ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea is common in children with Down syndrome (DS). Tonsillectomy is recommended as the first-line approach in treating children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), however, there is limited data on the long-term outcomes in children with DS who undergo tonsillectomy. In this retrospective study, we examined the long-term polysomnographic and symptomatic outcomes in children with DS who underwent tonsillectomy with or without an adenoidectomy (T&A). We hypothesize that the success of T&A to treat OSA in children with DS will diminish with time. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of children with DS who underwent T&A between 2009 and 2015 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were children with at least 1 postoperative polysomnogram (PSG) within 6 months of T&A with an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (OAHI) < 5. Outcomes were determined by subsequent clinic visits and postoperative polysomnograms: OAHI ≥ 5, snoring reported during clinic visit and time to reoccurrence. SETTING: Childrens Hospital Colorado. RESULTS: Of the 57 children with mild OSA at 1st (initial) PSG, 13/40 (33%) children had OAHI ≥ 5 at the 2nd postoperative PSG. Of the 18 patients who underwent a 3rd PSG, 4 (22%) progressed to moderate/severe OSA. A total of 17 patients out of the original 57 (30%) progressed to moderate/severe OSA with the median time for the additional post-op PSG's being 2.3 years. CONCLUSION: Children with DS who have at most mild OSA (OAHI < 5) following a T&A are at risk for progressing to at least moderate OSA within 2 years after their T&A. A surveillance PSG 2 years following surgery will identify these children.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To develop consensus statements for the scoring of pediatric drug induced sleep endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. METHODS: The leadership group identified experts based on defined criteria and invited 18 panelists to participate in the consensus statement development group. A modified Delphi process was used to formally quantify consensus from opinion. A modified Delphi priori process was established, which included a literature review, submission of statements by panelists, and an iterative process of voting to determine consensus. Voting was based on a 9-point Likert scale. Statements achieving a mean score greater than 7 with one or fewer outliers were defined as reaching consensus. Statements achieving a mean score greater than 6.5 with two or fewer outliers were defined as near consensus. Statements with lower scores or more outliers were defined as no consensus. RESULTS: A total of 78 consensus statements were evaluated by the panelists at the first survey - 49 achieved consensus, 18 achieved near consensus, and 11 did not achieve consensus. In the second survey, 16 statements reached consensus and 5 reached near consensus. Regarding scoring, consensus was achieved on the utilization of a 3-point Likert scale for each anatomic site for maximal observed obstructions of <50% (Score 0, no-obstruction), ≥ 50% but <90% (Score 2, partial obstruction), and ≥ 90% (Score 3, complete obstruction). Anatomic sites to be scored during DISE that reached consensus or near-consensus were the nasal passages, adenoid pad, velum, lateral pharyngeal walls, tonsils (if present), tongue base, epiglottis, and arytenoids. CONCLUSION: This study developed consensus statements on the scoring of DISE in pediatric otolaryngology using a modified Delphi process. The use of a priori process, literature review, and iterative voting method allowed for the formal quantification of consensus from expert opinion. The results of this study may provide guidance for standardizing scoring of DISE in pediatric patients.