Building Radiology Equity: Themes from the 2023 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology and Global Health.

Low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) are significantly impacted by the global scarcity of medical imaging services. Medical imaging is an essential component for diagnosis and guided treatment, which is needed to meet the current challenges of increasing chronic diseases and preparedness for acute-care response. We present some key themes essential for improving global health equity which were discussed at the 2023 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology and Global Health. They include: (i) capacity-building, (ii) artificial intelligence (AI), (iii) community-based patient navigation, (iv) organizational design for multidisciplinary global health strategy, (v) implementation science, and (vi) innovation. Although not exhaustive, these themes should be considered influential as we guide and expand global health radiology programs in LMICs in the coming years.

Advancing IR in Underserved Regions: Interventional Radiology Simulation Near and Far.

Simulation facilitates learning by imitating real-world systems or processes utilizing educational tools and models. Various fields, including business, aviation, and education use simulation for training. In healthcare, simulation provides trainees opportunities to develop procedural skills in a safe environment, building their understanding through hands-on interactions and experiences rather than passive didactics. Simulation is classified into low, medium, and high fidelity, based on how closely it mimics real-life experience. Its use in education is a valuable adjunct to instructional support and training with multiple potential benefits. Interventional radiology (IR) trainees can build technical and clinical proficiency prior to working directly on a patient. Simulation promotes experiential learning, constructivist learning, and student centeredness, thus giving students control over their learning and knowledge acquisition. More recently, the creative use of remote simulation has augmented traditional virtual didactic lectures, thereby further engaging international learners and enhancing remote collaboration. Despite the challenges to implementation, the addition of simulation in IR education is proving invaluable to supporting trainees and physicians in underserved regions.

Ambulatory Phlebectomy and Sclerotherapy as Tools for the Treatment of Varicose Veins and Telangiectasias.

Treatment of chronic venous disease is a fascinating and rewarding undertaking. Once the truncal reflux is addressed, several options are available that can be used to treat the associated ulcers, varicosities, reticular veins, and telangiectasias. This review will focus on two widely employed procedures: ambulatory phlebectomy and sclerotherapy.

Acute postoperative delayed hemorrhage following anterior colporrhaphy and cystoscopy: A case report and a review of the literature.

The development of a retroperitoneal hematoma is a rare complication in gynecologic surgery. The literature on the condition is largely in the form of case reports describing its occurrence in relation to vaginal procedures. We report the case of a 40-year-old woman who had acute delayed-onset postoperative hemorrhage and retroperitoneal hematoma formation following an uncomplicated anterior colporrhaphy. She re-presented to the hospital several hours after discharge, with severe pain and vaginal bleeding. On imaging, she was found to have a large pelvic hematoma that was displacing the uterus, with extraperitoneal free fluid and active contrast extravasation. She underwent resuscitation and successful coil embolization of a small branch of the right uterine artery. This case report adds to the body of literature on the occurrence of retroperitoneal hematoma in vaginal surgery and underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion in individuals presenting with signs or symptoms suggestive of this diagnosis.

Radiation dose associated with CT-guided drain placement for pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: To date, there are limited radiation dose data on CT-guided procedures in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to quantify the radiation dose associated with pediatric CT-guided drain placement and follow-up drain evaluations in order to estimate effective dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the electronic medical record and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) to identify all pediatric (<18 years old) CT-guided drain placements performed between January 2008 and December 2013 at our institution. We compiled patient data and radiation dose information from CT-guided drain placements as well as pre-procedural diagnostic CTs and post-procedural follow-up fluoroscopic abscess catheter injections (sinograms). Then we converted dose-length product, fluoroscopy time and number of acquisitions to effective doses using Monte Carlo simulations and age-appropriate conversion factors based on annual quality-control testing. RESULTS: Fifty-two drainages were identified with mean patient age of 11.0 years (5 weeks to 17 years). Most children had diagnoses of appendicitis (n=23) or inflammatory bowel disease (n=11). Forty-seven patients had diagnostic CTs, with a mean effective dose of 7.3 mSv (range 1.1-25.5 mSv). Drains remained in place for an average of 16.9 days (range 0-75 days), with an average of 0.9 (0-5) sinograms per patient in follow-up. The mean effective dose for all drainages and follow-up exams was 5.3 mSv (0.7-17.1) and 62% (32/52) of the children had effective doses less than 5 mSv. CONCLUSION: The majority of pediatric patients who have undergone CT-guided drain placements at our institution have received total radiation doses on par with diagnostic ranges. This information could be useful when describing the dose of radiation to parents and providers when CT-guided drain placement is necessary.

Comparison of Type II Endoleak Embolizations: Embolization of Endoleak Nidus Only versus Embolization of Endoleak Nidus and Branch Vessels.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of type II endoleak embolization involving embolization of the endoleak nidus only vs embolization of the endoleak nidus and branch vessels in patients treated with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients (mean age, 77.9 y; range, 63-88 y) with type II endoleak who underwent embolization from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: embolization of endoleak nidus only (group A) and embolization of endoleak nidus and branch vessels (group B). Mean follow-up intervals were 20.5 months ± 14.7 in group A and 24.3 months ± 18.5 in group B. Outcomes were compared between groups by Mann-Whitney U and Pearson χ2 tests. RESULTS: Mean interval from endovascular aneurysm repair to embolization was 47.6 months ± 42.9, and mean presentation time of endoleak before embolization was 23.1 months ± 25.8. Coils (n = 28) and liquid embolic agents (n = 23) were used for embolization. There were no significant differences in rates of residual endoleak (50% vs 53.8%; P = .96) or sac decrease/stabilization (62.5% vs 61.5%; P = .64). Procedure time and radiation exposure in group B (132.3 min ± 78.1; 232.4 Gy·cm2 ± 130.7) were greater than in group A (63.4 min ± 11.9; 61.5 Gy·cm2 ± 35.5; P < .01). There were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization of the endoleak nidus and branch vessels is not superior to embolization of only the nidus in terms of occlusion of type II endoleak and change in sac size despite requiring longer procedure times and resulting in greater patient radiation exposure.

Varicocele: A Review.

Varicoceles are relatively common clinical problem that are associated with pain, testicular atrophy, and reduced fertility rates. After a brief historical perspective is presented, this article reviews the anatomy, indications, treatment options, and potential complications related to varicoceles.

Survey of current status and physician opinion regarding ancillary staffing for the IR suite.

PURPOSE: To survey the status quo of ancillary staffing in predominantly hospital-based interventional radiology (IR) suites and to assess interventional radiologist attitudes toward current IR procedure room staffing availability and appropriateness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Invitations to an online survey composed of 26 questions focused on levels of IR suite ancillary staffing as well as operators' opinions of current IR procedure room staffing were sent via email to 2,284 active Society of Interventional Radiology members. RESULTS: There were 777 survey responses. Nurse staffing count per IR room was at least one in 90% (n = 699) during regular hours and 93.6% (n = 730) during off-hours, respectively. A second technologist was frequently used during regular hours and, to a lesser extent, during on-call hours (n = 341 [43.9%] and n = 122 [15.7%]), respectively. Ten and 15% of IR respondents believe staffing support is inadequate for most interventional procedures requiring moderate sedation during normal business hours and off-hours/weekends, respectively, and 69% and 56% of IR respondents believe anesthesia support is inadequate during normal business hours and during off-hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of technologists used per IR suite varies across practices and frequently exceeds that of earlier American College of Radiology recommendations, whereas use of IR suite nurse staffing is consistent with approximately one per suite and constant. However, there is dissatisfaction among surveyed interventional radiologists with availability and appropriateness of staffing of the IR procedure room, particularly during on-call hours and weekends, as well as with anesthesia support for emergent cases. No evidence-based guidelines for staffing the IR suite currently exist. This underscores the need for further investigation with the ultimate goal of creating such guidelines.

Assessing medical students' knowledge of IR at two American medical schools.

PURPOSE: To determine if there was a difference in the level of knowledge about interventional radiology (IR) between medical students in preclinical years of training compared with medical students in clinical years of training at two medical schools and to compare awareness of IR based on the curriculum at each school: one with required radiology education and one without such a requirement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to students at two medical schools; the survey assessed knowledge of IR, knowledge of training pathways, and preferred methods to increase exposure. Responses of the preclinical and clinical groups were compared, and responses from the clinical groups at each school were compared. RESULTS: "Poor" or "fair" knowledge of IR was reported by 84% (n = 217 of 259) of preclinical students compared with 62% of clinical students (n = 110 of 177; P < .001). IR was being considered as a career by 11% of all students (15%, n = 40 of 259 preclinical; 5%, n = 9 of 177 clinical). The main reason respondents were not considering IR was "lack of knowledge" (65%, n = 136 of 210 preclinical; 20%, n = 32 of 162 clinical). Students in the clinical group at the institution with a required radiology rotation reported significantly better knowledge of IR than clinical students from the institution without a required clerkship (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in knowledge of IR between preclinical and clinical students. Required radiology education in the clinical years does increase awareness of IR.

Renal ablation update.

Thermal ablative technologies have evolved considerably in the recent past and are now an important component of current clinical guidelines for the treatment of small renal masses. Both radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation have intermediate-term oncologic control that rivals surgical options, with favorable complication profiles. Studies comparing cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation show no significant difference in oncologic control or complication profile between the two modalities. Early data from small series with microwave ablation have shown similar promising results. Newer technologies including irreversible electroporation and high-intensity-focused ultrasound have theoretical advantages, but will require further research before becoming a routine part of the ablation armamentarium. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the current ablative technologies available, briefly review their mechanisms of action, discuss technical aspects of each, and provide current data supporting their use.

Radiation protection in interventional radiology: survey results of attitudes and use.

PURPOSE: To assess attitudes of interventional radiologists toward personal radiation protection and the use of radiation protection devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Invitations to an anonymous online survey that comprised eight questions focused on operator attitudes toward radiation protection devices were sent via e-mail to the active membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR): a total of 3,158 e-mail invitations. A single reminder e-mail was sent. RESULTS: There were 504 survey responders (16% response rate). Reported radiation safety device use included lead apron (99%), thyroid shield (94%), leaded eyeglasses (54%), ceiling-suspended leaded shield (44%), rolling leaded shields (12%), ceiling-suspended/rolling lead-equivalent apron (4%), radiation-attenuating sterile surgical gloves (1%), and sterile lead-equivalent patient-mounted drape (4%). Reasons commonly cited for not using certain devices were comfort (eyewear), ease of use (mounted shields), and lack of availability (rolling/hanging shields and patient-mounted shields). CONCLUSIONS: Interventionalists have an array of tools from which to choose for personal radiation protection; however, for a variety of reasons related to lack of availability or choice, these tools are not universally employed. Further study may be of value to clarify why comfort was cited most often as the primary barrier to the use of protective eyewear and difficulty of use was cited as the primary barrier to use of mounted shields (despite reporting that concern for radiation-induced injury to the eye is paramount). It may also be of interest to further study why certain devices with demonstrable protection effects are not readily available, such as rolling/hanging and patient-mounted shields.

Central Venous Line Placement prior to Gastric Bypass Improves Operating Room Efficiency.

Background. Bariatric surgery has increased across America. Venous access is difficult in these patients. Anesthesiologists often utilize valuable operating room (OR) time acquiring reliable intravenous lines. Our objective was to determine if outpatient central venous line (CVL) placement improves OR efficiency and professional reimbursement for CVL insertion. Methods. In our bariatric practice, selected surgery patients have outpatient CVLs placed during prophylactic vena cava filter placement. In a cohort of 268 gastric bypass patients operated between 1/01 and 11/06, we compared time-to-incision between 106 with pre-established CVLs and 162 without. In addition, we determined professional compensation rates for CVLs placed outpatient versus CVLs inserted in the OR. Results. Patients with preoperative (outpatient) CVLs required 35.6 ± 12.5 minutes to skin incision compared with 42.5 ± 13.9 minutes for controls (P < 0.0001), and 34.9% had skin incision in <30 minutes compared with 16.4% of controls. Radiologists collected 28.2% of outpatient billings for CPT code 36556, compared with anesthesiologists who collected <1% when placing CVLs in the OR. Conclusions. Outpatient CVLs prior to gastric bypass improve efficiency in the OR with earlier skin incision. Professional reimbursement is better for outpatient CVLs than intraoperative inpatient CVLs.