Androgenetic alopecia incidence in transgender and gender diverse populations: A retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a significant challenge for many transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients, but the rate of AGA among TGD patients receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) compared to cisgender patients has not yet been studied on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: We examined the incidence of AGA among TGD patients receiving GAHT compared to cisgender patients. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from 37,826 patients seen at Fenway Health between August 1, 2014, and August 1, 2020. Crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) for AGA were calculated using Poisson regression. RESULTS: TGD patients receiving masculinizing GAHT had aIRR 2.50, 95% CI 1.71-3.65 and 1.30, 95% CI 0.91-1.86 compared to cisgender women and cisgender men, respectively. The rate of AGA for TGD patients receiving feminizing GAHT was not significantly different compared to cisgender men but was significantly increased compared to cisgender women (aIRR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25-2.92). LIMITATIONS: Inability to determine causation and limited generalizability. CONCLUSION: TGD patients receiving masculinizing GAHT have 2.5 times the rate of AGA compared to cisgender women, whereas TGD patients on feminizing GAHT did not have a significantly increased rate of AGA compared to cisgender men.

Androgenetic alopecia in transgender and gender diverse populations: A review of therapeutics.

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) management is a significant clinical and therapeutic challenge for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) patients. Although gender-affirming hormone therapies affect hair growth, there is little research about AGA in TGD populations. After reviewing the literature on approved treatments, off-label medication usages, and procedures for treating AGA, we present treatment options for AGA in TGD patients. The first-line treatments for any TGD patient include topical minoxidil 5% applied to the scalp once or twice daily, finasteride 1 mg oral daily, and/or low-level laser light therapy. Spironolactone 200 mg daily is also first-line for transfeminine patients. Second-line options include daily oral minoxidil dosed at 1.25 or 2.5 mg for transfeminine and transmasculine patients, respectively. Topical finasteride 0.25% monotherapy or in combination with minoxidil 2% solution are second-line options for transmasculine and transfeminine patients, respectively. Other second-line treatments for any TGD patient include oral dutasteride 0.5 mg daily, platelet-rich plasma, or hair restoration procedures. After 6-12 months of treatment, AGA severity and treatment progress should be assessed via scales not based on sex; eg, the Basic and Specific Classification or the Bouhanna scales. Dermatologists should coordinate care with the patient's primary gender-affirming clinician(s) so that shared knowledge of all medications exists across the care team.

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Version 2-Advances in psoriatic disease management, COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity. CONCLUSIONS: These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge.

Incidence and Factors Associated With Acne Among Transgender Patients Receiving Masculinizing Hormone Therapy.

Importance: Acne is a common condition among transgender patients receiving masculinizing hormone therapy (MHT), but the incident risk and predictors of developing acne in this population have not yet been studied on a large scale. Objective: To assess risk of acne among a large population of transgender patients receiving MHT and clinical risk factors for acne diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study that included 988 patients who started MHT between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, with at least 1 year of follow-up was performed. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to 15, 2019. Data were obtained using electronic health records from a community health center serving the sexual and gender minority community. The population included every patient who began receiving MHT during the study period who was aged 18 years or older at the time of MHT initiation and whose assigned sex at birth was female. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was acne defined by International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for acne. Overall prevalence and incidence proportions over 2 years after initiation of MHT were calculated. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at the time of MHT initiation. A series of univariate analyses for all factors was calculated to test for an association with acne diagnosis, followed by multivariate analyses to test for independent predictors. Results: For 988 patients (median age, 25.8 years; interquartile range, 20.8-28.2 years), there was an overall acne prevalence of 31.1% (n = 307). The 1-year post-MHT acne incidence proportion was 19.0% and the 2-year incidence proportion was 25.1%. A younger age at MHT initiation was associated with a higher likelihood of developing acne, with a median of 22.4 years (interquartile range, 19.7-25.6 years) among patients who developed acne vs 24.7 years (interquartile range, 21.3-29.4 years) among patients who did not (P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: Acne is a common condition among transgender patients on MHT, with a prevalence increasing from 6.3% to 31.1% following MHT initiation. Patients aged 18 to 21 years appear to be the most likely to develop acne after MHT initiation.

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force Guidance for Management of Psoriatic Disease During the Pandemic: Version 1.

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance about management of psoriatic disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: A task force (TF) of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was convened. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by questions received by the NPF. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF approved 22 guidance statements. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements. All guidance statements proposed were recommended, 9 with high consensus and 13 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality. CONCLUSION: These statements provide guidance for the management of patients with psoriatic disease on topics ranging from how the disease and its treatments impact COVID-19 risk and outcome, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is intended to be a living document that will be updated by the TF as data emerge.

Risk of Serious Infection in Patients Receiving Systemic Medications for the Treatment of Psoriasis.

IMPORTANCE: There is a need for better understanding of the comparative safety of systemic medications used in the treatment of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of serious infection associated with biologic and nonbiologic systemic medications in patients with psoriasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational cohort study was conducted using medical and outpatient pharmacy claims from 2 large US health insurance claims databases from January 1, 2003, through September 30, 2015. We included patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis who were new users of systemic medications for psoriasis. EXPOSURES: Prescription claims for acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, etanercept, infliximab, methotrexate, or ustekinumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was serious infection, defined by inpatient discharge diagnosis International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare rates of serious infection for each exposure (acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab) with the referent group (methotrexate). We used pairwise 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching to adjust for potential confounders, which were assessed during a 180-day baseline period prior to study drug initiation. Results from the 2 databases were pooled via fixed-effects analysis. RESULTS: The databases included 31 595 patients in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart and 76 112 patients in Truven MarketScan who were new users of acitretin, adalimumab, apremilast, etanercept, infliximab, methotrexate, and ustekinumab. Users of acitretin, apremilast, infliximab, and methotrexate were older and had higher baseline comorbidity scores than subcutaneous biologic users (adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab). The pooled PS-matched analysis yielded a decreased rate of overall serious infection in users of apremilast (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94), etanercept (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93), and ustekinumab (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89) compared with methotrexate. We did not find a different rate of overall serious infection among users of acitretin, adalimumab, and infliximab compared with methotrexate. Subanalysis by type of serious infection showed a significantly increased risk of cellulitis among users of acitretin compared with methotrexate (PS-adjusted HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11-2.80). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with psoriasis treated with systemic medications in 2 large US claims databases, new users of apremilast, etanercept, and ustekinumab had a decreased rate of serious infection compared with methotrexate.

Drug utilization patterns and adherence in patients on systemic medications for the treatment of psoriasis: A retrospective, comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to systemic treatments for psoriasis leads to treatment failure and increased health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: Examine drug utilization patterns and adherence of new users of systemic medications for psoriasis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, comparative cohort study using a large US health insurance claims database including psoriasis patients who were new users of acitretin, adalimumab, etanercept, methotrexate, or ustekinumab. Adherence was measured by using proportion of days covered dichotomized as adherent (≥0.80) or nonadherent (<0.80). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing adherence to each exposure (acitretin, adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab) to the referent (methotrexate) were estimated via logistic regression, with pairwise 1:1 propensity score matching to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: In total, 22,742 patients were new users of systemic medications. Among these patients, adherence to adalimumab (OR 2.24, 95% CI 2.05-2.45); etanercept (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.63-1.92); and ustekinumab (OR 2.54, 95% CI 2.24-2.87) was greater and acitretin (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.50-0.63) lower compared with methotrexate. LIMITATIONS: Unable to evaluate reasons for discontinuation. CONCLUSION: We report greater adherence to biologics than methotrexate in new users. Further research is needed to understand overall low adherence to systemic medications for psoriasis.

Trends in Nationwide Herpes Zoster Emergency Department Utilization From 2006 to 2013.

Importance: The effect of vaccination on emergency department (ED) utilization for herpes zoster (HZ) has not been examined to date. Objective: To determine trends in US ED utilization and costs associated with HZ. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample data set was examined for temporal trends in the number of visits and costs for treatment of HZ in EDs in the United States from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2013. Cases of HZ were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Patients were stratified by age: less than 20 years (varicella vaccine recommended), 20 to 59 years (no vaccine recommended), and 60 years or older (HZ vaccine recommended). Population-based rates were estimated using sampling weights. Main Outcomes and Measures: Population-based incidence rates of HZ-related ED visits, charge for ED services, and total charges. Results: A total of 1 350 957 ED visits for HZ were identified between 2006 and 2013, representing 0.13% of all US ED visits. Of these patients, 563 200 (51.7%) were male; mean (SE) age was 54.0 (0.1) years. Between 2006 and 2013, the percentage of HZ-related ED visits increased from 0.13% to 0.14% (8.3%). This growth was driven by patients aged 20 to 59 years (increase of 22.8% [from 0.12% to 0.14% of ED visits]) while the proportion of ED HZ visits decreased for patients aged less than 20 years and 60 years or older, from 0.03% to 0.02% (-39.6%) and from 0.28% to 0.25% (-10.9%), respectively. For all age groups, there was an increase from 2006 to 2013 in overall adjusted total (from $92.83 to $202.47 million) and mean charges (from $763 to $1262) for HZ-related ED visits. Conclusions and Relevance: The number of ED visits and total cost associated with HZ increased between 2006 and 2013. Greater use was driven by an increased number of visits by patients aged 20 to 59 years, but populations recommended for vaccination (<20 and ≥60 years) demonstrated decreased ED utilization. Per-visit and total costs increased across all age groups. Vaccination may be associated with a reduction of ED utilization. Further research is required to confirm these results and examine the drivers of increased ED costs.

The risk of infection and malignancy with tumor necrosis factor antagonists in adults with psoriatic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to better understand the safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with psoriatic disease in whom TNF inhibitors are frequently used as monotherapy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the risks of infection and malignancy with the use of TNF antagonists in adult patients with psoriatic disease. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search for trials of TNF antagonists for adults with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. We included randomized, placebo-controlled trials of etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Twenty of 820 identified studies with a total of 6810 patients were included. Results were calculated using fixed effects models and reported as pooled odds ratios. RESULTS: Odds ratios for overall infection and serious infection over a mean of 17.8 weeks were 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.33) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.40-1.21), respectively. When adjusting for patient-years, the incidence rate ratio for overall infection was 1.01 (95% CI 0.92-1.11). The odds ratio for malignancy was 1.48 (95% CI 0.71-3.09) and 1.26 (95% CI 0.39-4.15) when nonmelanoma skin cancer was excluded. LIMITATIONS: Short duration of follow-up and rarity of malignancies and serious infections are limitations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small increased risk of overall infection with the short-term use of TNF antagonists for psoriasis that may be attributable to differences in follow-up time between treatment and placebo groups. There was no evidence of an increased risk of serious infection and a statistically significant increased risk in cancer was not observed with short-term use of TNF inhibitors.

The risk of stroke in patients with psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic Th-1 and Th-17 inflammatory disease. Chronic inflammation has also been associated with atherosclerosis and thrombosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of stroke in patients with psoriasis. We conducted a population-based cohort study of patients seen by general practitioners participating in the General Practice Research Database in the United Kingdom, 1987-2002. Mild psoriasis was defined as any patient with a diagnostic code of psoriasis, but no history of systemic therapy. Severe psoriasis was defined as any patient with a diagnostic code of psoriasis and a history of systemic therapy consistent with severe psoriasis. The unexposed (control) population was composed of patients with no history of a psoriasis diagnostic code. When adjusting for major risk factors for stroke, both mild (hazard ratio (HR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.1) and severe (1.43, 95% CI 1.1-1.9) psoriasis were independent risk factors for stroke. The excess risk of stroke attributable to psoriasis in patients with mild and severe disease was 1 in 4,115 per year and 1 in 530 per year, respectively. Patients with psoriasis, particularly if severe, have an increased risk of stroke that is not explained by major stroke risk factors identified in routine medical care.