Economic evaluations of interventions aimed at the prevention, treatment and/or rehabilitation of alcohol-related disorders: A systematic review. / Evaluaciones económicas de intervenciones dirigidas a la prevención, tratamiento y/o rehabilitación de trastornos por consumo de alcohol: Una revisión sistemática.

The aim of this systematic literature review is to identify economic evaluations of programmes or interventions aimed at the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of alcohol use disorders, as well as to determine those types of programmes, treatments or interventions that are efficient. The systematic literature review was conducted by searching the following databases: National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), MEDLINE Ovid and PubMed. The search terms used were in English. No time restriction was applied. A data extraction form was used to draw information. The systematic review follows the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) on reporting systematic reviews. The interventions were classified into three categories: "A" treatments for people with alcohol use disorders (tertiary prevention); "B" treatments for people at risk for alcohol-related problems (secondary prevention); "C" policy legislation and enforcement interventions (primary prevention). Furthermore, the "A" interventions were subclassified into psychological, pharmacological and combined interventions. The review included 63 papers. In terms of treatments for people with alcohol use disorders, any psychosocial intervention compared to no intervention appeared to be a dominant strategy. In terms of treatments for people at risk of alcohol-related problems, brief intervention appears to be dominant or cost-effective when compared to no intervention. Advertising controls, tax increases, licensing, legal drinking age, and mass media campaigns seem to be dominant or cost-effective strategies compared to no intervention or random breath testing. Previous reviews have been extended by depicting alcohol programmes according to their efficiency. Despite this, the available studies in this regard have heterogeneous approaches and most do not adequately define the costs included in their analyses. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage the evaluation of the efficiency of these types of interventions to aid decision-making in public health.

El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática de la literatura es identificar evaluaciones económicas de programas o intervenciones dirigidas a la prevención, tratamiento y rehabilitación de trastornos por consumo de alcohol, así como determinar aquellos tipos de programas, tratamientos o intervenciones que son eficientes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura mediante la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), MEDLINE Ovid and PubMed. Los términos de búsqueda utilizados fueron en inglés. No se aplicó ninguna restricción de tiempo. Se utilizó un formulario de extracción de datos para resumir la información. La revisión sistemática siguió las recomendaciones (PRISMA-P) sobre la presentación de informes de revisiones sistemáticas. Las intervenciones fueron clasificadas en tres categorías: «A¼ tratamientos para personas con trastornos por consumo de alcohol (prevención terciaria); «B¼ tratamientos para personas en riesgo de problemas relacionados con el alcohol (prevención secundaria); «C¼ legislación sobre políticas e intervenciones de aplicación (prevención terciaria). Además, las intervenciones «A¼ fueron subclasificadas en intervenciones psicológicas, farmacológicas y combinadas. Se incluyeron 63 documentos. En términos de tratamientos para personas con trastornos por uso de alcohol, cualquier intervención psicosocial en comparación con ninguna intervención parece ser una estrategia dominante. En términos de tratamientos para personas en riesgo de problemas relacionados con el alcohol, la intervención breve parece ser dominante o rentable en comparación con no hacer nada. Los controles publicitarios, las subidas de impuestos, las licencias, la edad legal para consumir alcohol y las campañas en los medios de comunicación parecen ser una estrategia dominante o rentable en comparación con ninguna intervención o prueba aleatoria de alcoholemia. Se han ampliado las revisiones anteriores al mostrar los programas de alcohol según criterios de eficiencia. A pesar de ello, los estudios disponibles al respecto tienen enfoques heterogéneos y la mayoría no define adecuadamente los costes incluidos en su análisis. Por tanto, es necesario continuar evaluando en términos de eficiencia este tipo de intervenciones para informar mejor la toma de decisiones en salud pública.

Evaluaciones económicas de intervenciones dirigidas a la prevención, tratamiento y/o rehabilitación de trastornos por consumo de alcohol: Una revisión sistemática / Economic evaluations of interventions aimed at the prevention, treatment and/or rehabilitation of alcohol-related disorders: A systematic review

El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática de la literatura es identificar evaluaciones económicas de programas o intervenciones dirigidas a la prevención, tratamiento y rehabilitación de trastornos por consumo de alcohol, así como determinar aquellos tipos de programas, tratamientos o intervenciones que son eficientes. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura mediante la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), MEDLINE Ovid and PubMed. Los términos de búsqueda utilizados fueron en inglés. No se aplicó ninguna restricción de tiempo. Se utilizó un formulario de extracción de datos para resumir la información. La revisión sistemática siguió las recomendaciones (PRISMA-P) sobre la presentación de informes de revisiones sistemáticas. Las intervenciones fueron clasificadas en tres categorías: «A» tratamientos para personas con trastornos por consumo de alcohol (prevención terciaria); «B» tratamientos para personas en riesgo de problemas relacionados con el alcohol (prevención secundaria); «C» legislación sobre políticas e intervenciones de aplicación (prevención terciaria). Además, las intervenciones «A» fueron subclasificadas en intervenciones psicológicas, farmacológicas y combinadas. Se incluyeron 63 documentos. En términos de tratamientos para personas con trastornos por uso de alcohol, cualquier intervención psicosocial en comparación con ninguna intervención parece ser una estrategia dominante. En términos de tratamientos para personas en riesgo de problemas relacionados con el alcohol, la intervención breve parece ser dominante o rentable en comparación con no hacer nada. Los controles publicitarios, las subidas de impuestos, las licencias, la edad legal para consumir alcohol y las campañas en los medios de comunicación parecen ser una estrategia dominante o rentable en comparación con ninguna intervención o prueba aleatoria de alcoholemia. ... (AU)

The aim of this systematic literature review is to identify economic evaluations of programmes or interventions aimed at the prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of alcohol use disorders, as well as to determine those types of programmes, treatments or interventions that are efficient. The systematic literature review was conducted by searching the following databases: National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), MEDLINE Ovid and PubMed. The search terms used were in English. No time restriction was applied. A data extraction form was used to draw information. The systematic review follows the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) on reporting systematic reviews. The interventions were classified into three categories: “A” treatments for people with alcohol use disorders (tertiary prevention); “B” treatments for people at risk for alcohol-related problems (secondary prevention); “C” policy legislation and enforcement interventions (primary prevention). Furthermore, the “A” interventions were subclassified into psychological, pharmacological and combined interventions. The review included 63 papers. In terms of treatments for people with alcohol use disorders, any psychosocial intervention compared to no intervention appeared to be a dominant strategy. In terms of treatments for people at risk of alcohol-related problems, brief intervention appears to be dominant or cost-effective when compared to no intervention. Advertising controls, tax increases, licensing, legal drinking age, and mass media campaigns seem to be dominant or cost-effective strategies compared to no intervention or random breath testing. Previous reviews have been extended by depicting alcohol programmes according to their efficiency. ... (AU)

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Incidence and Epidemiology of Catheter-Related Bacteremia, Spain.

We compared hospital-acquired catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) episodes diagnosed at acute care hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 with those detected during 2007-2019. We compared the annual observed and predicted CRB rates by using the negative binomial regression model and calculated stratified annual root mean squared errors. A total of 10,030 episodes were diagnosed during 2007-2020. During 2020, the observed CRB incidence rate was 0.29/103 patient-days, whereas the predicted CRB rate was 0.14/103 patient-days. The root mean squared error was 0.153. Thus, a substantial increase in hospital-acquired CRB cases was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared with the rate predicted from 2007-2019. The incidence rate was expected to increase by 1.07 (95% CI 1-1.15) for every 1,000 COVID-19-related hospital admissions. We recommend maintaining all CRB prevention efforts regardless of the coexistence of other challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Trends in the epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infections; towards a paradigm shift, Spain, 2007 to 2019.

BackgroundCatheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are frequent healthcare-associated infections and an important cause of death.AimTo analyse changes in CRBSI epidemiology observed by the Infection Control Catalan Programme (VINCat).MethodsA cohort study including all hospital-acquired CRBSI episodes diagnosed at 55 hospitals (2007-2019) in Catalonia, Spain, was prospectively conducted. CRBSI incidence rates were adjusted per 1,000 patient days. To assess the CRBSI rate trend per year, negative binomial models were used, with the number of events as the dependent variable, and the year as the main independent variable. From each model, the annual rate of CRBSI diagnosed per 1,000 patient days and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported.ResultsDuring the study, 9,290 CRBSI episodes were diagnosed (mean annual incidence rate: 0.20 episodes/1,000 patient days). Patients' median age was 64.1 years; 36.6% (3,403/9,290) were female. In total, 73.7% (n = 6,845) of CRBSI occurred in non-intensive care unit (ICU) wards, 62.7% (n = 5,822) were related to central venous catheter (CVC), 24.1% (n = 2,236) to peripheral venous catheters (PVC) and 13.3% (n = 1,232) to peripherally-inserted central venous catheters (PICVC). Incidence rate fell over the study period (IRR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.93-0.96), especially in the ICU (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87-0.89). As a whole, while episodes of CVC CRBSI fell significantly (IRR: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.87-0.91), peripherally-inserted catheter CRBSI (PVC and PICVC) rose, especially in medical wards (IRR PICVC: 1.08; 95%CI: 1.05-1.11; IRR PVC: 1.03; 95% 1.00-1.05).ConclusionsOver the study, CRBSIs associated with CVC and diagnosed in ICUs decreased while episodes in conventional wards involving peripherally-inserted catheters increased. Hospitals should implement preventive measures in conventional wards.