Genome-scale copy number variant analysis in schizophrenia patients and controls from South India.

Copy number variants (CNVs) are among the main genetic factors identified in schizophrenia (SZ) through genome-scale studies conducted mostly in Caucasian populations. However, to date, there have been no genome-scale CNV reports on patients from India. To address this shortcoming, we generated, for the first time, genome-scale CNV data for 168 SZ patients and 168 controls from South India. In total, 63 different CNVs were identified in 56 patients and 46 controls with a significantly higher proportion of medium-sized deletions (100 kb-1 Mb) after multiple testing (FDR = 2.7E-4) in patients. Of these, 13 CNVs were previously reported; however, when searched against GWAS, transcriptome, exome, and DNA methylation studies, another 17 CNVs with candidate genes were identified. Of the total 30 CNVs, 28 were present in 38 patients and 12 in 27 controls, indicating a significantly higher representation in the former (p = 1.87E-5). Only 4q35.1-q35.2 duplications were significant (p = 0.020) and observed in 11 controls and 2 patients. Among the others that are not significant, a few examples of patient-specific and previously reported CNVs include deletions of 11q14.1 (DLG2), 22q11.21, and 14q21.1 (LRFN5). 16p13.3 deletion (RBFOX1), 3p14.2 duplication (CADPS), and 7p11.2 duplication (CCT6A) were some of the novel CNVs containing candidate genes. However, these observations need to be replicated in a larger sample size. In conclusion, this report constitutes an important foundation for future CNV studies in a relatively unexplored population. In addition, the data indicate that there are advantages in using an integrated approach for better identification of candidate CNVs for SZ and other mental health disorders.

Pain, depression, and poor quality of life in chronic pancreatitis: Relationship with altered brain metabolites.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if altered brain metabolites are connected to pain, depression and affective responses in CP. METHODS: In this prospective study we evaluated pain characteristics, QOL (EORTC QLQc30+PAN28), depression (Beck depression inventory [BDI] II) in 558 patients with CP and 67 healthy controls. Brain metabolites were evaluated using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in 49 patients and 5 healthy controls. We measured plasma metabolites using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Relationship between metabolomic alterations, pain, depression and QOL components were assessed using statistical/bioinformatics methods. Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction was applied for multiple testing. RESULTS: 261 (46.8%) patients had depression compared to 5 (7.5%) among healthy controls [n = 67](p < 0.0001). Risk [OR (95% CI) of developing depression in the presence of pain was 1.9 (1.33-1.68); p = 0.0004. The depression scores correlated negatively with functional components and positively with symptom components of EORTC QLQ30. Significant negative correlation, though based on a small sample size, was observed between N-acetyl aspartate in the left hippocampus and choline in the left prefrontal cortex with emotional and cognitive functions. PLS-DA modelling revealed significant alteration in the plasma metabolomic profile among patients with CP who had depression. Six metabolites were significantly different between CP with depression and healthy controls, of which glycine contributed most significantly to the PLS-DA model (VIP score of 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients with CP develops depression that correlate with poor QOL functions. Pain, depression, and emotional components of QOL in patients with CP correlated with N-acetyl aspartate and choline in the left hippocampus and left prefrontal cortex of the brain.

Is there enough naloxone to deter the diversion? Effect of concurrent administration of intravenous naloxone on opioid agonist effects of intravenous buprenorphine: A randomised, double-blind, within-subject, crossover study among opioid-dependent subjects.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: We aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of different intravenous doses of naloxone on reinforcing effect of intravenous buprenorphine (2 mg) in patients stabilised on sublingual buprenorphine. DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a double-blind, within-subject, randomised, crossover study. Opioid-dependent patients, with history of intravenous drug use, stabilised on buprenorphine maintenance treatment were included after informed consent (n = 14). We administered and assessed the reinforcing effects of six test conditions: buprenorphine and naloxone co-formulation (BNX) in 4:1, 2:1 and 1:1 dose ratio (i.e. buprenorphine 2 mg + naloxone 0.5, 1 and 2 mg, respectively), buprenorphine alone (2 mg), pheniramine maleate (45.5 mg) and saline at 24 hourly intervals. RESULTS: No significant opioid withdrawals were precipitated during any test conditions. Compared to buprenorphine alone, 4:1 BNX had comparable euphoria, drug recognition, subjective opiate sensations and drug liking (P > 0.05); 2:1 BNX condition had significantly different subjective euphoria (P = 0.001), opioid recognition (P = 0.002), subjective opioid sensations at 60 min (P = 0.027) and drug liking (P < 0.001), while 1:1 BNX had significantly different objective euphoria (P = 0.002), opioid recognition (P = 0.030), subjective opioid sensations (P < 0.001) and drug liking (P < 0.001). No significant difference was noted on sedation scores between buprenorphine alone and all three combinations of BNX. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The 4:1 BNX condition did not impact the reinforcing agonist effects of buprenorphine. None of the intravenous BNX combination ratios precipitated opioid withdrawals. Findings emphasise the need for exploring more abuse deterrent mechanisms.