The negative predictive value of FDG PET/CT staging in early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and implications to transoral robotic surgery patient selection.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of preoperative FDG PET/CTfor detecting locoregional nodal disease. The aim was to help inform the decision-making process when identifying patients with early-stage OPSCC that would be suitable for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as a single-modality treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults with primary stage cT1-2 OPSCC with up to one metastatic neck lymph node (cN0-1) planned for TORS. Patients with a preoperative PET/CT and who had undergone staging neck dissection (ND) were included. Clinical and pathological nodal staging was established based on PET/CT and ND, respectively. The primary outcome was the frequency of occult (not seen on PET/CT) nodal disease on ND. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included (N = 88). The rate of occult nodal disease was 28.4 % (n = 25). The NPV of PET/CT in the clinically negative neck was 79 % and 66 % in cases with a single clinical node. Following staging ND, thetreatment plan changed in 27 % of cases overall, 7 % in cN0 and 36.7 % in cN1. Among these, 18 % met criteria for radiotherapy and 9 % for CRT. This represented a decrease in the number of ideal candidates for TORS as single-modality treatment from 88 to 64 (73 %). CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is a useful tool in the workup of patients for primary TORS. However, about one third of patients with early-stage OPSCC might benefit from adjuvant therapy not predicted by preoperative PET/CT. A staging ND helps confirm candidates for single-modality treatment with TORS.

Use of telemedicine consultations in head and neck cancer: patient perceptions, acceptability and accessibility.

BACKGROUNDS: Telemedicine has been effective in the management of various medical conditions, however, there is limited knowledge of its use in head and neck oncosurveillance. This is of importance currently while trying to mitigate the risk of transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to evaluate acceptability, satisfaction and perceptions of telemedicine technology among outpatients for head and neck oncologic surveillance. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted for head and neck surgical oncology patients who attended telemedicine consultations between March and October 2020 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. Data on demographic, socioeconomic and acceptability variables was collected, utilizing Likert scale questions. The primary outcome measures were patient satisfaction and perceptions, while the secondary outcome was access to technology. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients were invited to participate, and 100 were included in the final analysis; 95% of patient's had a positive experience with telemedicine appointments and were willing to have future telemedicine appointments. Regional and rural patients were more accepting of telemedicine consultations, citing savings in travel time and the minimal disruption to normal day-to-day activities. All participants had access to telecommunication devices, with 63% having three or more devices. Issues identified include a lack of physical examination by clinician for 65% of participants and the inability to self-examine for 88% of participants. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates patients' acceptance of telemedicine appointments as a component of outpatient surveillance for head and neck surgical oncology. This has benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to increasing accessibility for rural patients.