Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 25(5): 575-584, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29069156

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tooth whitening represents perhaps the most common aesthetic procedure in dentistry worldwide. The efficacy of bleaching depends on three aspects: bleaching agent, bleaching method, and tooth color. OBJECTIVE: This in vivo study aimed to examine whitening effects on frontal teeth of the upper and lower jaws using an over-the-counter (OTC) non-hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent in comparison to a placebo after one single use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty subjects (25 female; 15 male) participated in this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. The subjects were randomly allocated to two groups (n=20). The test group received the OTC product (iWhite Instant) and the placebo group received an identically composed product except for the active agents. Each subject was treated with a prefilled tray containing iWhite Instant or the placebo for 20 minutes. The tooth shade of the front teeth (upper and lower jaws) was assessed before (E_0), immediately after (E_1) and 24 h after treatment (E_2), using a shade guide (VITA classical). Statistical testing was accomplished using the Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.001). The dropout rate was 0%. RESULTS: There were no significant differences at E_0 between placebo and test groups regarding the tooth color. Differences in tooth color changes immediately after (ΔE1_0) and 24 h after treatment (ΔE2_0) were calculated for both groups. The mean values (standard deviations) of tooth color changes for ΔE1_0 were 2.26 (0.92) in the test group and 0.01 (0.21) in the placebo group. The color changes for ΔE2_0 showed mean values of 2.15 (1.10) in the test group and 0.07 (0.35) in the placebo group. For ΔE1_0 and ΔE2_0 significant differences were found between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this short-term study, the results showed that a non-hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent has significant whitening effects immediately and 24 h after a single-use treatment.


Subject(s)
Calcium Compounds/therapeutic use , Caproates/therapeutic use , Gluconates/therapeutic use , Lactates/therapeutic use , Phthalimides/therapeutic use , Tooth Bleaching Agents/therapeutic use , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Colorimetry , Dentin Sensitivity/chemically induced , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Observer Variation , Placebo Effect , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J. appl. oral sci ; 25(5): 575-584, Sept.-Oct. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO - Dentistry | ID: biblio-893651

ABSTRACT

Abstract Tooth whitening represents perhaps the most common aesthetic procedure in dentistry worldwide. The efficacy of bleaching depends on three aspects: bleaching agent, bleaching method, and tooth color. Objective: This in vivo study aimed to examine whitening effects on frontal teeth of the upper and lower jaws using an over-the-counter (OTC) non-hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent in comparison to a placebo after one single use. Material and methods: Forty subjects (25 female; 15 male) participated in this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. The subjects were randomly allocated to two groups (n=20). The test group received the OTC product (iWhite Instant) and the placebo group received an identically composed product except for the active agents. Each subject was treated with a prefilled tray containing iWhite Instant or the placebo for 20 minutes. The tooth shade of the front teeth (upper and lower jaws) was assessed before (E_0), immediately after (E_1) and 24 h after treatment (E_2), using a shade guide (VITA classical). Statistical testing was accomplished using the Mann-Whitney U test (p<0.001). The dropout rate was 0%. Results: There were no significant differences at E_0 between placebo and test groups regarding the tooth color. Differences in tooth color changes immediately after (ΔE1_0) and 24 h after treatment (ΔE2_0) were calculated for both groups. The mean values (standard deviations) of tooth color changes for ΔE1_0 were 2.26 (0.92) in the test group and 0.01 (0.21) in the placebo group. The color changes for ΔE2_0 showed mean values of 2.15 (1.10) in the test group and 0.07 (0.35) in the placebo group. For ΔE1_0 and ΔE2_0 significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusion: In this short-term study, the results showed that a non-hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent has significant whitening effects immediately and 24 h after a single-use treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Phthalimides/therapeutic use , Tooth Bleaching/methods , Caproates/therapeutic use , Calcium Compounds/therapeutic use , Tooth Bleaching Agents/therapeutic use , Gluconates/therapeutic use , Lactates/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Observer Variation , Placebo Effect , Double-Blind Method , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Colorimetry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Dentin Sensitivity/chemically induced , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use
3.
PLoS One ; 11(4): e0153250, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27070901

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of manual toothbrushes with different bristle stiffness on the abrasivity on eroded and sound human dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dentin specimens were made from impacted third molars and attributed to three groups: erosion-abrasion (EA), abrasion (A) and erosion (E). The specimens from EA and E were treated with 1% citric acid (pH 2.3) for 1 min rinsed, and neutralized with artificial saliva for 15 min. This cycle was repeated five times. Thereafter, specimens from EA and A were treated with three toothbrushes types with different bristle stiffness (soft, medium, and hard) in a custom-made toothbrushing machine. The brushing was performed at a load of 3 N with a toothpaste slurry for 630 s. This procedure was repeated five times, in group EA after each erosion cycle. EA and A groups passed through five cycles with a total of 6300 strokes. The abrasivity was analyzed by contact-free profilometry. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: With respect to bristle stiffness there was no statistically significant difference in dentin loss within the EA group. In group A, a statistically significantly higher dentin loss was found for the soft in comparison to the hard bristles. No statistically significant differences were measured between soft/medium and medium/hard toothbrushes. The amount of dentin loss from specimens in the EA group was significantly higher than in the A group. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the dentin loss in the Abrasion group was higher with soft bristles than with hard ones. This result might have an influence on the toothbrush recommendations for patients with non-carious cervical lesions.


Subject(s)
Dentin/injuries , Tooth Abrasion/etiology , Tooth Abrasion/pathology , Tooth Erosion/etiology , Tooth Erosion/pathology , Toothbrushing/adverse effects , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Dentin/pathology , Hardness , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Materials Testing , Molar, Third/injuries , Molar, Third/pathology , Saliva, Artificial , Surface Properties , Toothpastes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL