Implementation of a Multicomponent Program to Improve Effective Use and Maintenance of Medical Equipment in Sri Lankan Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Medical equipment (ME) maintenance retains an asset's original anticipated useful life and preserves its reliability and cost-effectiveness. This study developed and implemented a multicomponent program to improve ME use and maintenance in nine Sri Lankan hospitals from May 2020 to May 2021. METHODS: This pre-post implementation study involved an initial baseline assessment of existing ME maintenance systems, the development and implementation of a multicomponent improvement program, and a 3-month postevaluation. Five targets ME were selected for the study: oxygen regulator, electrocardiogram (ECG) machine, suction apparatus, blood pressure apparatus, and mini autoclave. A pretested questionnaire was administered to randomly selected nursing officers (n = 101) and health-care assistants (n = 120) to obtain baseline ME maintenance data. Six focus group discussions and 24 key informant interviews were conducted with key stakeholders to codesign the multicomponent interventions, which included: developing a standard operating procedure targeting preventive maintenance activities; establishing focal points to provide technical and logistic support; staff training; and the introduction of institutional ME maintenance documents. Program effectiveness was assessed at 3 months postimplementation using the seven predefined outcome variables. RESULTS: Baseline assessment identified no ME maintenance programs implemented in any of the hospitals. The highest availability was observed for oxygen regulator (62% to 82.3%) and ECG machine (66.1% to 84.7%). The highest functionality improvement was observed for ECG machine (40.4% to 79.7%). The positive perception of maintenance process of ME achieved the highest (33% to 80%) improvement. Following program implementation, improvements were noted in: the availability (P = 0.00) and functionality (P = 0.00 to P = 0.02) of all selected ME; equipment maintenance processes (P = 0.000); as well as staff knowledge, skills, perceptions, and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The program improved the use and maintenance of ME and was widely supported by the key stakeholders. The approach is relevant to other resource-poor hospital settings, as inadequate ME maintenance causes health system inefficiencies.

Economic cost of managing patients with oral potentially malignant disorders in Sri Lanka.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer of the oral cavity is the leading malignancy amongst males in Sri Lanka, and eighth amongst women. Almost all malignancies are developed from a clinically visible precursor stage called an oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD). The objective of this study was to estimate costs of managing patients with OPMD in Sri Lanka for a 12-month period from diagnosis. METHODS: A hospital-based costing study was conducted in Sri Lanka in the years 2016-2017. Three selected treatment centres participated. For societal perspectives, healthcare, household and indirect costs were used. Costs to the healthcare system included clinic visits, diagnostic biopsy, consumables and drug costs. Capital costs included apportioned value of land, buildings, equipment and furniture. Household costs consisted of out-of-pocket expenditure and indirect costs of lost income. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were recruited (39 male and 23 female). The majority had awareness of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Total average cost of managing a single patient with an OPMD for 1 year was SLR 19 547 (US$ 140) which includes a health system cost of SLR 7320 (US$ 52) and household cost of SLR 12 227 (US$ 87). Travel loss and income loss were a substantial burden to patients and their families. CONCLUSIONS: Managing patients with an OPMD, even with annual monitoring, is less costly than managing patients with oral cancer. Out-of-pocket costs are very high, and these could be reduced by revising the National Management Guidelines to allow care closer to home.

Economic burden of managing oral cancer patients in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional hospital -based costing study.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer of the oral cavity is the leading malignancy among males in Sri Lanka, and sixth among women. This study aimed to estimate costs of managing patients with oral cancer (OCA) in Sri Lanka for a 12 month period from diagnosis. DESIGN: Hospital based costing study. SETTINGS: Four selected cancer treatment centres in Sri Lanka. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine OCA patients: 60 were males and 12 had recurrent tumours. OUTCOME: Societal perspectives (healthcare, household and indirect costs) were itemised. Costs to the healthcare system included surgery, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Capital costs including apportioned value of land, buildings, equipment and furniture. Household costs consisted of out of pocket expenditure for healthcare and indirect costs of lost income. Costs were estimated from the stage of presentation for treatment to 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Mean cost of managing a single stage II OCA patient for 1 year was Sri Lankan rupees (SLR) 58 979 (US$394, at the midyear exchange rate in 2016) to the health system. Mean household cost was SLR 77 649 (US$518). The annual cost of managing a stage III or IV patient was SLR 303 620 (US$2027), with household costs of SLR 71 932 (US$480). CONCLUSIONS: Owing to the high incidence of OCA in Sri Lanka, the economic costs associated with these diseases are enormous, resulting in negative impacts on both the healthcare system and individual families, seriously impacting the country's economy. Policy-makers should take note of this burden and increase steps for prevention and control of this devastating disease.

Capacity building for critical care training delivery: Development and evaluation of the Network for Improving Critical care Skills Training (NICST) programme in Sri Lanka.

OBJECTIVES: To deliver and evaluate a short critical care nurse training course whilst simultaneously building local training capacity. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: A multi-modal short course for critical care nursing skills was delivered in seven training blocks, from 06/2013-11/2014. Each training block included a Train the Trainer programme. The project was evaluated using Kirkpatrick's Hierarchy of Learning. There was a graded hand over of responsibility for course delivery from overseas to local faculty between 2013 and 2014. SETTING: Sri Lanka. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant learning assessed through pre/post course Multi-Choice Questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 584 nurses and 29 faculty were trained. Participant feedback was consistently positive and each course demonstrated a significant increase (p≤0.0001) in MCQ scores. There was no significant difference MCQ scores (p=0.186) between overseas faculty led and local faculty led courses. CONCLUSIONS: In a relatively short period, training with good educational outcomes was delivered to nearly 25% of the critical care nursing population in Sri Lanka whilst simultaneously building a local faculty of trainers. Through use of a structured Train the Trainer programme, course outcomes were maintained following the handover of training responsibility to Sri Lankan faculty. The focus on local capacity building increases the possibility of long term course sustainability.

Nursing intensive care skills training: a nurse led, short, structured, and practical training program, developed and tested in a resource-limited setting.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of a nurse-led, short, structured training program for intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: A training program using a structured approach to patient assessment and management for ICU nurses was designed and delivered by local nurse tutors in partnership with overseas nurse trainers. The impact of the course was assessed using the following: pre-course and post-course self-assessment, a pre-course and post-course Multiple Choice Questionnaire (MCQ), a post-course Objective Structured Clinical Assessment station, 2 post-course Short Oral Exam (SOE) stations, and post-course feedback questionnaires. RESULTS: In total, 117 ICU nurses were trained. Post-MCQ scores were significantly higher when compared with pre-MCQ (P < .0001). More than 95% passed the post-course Objective Structured Clinical Assessment (patient assessment) and SOE 1 (arterial blood gas analysis), whereas 76.9% passed SOE 2 (3-lead electrocardiogram analysis). The course was highly rated by participants, with 98% believing that this was a useful experience. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing Intensive Care Skills Training was highly rated by participants and was effective in improving the knowledge of the participants. This sustainable short course model may be adaptable to other resource-limited settings.