[Alpha-blockers or hexanic extract of Serenoa repens for 6 months: sub-analysis of the PERSAT study]. / Alpha-bloquants ou extrait hexanique de Serenoa repens pendant 6 mois : sous-analyse de l'étude PERSAT.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this sub-analysis of the PERSAT study was to evaluate the efficacy of hexanic extract of S. Repens (HESr) and alpha-blockers (AB), at 6 months in patients with moderate to severe LUTS/BPH. METHODS: The PERSAT observational study was conducted in France by general practitioners on patients with BPH with an IPSS≥12 score. The primary endpoint was the percentage of responders (decrease in total IPSS score ≥ 3) at 6 months. Improvement in quality of life (IPSS-QoL) as well as patient satisfaction were also measured. RESULTS: Of the 759 patients in the study, 324 treated with HESr and 309 with AB were reviewed at 6 months, with no change in treatment during follow-up. Characteristics at inclusion were globally similar with a mean IPSS of 18.2±4.9. The response rates at 6 months (IPSS-total decrease ≥ 3) were 93.7% and 94.8% for patients treated with HESr and AB, with a mean decrease in IPSS score of 10.1±5.6 points, which reached 13.6 and 14.8 points respectively, in severe patients (IPSS>19), without major difference between groups. More than 95% of HESr or AB patients reported a significant overall improvement in their LUTS/BPH. The most frequently reported adverse events with AB were ejaculation disorders (4.9%) and hypotension (4.2%) and with HESr digestive disorders (1.5%). CONCLUSION: This sub-analysis of the PERSAT cohort reported the clinical efficacy of HESr and AB as a first-line treatment in the management of moderate or severe LUTS/BPH patients.

Stroke Prevention by Anticoagulants in Daily Practice Depending on Atrial Fibrillation Pattern and Clinical Risk Factors.

Background and Purpose: The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of individual direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for primary prevention of stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) in routine clinical practice in patients with various clinical risk factors depending on their atrial fibrillation (AF) patterns. Methods: A nested case-referent study was conducted using data from 2 national registries of patients with stroke and AF. Stroke cases with previous history of AF were matched to up to 2 randomly selected referent patients with AF and no stroke. The association of individual anticoagulant use with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke was studied in patients with or without permanent AF using multivariable conditional logistic models, controlled for clinically significant risk factors and multiple other cardiovascular risk factors. Results: In total, 2586 stroke cases with previous AF and 4810 nonstroke referent patients with AF were retained for the study. Direct oral anticoagulant users had lower odds of stroke of any type than vitamin K antagonist users: the adjusted-matched OR for ischemic stroke were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50­0.98) for dabigatran, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53­0.86) for rivaroxaban, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.52­1.02) for apixaban while for hemorrhagic stroke they were 0.31 (95% CI, 0.14­0.68), 0.64 (95% CI, 0.39­1.06), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.33­1.49), respectively. The effects of individual direct oral anticoagulants relative to vitamin K antagonists were similar in permanent AF and nonpermanent AF patients. Conclusions: Similar results were observed for each direct oral anticoagulant in real life as those observed in the pivotal clinical trials. The pattern of AF did not affect the outcome.

Decongestant use and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: a case-crossover study.

Pharmacovigilance reports of cerebral and cardiovascular events in those who use decongestants have triggered alerts related to their use. We aimed to assess the risk of stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) associated with the use of decongestants. We conducted a nested case-crossover study of patients with incident stroke and MI identified in France between 2013 and 2016 in two systematic disease registries. Decongestant use in the three weeks preceding the event was assessed using a structured telephone interview. Conditional logistic multivariable models were used to estimate the odds of incident MI and stroke, also accounting for transient risk factors and comparing week 1 (index at-risk time window, immediately preceding the event) to week 3 (reference). Time-invariant risk factors were controlled by design. In total, 1394 patients with MI and 1403 patients with stroke, mainly 70 years old or younger, were interviewed, including 3.2% who used decongestants during the three weeks prior to the event (1.0% definite exposure in the index at-risk time window, 1.1% in the referent time window; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.78; 95%CI, 0.43-1.42). Secondary analysis yielded similar results for individual events (MI/stroke). We observed no increased risk of MI or stroke for patients 70 years of age and younger without previous MI or stroke who used decongestants.

Does Changing Antiretroviral Therapy in the First Trimester of Pregnancy for Safety Concerns Have an Impact on Viral Suppression?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether changing antiretroviral therapy (ART) during pregnancy because of concern about fetal risks led to poorer virological outcomes. METHODS: All pregnancies in women with HIV-1 infection enrolled in the national multicenter prospective French Perinatal cohort at 14 week gestation or more were included between January 2005 and December 2015, if the mother was on ART at conception with a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL. The reasons for a change in the ART were analyzed according to treatment guidelines at the time of the pregnancy and defined as for safety concerns in the absence of reported maternal intolerance. Virological and pregnancy outcomes were studied by survival analysis and logistic regression adjusted for a propensity score established for each patient according to baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of 7079 pregnancies in the overall cohort, 1797 had ART at conception with a viral load <50 copies/mL before 14 week gestation. Of these, 22 changed regimens in the first trimester for intolerance, and 411 of the remaining 1775 (23%) solely for safety concerns. The proportion of change was higher when the initial treatment was not recommended in the national guidelines (OR adjusted: 23.1 [14.0-38.2]), than when it was an alternative option (ORa: 2.2 [1.3-3.7]), as compared to recommended first-line regimens. Treatment changes for safety concerns did not lead to poorer virological control, compared with pregnancies without such changes (19.3% vs. 15.6%, HRa: 1.0 [0.7-1.4]). CONCLUSIONS: Changing ART early in pregnancy to regimens considered safer for pregnancy, and neonatal health did not have a destabilizing effect on viral suppression.

T-Cell Receptor Excision Circles in HIV-Exposed, Uninfected Newborns Measured During a National Newborn Screening Program for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency.

Severe combined immunodeficiency screening by measuring T-receptor excision circles at birth allows evaluation of the impact of various maternal conditions on newborn immunity. The slight decrease observed in a French cohort of newborns to HIV-infected mothers can be explained by the confounding factors of prematurity and African descent.