Effects of exenatide alone and in combination with daclizumab on beta-cell function in long-standing type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes, we investigated whether improved beta-cell function can be achieved by combining intensive insulin therapy with agents that may 1) promote beta-cell growth and/or limit beta-cell apoptosis and 2) weaken the anti-beta-cell autoimmunity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: For this study, 20 individuals (mean age 39.5 +/- 11.1 years) with long-standing type 1 diabetes (21.3 +/- 10.7 years) were enrolled in this prospective open-label crossover trial. After achieving optimal blood glucose control, 16 subjects were randomized to exenatide with or without daclizumab. Endogenous insulin production was determined by repeatedly measuring serum C-peptide. RESULTS: In 85% of individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes who were screened for participation in this trial, C-peptide levels >or=0.05 ng/ml (0.02 nmol/l) were found. Residual beta-cells responded to physiological (mixed-meal) and pharmacological (arginine) stimuli. During exenatide treatment, patients lost 4.1 +/- 2.9 kg body wt and insulin requirements declined significantly (total daily dose on exenatide 0.48 +/- 0.11 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.13 units x kg(-1) x day(-1) without exenatide; P = 0.0062). No signs of further activation of the underlying autoimmune disease were observed. Exenatide delayed gastric emptying, suppressed endogenous incretin levels, but did not increase C-peptide secretion. CONCLUSIONS: In long-standing type 1 diabetes, which remains an active autoimmune disease even decades after its onset, surviving beta-cells secrete insulin in a physiologically regulated manner. However, the combination of intensified insulin therapy, exenatide, and daclizumab did not induce improved function of these remaining beta-cells.

History of islet transplantation.

Patients with a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus endure stringent life-long medical therapy through the use of insulin to prevent end organ complications and maintain normoglycemia. However, some patients still suffer from hypoglycemic unawareness, even under intensive therapy. Within the past decade, noble efforts have been attempted to provide normoglycemia through cadaveric islet of Langerhans transplantation in order to reach a physiologic response. This effort, which has evolved for more than a century, actually predates the discovery of insulin.

Benefits and risks of solitary islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes using steroid-sparing immunosuppression: the National Institutes of Health experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the National Institutes of Health's experience initiating an islet isolation and transplantation center, including descriptions of our first six recipients, and lessons learned. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Six females with chronic type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia unawareness, and no endogenous insulin secretion (undetectable serum C-peptide) were transplanted with allogenic islets procured from brain dead donors. To prevent islet rejection, patients received daclizumab, sirolimus, and tacrolimus. RESULTS: All patients noted less frequent and less severe hypoglycemia, and one-half were insulin independent at 1 year. Serum C-peptide persists in all but one patient (follow-up 17-22 months), indicating continued islet function. Two major procedure-related complications occurred: partial portal vein thrombosis and intra-abdominal hemorrhage. While we observed no cytomegalovirus infection or malignancy, recipients frequently developed transient mouth ulcers, diarrhea, edema, hypercholesterolemia, weight loss, myelosuppression, and other symptoms. Three patients discontinued immunosuppressive therapy: two because of intolerable toxicity (deteriorating kidney function and sirolimus-induced pneumonitis) while having evidence for continued islet function (one was insulin independent) and one because of gradually disappearing islet function. CONCLUSIONS: We established an islet isolation and transplantation program and achieved a 50% insulin-independence rate after at most two islet infusions. Our experience demonstrates that centers not previously engaged in islet transplantation can initiate a program, and our data and literature analysis support not only the promise of islet transplantation but also its remaining hurdles, which include the limited islet supply, procedure-associated complications, imperfect immunosuppressive regimens, suboptimal glycemia control, and loss of function over time.