Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
1.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 71(3): 904-915, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796675

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implant signal processing strategies define the rules of how acoustic signals are converted into electrical stimulation patterns. Technological and anatomical limitations, however, impose constraints on the signal transmission and the accurate excitation of the auditory nerve. Acoustic signals are degraded throughout cochlear implant processing, and electrical signal interactions at the electrode-neuron interface constrain spectral and temporal precision. In this work, we propose a novel InterlACE signal processing strategy to counteract the occurring limitations. METHODS: By replacing the maxima selection of the Advanced Combination Encoder strategy with a method that defines spatially and temporally alternating channels, InterlACE can compensate for discarded signal content of the conventional processing. The strategy can be extended bilaterally by introducing synchronized timing and channel selection. InterlACE was explored unilaterally and bilaterally by assessing speech intelligibility and spectral resolution. Five experienced bilaterally implanted cochlear implant recipients participated in the Oldenburg Sentence Recognition Test in background noise and the spectral ripple discrimination task. RESULTS: The introduced alternating channel selection methodology shows promising outcomes for speech intelligibility but could not indicate better spectral ripple discrimination. CONCLUSION: InterlACE processing positively affects speech intelligibility, increases available unilateral and bilateral signal content, and may potentially counteract signal interactions at the electrode-neuron interface. SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows how cochlear implant channel selection can be modified and extended bilaterally. The clinical impact of the modifications needs to be explored with a larger sample size.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Speech Perception/physiology , Noise , Speech Intelligibility , Acoustic Stimulation
2.
Int J Audiol ; 62(2): 118-128, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34964676

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study compared two different versions of an electrophysiology-based software-guided cochlear implant fitting method with a procedure employing standard clinical software. The two versions used electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds for either five or all twenty-two electrodes to determine sound processor stimulation level profiles. Objective and subjective performance results were compared between software-guided and clinical fittings. DESIGN: Prospective, double-blind, single-subject repeated-measures with permuted ABCA sequences. STUDY SAMPLE: 48 post linguistically deafened adults with ≤15 years of severe-to-profound deafness who were newly unilaterally implanted with a Nucleus device. RESULTS: Speech recognition in noise and quiet was not significantly different between software- guided and standard methods, but there was a visit/learning-effect. However, the 5-electrode method gave scores on the SSQ speech subscale 0.5 points lower than the standard method. Clinicians judged usability for all methods as acceptable, as did subjects for comfort. Analysis of stimulation levels and ECAP thresholds suggested that the 5-electrode method could be refined. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition was not inferior using either version of the electrophysiology-based software-guided fitting method compared with the standard method. Subject-reported speech perception was slightly inferior with the five-electrode method. Software-guided methods saved about 10 min of clinician's time versus standard fittings.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Speech Perception , Adult , Humans , Prospective Studies , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Speech Perception/physiology , Noise , Deafness/rehabilitation
3.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 69(8): 2533-2544, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35143392

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cochlear implant (CI) electrode distances to the cochlea's inner wall (the modiolus) and electrical impedance measurements made at the CI's electrode contacts. We introduced a protocol for "three-point impedances" in which we recorded bipolar impedances in response to monopolar stimulation at a neighboring electrode. We aimed to assess the usability of three-point impedances and two existing CI impedance measurement methods (monopolar and four-point impedances) for predicting electrode positioning during CI insertion. METHODS: Impedances were recorded during stepwise CI electrode array insertions in cadaveric human temporal bones. The positioning of the electrodes with respect to the modiolus was assessed at each step using cone beam computed tomography. Linear mixed regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the impedances and electrode-modiolar distances. The experimental results were compared to clinical impedance data and to an existing lumped-element model of an implanted CI. RESULTS: Three-point and four-point impedances strongly correlated with electrode-modiolar distance. In contrast, monopolar impedances were only minimally affected by changes in electrode positioning with respect to the modiolus. An overall model specificity of 62% was achieved when incorporating all impedance parameters. This specificity could be increased beyond 73% when prior expectations of electrode positioning were incorporated in the model. CONCLUSION: Three-point and four-point impedances are promising measures to predict electrode-modiolar distance in real-time during CI insertion. SIGNIFICANCE: This work shows how electrical impedance measurements can be used to predict the CI's electrode positioning in a biologically realistic model.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cochlea/diagnostic imaging , Cochlea/physiology , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Electric Impedance , Electrodes, Implanted , Humans
4.
J Neurosci Methods ; 358: 109212, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Models of auditory nerve fiber (ANF) responses to electrical stimulation are helpful to develop advanced coding for cochlear implants (CIs). A phenomenological model of ANF population responses to CI electrical stimulation with a lower computational complexity compared to a biophysical model would be beneficial to evaluate new CI coding strategies. NEW METHOD: This study presents a phenomenological model which combines four temporal characteristics of ANFs (refractoriness, facilitation, accommodation and spike rate adaptation) in addition to a spatial spread of the electric field. RESULTS: The model predicts the performances of CI subjects in the melodic contour identification (MCI) experiment. The simulations for the MCI experiment were consistent with CI recipients' experimental outcomes that were not predictable from the electrical stimulation patterns themselves. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Previously, no phenomenological population model of ANFs has combined all four aforementioned temporal phenomena. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model would help the further investigations of ANFs responses to different electrical stimulation patterns and comparison of different sound coding strategies in CIs.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Acoustic Stimulation , Cochlear Nerve , Electric Stimulation , Humans
5.
Trends Hear ; 25: 2331216521990594, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33710919

ABSTRACT

The use of electrocochleography (ECochG) for providing real-time feedback of cochlear function during cochlear implantation is receiving increased attention for preventing cochlear trauma and preserving residual hearing. Although various studies investigated the relationship between intra-operative ECochG measurements and surgical outcomes in recent years, the limited interpretability of ECochG response changes leads to conflicting study results and prevents the adoption of this method for clinical use. Specifically, the movement of the recording electrode with respect to the different signal generators in intracochlear recordings makes the interpretation of signal changes with respect to cochlear trauma difficult. Here, we demonstrate that comparison of ECochG signals recorded simultaneously from intracochlear locations and from a fixed extracochlear location can potentially allow a differentiation between traumatic and atraumatic signal changes in intracochlear recordings. We measured ECochG responses to 500 Hz tone bursts with alternating starting phases during cochlear implant insertions in six human cochlear implant recipients. Our results show that an amplitude decrease with associated near 180° phase shift and harmonic distortions in the intracochlear difference curve during the first half of insertion was not accompanied by a decrease in the extracochlear difference curve's amplitude (n = 1), while late amplitude decreases in intracochlear difference curves (near full insertion, n = 2) did correspond to extracochlear amplitude decreases. These findings suggest a role for phase shifts, harmonic distortions, and recording location in interpreting intracochlear ECochG responses.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Audiometry, Evoked Response , Cochlea/surgery , Hearing , Humans
6.
Hear Res ; 388: 107885, 2020 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035288

ABSTRACT

A bio-inspired coding (BIC) strategy was implemented in this study with the goal of better representation of spectral and temporal information. The auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) characteristics such as refractory recovery, facilitation and spatial spread were obtained from ECAP data recorded in 11 CI recipients. These characteristics, together with a non-individualized model-derived adaptation effect, were integrated into the BIC strategy for a better selection of channels. Two variations of the BIC strategy were compared to the conventional advanced combination encoder (ACE) coding strategy: the BIC-I strategy based on the individual CI recipients' ECAP parameters, and the BIC-G strategy based on the median values of ECAP parameters from all CI recipients who participated in the study. The melodic contour identification (MCI) and Oldenburg sentence recognition in noise (OLSA) tests were used to assess and compare the three coding strategies. A significantly better performance in the transformed MCI test results with the rationalized arcsine transformation, was observed for both BIC strategy variations compared to the ACE strategy. There was no significant difference between the two variations of the BIC strategy and the ACE strategy in the OLSA test. No correlation was found between recovery time constants, absolute refractory periods, left and right width of SOE functions from three test electrodes and CI recipients' performances in the two experiments. However, significant correlations were found between facilitation time constant and amplitude and the results of the MCI and OLSA tests for the two variations of the BIC strategy.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Pitch Perception , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Electric Stimulation , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Recognition, Psychology , Speech Intelligibility , Young Adult
7.
Hear Res ; 380: 187-196, 2019 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31325737

ABSTRACT

Auditory nerve fibers' (ANFs) refractoriness and facilitation can be quantified in electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) recorded via neural response telemetry (NRT). Although facilitation has been observed in animals and human cochlear implant (CI) recipients, no study has modeled this in human CI users until now. In this study, recovery and facilitation effects at different masker and probe levels for three test electrodes (E6, E12 and E18) in 11 CI subjects were recorded. The ECAP recovery and facilitation were modeled by exponential functions and the same function used for +10 CL masker offset condition can be applied to all other masker offsets measurements. Goodness of fit was evaluated for the exponential functions. A significant effect of probe level was observed on a recovery time constant which highlights the importance of recording the recovery function at the maximum acceptable stimulus level. Facilitation time constant and amplitude showed no dependency on the probe level. However, facilitation was stronger for masker level at or around the threshold of the ECAP (T-ECAP). There was a positive correlation between facilitation magnitude and amplitude growth function (AGF) slope, which indicates that CI subjects with better peripheral neural survival have stronger facilitation.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Cochlear Implants , Cochlear Nerve/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Hearing Disorders/therapy , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Telemetry , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Electric Stimulation , Female , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Hearing Disorders/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Brain Struct Funct ; 223(1): 145-163, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28735495

ABSTRACT

To gain more insight into central hearing loss, we investigated the relationship between cortical thickness and surface area, speech-relevant resting state EEG power, and above-threshold auditory measures in older adults and younger controls. Twenty-three older adults and 13 younger controls were tested with an adaptive auditory test battery to measure not only traditional pure-tone thresholds, but also above individual thresholds of temporal and spectral processing. The participants' speech recognition in noise (SiN) was evaluated, and a T1-weighted MRI image obtained for each participant. We then determined the cortical thickness (CT) and mean cortical surface area (CSA) of auditory and higher speech-relevant regions of interest (ROIs) with FreeSurfer. Further, we obtained resting state EEG from all participants as well as data on the intrinsic theta and gamma power lateralization, the latter in accordance with predictions of the Asymmetric Sampling in Time hypothesis regarding speech processing (Poeppel, Speech Commun 41:245-255, 2003). Methodological steps involved the calculation of age-related differences in behavior, anatomy and EEG power lateralization, followed by multiple regressions with anatomical ROIs as predictors for auditory performance. We then determined anatomical regressors for theta and gamma lateralization, and further constructed all regressions to investigate age as a moderator variable. Behavioral results indicated that older adults performed worse in temporal and spectral auditory tasks, and in SiN, despite having normal peripheral hearing as signaled by the audiogram. These behavioral age-related distinctions were accompanied by lower CT in all ROIs, while CSA was not different between the two age groups. Age modulated the regressions specifically in right auditory areas, where a thicker cortex was associated with better auditory performance in older adults. Moreover, a thicker right supratemporal sulcus predicted more rightward theta lateralization, indicating the functional relevance of the right auditory areas in older adults. The question how age-related cortical thinning and intrinsic EEG architecture relates to central hearing loss has so far not been addressed. Here, we provide the first neuroanatomical and neurofunctional evidence that cortical thinning and lateralization of speech-relevant frequency band power relates to the extent of age-related central hearing loss in older adults. The results are discussed within the current frameworks of speech processing and aging.


Subject(s)
Aging , Brain Mapping , Brain Waves/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Central/pathology , Hearing Loss, Central/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Cerebral Cortex/diagnostic imaging , Electroencephalography , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Young Adult
9.
J Neurosci Methods ; 277: 63-74, 2017 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27939961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contemporary speech processing strategies in cochlear implants (CIs) such as the Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) use a standard Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) filterbank to extract envelopes. The assignment of the FFT bins to approximate the frequency resolution of the basilar membrane is only partly based on physiology, especially since the bins are distributed linearly below 1000Hz and logarithmically above 1000Hz. NEW METHOD: A Gammatone filterbank which provides a closer approximation to the bandwidths of filters in the human auditory system could replace the standard FFT filterbank in the ACE strategy. An infinite impulse response (IIR) all-pole design of the Gammatone filterbank was compared to the FFT filterbank with 128, 256 and 512 points resolutions and the effect of the frequency boundaries of the filters was also investigated. RESULTS: Melodic contour identification (MCI) and just noticeable difference (JND) experiments, both involving synthetic clarinet notes in octaves 3 and 4, were conducted with 6 normal hearing (NH) participants using noise vocoded stimuli; and 10 CI recipients just performed the MCI experiment. The MCI results for both NH and CI subjects, showed a significant effect of the filterbank on the percentage correct responses of the participants. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The Gammatone filterbank can better resolve the harmonics of tested synthetic clarinet notes which led to better performances in the MCI experiment. CONCLUSIONS: The total delay of the Gammatone filterbank can be made smaller than the delay of the FFT filterbank with the same frequency resolution at low frequencies.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain Mapping , Cochlear Implants , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Hearing Disorders/physiopathology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Electric Stimulation , Female , Fourier Analysis , Hearing Disorders/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Music , Pitch Perception
11.
Hear Res ; 333: 136-149, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26775182

ABSTRACT

Most simulations of cochlear implant (CI) coding strategies rely on standard vocoders that are based on purely signal processing techniques. However, these models neither account for various biophysical phenomena, such as neural stochasticity and refractoriness, nor for effects of electrical stimulation, such as spectral smearing as a function of stimulus intensity. In this paper, a neural model that accounts for stochastic firing, parasitic spread of excitation across neuron populations, and neuronal refractoriness, was developed and augmented as a preprocessing stage for a standard 22-channel noise-band vocoder. This model was used to subjectively and objectively assess consonant discrimination in commercial and experimental coding strategies. Stimuli consisting of consonant-vowel (CV) and vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) tokens were processed by either the Advanced Combination Encoder (ACE) or the Excitability Controlled Coding (ECC) strategies, and later resynthesized to audio using the aforementioned vocoder model. Baseline performance was measured using unprocessed versions of the speech tokens. Behavioural responses were collected from seven normal hearing (NH) volunteers, while EEG data were recorded from five NH participants. Psychophysical results indicate that while there may be a difference in consonant perception between the two tested coding strategies, mismatch negativity (MMN) waveforms do not show any marked trends in CV or VCV contrast discrimination.


Subject(s)
Auditory Pathways/physiopathology , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Computer Simulation , Neural Networks, Computer , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implants , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Loudness Perception , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Prosthesis Design , Psychoacoustics , Speech Acoustics , Stochastic Processes , Time Factors , Voice Quality
12.
Am J Audiol ; 24(3): 398-410, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001407

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Background sounds provided by a wearable sound playback device were mixed with the acoustical input picked up by a cochlear implant speech processor in an attempt to suppress tinnitus. METHOD: First, patients were allowed to listen to several sounds and to select up to 4 sounds that they thought might be effective. These stimuli were programmed to loop continuously in the wearable playback device. Second, subjects were instructed to use 1 background sound each day on the wearable device, and they sequenced the selected background sounds during a 28-day trial. Patients were instructed to go to a website at the end of each day and rate the loudness and annoyance of the tinnitus as well as the acceptability of the background sound. Patients completed the Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire (Tyler, Stocking, Secor, & Slattery, 2014) at the beginning of the trial. RESULTS: Results indicated that background sounds were very effective at suppressing tinnitus. There was considerable variability in sounds preferred by the subjects. CONCLUSION: The study shows that a background sound mixed with the microphone input can be effective for suppressing tinnitus during daily use of the sound processor in selected cochlear implant users.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Sound , Tinnitus/rehabilitation , Deafness/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Music , Tinnitus/complications
13.
Int J Audiol ; 54 Suppl 2: 17-22, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25922886

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for the development of two types of closed-set speech-perception tests that can be applied and interpreted in the same way across languages. The guidelines cover the digit triplet and the matrix sentence tests that are most commonly used to test speech recognition in noise. They were developed by a working group on Multilingual Speech Tests of the International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA). DESIGN: The recommendations are based on reviews of existing evaluations of the digit triplet and matrix tests as well as on the research experience of members of the ICRA Working Group. They represent the results of a consensus process. RESULTS: The resulting recommendations deal with: Test design and word selection; Talker characteristics; Audio recording and stimulus preparation; Masking noise; Test administration; and Test validation. CONCLUSIONS: By following these guidelines for the development of any new test of this kind, clinicians and researchers working in any language will be able to perform tests whose results can be compared and combined in cross-language studies.


Subject(s)
Multilingualism , Speech Perception , Speech Reception Threshold Test/methods , Acoustic Stimulation , Auditory Threshold , Comprehension , Consensus , Humans , Noise/adverse effects , Observer Variation , Perceptual Masking , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychoacoustics , Recognition, Psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Reception Threshold Test/standards
14.
Ear Hear ; 36(4): 408-16, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25695925

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare speech perception outcomes between bilateral implantation (cochlear implants [CIs]) and bimodal rehabilitation (one CI on one side plus one hearing aid [HA] on the other side) and to explore the clinical factors that may cause asymmetric performances in speech intelligibility between the two ears in case of bilateral implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective data from 2247 patients implanted since 2003 in 15 international centers were collected. Intelligibility scores, measured in quiet and in noise, were converted into percentile ranks to remove differences between centers. The influence of the listening mode among three independent groups, one CI alone (n = 1572), bimodal listening (CI/HA, n = 589), and bilateral CIs (CI/CI, n = 86), was compared in an analysis taking into account the influence of other factors such as duration of profound hearing loss, age, etiology, and duration of CI experience. No within-subject comparison (i.e., monitoring outcome modifications in CI/HA subjects becoming CI/CI) was possible from this dataset. Further analyses were conducted on the CI/CI subgroup to investigate a number of factors, such as implantation side, duration of hearing loss, amount of residual hearing, and use of HAs that may explain asymmetric performances of this subgroup. RESULTS: Intelligibility ranked scores in quiet and in noise were significantly greater with both CI/CI and CI/HA than with a CI-alone group, and improvement with CI/CI (+11% and +16% in quiet and in noise, respectively) was significantly better than with CI/HA (+6% and +9% in quiet and in noise, respectively). From the CI/HA group, only subjects with ranked preoperative aided speech scores >60% performed as well as CI/CI participants. Furthermore, CI/CI subjects displayed significantly lower preoperative aided speech scores on average compared with that displayed by CI/HA subjects. Routine clinical data available from the present database did not explain the asymmetrical results of bilateral implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study, based on basic speech audiometry (no lateralization cues), indicates that, on average, a second CI is likely to provide slightly better postoperative speech outcome than an additional HA for people with very low preoperative performance. These results may be taken into consideration to refine surgical indications for CIs.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/methods , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Speech Perception , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Speech , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Biomed Tech (Berl) ; 60(2): 123-33, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25720032

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the principles and operation of a new telemetry-based function test for the Nucleus® cochlear implant, known as the CS19 Intra-Cochlear Impedance Matrix (IIM) and to present results from a multicentre clinical study to establish reproducibility (test-retest reliability) and normative ranges. METHOD: The IIM test measures bipolar impedances between all electrode pairs and employs a normalization procedure based on common ground impedances in order to identify abnormal current paths among electrodes. Six European clinics collected IIM data from a total of 192 devices. RESULTS: Reproducibility was high between initial and repeat measurements. The normative analysis demonstrated narrow ranges among devices after normalization of impedance data. The IIM is able to identify abnormal current paths that are not evident from standard impedance telemetry and may otherwise only be found utilising average electrode voltage measurements (AEV). CONCLUSIONS: The IIM test was found to be straightforward to perform clinically and demonstrated reproducible data with narrow ranges in normally-functioning devices. Because this test uses a very low stimulation level the IIM test is well suited for children or multiply handicapped CI users who cannot reliably report on their auditory percepts. The new algorithms show potential to improve implant integrity testing capabilities if implemented in future clinical software.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/standards , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Telemetry/instrumentation , Child , Electric Impedance , Electrodes , Female , Humans , Male
16.
Audiol Res ; 5(2): 132, 2015 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26779327

ABSTRACT

The Nucleus(®) 5 System Sound Processor (CP810, Cochlear™, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia) contains two omnidirectional microphones. They can be configured as a fixed directional microphone combination (called Zoom) or as an adaptive beamformer (called Beam), which adjusts the directivity continuously to maximally reduce the interfering noise. Initial evaluation studies with the CP810 had compared performance and usability of the new processor in comparison with the Freedom™ Sound Processor (Cochlear™) for speech in quiet and noise for a subset of the processing options. This study compares the two processing options suggested to be used in noisy environments, Zoom and Beam, for various sound field conditions using a standardized speech in noise matrix test (Oldenburg sentences test). Nine German-speaking subjects who previously had been using the Freedom speech processor and subsequently were upgraded to the CP810 device participated in this series of additional evaluation tests. The speech reception threshold (SRT for 50% speech intelligibility in noise) was determined using sentences presented via loudspeaker at 65 dB SPL in front of the listener and noise presented either via the same loudspeaker (S0N0) or at 90 degrees at either the ear with the sound processor (S0NCI+) or the opposite unaided ear (S0NCI-). The fourth noise condition consisted of three uncorrelated noise sources placed at 90, 180 and 270 degrees. The noise level was adjusted through an adaptive procedure to yield a signal to noise ratio where 50% of the words in the sentences were correctly understood. In spatially separated speech and noise conditions both Zoom and Beam could improve the SRT significantly. For single noise sources, either ipsilateral or contralateral to the cochlear implant sound processor, average improvements with Beam of 12.9 and 7.9 dB in SRT were found. The average SRT of -8 dB for Beam in the diffuse noise condition (uncorrelated noise from both sides and back) is truly remarkable and comparable to the performance of normal hearing listeners in the same test environment. The static directivity (Zoom) option in the diffuse noise condition still provides a significant benefit of 5.9 dB in comparison with the standard omnidirectional microphone setting. These results indicate that CI recipients may improve their speech recognition in noisy environments significantly using these directional microphone-processing options.

17.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 15(3): 136-44, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24559068

ABSTRACT

Custom Sound EP™ (CSEP) is an advanced flexible software tool dedicated to recording of electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in Nucleus® recipients using Neural Response Telemetry™ (NRT™). European multi-centre studies of the Freedom™ cochlear implant system confirmed that CSEP offers tools to effectively record ECAP thresholds, amplitude growth functions, recovery functions, spread of excitation functions, and rate adaptation functions and an automated algorithm (AutoNRT™) to measure threshold profiles. This paper reports on rate adaptation measurements. Rate adaptation of ECAP amplitudes can successfully be measured up to rates of 495 pulses per second (pps) by repeating conventional ECAP measurements and over a wide range of rates up to 8000 pps using the masked response extraction technique. Rate adaptation did not show a predictable relationship with speech perception and coding strategy channel rate preference. The masked response extraction method offers opportunities to study long-term rate adaptation with well-defined and controlled stimulation paradigms.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Neural Pathways/physiology , Telemetry/instrumentation , Adult , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Auditory Threshold/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/physiopathology , Humans , Loudness Perception
18.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 144: w13909, 2014 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24496729

ABSTRACT

The cochlear implant (CI) is one of the most successful neural prostheses developed to date. It offers artificial hearing to individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss and with insufficient benefit from conventional hearing aids. The first implants available some 30 years ago provided a limited sensation of sound. The benefit for users of these early systems was mostly a facilitation of lip-reading based communication rather than an understanding of speech. Considerable progress has been made since then. Modern, multichannel implant systems feature complex speech processing strategies, high stimulation rates and multiple sites of stimulation in the cochlea. Equipped with such a state-of-the-art system, the majority of recipients today can communicate orally without visual cues and can even use the telephone. The impact of CIs on deaf individuals and on the deaf community has thus been exceptional. To date, more than 300,000 patients worldwide have received CIs. In Switzerland, the first implantation was performed in 1977 and, as of 2012, over 2,000 systems have been implanted with a current rate of around 150 CIs per year. The primary purpose of this article is to provide a contemporary overview of cochlear implantation, emphasising the situation in Switzerland.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/rehabilitation , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Humans , Infant , Patient Selection , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Switzerland
19.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 15(1): 36-42, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23684420

ABSTRACT

Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users encounter difficulties in localizing sound sources in everyday environments, especially in the presence of background noise and reverberation. They tend to show large directional errors and front-back confusions compared to normal hearing (NH) subjects in the same conditions. In this study, the ability of bilateral CI users to use head movements to improve sound source localization was evaluated. Speech sentences of 0.5, 2, and 4.5 seconds were presented in noise to the listeners in conditions with and without head movements. The results show that for middle and long signal durations, the CI users could significantly reduce the number of front-back confusions. The angular accuracy, however, did not improve. Analysis of head trajectories showed that the CI users had great difficulties in moving their head towards the position of the source, whereas the NH listeners targeted the source loudspeaker correctly.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/therapy , Head Movements/physiology , Noise , Sound Localization/physiology , Adult , Aged , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/psychology , Differential Threshold/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
20.
Audiol Neurootol ; 18(1): 36-47, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23095305

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To update a 15-year-old study of 800 postlinguistically deaf adult patients showing how duration of severe to profound hearing loss, age at cochlear implantation (CI), age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss, etiology and CI experience affected CI outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. METHODS: Data from 2251 adult patients implanted since 2003 in 15 international centers were collected and speech scores in quiet were converted to percentile ranks to remove differences between centers. RESULTS: The negative effect of long duration of severe to profound hearing loss was less important in the new data than in 1996; the effects of age at CI and age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss were delayed until older ages; etiology had a smaller effect, and the effect of CI experience was greater with a steeper learning curve. Patients with longer durations of severe to profound hearing loss were less likely to improve with CI experience than patients with shorter duration of severe to profound hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: The factors that were relevant in 1996 were still relevant in 2011, although their relative importance had changed. Relaxed patient selection criteria, improved clinical management of hearing loss, modifications of surgical practice, and improved devices may explain the differences.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss/surgery , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...