Cycle threshold predicted mortality in a cohort of patients with hematologic malignancies infected with SARS-CoV-2 / El umbral de ciclado predijo la mortalidad en una cohorte de pacientes conneoplasias hematológicas infectados con SARS-CoV-2 / Microbiología clinica y enfermedades infecciosas

Abstract When a SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test is performed, it may determine an indirect measureof viral load called cycle threshold (Ct). Respiratory samples with Ct <25.0 cycles are consideredto contain a high viral load. We aimed to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 Ct at diagnosis couldpredict mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphomas, leukemias, multiplemyeloma) who contracted COVID-19. We included 35 adults with COVID-19 confirmed by RT-qPCR performed at diagnosis. We evaluated mortality due to COVID-19 rather than mortalitydue to the hematologic neoplasm or all-cause mortality. Twenty-seven (27) patients survivedand 8 died. The global mean Ct was 22.8 cycles with a median of 21.7. Among the survivors,the mean Ct was 24.2, and the median Ct value was 22.9 cycles. In the deceased patients, themean Ct was 18.0 and the median Ct value was 17.0 cycles. Using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test,we found a significant difference (p = 0.035). SARS-CoV-2 Ct measured in nasal swabs obtainedat diagnosis from patients with hematologic malignancies may be used to predict mortality.

Resumen Cuando se realiza una RT-qPCR para SARS-CoV-2, es posible determinar una medidaindirecta de la carga viral llamada umbral de ciclado (Ct). Las muestras respiratorias con Ct<25,0 ciclos se consideran de alta carga viral. Nos propusimos determinar si el Ct para SARS-CoV-2 al diagnóstico predice la mortalidad en pacientes con neoplasias hematológicas (linfomas,leucemias, mielomas) que contrajeron COVID-19. Incluimos 35 adultos con COVID-19 confirmadopor RT-qPCR al diagnóstico. Evaluamos la mortalidad por COVID-19, no la mortalidad por la neo-plasia hematológica o la mortalidad por cualquier causa. De los 35 pacientes, 27 sobrevivierony 8 fallecieron. El Ct global medio fue 22,8 ciclos con una mediana de 21,7 ciclos. Entre lossobrevivientes, el Ct medio fue 24,2 ciclos con una mediana de 22,9 ciclos. Entre los fallecidos,el Ct medio fue 18,0 y el Ct mediano fue 17,0 ciclos. Empleando la prueba de suma de rangosde Wilcoxon, encontramos una diferencia significative (p = 0,035). En pacientes con neoplasiashematológicas infectados con coronavirus, el Ct de SARS-CoV-2 medido en hisopados nasales almomento del diagnóstico podría ser utilizado para predecir la mortalidad.

Cycle threshold predicted mortality in a cohort of patients with hematologic malignancies infected with SARS-CoV-2.

When a SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test is performed, it may determine an indirect measure of viral load called cycle threshold (Ct). Respiratory samples with Ct <25.0 cycles are considered to contain a high viral load. We aimed to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 Ct at diagnosis could predict mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphomas, leukemias, multiple myeloma) who contracted COVID-19. We included 35 adults with COVID-19 confirmed by RT-qPCR performed at diagnosis. We evaluated mortality due to COVID-19 rather than mortality due to the hematologic neoplasm or all-cause mortality. Twenty-seven (27) patients survived and 8 died. The global mean Ct was 22.8 cycles with a median of 21.7. Among the survivors, the mean Ct was 24.2, and the median Ct value was 22.9 cycles. In the deceased patients, the mean Ct was 18.0 and the median Ct value was 17.0 cycles. Using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, we found a significant difference (p=0.035). SARS-CoV-2 Ct measured in nasal swabs obtained at diagnosis from patients with hematologic malignancies may be used to predict mortality.

RBD-specific polyclonal F(ab´)2 fragments of equine antibodies in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 disease: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 2/3 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: passive immunotherapy is a therapeutic alternative for patients with COVID-19. Equine polyclonal antibodies (EpAbs) could represent a source of scalable neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess efficacy and safety of EpAbs (INM005) in hospitalized adult patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 pneumonia in 19 hospitals of Argentina. Primary endpoint was improvement in at least two categories in WHO ordinal clinical scale at day 28 or hospital discharge (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT04494984). FINDINGS: between August 1st and October 26th, 2020, a total of 245 patients were enrolled. Enrolled patients were assigned to receive two blinded doses of INM005 (n = 118) or placebo (n = 123). Median age was 54 years old, 65•1% were male and 61% had moderate disease at baseline. Median time from symptoms onset to study treatment was 6 days (interquartile range 5 to 8). No statistically significant difference was noted between study groups on primary endpoint (risk difference [95% IC]: 5•28% [-3•95; 14•50]; p = 0•15). Rate of improvement in at least two categories was statistically significantly higher for INM005 at days 14 and 21 of follow-up. Time to improvement in two ordinal categories or hospital discharge was 14•2 (± 0•7) days in the INM005 group and 16•3 (± 0•7) days in the placebo group, hazard ratio 1•31 (95% CI 1•0 to 1•74). Subgroup analyses showed a beneficial effect of INM005 over severe patients and in those with negative baseline antibodies. Overall mortality was 6•9% the INM005 group and 11•4% in the placebo group (risk difference [95% IC]: 0•57 [0•24 to 1•37]). Adverse events of special interest were mild or moderate; no anaphylaxis was reported. INTERPRETATION: Albeit not having reached the primary endpoint, we found clinical improvement of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, particularly those with severe disease.