ABSTRACT
Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) present a significant health concern, affecting a substantial portion of the older adult population worldwide. This narrative review explores the prevalence, diagnostic challenges and management strategies for OVCFs. Despite the increasing incidence and impact on morbidity and mortality, existing clinical guidelines lack consistency and clear diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. The review addresses key questions faced by physicians dealing with older adult patients experiencing acute back pain, offering insights into triage, radiological assessments and classification systems. We propose a comprehensive algorithm for clearing OVCF, considering clinical presentation, radiological findings and morphological aspects. Emphasis is placed on the importance of medically treating osteoporosis alongside OVCF management. The review encompasses relevant literature from 1993 to 2023, provides a detailed discussion on triage issues and incorporates a clinically oriented classification system developed by the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma. The Material and Methods section outlines the extensive literature search carried out in PUBMED, encompassing clinical and experimental studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The articles retained focused mainly on answering critical questions regarding radiological assessments, imaging modalities and the presence of a specific classification system for OVCFs. The review emphasises that the evaluation and management of OVCFs necessitates a multidisciplinary approach involving spine specialists and bone disease experts. It also addresses the role of conservative versus surgical treatments, with a focus on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. The conclusion summarises the algorithm derived for use in emergency departments and general practice, aiming to streamline OVCF management, reduce unnecessary examinations and ensure optimal patient care. The algorithm recommends primary diagnosis using computed tomography, with magnetic resonance imaging reserved for specific cases. The review advocates a holistic approach, integrating medical and surgical interventions to address the complex challenges posed by OVCFs in ageing populations.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This article evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MRI-guided lumbar or sacral nerve root infiltration for chronic back pain. We compared the outcomes of our MRI-guided infiltrations with data from CT-guided infiltrations reported in the literature and explored the potential advantages of MRI guidance. METHOD: Forty-eight MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed using a 3 T MRI machine. The optimal needle path was determined using breathhold T2-weighted sequences, and the needle was advanced under interleaved guidance based on breathhold PD-weighted images. Pain levels were assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) before the procedure and up to 5 months after, during follow-up. Procedure success was evaluated by comparing patients' pain levels before and after the infiltration. RESULTS: The MRI-guided infiltrations yielded pain reduction 1 week after the infiltration in 92% of cases, with an average NRS substantial change of 3.9 points. Pain reduction persisted after 5 months for 51% of procedures. No procedure-related complications occurred. The use of a 22G needle and reconstructed subtraction images from T2 FatSat sequences improved the workflow. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that MRI-guided nerve root infiltration is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for chronic back pain. Precise positioning of the needle tip and accurate distribution of the injected solution contributed to the effectiveness of MRI-guided infiltration, which appeared to be as accurate as CT-guided procedures. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of metal artifact reduction sequences to optimize chronic back pain management.
Subject(s)
Lumbosacral Region , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Spinal Nerve Roots , Back Pain , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Several reconstructive approaches have been described for reconstruction after sacral chordomas, classically myocutaneous flaps. Recently, postural muscle preservation techniques are preferred whenever possible. We present the case of a 70-year-old man who underwent en-bloc resection of a sacral chordoma resulting in a large three-dimensional defect. To reconstruct the pelvic floor, an acellular dermal matrix and a double pedicled muscle gracilis flap were used to avoid herniation of the abdominal cavity organs. The overlying soft tissue defect was reconstructed with a unilateral gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flap partially deepithelialized. No surgical complications were observed. Aesthetic and functional outcomes were both satisfying at 9-months postoperative follow-up. The ambulatory functions were not compromised. This combined flap reconstruction associated with a dermal matrix offers a reliable and effective option for sacral reconstruction while minimizing the morbidity.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Sacral chordoma is a rare primary bone neoplasm associated with high morbidity. The aim of this study is to identify demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of this tumor and evaluate their impact on survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database collecting data between 2000 and 2018 was searched for all cases of sacral chordoma. We analyzed demographic aspects, cancer stage and treatment patterns. Overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-two patients were identified with a mean age of 62.7 years. Most tumors presented regional invasion at diagnosis (43.2%). Mean overall survival was 124.7 months. No significant difference in terms of overall survival was found between surgery alone and surgery associated with radiotherapy. Both options provided a significantly increased survival than radiotherapy alone. Age of less than 50 years or between 50 and 69 correlated significantly with improved survival. CONCLUSION: Age and stage at diagnosis impact significantly survival outcomes. Surgery remains the mainstay treatment with the highest overall survival. Its association with radiotherapy is currently questionable and needs further research.
Subject(s)
Chordoma/epidemiology , Spinal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Chordoma/mortality , Chordoma/pathology , Chordoma/therapy , Cordotomy/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , SEER Program , Spinal Neoplasms/mortality , Spinal Neoplasms/pathology , Spinal Neoplasms/therapy , Survival Analysis , Switzerland/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of sagittal plane hip mobility is usually performed using the Modified Thomas Test (for extension) and the Straight-Leg-Raise (for flexion) with a goniometer. These tests have limited reliability, however. An active swinging leg movement test (the SWING test), assessed using 3D motion analysis, could provide an alternative to these passive clinical tests. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the SWING test a more reliable alternative to evaluate hip mobility, in comparison to the clinical extension and flexion tests? METHODS: Ten asymptomatic adult participants were evaluated by two investigators over three sessions. Participants performed 10 maximal hip extensions and flexions, with both legs straight and no trunk movement (the SWING test). Hip kinematics was assessed using a 3D motion analysis system. Maximal and minimal hip angles were calculated for each swing and represented maximal hip flexion (SWING flexion) and extension (SWING extension), respectively. The Modified Thomas Test and Straight-Leg-Raise were repeated 3 times for each leg. On the first day, both investigators performed all the tests (SWING + Modified Thomas Test + Straight-Leg-Raise). A week later, a single investigator repeated all the tests. Inter-rater, intra-rater, within-day and between-day reliability were evaluated using intra-class correlation. RESULTS: Intra-class correlation coefficients for all the tests were superior to 0.8, except for the Modified Thomas Test's intra-rater, between-day (intra-class correlation 0.673) and the Straight-Leg-Raise's inter-rater, within-day (intra-class correlation 0.294). The SWING test always showed a higher intra-class correlation coefficient than the passive clinical tests. The only significant correlation found was for the Straight-Leg-Raise and SWING flexion (r = 0.48; P < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: The SWING test seems to be an alternative to existing passive clinical tests, offering better reliability for assessing sagittal plane hip mobility.
Subject(s)
Hip Joint , Leg , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Range of Motion, Articular , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For the treatment of radicular pain, nerve root infiltrations can be performed under MRI guidance in select, typically younger, patients where repeated CT exams are not desirable due to associated radiation risk, or potential allergic reactions to iodinated contrast medium. METHODS: Fifteen 3 T MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed in 12 patients with a dedicated surface coil combined with the standard spine coil, using a breathhold PD sequence. The needle artifact on the MR images and the distance between the needle tip and the infiltrated nerve root were measured. RESULTS: The distance between the needle tip and the nerve root was 2.1 ± 1.4 mm. The visual artifact width, perpendicular to the needle long axis, was 2.1 ± 0.7 mm. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: This technical note describes the optimization of the procedure in a 3 T magnetic field, including reported procedure time and an assessment of targeting precision.
Subject(s)
Injections, Spinal/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Radiculopathy/drug therapy , Spinal Nerve Roots/diagnostic imaging , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Female , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae/innervation , Male , Middle Aged , Ropivacaine/administration & dosage , Sciatic Nerve/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
No definite consensus exists for the clearance of the cervical spine (C-spine) after blunt trauma, despite many validated algorithms, recommendations and guidelines. We intend to answer the most relevant questions with which physicians are confronted when clearing C-spines after blunt trauma in emergency departments (EDs). To exclude significant C-spine injuries we designed an algorithm to be compatible with clinical practice, to simplify patient management and avoid unrewarding evaluation.We conducted an exploratory PubMed search including articles published from January 2000 to October 2018. Keywords used were "cervical spine", "injury", "clearance", "Canadian C-spine Rule", "CCR" and "national emergency x-radiography utilization study". Clinical and experimental studies were included in a detailed review.We based our literature review on 33 articles. While answering fundamental triage questions from daily clinical practice, the current literature is discussed in detail. We designed an algorithm for the C-spine clearance suitable for any trauma centre with a high-quality multiplanar reconstruction computerized tomography (CT) scan continuously available.The high sensitivity of the Canadian C-spine Rule (CCR) prevents missing C-spine injuries while limiting the amount of unnecessary radiologic examinations. Plain radiographs were fully abandoned for C-spine clearance. A negative CT scan is sufficient to clear the majority of C-spine injuries and allows for collar removal. In case of motor symptoms or radio-clinical discrepancy, the advice of a specialized spine surgeon must be requested. Magnetic resonance imaging must not be routinely used. Neck pain despite negative imaging is not a reason to delay removal of stiff cervical collars. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:253-259. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190047.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) patients present with reduced back extensor muscle endurance which could be explained by the higher fatigability of their lumbar muscles. However, studies investigating lumbar muscle fatigability have shown contradictory findings. Furthermore, none investigated potential asymmetry in lumbar muscle fatigability, despite neuromuscular asymmetry being reported as a risk factor for NSCLBP. The present study's primary purpose was to determine whether NSCLBP patients presented with higher lumbar muscle fatigability and fatigability asymmetry than asymptomatic participants. METHODS: Thirty NSCLBP patients and 23 asymptomatic participants performed the Sorensen test. The median frequencies from the electromyographs of the right and left erector spinae longissimus (ESL) and lumbar multifidus (LMF) were measured during the test. A linear regression was performed on the median frequencies on each muscle. Slope and initial median frequency were extracted to characterize fatigability. Asymmetry was quantified by the absolute differences between right-side and left-side muscle pairs. RESULTS: NSCLBP patients presented significantly poorer back extensor muscle endurance than asymptomatic participants. No differences were found between NSCLBP patients and asymptomatic participants in terms of fatigability or fatigability asymmetry for either the ESL or LMF. The initial median frequency in both muscles was significantly lower among NSCLBP patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that NSCLBP patients did not present higher fatigability or higher fatigability asymmetry in lumbar muscles than asymptomatic participants. The heterogeneity of the NSCLBP population, due to the absence of any specific etiology, may explain these findings. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Subject(s)
Back Muscles/physiopathology , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Muscle Fatigue/physiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Electromyography , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Low back pain, especially nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP), the leading cause of disability worldwide, represents both social and economic problems. Different therapeutic management techniques can be used, but their effects vary. Clinicians and researchers attribute the variation in the efficacy of therapeutic and management techniques to the heterogeneity of the nonspecific chronic low back pain population, and they agree that nonspecific chronic LBP must be subgrouped. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify nonspecific chronic LBP subgroups based on a multifactorial approach, including biomechanical, physical, and psychosocial data. METHODS: A total of 100 nonspecific chronic LBP patients and 30 healthy participants aged between 18 and 60 years will be recruited for this prospective study. A psychosocial profile will be established using questionnaires on anxiety, depression, functional disability, pain, fear of pain, avoidance belief, and physical activity. A physical capacity evaluation will be conducted. It will evaluate flexibility of the hips, lumbar spine, and lateral thoracolumbar segment, as well as trunk (extensor and flexor) muscle endurance. The subjects will perform functional daily life activities, such as walking, object lifting, forward bending, sit-to-stand, stand-to-sit, balance, and usual postures. Full body kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyography of the trunk and hip muscles will be assessed during these tasks. The clustering classification methods for the statistical analysis will be determined according to the data and will be used to identify the subgroups of nonspecific chronic LBP patients. RESULTS: Data collection started in September 2017 and will be completed with the inclusion of all the participants (100 nonspecific chronic LBP and 30 control). The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant international conferences. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous studies have showed that the therapeutic management of nonspecific chronic LBP is difficult and has inconstant effects caused by the complexity and heterogeneity of nonspecific chronic LBP. Identifying subgroups with a multifactorial approach is more comprehensive and closer to the pathophysiology of nonspecific chronic LBP. It also represents benefit interests and a challenge both clinically and socially. The perspective of this study is expected to support clinicians for a more adapted therapeutic management for each subgroup.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is few medical literature regarding factors associated with remission after surgical and medical treatment of postoperative spine infections. METHODS: Single-centre case-control study 2007-2014. Cluster-controlled Cox regression model with emphasis on surgical and antibiotic-related parameters. RESULTS: Overall, we found 66 episodes in 48 patients (49 episodes with metalwork) who had a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 0.5 to 6.8 years). The patients had a median of two surgical debridements. The median duration of antibiotic therapy was 8 weeks, of which 2 weeks parenteral. Clinical recurrence after treatment was noted in 13 episodes (20%), after a median interval of 2 months. In 53 cases (80%), the episodes were considered as in remission. By multivariate analyses, no variable was associated with remission. Especially, the following factors were not significantly related to remission: number of surgical interventions [hazard ratio (HR) 0.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.8-1.1]; infection due to Staphylococcus aureus (HR 0.9; 0.8-1.1), local antibiotic therapy (HR 1.2; 0.6-2.4), and, duration of total (HR 1.0; 0.99-1.01) (or just parenteral) (HR 1.0; 0.99-1.01) antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with post-operative spine infections, remission is achieved in 80%. The number of surgical debridement or duration of antibiotic therapy shows no association with recurrence, suggesting that individual risk factors might be more important than the duration of antibiotic administration.
ABSTRACT
Seventy per cent of patients with cancer have evidence of metastases and spinal involvement may occur in up to 50 %. Pain is the most frequent symptom and it occurs in 90 % of the patients. It exist three different type of spinal pain : inflammatory, radicular and mechanical pain. Pain could be related to a neurological compromise and treatment becomes urgent. Steroids are introduced even if surgery is indicated. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score is a useful tool in order to determine instability in spinal metastases. Early recognition of instability could allow to minimal invasive surgery and even vertebroplasty. Tokuhashi score facilitates patient's selection during the decision-making process to the multidisciplinary team.
Septante pour cents des patients atteints de cancer souffriront de métastases, dont la localisation la plus fréquente sera la colonne vertébrale. Dans 90 % des cas, la douleur sera le symptôme d'appel. Elle pourra être inflammatoire, radiculaire ou mécanique, associée ou non à des troubles neurologiques. Si ces derniers sont présents, une prise en charge urgente est nécessaire. Une chirurgie aura plus de succès si elle est associée à un traitement par stéroïdes. Le Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score permet d'évaluer de manière objective la stabilité d'une lésion et de déterminer quelles sont celles à risque latent de fracture et de compromis neurologique. A un stade précoce, la stabilisation peut être réalisée par technique chirurgicale mini-invasive ou vertébroplastie. Le score de Tokuhashi est une aide précieuse lors du processus décisionnel, même si un travail en équipe multidisciplinaire reste la pierre angulaire de la prise en charge de ces pathologies.