A narrative review on the consultation tools available for pharmacists in the United Kingdom: do they facilitate person-centred care?

OBJECTIVES: To identify consultation tools cited in the published literature and undertake a narrative review which establishes their scope to support the delivery of person-centred medicine-focused consultations between community pharmacists and patients in the United Kingdom (UK). KEY FINDINGS: Nine consultation tools used in a pharmacy context were identified. Four tools (Calgary-Cambridge guide, MRCF, MUR and NMS advanced services and PaCT) were selected for further appraisal. None of the tools identified provided a suitable format or sufficient guidance to address all components required for the delivery of a person-centred patient consultation in practice. SUMMARY: Tools available to UK pharmacists are inadequate for fully supporting delivery of a person-centred consultation in practice. Revision of existing tools or creation of more pharmacy-specific tools will support UK pharmacists' delivery of person-centred consultations in practice.

Engaging patients to access the community pharmacy medicine review service after discharge from hospital: a cross-sectional study in England.

Background The post-discharge Medicines-Use-Review (dMUR) is a commissioned service in England and Wales whereby community pharmacists facilitate patients' understanding of their medicines and resolve any medicine-related problems. This service is poorly utilised. Objective To explore the impact of raising hospital patients' awareness of dMURs on their uptake. Setting Hospital in South East England. Method Patients on medical wards with at least one change (medicine, or dose regimen) to their admission medicines were provided with standardized written and verbal information about the service. Participants were responsible for their own medicines and anticipated that they would be discharged home. Structured telephone interviews conducted 4 weeks after discharge explored any medicine-related issues experienced, and reasons for engaging, or not, with the dMUR service. Responses to closed questions were analysed using descriptive statistics. Responses to open questions were analysed thematically. Ethics approval was obtained. Main outcome measure Proportion of patients who received a dMUR and their motivations or barriers to accessing the service. Results Hundred patients were recruited and 84 interviewed. Their mean (SD) age was 73 (11) years. They were taking a median (range) of 9 (2-19) medicines. 67% (56/84) remembered receiving information about dMURs. Nine (11%) had attempted to make an appointment although four had not received the service because the pharmacist was unavailable. Most (88%) were not planning to access the service. The most common reason given was poor morbidity or mobility (13/31, 42%). Conclusion The use of written and verbal information to encourage patients to use the dMUR service had minimal impact.

Development of a tool to support person-centred medicine-focused consultations with stroke survivors.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a tool to support medicine-focused person-centred consultations between community pharmacists and stroke survivors. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 15 stroke survivors and 16 community pharmacists were conducted. Thematic analysis of the data was performed and emerging themes examined to determine their relevance to the principles of delivering person-centred care. Findings were used to generate a framework from which a consultation tool was created. Face validity and the feasibility of using the tool in practice were explored with participating pharmacists. RESULTS: Three major themes were identified; personal, process and environmental factors. A tool, in two parts, was developed, A 'Getting to know me' form which would help the pharmacist to appreciate the individual needs of the stroke survivor and a consultation guide to facilitate the consultation process. Pharmacists considered that both were useful and would support a person-centred medicine-focussed consultation. CONCLUSION: A consultation tool, reflecting the needs of stroke survivors, has been developed and is feasible for use within community pharmacy practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Pharmacists must recognise the individual needs of stroke survivors to ensure that they provide consultations which are truly person-centred. The tool developed could support medicine-related consultations with patients with other long term conditions.