Bioequivalence, food effect and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105, a novel granule formulation of abiraterone acetate, to Zytiga in healthy male subjects.

PURPOSE: SUVN-1105 is a novel formulation of abiraterone acetate which was developed to demonstrate improved bioavailability, compared to Zytiga and Yonsa, and to reduce the dose and eliminate the food effect. A Phase 1 study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence, food effect, and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 to Zytiga in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The study comprised of 2 segments. Segment 1 was a single-center, 4-period crossover, open-label, fixed treatment sequence, single-dose study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 (N = 12 subjects per period). Segment 2 was a single-center, open-label, single-dose, randomized, 4-period, 4-treatment, 4-sequence crossover study to evaluate bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of SUVN-1105 against Zytiga (N = 44) under overnight fasted, modified fasted, and fed conditions. RESULTS: Abiraterone exposures appeared to increase proportionately with SUVN-1105 dose (200 mg vs. 250 mg) in Segment 1. In Segment 2, abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 in the fasted or fed conditions were higher than those of Zytiga 1000 mg in the overnight fasted conditions. Abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 decreased in the fed conditions (64% and 29% decrease in Cmax and AUC, respectively) compared to overnight fasted conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The abiraterone exposures of 250 mg SUVN-1105 in the fasted or fed conditions fall within the abiraterone exposures of 1000 mg Zytiga in fasted and modified fasted conditions. Single doses of SUVN-1105 were safe and well-tolerated in healthy males both in the fasted and fed conditions.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ropanicant (SUVN-911), a Novel Alpha4 Beta2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (α4ß2 nAChR) Antagonist, in Healthy Adult and Elderly Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ropanicant hydrochloride (previously known as SUVN-911, hereinafter referred to as ropanicant) is a novel alpha4 beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α4ß2 nAchR) antagonist being developed for the treatment of major depressive disorder. The objectives of the present studies were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ropanicant after single and multiple ascending doses and to evaluate the effect of food, sex, and age on its pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. METHODS: Two phase I studies have been conducted for ropanicant. Study 1 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-human study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single ascending doses (0.5, 6, 15, 30, and 60 mg) and multiple ascending doses (15, 30, and 45 mg) of ropanicant administered orally for 14 days to healthy male subjects. In Study 2, the effect of food, sex, and age on ropanicant pharmacokinetics was evaluated following a single 30-mg oral dose. RESULTS: Ropanicant at single doses up to 60 mg and multiple doses up to 45 mg once daily was found to be safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache and nausea. Ropanicant exposures were more than dose proportional following single and multiple administrations. Urinary excretion of unchanged ropanicant was low across the doses. Upon multiple dosing, 1.5- to 2.5-fold higher exposures for maximum concentration and 1.6- to 4.0-fold higher exposures for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0-24 h were observed on day 14 as compared with day 1. Sex had an effect on the pharmacokinetics of ropanicant as a 64% higher area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h and a 26% higher maximum concentration was observed in female adults when compared with male adults. Plasma exposures were comparable in fasted versus fed conditions and in adult versus elderly subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Ropanicant was found to be safe and well tolerated following single and multiple oral administrations in healthy subjects. Ropanicant showed nonlinear pharmacokinetics and accumulation following multiple dosing. Urinary excretion represents an insignificant elimination pathway for ropanicant. Ropanicant pharmacokinetics were sex dependent, and food and age had no effect on its pharmacokinetics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03155503 and NCT03551288.

Effect of masupirdine (SUVN-502) on cognition in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, phase 2, proof-of-concept study.

Introduction: This study explored the efficacy and safety of a serotonin-6 receptor antagonist, masupirdine, as adjunct treatment in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) concomitantly treated with donepezil and memantine. Methods: The effects of masupirdine were evaluated in patients with moderate AD dementia on background treatment with donepezil and memantine. Five hundred thirty-seven patients were expected to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, using permuted blocked randomization. After a 2- to 4-week screening period, the study consisted of a 26-week double-blind treatment period, and a 4-week washout period. The primary efficacy measure was the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog 11). Secondary efficacy measures were Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes, Mini-Mental State Examination, 23-item Alzheimer's Disease Co-operative Study Activities of Daily Living, and 12-item Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Changes from baseline were analyzed using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). A total of 564 patients were randomized to receive either daily masupirdine 50 mg (190 patients), masupirdine 100 mg (185 patients), or placebo (189 patients). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02580305). Results: The MMRM results showed statistically non-significant treatment differences in change from baseline in ADAS-Cog 11 scores at week 26, comparing each masupirdine dose arm to the placebo arm. No significant treatment effects were observed in the secondary evaluations. Discussion: Masupirdine was generally safe and well tolerated. Possible reasons for the observed trial results are discussed. Highlights: Masupirdine was evaluated in moderate Alzheimer's disease patients.First trial in class with background treatment of donepezil and memantine.Masupirdine was generally safe and well tolerated.Possible reasons for the observed trial results are discussed.