The Nocebo Effect: A Bias in Clinical Practice-An Ethical Approach.

BACKGROUND: The nocebo effect is often disregarded in medical practice and is certainly much less known than the placebo effect, although, in reality, both can influence therapeutic decision making and the quality of life of patients. However, the nocebo effect raises a number of issues not only of a practical nature related to clinical activity but also ethical dilemmas related to the observance of the patient's autonomy, nonmaleficence, or informed consent and the information on which it is based. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The ethical dilemmas raised by the nocebo effect revolve around how informed consent can be achieved, the accuracy and volume of information that is transmitted to the patient, and how to report negative side effects of therapeutic treatment. DATA SOURCES: In September 2023, a narrative analysis of the literature was conducted using a combination of keywords such as nocebo, placebo, ethics, therapeutic relationship from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and so on, as well as from official documents developed at an international level (World Health Organization), for a period of 10 years (2012-2021). RESULTS: Analyzing the articles that remarked upon the significant impact of ethics in nocebo research or in the therapeutic relationship, we can state that the existence of several relevant issues of interest have been detected regarding the ethical use of nocebo and its impact in research or in clinics and thus the need for proper knowledge and management of the impact of nocebo effects. The ethical paradox of obtaining informed consent with the 2 goals, first, the need for complete information and second, the preservation of the autonomy of the patient, respectively, that of "primum non-nocere" and of avoiding unnecessary harm by revealing probable adverse effects is a point of interest for numerous studies. The potential for a nocebo effect is present when we inform patients about the risks and benefits of treatment, there being a clear link between the moral and ethical duty to inform patients and the need to avoid situations that increase the nocebo impact on how the disease or the adverse effects of the treatment are perceived. Adapting information about the side effects of medicines should focus on ensuring a balance between transparency and caution, especially in patients with a high potential for nocebo effect. CONCLUSIONS: The nocebo effect had for a long time been unknown or denied, although it can interfere with the results of the treatment used. As the nocebo phenomenon becomes increasingly known in medical practice, the clinical and ethical implications are identified by medical staff, and nocebo's adverse responses are no longer ignored.

Self-Medicating for Pain: A Public Health Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Pain is one of the symptoms for which any man is willing not only to go to the doctor but also to resort to any means, including self-medication, to "get rid" of it. Self-medication is not only a current practice but also a public health problem, under the circumstances that it can influence the way in which a disease is diagnosed and/or treated in a timely manner, and, consequently, repercussions may occur on the cost of treatment, in the case of severe forms. Pain is a vital symptom, and the diminution until the disappearance of pain is a fundamental right of each individual; the analysis of ethical issues in the case of self-administration of analgesic medication has not been a major concern. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Understanding the problem is important to realize whether self-medicating for pain is a necessity or an abuse, and in this respect, we review scientific articles from international databases: PubMed and ProQuest. DATA SOURCES: The study is based on the consultation of scientific articles from international databases-PubMed and ProQuest, the main keywords in the search being pain and self-medication, to which a stigma or public health is sequentially added. RESULTS: Pain is becoming more and more a global problem and the extent of its spread can substantiate our assertion about pathology with pandemic impact. Under the pressure of patient associations, of the media, and of nonmedical authorities, the opinion about the need for a stoic approach to pain has long become an outdated theory, and chronic pain, beyond a multidimensional approach, is increasingly considered not only a useless element but also even a destructive one. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and self-medication must be addressed, including in medical practice, starting from their multidimensionality from the following perspectives: medicobiological, sociocultural, instructive-educational, legal-political, and especially ethical. They are not only individual health problems but also become, when connected with a stigma, a public health problem.

Therapeutic Interventions for Adjustment Disorder: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Adjustment disorder requires therapeutic intervention because of its complications, which include a significant risk of suicide, but evidence-based therapeutic guidelines are not available. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The main problem is related to answer to the following question: What is the optimal therapeutic approach to adjustment disorder? In this respect we review all randomized controlled trials that aimed to investigate therapeutic interventions for adjustment disorder in adult populations. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive search of the electronic database PubMed (January 1980-June 2019). The review included clinical trials that aimed to investigate a psychological or pharmacological treatment for adjustment disorder in adult population and reported outcome data for therapeutic interventions. RESULTS: The search identified 23 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review. Pharmacotherapy interventions were the focus of 11 studies that used various medications and dosages including viloxazine, lormetazepam, S-adenosylmethionine, pivagabine, trazodone, clorazepate, etifoxine, lorazepam, diazepam, afobazole, and plant extracts (Kava-kava, Euphytose, and Ginkgo biloba) on a total number of 1020 patients. Psychotherapy interventions were identified in 12 studies that used mirror therapy, short-term dynamic psychotherapy, yoga meditation, body-mind-spirit technique, mindfulness, bibliotherapy (self-help manual), humor training, and cognitive behavioral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotherapy seems indicated for mildly symptomatic adjustment disorder. Given the fact that adjustment disorder with severe symptoms is associated with a high risk of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, clinicians must consider the potential benefit of using psychotropic agents such as benzodiazepines, antidepressants, or etifoxine.

Multiple Drug-Intolerant Hypertension.

CLINICAL FEATURES: The term multiple drug intolerance (MDI) is attributed to patients who experience adverse drug reactions to more than 3 different classes of medication without a known immunological mechanism. A special attention should be given to multiple drug-intolerant hypertension (MDI-HTN) that is a cause of drop out from treatment and consequent poor blood pressure control. Patients with MDIs account for 2%-5% of all population. The patient we present is a 63-year-old man with third-degree hypertension identified with intolerance to drugs from 4 major classes of antihypertensive medication. THERAPEUTIC CHALLENGE: Patients with MDIs are difficult to treat. They frequently also have numerous comorbidities and high cardiovascular risk. It is recognized that guidelines for the management of hypertension do not include an algorithm of action in situations of MDIs to medication. SOLUTION: We chose to use a recently proposed four-step algorithm for the management of MDI-HTN. A 1-month follow-up program was established. Weekly visits were scheduled to elicit about side effects and measure blood pressure . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed after a month. The strategy was first to reuse medication from classes the patient was intolerant to, but in smaller doses and in combinations. Among same class members, we have chosen those with less adverse effects. Not all steps within the algorithm were followed since our patient did not need alternative formulation as liquid or transdermal ones. Anxiety medication was prescribed as nonlicensed antihypertensive medication. At the end of the follow-up month, blood pressure control was satisfactory, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was 135.5/83.0 mm Hg, and the patient did not claim any adverse drug reactions.