ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The evidence on the utility and effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions delivered via telerehabilitation is growing rapidly. Telerehabilitation is expected to have a key role in rehabilitation in the future. AIM: The aim of this evidence-based position paper (EBPP) is to improve PRM physicians' professional practice in telerehabilitation to be delivered to improve functioning and to reduce activity limitations and/or participation restrictions in individuals with a variety of disabling health conditions. METHODS: To produce recommendations for PRM physicians on telerehabilitation, a systematic review of the literature and a consensus procedure by means of a Delphi process have been performed involving the delegates of all European countries represented in the UEMS PRM Section. RESULTS: The systematic literature review is reported together with the 32 recommendations resulting from the Delphi procedure. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that PRM physicians deliver rehabilitation services remotely, via digital means or using communication technologies to eligible individuals, whenever required and feasible in a variety of health conditions in favor of the patient and his/her family, based on evidence of effectiveness and in compliance with relevant regulations. This EBPP represents the official position of the European Union through the UEMS PRM Section and designates the professional role of PRM physicians in telerehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine , Telerehabilitation , Humans , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/standards , Europe , Delphi Technique , Professional Practice/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , European UnionABSTRACT
Hand osteoarthritis is the most common joint condition and is associated with significant morbidity. It is of paramount importance that patients are thoroughly assessed and examined when complaining of hand stiffness, pain, deformity or disability and that the patient's concerns and expectations are addressed by the healthcare professional. In 2019 the American College of Rheumatology and Arthritis Foundation (ACR/AF) produced guidelines which included recommendations for the treatment of hand osteoarthritis. An ESCEO expert working group (including patients) was convened and composed this paper with the aim to assess whether these guidelines were appropriate for the treatment of hand osteoarthritis therapy in Europe and whether they met with the ESCEO patient-centered approach. Indeed, patients are the key stakeholders in healthcare and eliciting the patient's preference is vital in the context of an individual consultation but also for informing research and policy-making. The patients involved in this working group emphasised the often-neglected area of aesthetic changes in hand osteoarthritis, importance of developing pharmacological therapies which can alleviate pain and disability and the need of the freedom to choose which approach (out of pharmacological, surgical or non-pharmacological) they wished to pursue. Following robust appraisal, it was recommended that the ACR/AF guidelines were suitable for a European context (as described within the body of the manuscript) and it was emphasised that patient preferences are key to the success of individual consultations, future research and future policy-making.
Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Europe , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Patient-Centered Care , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of the most common developmental disorders affecting movement and posture of the body, causing activity limitations and participation restrictions. The motor disorders of persons with CP are often accompanied by disturbances of sensation, cognition, communication and perception. The symptoms of CP are very diverse and persons with CP are usually presented with a mixed type of symptoms. The non-progressive disturbances can be attributed to disorders that were developed during pregnancy, birth and/or infant stage. The aim of this study was to improve physicians' professional practice of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine for persons with cerebral palsy in order to improve their functionality, social and community integration, and to reduce activity limitations and/or participation restrictions. A systematic review of the literature including an 18-year period and consensus procedure by means of a Delphi process was performed and involved the delegates of all European countries represented in the Union of European Medical Specialists Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (UEMS PRM) Section. As the result of a Consensus Delphi procedure, 74 recommendations are presented together with the systematic literature review. The PRM physician's role for persons with cerebral palsy is to lead and coordinate the multiprofessional team, working in an interdisciplinary way. They should propose and manage the complex but individual PRM program developed in conjunction with other health professionals, medical specialists and importantly in agreement with the patient, their family and care giver. This should be, according to the specific medical diagnosis to improve patients' health, functioning, social and education status, considering all impairments, comorbidities and complications, activity limitations and participation restrictions. This evidence-based position paper is representing the official position of The European Union through the UEMS PRM Section and designates the professional role of PRM physicians in persons with cerebral palsy.
Subject(s)
Cerebral Palsy , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine , Europe , Humans , Professional PracticeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hand osteoarthritis (HOA) is a complex disorder with various subtypes characterized with predominance of different features. It is challenging to estimate the severity of hand disability in HOA, since contribution of different disease components to clinical burden is yet to be clarified. The aim of the study is to investigate hand functions in nonerosive interphalangeal hand osteoarthritis (HOA) without inflammatory features, and search for effects of osteophyte formations detected by radiography and ultrasound on functionality. METHODS: Thirty one HOA patients and 20 healthy subjects with similar age, gender, body mass index were included. Hand functions were evaluated by self-reported questionnaires and objective strength and dexterity measurements. A total of 459 interphalangeal joints were evaluated and scored by radiography and ultrasound for ostephyte formations. RESULTS: Strength and dexterity measurements were similar between groups. Self-reported functionality was hampered in HOA group but not statistically significant. Osteophyte scores obtained by ultrasound and radiography were significantly higher in HOA group. Osteophyte scores obtained by ultrasound were higher than the scores obtained by radiography. Ultrasound scores showed no correlation with any of the parameters while osteophytes scores obtained by radiography partially showed a significant negative correlation with assembly part of dexterity testing. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference observed in hand strength and dexterity in nonerosive interphalangeal HOA patients withouth signs of inflammation when compared to healthy subjects. Osteophyte formations prominent enough to be deteceted by radiography may have a negative effect on hand dexterity.
Subject(s)
Hand Strength , Osteoarthritis , Osteophyte , Body Mass Index , Exostoses , Hand , Humans , Inflammation , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Osteophyte/diagnostic imaging , Osteophyte/physiopathology , Radiography , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the accordance to the 2018 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis (OA) among the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) expert panel and composition of TLAR recommendations for the management of hand OA under guidance of the current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TLAR convener designated an expert panel of 10 physicians experienced in hand OA for this process. The 2018 EULAR recommendations for the management of hand OA and the systematic review of the literature were sent to the expert panel via e-mails. The e-mail process which included Delphi round surveys was completed. The EULAR standard operational procedure Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II was followed. The level of agreement was calculated for each item and presented as mean, standard deviations, minimum and maximum and comparisons of 2018 EULAR recommendations were performed. RESULTS: Five overarching principles and 10 recommendations were discussed. Revisions were held for the sixth, seventh, and ninth recommendations with lowest level of agreements. These recommendations were revised in accordance with suggestions from the experts and re-voted. The revised forms were approved despite the lack of statistically significant difference between these forms (p=0.400, p=0.451, p=0.496, respectively). Except for the ninth recommendation about surgery (p=0.008), no significant difference in level of agreements was observed between the EULAR and TLAR hand OA recommendations. The 11th recommendation about paraffin bath was added. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment of hand OA consists of personalized non-pharmacological (self-management, exercise, splint), pharmacological (topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as the first choice), and interventional procedures (only for refractory cases) based on shared decision between the patient and physician. TLAR hand OA recommendations were created mainly based on the most recent literature and the last EULAR hand OA management recommendations, which are widely approved among the TLAR experts.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Hand osteoarthritis (HOA) is a complex disorder with various subtypes characterized with predominance of different features. It is challenging to estimate the severity of hand disability in HOA, since contribution of different disease components to clinical burden is yet to be clarified. The aim of the study is to investigate hand functions in nonerosive interphalangeal hand osteoarthritis (HOA) without inflammatory features, and search for effects of osteophyte formations detected by radiography and ultrasound on functionality. Methods: Thirty one HOA patients and 20 healthy subjects with similar age, gender, body mass index were included. Hand functions were evaluated by self-reported questionnaires and objective strength and dexterity measurements. A total of 459 interphalangeal joints were evaluated and scored by radiography and ultrasound for ostephyte formations. Results: Strength and dexterity measurements were similar between groups. Self-reported functionality was hampered in HOA group but not statistically significant. Osteophyte scores obtained by ultrasound and radiography were significantly higher in HOA group. Osteophyte scores obtained by ultrasound were higher than the scores obtained by radiography. Ultrasound scores showed no correlation with any of the parameters while osteophytes scores obtained by radiography partially showed a significant negative correlation with assembly part of dexterity testing. Conclusions: No significant difference observed in hand strength and dexterity in nonerosive interphalangeal HOA patients withouth signs of inflammation when compared to healthy subjects. Osteophyte formations prominent enough to be deteceted by radiography may have a negative effect on hand dexterity.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Osteophyte/diagnostic imaging , Finger Joint/physiopathology , Radiography/instrumentation , Ultrasonography/instrumentationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common type of musculoskeletal pain, thus it is one of the most commonly encountered conditions in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. The physicians who are primarily responsible for the nonsurgical management of LBP are physiatrists. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the approaches of physiatrists to low back pain across Europe. Preferences, tendencies, and priorities in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of LBP, as well as the epidemiological data pertaining to LBP in PRM practice were evaluated in this Europe-wide study. METHODS: The study was conducted under the control of the European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM) Musculoskeletal Disorders Research Committee. A total of 576 physiatrists from most European countries participated in the survey. RESULTS: The results show that physiatrists frequently deal with patients with LBP in their daily practice. Most patients are not referred to other departments and are treated with various conservative methods. Less than one-fifth of patients are primarily referred for surgery. The physiatrists believe that a clear diagnosis to account for cases of low back pain is rarely established. The most common diagnosis is discopathy. History and physical examination remain the most valuable clinical evaluation tools for low back pain according to physiatrists. Less than half the patients require a magnetic resonance imaging. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most commonly prescribed drugs for low back pain. Exercise, back care information, and physical therapy are the preferred conservative treatments. More than half of the physiatrists offer interventional treatments to patients with low back pain. CONCLUSION: The present study is a preliminary report that presents the attitudes of European physiatrists in the management of low back pain. Further researches are warranted to standardize the conservative management of LBP.
Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/therapy , Physiatrists , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Physical Examination , Physical Therapy Modalities/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Scoliosis and other spinal deformities involve 3-4% of the population during growth. Their so-called conservative treatment is in the field of competence of physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physicians. This evidence based position paper represents the official position of the European Union through the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) - PRM Section. The aim of the paper was to improve PRM specialists' professional practice for patients with spinal deformities during growth. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review of the literature and a Consensus procedure with 26 recommendations by means of a Delphi method process has been performed involving the delegates of all European countries represented in the UEMS-PRM Section. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: the systematic literature review is reported together with 26 recommendations coming from the Consensus Delphi procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The professional role of PRM physicians in spinal deformities during growth is to propose a complete PRM treatment for the patients considering all the concurring diseases and pathologies, impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions. The PRM physician's role is to coordinate the individual PRM project developed in team with other health professionals and medical specialists, in agreement with the patient and his family, according to the specific medical diagnoses.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Practice , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/standards , Spinal Curvatures/rehabilitation , European Union , Humans , Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine/methods , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of isokinetic and aerobic exercise training programs on serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, pain, and functional activity in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Forty-two postmenopausal women and men with knee OA according to American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria were included. Patients were randomized into isokinetic and aerobic exercises and control groups. In intervention groups, patients were included in predetermined exercise programs 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Severity of pain, functional activity status, muscle strength, functional capacity, and serum cytokine levels were evaluated at baseline and at the 6th week. RESULTS: At the end of 6th week, there was no statistically significant decrease in serum pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in both the exercise groups, although C-reactive protein levels exhibited a strong trend toward significance. We found a significant decrease in visual analog scale and Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index scores, and significant increase in functional capacity and muscle strength in both the exercise groups compared with those in the control group.
Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Interleukin-6/blood , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Pain/rehabilitation , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood , Aged , C-Reactive Protein , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle Strength/physiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/blood , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Pain/blood , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function/physiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
A patient suffering from a brachial plexus injury after axillary arteriography is discussed. In the pertinent literature, local complications such as hematomas or pseudoaneurysms have been reported. Herein, rendering this patient, we introduce a new type of a delayed complication after the angiography-compressive injury of the brachial plexus.
Subject(s)
Angiography/adverse effects , Axillary Artery , Brachial Artery , Brachial Plexus/injuries , Nerve Compression Syndromes/pathology , Aged , Catheterization , Humans , Hypesthesia/etiology , Hypesthesia/pathology , Male , Nerve Compression Syndromes/etiology , Stress, MechanicalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA), compare them with healthy controls, and assess the effects of disease activity and corticosteroid treatment on BMD. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients diagnosed with JCA and 45 healthy controls were included in this study. Disease activity was determined by clinical and laboratory evaluation, Articular Disease Severity Score (ADSS), and the Juvenile Arthritis Functional Assessment Report (JAFAR). Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). RESULTS: Patients with JCA showed significant decreases in BMD compared with healthy controls. The JCA patients treated with corticosteroids showed significantly lower BMDs than the healthy control group. Age of the patients and age of onset were found to correlate with BMD. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that glucocorticoids were involved in the development of osteoporosis in JCA, with many other factors affecting bone mineralization. We could not demonstrate any relationship between BMD and disease activity, but the study data suggest that early onset disease is also an important factor in the development of osteoporosis in JCA.