[Toxicity of docetaxel, platine, 5-fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer: The importance of nutritional status]. / Toxicité de la chimiothérapie d'induction par docétaxel, platine, 5-fluorouracile (TPF) pour les cancers des voies aérodigestives supérieures localement évolués en routine clinique : importance du statut nutritionnel.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to identify predictive factors of toxicity of docetaxel, platin, 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2009 to March 2015, 57 patients treated consecutively with TPF were included retrospectively. There were 47 males (83%), the median age was 56 years [40-71 years]. Thirty-eight patients (67%) were treated for inoperable cancer (highly symptomatic and/or high tumor burden) and 19 (33%) were treated for laryngeal preservation. There were 47% stage IVa, 32% stage III and 21% stage IVb. At diagnosis, there were 53% stable weight, 28% grade 1 weight loss, 17% grade 2 weight loss and 2% grade 3 weight loss. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of patients were in partial response after TPF, 28% in complete response, 7% stable, 2% progressing and 2% discordant response. The possibility of oral feeding without a feeding tube was predictive of a better response (P=0.02). Thirty-nine percent of patients increased weight during TPF, 35% were stable, 18% in grade 1 weight loss, 6% in grade 2 and 2% in grade 3. Six of the patients (10.5%) died during chemotherapy: four from febrile neutropenia, one from pneumopathy and one of unknown cause. Age 57years and older was associated with a higher risk of grade≥3 anemia and thrombocytopenia. There was a higher risk of grade≥3 infection for weight loss at diagnosis (P=0.04) and feeding tube (P=0.05). There was a higher risk of grade≥3 neutropenia for weight loss during TPF (P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Induction chemotherapy by TPF has an strong anti-tumor efficacy (75.5% objective response) but an important morbidity with 10% toxic deaths in our very symptomatic population with a very important tumor burden. Age and nutritional status are important factors to consider.

Radiotherapy plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a "real-life" report.

BACKGROUND: The optimization of the management for elderly glioblastoma patients is crucial given the demographics of aging in many countries. We report the outcomes for a "real-life" patient cohort (i.e. unselected) comprising consecutive glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more, treated with different radiotherapy +/- temozolomide regimens. METHODS: From 2003 to 2016, 104 patients ≥ 70 years of age, consecutively treated by radiotherapy for glioblastoma, were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed with IDH-wild type glioblastoma according to pathological criteria. RESULTS: Our patient cohort comprised 51 female patients (49%) and 53 male. The median cohort age was 75 years (70-88), and the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70 (30-100). Five (5%) patients underwent macroscopic complete resection, 9 (9%) had partial resection, and 90 (86%), a stereotactic biopsy. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 33/73 cases (45%). Fifty-two (50%), 38 (36%), and 14 (14%) patients were categorized with RPA scores of III, IV, and I-II. Thirty-three (32%) patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 sessions) with temozolomide (Stupp), 37 (35%) received hypofractionated radiotherapy (median dose 40 Gy, 15 sessions) with temozolomide (HFRT + TMZ), and 34 (33%) HFRT alone. Patients receiving only HFRT were significantly older, with lower KPSs. The median overall survival (OS; all patients) was 5.2 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months, were 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively, with no statistical differences between patients receiving Stupp or HFRT + TMZ (P = 0.22). In contrast, patients receiving HFRT alone manifested a significantly shorter survival time (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.018). In multivariate analyses, the prognostic factors for OS were: i) the type of surgery (HR: 0.47 [0.26-0.86], P = 0.014), ii) RPA class (HR: 2.15 [1.17-3.95], P = 0.014), and iii) temozolomide use irrespective of radiotherapy schedule (HR: 0.54 [0.33-0.88], P < 0.02). MGMT promoter methylation was neither a prognostic nor a predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes agree with the literature in terms of optimal surgery and the use of HFRT as a standard treatment for elderly GBM patients. Our study emphasizes the potential benefit of using temozolomide with radiotherapy in a real-life cohort of elderly GBM patients, irrespective of their MGMT status.

Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, phase II GORTEC study.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil is the standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Cetuximab and taxane combinations have shown promising activity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of four cycles of docetaxel associated with cisplatin and cetuximab (TPEx), followed by maintenance with cetuximab every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a histologically confirmed HNSCC with metastasis or recurrence unsuitable for locoregional curative treatment received docetaxel and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) both) at day 1 and weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) (loading dose of 400 mg/m(2)), repeated every 21 days for four cycles, followed by maintenance cetuximab 500 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was done systematically after each chemotherapy cycle. Patients had a good general status (performance status ≤1) and were under 71 years. Prior total doses of cisplatin exceeding 300 mg/m(2) were not allowed. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) after four cycles. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. The primary end point was met with an ORR of 44.4% (95% CI 30.9-58.6). Median overall and progression-free survivals were, respectively, 14 months (95% CI 11.3-17.3) and 6.2 months (95% CI 5.4-7.2). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were skin rash (16.6%) and non-febrile neutropenia (20.4%). There were one pulmonary embolism and two infectious events leading to death. CONCLUSIONS: The TPEx regimen showed promising activity as first-line treatment in fit patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Further studies are needed to compare the TPEx versus EXTREME regimen in this population. CLINICALTRIALGOV: NCT01289522.

Immunonutrition improves functional capacities in head and neck and esophageal cancer patients undergoing radiochemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition is frequent in head and neck (HN) and esophageal cancer patients and aggravated by radiochemotherapy (RCT), increasing morbi-mortality and treatment toxicity. Our goal was to investigate the effect of immunonutrition consisting of an arginine, omega-3 fatty acid, nucleotides-enriched diet on nutritional status, and functional capacity in HN or esophageal cancer patients undergoing RCT. METHODS: 37 patients were randomized in a double-blind clinical trial. 5 days before and until the end of RCT (5-7 weeks), they received either an Immunomodulating Enteral Nutrition (IEN) or an isonitrogenous, isoenergetic Standard Enteral Nutrition (SEN). Anthropometrical parameters, nutritional risk index (NRI), serum albumin, plasma antioxidant capacity, and functional capacity were recorded between the beginning and the end of RCT. RESULTS: A significant gain in total body weight (+2.1 ± 3.1 kg) was observed in IEN patients. Albuminemia and NRI were improved concomitantly in IEN malnourished patients. Plasma antioxidant capacity was improved (+100 ± 13 µM EqTrolox) in IEN patients. Functional capacity measured by WHO Performance Status and Karnofsky index was maintained in IEN patients but significantly reduced in SEN patients. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data show that immunonutrition could improve the nutritional status together with functional capacity in HN and esophageal cancer patients undergoing RCT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial promoted by the University Hospital Center of Clermont-Ferrand has been registered at ClinicalTrial.gov website under the following reference: NCT00333099.

Adherence with oral oncologic treatment in cancer patients: interest of an adherence score of all dosing errors.

PURPOSE: Patient nonadherence to oral antineoplastic therapy is a well-recognized barrier to effective treatment. In order to identify patients who may need additional support to become adherent, it is important to have a useful tool that takes into account all the parameters of adherence to prescription. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate adherence of oral antineoplastic agents and to investigate two calculation methods of adherence score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine cancer patients were enrolled in this study. Fourteen were treated by capecitabine and 15 patients by aromatase inhibitors. Adherence was measured using a medication event monitoring system and adherence score was calculated by a usual method and a composite adherence score that takes into account missed doses and also intake interval errors (between 2 doses and between meals). RESULTS: Across the 6-month evaluation period, average adherence was 95% with the standard calculation (capecitabine group: 89%; aromatase inhibitor group: 99%) versus 83% with the composite index (capecitabine group: 62%; aromatase inhibitor group: 99%) (p = 0.030). The composite calculation permits to highlight more nonadherent patients (29.6 vs. 7.4%), particularly in the capecitabine group (73 vs. 18%, p = 0.001). We report 2 cases identified as nonadherent with composite adherence rate. CONCLUSION: The composite adherence score permits to better evaluate adherence to prescription and to identify barriers to adherence and persistence.