Correspondence in reference to the previously published manuscript: Reduction of cycles of bendamustine plus rituximab therapy in the cases with good response for indolent B-cell lymphomas.

Takezaki et al. analyzed the outcome of 57 patients with indolent lymphomas treated with Bendamustine plus Rituximab (BR) according to the number of cycles received, showing that patients who discontinued BR after four cycles had similar outcomes compared to patients who received five or six cycles. Considering the similarities but also the differences between indolent lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we enriched the results obtained with a cohort of CLL patients treated with BR starting from the experience of the Lazio region group on CLL. Out of 115 patients, 97 (84%) received 4-6 cycles of BR, while 18 (16%) received 1-3 cycles. The outcome of the group of patients who received at least 4 cycles was superior in terms of response rate (ORR 96% vs. ORR 83%, p = 0.041; CR 58% vs. CR 28%, p = 0.052 respectively) and PFS [median PFS 52.6 (40.3-64.9) versus 26.2 (19.3-33.0) months, p < 0.001]. The number of patients undergoing 4 cycles of BR (4-cycles group) and 5-6 cycles (over-4-cycles group) was 9 and 88, respectively. Compared to analysis conducted by the Japanese group in indolent lymphomas, in CLL we did not observe any difference between the outcome of the 4-cycles group and the over-4-cycles group in terms of ORR (89% vs. 97%, p = 0.268) and in survival [median PFS 40.8 (13.7-67.8) versus 52.6 (38.7-66.5) months, p = 0.117]. Moreover, we observed that patients who achieved a clinical CR showed overlapping outcomes with patients who received more than 4 cycles [CR vs. non-CR median PFS not reached vs. 11.0 months; over-4-cycles group median PFS 52.6 months (40.3-64.9); p < 0.001]. Nowadays chemoimmunotherapy with BR is reserved to fit elderly CLL patients, and there are many chemo-free treatment options available; therefore, discontinuation after 4 cycles may be permissible in patients who obtained a CR in order to limit toxicity as much as possible.

Minimal residual disease as biomarker for optimal biologic dosing of ARA-C in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

We assessed by flow cytometry minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) given standard-dose (SDAC) and high-dose ARA-C (HDAC) regimens. Of 163 patients enrolled, 130 (median age, 45 years; range, 18-59 years) qualified for analysis, all achieving complete remission after treatment with SDAC (n = 78) or HDAC (n = 52) plus etoposide and daunorubicin. Consolidation consisted of intermediate-dose ARA-C and daunorubicin. MRD negativity was significantly more frequent in the SDAC vs. HDAC arm after both induction (37% vs. 15%, P = 0.007) and consolidation (44% vs. 18%, P = 0.002). Respective median residual leukemic cell counts with SDAC and HDAC use were 1.5 × 10(-3) and 4 × 10(-3) (P = 0.033) after induction and 5.7 × 10(-4) and 2.9 × 10(-3) (P = 0.008) after consolidation. Based on ARA-C schedule and post-consolidation MRD status, the four patient groups (SDAC-MRD(-) , HDAC-MRD(-) , SDAC-MRD(+) , and HDAC-MRD(+) ) displayed 5-year overall survival rates of 60%, 33%, 24%, and 42% (P = 0.007), respectively, with 24%, 35%, 74%, and 48% (P < 0.0001) respective cumulative incidence of relapse estimates. MRD may serve as a biomarker for optimal biologic dosing of ARA-C, and SDAC regimen appears to yield more frequent MRD negativity.

Central nervous system involvement in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: diagnostic tools, prophylaxis, and therapy.

In adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), Central Nervous System (CNS) involvement is associated with a very poor prognosis. The diagnostic assessment of this condition relies on the use of neuroradiology, conventional cytology (CC) and flow cytometry (FCM). Among these approaches, which is the gold standard it is still a matter of debate. Neuroradiology and CC have a limited sensitivity with a higher rate of false negative results. FCM demonstrated a superior sensitivity over CC, particularly when low levels of CNS infiltrating cells are present. Although prospective studies of a large series of patients are still awaited, a positive finding by FCM appears to anticipate an adverse outcome even if CC shows no infiltration. Current strategies for adult ALL CNS-directed prophylaxis or therapy involve systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy and radiation therapy. An early and frequent intrathecal injection of cytostatic combined with systemic chemotherapy is the most effective strategy to reduce the frequency of CNS involvement. In patients with CNS overt ALL, at diagnosis or upon relapse, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation might be considered. This review discusses risk factors, diagnostic techniques for identification of CNS infiltration and modalities of prophylaxis and therapy to manage it.

High sensitivity of flow cytometry improves detection of occult leptomeningeal disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma.

Conventional cytology (CC) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fails to demonstrate malignant cells in up to 45 % of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL/LL) in whom occult leptomeningeal disease is present. Flow cytometry (FCM) is considered more sensitive than CC, but clinical implications of CC negativity/CC positivity are not yet established. CSF samples from 38 adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL/LL were examined. Five (13 %) and nine (24 %) specimens were CC positive-FC positive (FCM(pos)/CC(pos)) and CC negative-FC positive (CC(neg)/FCM(pos)), respectively. The remaining 24 (63 %) samples were double negative (CC(neg)/FCM(neg)) (p = 0.001). CC(neg)/FCM(pos) patients showed a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared to CC(neg)/FCM(neg) ones. In multivariate analysis, the status of single FCM positivity was demonstrated to affect independently duration of OS (p = 0.005). In conclusion, FCM significantly improves detection of leptomeningeal occult localization in ALL/LL and appears to anticipate an adverse outcome. Further prospective studies on larger series are needed to confirm this preliminary observation.

Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia with 20-30% bone marrow blasts.

The transition of patients with ≥20% <30% bone marrow (BM) blast from the FAB category of myelodysplasia to the family of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to the recent WHO classification has not resolved the argument as to whether the natural history and responsiveness to therapy of these diseases is comparable to that of AML with > 30% BM blast. These controversies are even more manifest when it comes to elderly patients in whom concern for intensive chemotherapy (IC) related toxicity is the critical determinant for the therapeutic choice. In fact, due to concerns of treatment-related morbidity and mortality associated with delivery of IC, approximately only 30% of all patients ≥65 years are considered eligible for this approach. Therefore, a great deal of attention has been dedicated to alternative agents such as hypomethylators (azacitidine and decitabine). Actually, these agents have shown efficacy with reduced toxicity when administered to elderly patients with 20-30% BM blasts and not eligible for IC. In the present review, we will discuss the clinical results achieved in the treatment of elderly patients with 20%-30% BM blasts AML using intensive chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents. Overall, our survey of the literature suggests that only controlled, randomized, clinical trials will answer the question as to whether hypomethylating agents has the potential to substitute for IC even in elderly patients with an optimal functional status.

Phase II Study of Bortezomib as a Single Agent in Patients with Previously Untreated or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Therapy.

We explored the safety and efficacy of bortezomib given as single agent in patients with untreated or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), unfit for conventional chemotherapy. Fourteen patients were treated with bortezomib 1.5 mg/m(2) administered twice weekly for two weeks, every 3 weeks. Median age was 70 years (range 60-81) and the median number of cycles delivered was 2 (range 1-4). Of 13 evaluable patients, in 8 (61%), the administration of bortezomib resulted in an antileukemic effect as demonstrated by peripheral blood and/or bone marrow blast reduction. In 4 (50%) of these 8, a decrease by 37% of transfusion requirement was also observed (P = 0.009). Overall median survival was 4 months (range 0.25-10). Neurotoxicity was the most frequent adverse event with 7 of 13 (54%) patients experiencing grades 3-4 peripheral neuropathy. Neurotoxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 4 (57%) of 7. In conclusion, the observed anti-leukemic activity of bortezomib indicates that there is room for designing additional studies in which combination with other chemotherapeutic agents should be considered. Clinical registration no.: EUDRACT 2006-006923-38.