A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study of oral seletalisib in primary Sjögren's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: This phase 2 proof-of-concept study (NCT02610543) assessed efficacy, safety and effects on salivary gland inflammation of seletalisib, a potent and selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe primary Sjögren's syndrome (PSS). METHODS: Adults with PSS were randomized 1:1 to seletalisib 45 mg/day or placebo, in addition to current PSS therapy. Primary end points were safety and tolerability and change from baseline in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) score at week 12. Secondary end points included change from baseline at week 12 in EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) score and histological features in salivary gland biopsies. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were randomized (seletalisib n = 13, placebo n = 14); 20 completed the study. Enrolment challenges led to early study termination with loss of statistical power (36% vs 80% planned). Nonetheless, a trend for improvement in ESSDAI and ESSPRI [difference vs placebo: -2.59 (95% CI: -7.30, 2.11; P=0.266) and -1.55 (95% CI: -3.39, 0.28), respectively] was observed at week 12. No significant changes were seen in saliva and tear flow. Serious adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3/13 of patients receiving seletalisib vs 1/14 for placebo and 5/13 vs 1/14 discontinued due to AEs, respectively. Serum IgM and IgG concentrations decreased in the seletalisib group vs placebo. Seletalisib demonstrated efficacy in reducing size and organisation of salivary gland inflammatory foci and in target engagement, thus reducing PI3K-mTOR signalling compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Despite enrolment challenges, seletalisib demonstrated a trend towards clinical improvement in patients with PSS. Histological analyses demonstrated encouraging effects of seletalisib on salivary gland inflammation and organisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02610543.

Seletalisib for Activated PI3Kδ Syndromes: Open-Label Phase 1b and Extension Studies.

Mutations in two genes can result in activated PI3Kδ syndrome (APDS), a rare immunodeficiency disease with limited therapeutic options. Seletalisib, a potent, selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, was evaluated in patients with APDS1 and APDS2. In the phase 1b study (European Clinical Trials Database 2015-002900-10) patients with genetic and clinical confirmation of APDS1 or APDS2 received 15-25 mg/d seletalisib for 12 wk. Patients could enter an extension study (European Clinical Trials Database 2015-005541). Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, with exploratory efficacy and immunology endpoints. Seven patients (median age 15 years; APDS1 n = 3; APDS2 n = 4) received seletalisib; five completed the phase 1b study. For the extension study, four patients entered, one withdrew consent (week 24), three completed ≥84 wk of treatment. In the phase 1b study, patients had improved peripheral lymphadenopathy (n = 2), lung function (n = 1), thrombocyte counts (n = 1), and chronic enteropathy (n = 1). Overall, effects were maintained in the extension. In the phase 1b study, percentages of transitional B cells decreased, naive B cells increased, and senescent CD8 T cells decreased (human cells); effects were generally maintained in the extension. Seletalisib-related adverse events occurred in four of seven patients (phase 1b study: hepatic enzyme increased, dizziness, aphthous ulcer, arthralgia, arthritis, increased appetite, increased weight, restlessness, tendon disorder, and potential drug-induced liver injury) and one of four patients had adverse events in the extension (aphthous ulcer). Serious adverse events occurred in three of seven patients (phase 1b study: hospitalization, colitis, and potential drug-induced liver injury) and one of four patients had adverse events in the extension (stomatitis). Patients with APDS receiving seletalisib had improvements in variable clinical and immunological features, and a favorable risk-benefit profile was maintained for ≤96 wk.

A Dual-Administration Microtracer Technique to Characterize the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of [14 C]Seletalisib (UCB5857) in Healthy Subjects.

Phosphoinositide 3 kinases are targets for development of small-molecule inhibitors to disrupt progression of immune-inflammatory diseases. This phase 1 open-label study (Eudract 2014-005353-39) evaluated the safety and relative bioavailability of 2 new seletalisib (UCB5857) formulations (A and B) compared with a reference formulation. Absolute bioavailability (period 1a, n = 6) and disposition and metabolism (period 1b, n = 6) of the reference formulation were evaluated: healthy subjects received 30 mg orally plus ∼20 µg of a 14 C-labeled microtracer (intravenously in 1a, orally in 1b). New formulations were evaluated: subjects from periods 1a and 1b were pooled and randomly distributed to receive a single oral dose (30 mg) of formulation A (n = 6) or B (n = 6) in periods 2 and 3, using a crossover design. Absolute oral bioavailability of seletalisib was 97% (90% confidence interval 87, 107). Unchanged [14 C]seletalisib was the predominant radioactive component in plasma (94.8%). After oral dosing, the radioactive dose was primarily recovered in feces (74.6%, geometric coefficient of variation [GeoCV] 18.1%), mostly as metabolites. Seletalisib demonstrated a 24-hour terminal half-life, volume of distribution of 60.9 L (GeoCV 23.8%), and a total plasma clearance of 1.7 L/h (GeoCV 35.4%). Formulations A and B displayed similar or even higher exposure compared with reference seletalisib (areas under the concentration-time curves 19 337 [GeoCV 30.8%], 20 380 [GeoCV 37.7%], and 15 932 [GeoCV 36.4%] h·ng/mL, respectively). New formulations A and B were bioequivalent with each other, and all 3 formulations showed acceptable safety profiles. This radiolabeled microtracer approach successfully informed on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of seletalisib and further guided the mechanistic pharmacokinetic modeling.

Association between serum levels of C-reactive protein and response to treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with solid tumors: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

Our objective was to determine the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at initiation of anemia treatment and response in solid tumor patients with chemotherapy (CT)-induced anemia. This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study which included adult patients with solid tumor initiating treatment for CT-induced anemia. Data were collected up to 16 weeks, or until premature discontinuation. We included 98 patients (median age 62.5 years, 64 % males, 57 % with ECOG 0-1, 85.7 % at stages III-IV and 54.1 % undergoing palliative CT). Mean (SD) Hb levels at baseline were 10.3 (0.9) g/dL (85.7 % < 11 g/dL) and median (Q1; Q3) CRP was 16.4 mg/L (3.9; 77.8) (68 % ≥ 5 mg/L). A total of 96 % of patients initiated erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) and iron supplementation; 4 % initiated iron monotherapy. After a median of 85 days, 65 % of patients had Hb ≥ 11 g/dL (in absence of transfusion) (mean change: +0.86 g/dL, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.19). A total of 8 patients required transfusion. A significant correlation (r = -0.39, p = 0.003) was observed between baseline CRP and final Hb levels. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, the independent predictors of higher final Hb levels were a high baseline Hb (adjusted ß = +0.69 g/dL for each g/dL of baseline Hb, 95 % CI 0.17-1.21) and a low log baseline CRP (-0.62 for each log mg/L, 95 %CI -1.22 to -0.02). Our results suggest that, in patients with solid tumors and CT-induced anemia, high CRP levels at treatment initiation predict a poor response to treatment with ESA and iron, independently from anemia severity at therapy initiation and from other patient and disease characteristics.

Evaluation of clinical use and effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

PURPOSE: To investigate the patterns of use of darbepoetin alfa in Spanish centers, and to evaluate its effectiveness in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia under clinical practice conditions. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study in adult patients with non-myeloid malignancies who initiated chemotherapy and darbepoetin alfa. Data was collected for up to 16 weeks or until treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 685 patients (72.7% with solid tumors and 27.3% with hematologic malignancies) were included in the study. Median age was 64.7 years (range 18.5-88.9 years), 50.7% were women, 82.4% had ECOG status 0-1 and 80.5% had stage III/IV cancer. At darbepoetin initiation, mean hemoglobin (Hb) was 100 g/L (SD 10), with 11.0% and 23.1% of patients below 90 g/L in solid and hematologic malignancies, respectively. A decrease in transfusion requirements was observed between weeks 5-16 with respect to weeks 0-16 (13.3% [95% CI: 10.7 to 15.9] versus 19.0% [95% CI: 16.0 to 22.0]). Hb levels were significantly increased during the treatment (mean change of 10.4 g/L for solid tumors [p < 0.001], and 16.6 g/L for hematologic malignancies [p < 0.001]). The percentage of patients with baseline Hb level <110 g/L who achieved an Hb level ≥110 g/L during the study was 66.5% (95% CI: 62.5% to 70.5%). Six serious adverse reactions were considered related to darbepoetin alfa (thromboembolic events, 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of a retrospective design, our results suggest that darbepoetin alfa is a well tolerated treatment that increases hemoglobin levels and reduces the need for transfusion in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Patients' perception of cancer-related fatigue: results of a survey to assess the impact on their everyday life.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is a cancer-related symptom with great impact on patients' daily lives, but often not discussed with their oncologists. This survey explored functional and psychological fatigue impact among different cancer symptoms according to patient's perception (pp). METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted in 10 oncologist services throughout Spain. Demographical data and tumour diagnoses were collected. Fatigue impact on functional and social activities (Likert scale) and on emotional well-being (visual analogue scale) was measured. The pp of oncologist's response to fatigue report was recorded. RESULTS: 505 surveyed cancer patients were analysed (55.2% women, aged 58.8 years +/-11.7), 97.8% remembered experiencing fatigue during treatment. 27.1% did not discuss their fatigue with their oncologist. Fatigue affected patient's daily routine (> or = 50% of times) included self-care (58.26%), entertainment activities (69.8%), and relationships (71.4%). Fatigue was the most bothersome symptom of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients perceive fatigue as the symptom with highest impact on their daily living and that substantially affects their emotional and social areas.