Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 232: 200-206.e4, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33417918

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) severity score among children with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections and HUS by stratifying them according to their risk of adverse events. The score has not been previously evaluated in a North American acute care setting. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed medical records of children <18 years old infected with STEC and treated in 1 of 38 participating emergency departments in North America between 2011 and 2015. The HUS severity score (hemoglobin [g/dL] plus 2-times serum creatinine [mg/dL]) was calculated using first available laboratory results. Children with scores >13 were designated as high-risk. We assessed score performance to predict severe adverse events (ie, dialysis, neurologic complication, respiratory failure, and death) using discrimination and net benefit (ie, threshold probability), with subgroup analyses by age and day-of-illness. RESULTS: A total of 167 children had HUS, of whom 92.8% (155/167) had relevant data to calculate the score; 60.6% (94/155) experienced a severe adverse event. Discrimination was acceptable overall (area under the curve 0.71, 95% CI 0.63-0.79) and better among children <5 years old (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI 0.68-0.87). For children <5 years, greatest net benefit was achieved for a threshold probability >26%. CONCLUSIONS: The HUS severity score was able to discriminate between high- and low-risk children <5 years old with STEC-associated HUS at a statistically acceptable level; however, it did not appear to provide clinical benefit at a meaningful risk threshold.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision Rules , Emergency Service, Hospital , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Escherichia coli Infections/complications , Escherichia coli Infections/mortality , Female , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/complications , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/mortality , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , North America , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol ; 48(3): 220-223, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29530452

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Brain deposition of gadolinium following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) was initially reported in 2014. Gadolinium deposition is now recognized as a dose-dependent consequence of exposure. The potential clinical implications are not yet understood. The purpose of this study was to determine radiologists' reporting practices in response to gadolinium deposition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey querying radiologists' practices regarding gadolinium deposition was distributed by Radiopaedia.org from November-December 2015. RESULTS: Our study sample included 94 total respondents (50% academic; 27% private practice; 23% hybrid) from 30 different countries (USA 18%). Fifty-seven (62%) radiologists had observed brain gadolinium deposition on MRI brain studies howerver more than half of these (30 of 57) reported detecting dentate T1 shortening only rarely (<1/month). Among respondents, 58% (52 of 89) do not or would not include the finding in the radiology report; only 12 (13%) report the finding in the impression of their reports. The most common reason for not reporting gadolinium deposition was the risk of provoking unnecessary patient anxiety (29%, 20 of 70). Recent data on gadolinium deposition has led to a reported practice change in 24 of 87 (28%) of respondents. CONCLUSION: Recognition of, and attitudes toward, brain gadolinium deposition were inconsistent in this worldwide sample. Most surveyed radiologists do not routinely report dentate T1shortening as a marker of gadolinium deposition. Fear of provoking patient/clinician anxiety and an incomplete understanding of the implications of gadolinium deposition contribute to inconsistencies in reporting.


Subject(s)
Brain/metabolism , Contrast Media/pharmacokinetics , Gadolinium/pharmacokinetics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Radiologists , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Pediatr ; 180: 184-190.e1, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27745751

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify the gaps in the care of children infected with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), we sought to quantitate care received and management timelines. Such knowledge is crucial to the design of interventions to prevent the development of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective case-series study of 78 children infected with STEC in Alberta, Canada, through the linkage of microbiology and laboratory results, telephone health advice records, hospital charts, physician billing submissions, and outpatient antimicrobial dispensing databases. Outcomes were the time intervals between initial presentation and reporting of positive culture result and symptom onset to HUS and to describe the proportions that had baseline blood work performed and received antibiotics. RESULTS: Seventy-eight children infected with STEC were identified; 13% (10/78) developed HUS. Median time from initial presentation to laboratory stool sample receipt was 33 hours (IQR 18, 42); time to positive culture was 120 hours (IQR 86, 205). Time from symptom onset to HUS diagnosis was 188 ± 37 hours. Baseline blood tests were obtained in 74% (58/78) of infected children. Antibiotics were administered to 50% (5/10) of those who developed HUS and 22% (15/78) of those who did not; P = .11. The provincial telephone advice system received 31 calls regarding 24 children infected with STEC; 23% (7/31) of callers were recommended to seek emergency department care. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of children developed HUS following multiple interactions with the health care system. Delays in the confirmation of STEC infection occurred. There are numerous opportunities to improve the timing, monitoring, and interventions in children infected with STEC.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Escherichia coli Infections/therapy , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/microbiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/prevention & control , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Adolescent , Alberta , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Child , Child, Preschool , Escherichia coli Infections/complications , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL