A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Time to Antibiotics for Children with Intestinal Failure, Fever, and a Central Line.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric intestinal failure (IF) patients experience significant morbidity, including sepsis related to central line-associated bloodstream infections. Adult studies of sepsis demonstrate an association between time to antibiotic administration (TTA) and mortality. To overcome challenges in treating pediatric IF patients in an emergency department (ED), we appropriated an existing, reliable system for febrile immunocompromised oncology/bone marrow transplant children. We describe the translation of this process to febrile IF patients in the ED and steps toward sustained improvement. METHODS: We formed a multidisciplinary team and used the Model for Improvement to define aims and identify key drivers. The goal was to use an existing improvement process to increase the percentage of patients with IF who receive antibiotics within 60 minutes of arrival to the ED from 46% to 90%. Key drivers included pre- and postarrival processes, staff and family engagement, and a preoccupation with failure. We performed Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles targeting family engagement, prearrival efficiency, and postarrival consistency. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-six encounters involving febrile IF patients between November 2012 and March 2017 were evaluated. There was a sustained reduction in the median time from arrival to antibiotic administration (71-45 minutes). We decreased TTA to less than 60 minutes for 77% of febrile IF patients. CONCLUSIONS: The basic tenets of process improvement for 1 high-risk population can be translated to another high-risk population but must be adjusted for variability in characteristics.

Sustained reductions in time to antibiotic delivery in febrile immunocompromised children: results of a quality improvement collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Timely delivery of antibiotics to febrile immunocompromised (F&I) paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED) and outpatient clinic reduces morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this quality improvement initiative was to increase the percentage of F&I patients who received antibiotics within goal in the clinic and ED from 25% to 90%. METHODS: Using the Model of Improvement, we performed Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to design, test and implement high-reliability interventions to decrease time to antibiotics. Pre-arrival interventions were tested and implemented, followed by post-arrival interventions in the ED. Many processes were spread successfully to the outpatient clinic. The Chronic Care Model was used, in addition to active family engagement, to inform and improve processes. RESULTS: The study period was from January 2010 to January 2015. Pre-arrival planning improved our F&I time to antibiotics in the ED from 137 to 88 min. This was sustained until October 2012, when further interventions including a pre-arrival huddle decreased the median time to <50 min. Implementation of the various processes to the clinic delivery system increased the mean percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 min to >90%. In September 2014, we implemented a rapid response team to improve reliable venous access in the ED, which increased our mean percentage of patients receiving timely antibiotics to its highest rate (95%). CONCLUSIONS: This stepwise approach with pre-arrival planning using the Chronic Care Model, followed by standardisation of processes, created a sustainable improvement of timely antibiotic delivery in F&I patients.