Right and left ventricular cardiac magnetic resonance imaging derived peak systolic strain is abnormal in children with myocarditis.

PURPOSE: Cardiac Magnetic resonance (CMR) derived left ventricular longitudinal and circumferential strain is known to be abnormal in myocarditis. CMR strain is a useful additional tool that can identify subclinical myocardial involvement and may help with longitudinal follow-up. Right ventricular strain derived by CMR in children has not been studied. We sought to evaluate CMR derived biventricular strain in children with acute myocarditis. METHODS: Children with acute myocarditis who underwent CMR between 2016-2022 at our center were reviewed, this group included subjects with COVID-19 myocarditis. Children with no evidence of myocarditis served as controls Those with congenital heart disease and technically limited images for CMR strain analysis were excluded from final analysis. Biventricular longitudinal, circumferential, and radial peak systolic strains were derived using circle cvi42®. Data between cases and controls were compared using an independent sample t-test. One-way ANOVA with post hoc analysis was used to compare COVID-19, non-COVID myocarditis and controls. RESULTS: 38 myocarditis and 14 controls met inclusion criteria (mean age 14.4 ± 3 years). All CMR derived peak strain values except for RV longitudinal strain were abnormal in myocarditis group. One-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant difference with abnormal RV and LV strain in COVID-19 myocarditis when compared to non-COVID-19 myocarditis and controls. CONCLUSION: CMR derived right and left ventricular peak systolic strain using traditionally acquired cine images were abnormal in children with acute myocarditis. All strain measurements were significantly abnormal in children with COVID-19 even when compared to non-COVID myocarditis.

Aortic Arch Reconstruction Using Nonvalved Femoral Vein Homograft in High-Risk Neonates.

Aortic arch obstruction is often present with complex concomitant congenital heart defects (CHDs). The use of nonvalved femoral vein homograft (FVH) to reconstruct the aortic arch has distinct surgical advantages, including simplified reconstruction. We present an intraoperative video of a Yasui procedure utilizing FVH for aortic reconstruction in a 12-day-old (2.2 kg) neonate with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, malalignment ventricular septal defect, aortic valve atresia, aortic arch hypoplasia, atrial septal defect, and ductal dependent systemic circulation. Further, we report outcomes for a series of three additional neonatal patients with complex CHD and aortic arch obstruction who underwent FVH arch reconstruction.

Surgical approach for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: A comparison of two techniques.

BACKGROUND: Un-roofing is the most common technique utilized for repair of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA). There are very few publications directly comparing un-roofing to another surgical technique, like reimplantation. METHODS: The prospectively collected Children's Memorial Hermann Heart Institute Society of Thoracic Surgeon's Database was retrospectively reviewed from 2007 to 2021. Surgical patients were included if they underwent un-roofing or reimplantation of the AAOCA. The primary outcomes of this study were operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Secondary outcomes included angiographic outcomes, aortic regurgitation incidence, ventricular function, and symptom relief. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2021, there were 12 patients who underwent either a reimplantation (n = 9, 73%) or un-roofing (n = 3, 27%) for an AAOCA. The hospital length of stay was a median of 1.8 days longer for reimplantation compared to un-roofing. The last follow-up echocardiogram was a median of 52.2 days later in the reimplantation group. There was one patient (11%) in the reimplantation group that had more than or equal to mild aortic regurgitation and mild systolic ventricular dysfunction. Outpatient follow-up was incomplete and there was no postoperative computed tomographic angiography in the un-roofing cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery reimplantation is a valuable alternative surgical technique to un-roofing for the repair of AAOCA. There are still some concerns with the creation of aortic regurgitation or incomplete symptom relief with any surgical technique. Longer-term follow-up and prospective studies will be needed to show an effective reduction of myocardial ischemia and risk of sudden cardiac death.