Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(11): e14817, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34490695

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: AL amyloidosis is caused by the proliferation of an immunoglobulin-secreting B cell clone. AA amyloidosis is a rare complication of chronic inflammation. However, some patients present with diseases combining monoclonal immunoglobulin production and chronic inflammation. The aim of this work was to describe cases of AA amyloidosis associated with monoclonal gammopathies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all patients reported in French national amyloid centres presenting with AA amyloidosis and monoclonal gammopathy and performed a literature review. The quality of AA amyloidosis diagnosis and the causal relationship with monoclonal gammopathy were assessed. RESULTS: In total, four patients from our centres and eight from the literature fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The haematological disorders presenting with monoclonal gammopathy were as follows: Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (n = 8), Schnitzler syndrome (n = 2), multiple myeloma (n = 1) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (n = 1). Treatment strategies varied among the cases, with the treatment of the haematological disorder in 4 and anti-inflammatory treatment in 2. CONCLUSION: Monoclonal gammopathies might be a rare and poorly known cause of AA amyloidosis. Such monoclonal gammopathies could be named "monoclonal gammopathies of inflammatory significance."


Subject(s)
Amyloidosis , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance , Multiple Myeloma , Paraproteinemias , Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia , Amyloidosis/complications , Humans , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/complications , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/complications , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Paraproteinemias/complications
2.
Am J Nephrol ; 35(4): 341-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22473131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cinacalcet decreases serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium concentrations in kidney transplant recipients with autonomous hyperparathyroidism. Long-term treatment with cinacalcet may increase urinary calcium excretion and the risk of renal calcium deposits and may alter renal graft function. METHODS: We studied 71 renal recipients with hypercalcemic hyperparathyroidism. Of these patients, 34 received cinacalcet between month 3 and month 12 after renal transplantation. We compared phosphate calcium balance, measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal biopsies in cinacalcet-treated and non-cinacalcet-treated patients. Measurements were performed before initiating cinacalcet treatment (month 3) and at month 12. RESULTS: Patients treated with cinacalcet had more severe hyperparathyroidism. Serum PTH concentration decreased in both groups between months 3 and 12, but the decrease was much more important in cinacalcet-treated patients. Urinary calcium excretion significantly increased under cinacalcet treatment and was more than twice as high at month 12 as in patients who did not receive cinacalcet treatment. However, the hypercalciuria was not associated with an increase in calcium deposits on renal biopsies or an alteration of measured GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Despite sustained and marked hypercalciuria induced by cinacalcet treatment, cinacalcet does not have adverse effects on GFR or on renal graft calcium deposits in the first year following renal transplantation.


Subject(s)
Calcimimetic Agents/therapeutic use , Hyperparathyroidism/drug therapy , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Kidney/pathology , Naphthalenes/therapeutic use , Nephrocalcinosis/pathology , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Calcimimetic Agents/adverse effects , Calcium/blood , Calcium/urine , Chi-Square Distribution , Cinacalcet , Female , Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 , Fibroblast Growth Factors/blood , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Hypercalciuria/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Naphthalenes/adverse effects , Nephrocalcinosis/chemically induced , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Phosphates/blood , Vitamin D/analogs & derivatives , Vitamin D/blood , Young Adult
3.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 26(3): 1087-93, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20667993

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Belatacept is thought to disrupt the interaction between CD80/86 and CD28, thus preventing T-cell activation by blocking the co-stimulatory second signal. However, the consequences on the T-cell profile in human renal transplant cases have not been determined. METHODS: In this study, we analysed intra-graft levels of the mRNAs for Treg (FOXP3), cytotoxic CD8 T cells (Granzyme B), Th1 (INFγ, Tbet), Th2 (GATA3) and Th17 (RORγt and IL-17) in protocol biopsies obtained 12 months after renal transplantation in recipients treated with Belatacept or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). RESULTS: Only the intra-graft abundance of FOXP3 mRNA was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the Belatacept group than the CNI group. Conclusions. These results are in agreement with in vitro data suggesting that CD28 is a major co-stimulatory signal of both Tregs development and peripheral homeostasis but contrast with clinical trials showing a better 1-year graft function and a lower incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy in patients receiving Belatacept than patients treated with CNI. They suggest that immune benefits induced by Belatacept are not mediated by Treg expansion and that FOXP3 is not by itself a prognostic marker of long-term graft function in a non-inflammatory context. These results have to be, however, considered as preliminary since the size of our study population is limited.


Subject(s)
Forkhead Transcription Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/drug effects , Transplantation Tolerance/drug effects , Abatacept , B7-1 Antigen/immunology , B7-2 Antigen/immunology , Biopsy , CD28 Antigens/immunology , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Female , Flow Cytometry , Forkhead Transcription Factors/genetics , Forkhead Transcription Factors/metabolism , Graft Rejection/immunology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Interleukin-17/metabolism , Kidney Diseases/immunology , Kidney Diseases/surgery , Lymphocyte Activation , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Prognosis , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Th2 Cells/immunology , Transplantation Tolerance/immunology
4.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 5(11): 2101-8, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20671220

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown etiology. The outcome of renal transplantation on patients with sarcoidosis is not well known. A few case reports have described recurrence of sarcoidosis after transplant. Here, we report for the first time results and outcome of renal transplantation in a series of patients with sarcoidosis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eighteen patients with sarcoidosis who underwent renal transplantation were identified retrospectively in eight French renal transplantation departments. Patient medical charts, demographics, and the outcome of renal transplantation were reviewed. RESULTS: Initial renal disease was related to sarcoidosis in 10 patients. At the end of the follow-up (median, 42 months), patient and death-censored graft survival were 94.4% and the mean GFR was 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Five patients (27%) experienced recurrence of sarcoidosis including extra-renal involvement in two patients and renal involvement in three patients. Median GFR was lower in the group of patients with renal recurrence compared with that of the entire cohort: 31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Recurrence occurred shortly after transplantation (median period, 13 months). Risk factors for recurrence included primary renal disease related to sarcoidosis and a shorter delay between the last episode of sarcoidosis and renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that renal transplantation may be carried out safely in transplant candidates with sarcoidosis. Recurrence is not rare and is likely to affect graft outcome. These results fully justify a specific clinical and histologic monitoring mainly during the early posttransplant period.


Subject(s)
Kidney Diseases/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Sarcoidosis/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , France , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 25(8): 2745-53, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20220203

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Determining if a kidney from a marginal donor is likely to elicit a strong and specific immune response, leading to an increased risk of acute rejection, is of importance in renal transplantation. METHODS: In this study, we analysed the effect of extended criteria donor (ECD) on the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and the effect of immunological risk factors on graft outcome in a large cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 2121 patients) grafted with ECD (n = 656 patients) or optimal donor (OD) (n = 1465 patients). RESULTS: The incidence of BPAR was not statistically different between the ECD group recipients (105/656, 16%) and the OD group recipients (251/1465, 17%) (P = 0.52). These values remained similar after adjustment for immunological risk [defined as retransplantation and/or panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level >20%] (P = 0.92 for patients with immunological risk and P = 0.47 for patients without immunological risk). We next analysed the death-censored graft survival data for OD and ECD groups, as a function of immunological status, and found that the immunological risk factor did not affect graft survival in ECD transplant recipients (P = 0.64). CONCLUSION: Although our groups were not homogenous, our study did not reveal an increased risk of acute rejection in recipients of ECD allograft.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Tissue Donors/classification , Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney/immunology , Kidney/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...