Investigating the Bioavailability and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Release of Two Different Strengths of Somapacitan: A Randomised, Double-Blind Crossover Trial.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE: Randomised, double-blind, crossover trial to confirm bioequivalence of somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone (GH), in 5 mg/1.5 mL and 10 mg/1.5 mL strengths in equimolar doses. METHODS: Healthy participants were randomised (1:1:1) to subcutaneous somapacitan treatment in one dosing period with 5 mg/1.5 mL and two periods with 10 mg/1.5 mL. Eligibility criteria included age 18-45 years and body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria included history of GH deficiency, previous GH treatment, weight > 100.0 kg and participation in any clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product within 45 days or five times the half-life of the previous investigational product before screening. Area under the curve from time 0 until last quantifiable observation (AUC0-t), maximum serum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax and terminal half-life of somapacitan and safety were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 33 participants were randomised. For AUC0-t, estimated treatment ratio (ETR) (5 mg/1.5 mL versus 10 mg/1.5 mL) was 0.95 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.01). Point estimate and 90% CIs were within the acceptance range (0.80-1.25). For Cmax, ETR was 0.77 (90% CI 0.68-0.89). Point estimate and 90% CIs were outside the acceptance range (0.80-1.25). Mean insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-I standard deviation score concentration-time curves for each strength were almost identical. No new safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Bioequivalence criterion for somapacitan 5 mg/1.5 mL and 10 mg/1.5 mL was met for AUC0-t but not for Cmax. The two strengths had equivalent IGF-I responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03905850 (3 April 2019).

Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone used to treat people with growth hormone deficiency. Somapacitan is injected under the skin with an injection pen. The dose is based on a person's body weight and how they respond to treatment. We compared two strengths of injection pen, containing either 5 or 10 mg of somapacitan per 1.5 mL. For both strengths, participants were given the same dose. We wanted to understand whether the body absorbs these different strengths into the bloodstream in the same way. We also measured levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), a hormone formed when growth hormone is present in the blood, to see the effect of different strengths of somapacitan on the body. In our study, 33 healthy adults received one round of injection using the somapacitan 5 mg pen and two rounds using the somapacitan 10 mg pen, all at least 3 weeks apart. We found no differences in the amount of somapacitan being absorbed into the bloodstream, nor how fast it was absorbed. The peak amount of somapacitan in the bloodstream was higher in people using the 10 mg pen. There were no differences in IGF-I levels following use of either injection pen. Overall, our results show both strengths of somapacitan lead to similar responses in the body. Having different strength options could allow doctors to adjust the dose of somapacitan more easily, depending on a patient's response to treatment.

Effect of Kidney or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Somapacitan: Two Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative being developed for once-weekly dosing in patients with GH deficiency (GHD). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of kidney or hepatic impairment on somapacitan exposure in adults. METHODS: In two open-label, parallel-group, single-center, 6-week trials, eligible subjects (18-75 years of age, body mass index 18.5-34.9 kg/m2, GH-naïve, without GHD) were divided into five kidney (total n = 44) or three hepatic (n = 34) function groups. Subjects with normal kidney/hepatic function were matched to those with kidney/hepatic impairment by age, sex, and body weight. Subjects received three subcutaneous somapacitan administrations (0.08 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, and 15. Blood samples were collected before each dose, at 28 time points throughout 2 weeks after the last dose, and at follow-up (3-4 weeks after the last dose). The primary endpoint was area under the somapacitan serum concentration-time curve up to 1 week after the last dose (AUC0-168 h), while secondary endpoints included AUC0-168 h of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I. RESULTS: In the kidney impairment trial, somapacitan AUC0-168 h was higher in groups with severe kidney impairment and requiring hemodialysis versus the normal kidney function group (estimated ratio and 90% confidence interval 1.75 [1.00-3.06] and 1.63 [1.01-2.61], respectively). AUC0-168 h of IGF-I was increased in the moderate impairment group (1.35 [1.09-1.66]), severe impairment group (1.40 [1.10-1.78]), and requiring hemodialysis group (1.24 [1.01-1.52]), compared with the normal function group. In the hepatic impairment trial, somapacitan AUC0-168 h was significantly higher in the moderate impairment group compared with the normal hepatic function group (4.69 [2.92-7.52]). IGF-I AUC0-168 h was lower in both hepatic impairment groups (0.85 [0.67-1.08] for the mild impairment group and 0.75 [0.60-0.95] for the moderate impairment group) compared with the normal function group. No new safety or tolerability issues were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, somapacitan exposure increased with level of kidney/hepatic impairment. Clinically, this will be taken into account when treating adults with GHD with somapacitan, as doses should be individually titrated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03186495 (kidney impairment trial, registered 12 June 2017); NCT03212131 (hepatic impairment trial, registered 30 June 2017).

Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone molecule for patients with growth hormone deficiency. After its administration as a subcutaneous injection, the action of somapacitan can be affected by kidney or liver disease. Thus, we conducted two trials in which the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of somapacitan were compared between adult subjects with different degrees of worsened kidney or liver function and their healthy counterparts. We found that subjects with severely impaired kidney function and those requiring hemodialysis had a higher somapacitan exposure in blood serum compared with subjects with normal kidney function. The concentration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, an effector molecule of growth hormone, was also increased with decreased kidney function. In subjects with moderate hepatic function impairment, somapacitan exposure was also higher than those with normal hepatic function; however, the IGF-I concentrations were lower, both at baseline and after dosing with somapacitan. Our results indicate that patients with growth hormone deficiency and kidney or liver disease may need different doses of somapacitan than people with healthy kidneys and/or liver. However, this will be taken into account because somapacitan doses will be individually titrated for each patient with growth hormone deficiency.

The sorting protein PACS-2 promotes ErbB signalling by regulating recycling of the metalloproteinase ADAM17.

The metalloproteinase ADAM17 activates ErbB signalling by releasing ligands from the cell surface, a key step underlying epithelial development, growth and tumour progression. However, mechanisms acutely controlling ADAM17 cell-surface availability to modulate the extent of ErbB ligand release are poorly understood. Here, through a functional genome-wide siRNA screen, we identify the sorting protein PACS-2 as a regulator of ADAM17 trafficking and ErbB signalling. PACS-2 loss reduces ADAM17 cell-surface levels and ADAM17-dependent ErbB ligand shedding, without apparent effects on related proteases. PACS-2 co-localizes with ADAM17 on early endosomes and PACS-2 knockdown decreases the recycling and stability of internalized ADAM17. Hence, PACS-2 sustains ADAM17 cell-surface activity by diverting ADAM17 away from degradative pathways. Interestingly, Pacs2-deficient mice display significantly reduced levels of phosphorylated EGFR and intestinal proliferation. We suggest that this mechanism controlling ADAM17 cell-surface availability and EGFR signalling may play a role in intestinal homeostasis, with potential implications for cancer biology.

Bimodal ex vivo expansion of T cells from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prerequisite for adoptive cell transfer.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has proven effective in metastatic melanoma and should therefore be explored in other types of cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of potentially expanding clinically relevant quantities of tumor-specific T-cell cultures from TIL from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using a more rapid expansion procedure compared with previous HNSCC studies. METHODS: In a two-step expansion process, initially TIL bulk cultures were established from primary and recurrent HNSCC tumors in high-dose interleukin (IL)-2. Secondly, selected bulk cultures were rapidly expanded using anti-CD3 antibody, feeder cells and high-dose IL-2. T-cell subsets were phenotypically characterized using flow cytometry. T-cell receptor (TCR) clonotype mapping was applied to examine clonotype dynamics during culture. Interferon (INF)-γ detection by Elispot and Cr(51) release assay determined the specificity and functional capacity of selected TIL pre- and post-rapid expansion. RESULTS: TIL bulk cultures were expanded in 80% of the patients included, showing tumor specificity in 60% of the patients. Rapid expansions generated up to 3500-fold expansion of selected TIL cultures within 17 days. The cultures mainly consisted of T-effector memory cells, with varying distributions of CD8(+) and CD4(+) subtypes both among cultures and patients. TCR clonotype mapping demonstrated oligoclonal expanded cultures, ranging from approximately 10 to 30 T-cell clonotypes. TIL from large-scale rapid expansions maintained functional capacity, and contained tumor-specific T cells. CONCLUSION: The procedure is feasible for expansion of TIL from HNSCC, ensuring clinically relevant expansion folds within 7 weeks. The cell culture kinetics and phenotypes of the TIL resemble previously published results on TIL from melanoma, setting the stage for clinical testing of this promising treatment strategy for patients with HNSCC.

Missense polymorphisms in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and risk of breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are key tumor suppressors with a role in cellular DNA repair, genomic stability, and checkpoint control. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 often cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; however, missense polymorphisms in these genes pose a problem in genetic counseling, as their impact on risk of breast and ovarian cancer is unclear. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We resequenced BRCA1 and BRCA2 in 194 women with a familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer and identified nine possibly biologically relevant polymorphisms (BRCA1 Gln356Arg, Pro871Leu, Glu1038Gly, Ser1613Gly, and Met1652Ile. BRCA2 Asn289His, Asn372His, Asp1420Tyr, and Thr1915Met). [corrected] We evaluated risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer by these polymorphisms in a prospective study of 5,743 women from the general population followed for 39 years and in a case-control study of 1,201 breast cancer cases and 4,120 controls. RESULTS: We found no association between heterozygosity or homozygosity for any of the nine polymorphisms and risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer in either study. We had 80% power to exclude hazard/odds ratios for heterozygotes and/or homozygotes for all nine missense polymorphisms above 1.3 to 3.3 in the prospective study, and above 1.2 to 3.2 in the case-control study. CONCLUSIONS: Heterozygosity and homozygosity of any of the examined nine BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense polymorphisms cannot explain the increased risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer observed in families with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. Therefore, genetic counseling of such families safely can disregard findings of these missense polymorphisms.

Risk of cancer by ATM missense mutations in the general population.

PURPOSE: Truncating and missense mutations in the ATM gene, which cause insufficient DNA damage surveillance, allow damaged cells to proceed into mitosis, which eventually results in increased cancer susceptibility. We tested the hypotheses that ATM Ser49Cys and ATM Ser707Pro heterozygosity increase the risk of cancer overall, of breast cancer, and of 26 other cancer subtypes in the general population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We genotyped 10,324 individuals from the Danish general population who were observed prospectively for 36 years, during which 2,056 developed cancer. RESULTS: Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for ATM Ser49Cys heterozygotes versus noncarriers were 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.5) for cancer overall, 0.8 (95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0) for breast cancer, 4.8 (95% CI, 2.2 to 11) for melanoma, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1 to 5.0) for prostate cancer, and 3.4 (95% CI, 1.1 to 11) for cancer of the oral cavity/pharynx. Multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for ATM Ser707Pro heterozygotes versus noncarriers were 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.2) for cancer overall, 0.6 (95% CI, 0.2 to 1.6) for breast cancer, 10 (95% CI, 1.1 to 93) for thyroid/other endocrine tumors, and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.0 to 7.6) for cancer of corpus uteri. CONCLUSION: ATM missense mutations do not increase the risk of cancer overall or of breast cancer in the general population; however, we observed in exploratory analyses that ATM missense mutations may be associated with an increased risk of other cancer subtypes. As we did multiple comparisons, some of these findings could represent chance findings rather than real phenomena.