observed. No statistically significant difference was found in blood pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation in all evaluation periods for both solutions. The feeling after treatment was similar for the 2 solutions. CONCLUSION: Four percent articaine with 1:200,000 and 3% mepivacaine presented the same efficacy, and children displayed the same behavior during injection.