Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Classification System for operative complications in adult spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Currently there is no standardized mechanism to describe or compare complications in adult spine surgery. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to modify and validate the Clavien-Dindo-Sink complication classification system for applications in spine surgery. METHODS: The Clavien-Dindo-Sink complication classification system was evaluated and modified for spine surgery by four fellowship-trained spine surgeons using a consensus process. A distinct group of three fellowship-trained spine surgeons completed a randomized electronic survey grading 71 real-life clinical case scenarios. The survey was repeated 2 weeks after its initial completion. Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics were used to evaluate interrater and intrarater reliabilities, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, interobserver reliability during the first and second rounds of grading was excellent with a κ of 0.847 (95% CI 0.785-0.908) and 0.852 (95% CI 0.791-0.913), respectively. In the first round, interrater reliability ranged from good to excellent with a κ of 0.778 for grade I (95% CI 0.644-0.912), 0.698 for grade II (95% CI 0.564-0.832), 0.861 for grade III (95% CI 0.727-0.996), 0.845 for grade IV-A (95% CI 0.711-0.979), 0.962 for grade IV-B (95% CI 0.828-1.097), and 0.960 for grade V (95% CI 0.826-1.094). Intraobserver reliability testing for all three independent observers was excellent with a κ of 0.971 (95% CI 0.944-0.999) for rater 1, 0.963 (95% CI 0.926-1.001) for rater 2, and 0.926 (95% CI 0.869-0.982) for rater 3. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Classification System demonstrates excellent interrater and intrarater reliability in adult spine surgery cases. This system provides a useful framework to better communicate the severity of spine-related complications.

The Effects of Cervical Orthoses on Head and Intervertebral Range of Motion.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: Quantify and compare the effectiveness of cervical orthoses in restricting intervertebral kinematics during multiplanar motions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies evaluating the efficacy of cervical orthoses measured global head motion and did not evaluate individual cervical motion segment mobility. Prior studies focused only on the flexion/extension motion. METHODS: Twenty adults without neck pain participated. Vertebral motion from the occiput through T1 was imaged using dynamic biplane radiography. Intervertebral motion was measured using an automated registration process with validated accuracy better than 1 degree. Participants performed independent trials of maximal flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending in a randomized order of unbraced, soft collar (foam), hard collar (Aspen), and cervical thoracic orthosis (CTO) (Aspen) conditions. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to identify differences in the range of motion (ROM) among brace conditions for each motion. RESULTS: Compared with no collar, the soft collar reduced flexion/extension ROM from occiput/C1 through C4/C5, and reduced axial rotation ROM at C1/C2 and from C3/C4 through C5/C6. The soft collar did not reduce motion at any motion segment during lateral bending. Compared with the soft collar, the hard collar reduced intervertebral motion at every motion segment during all motions, except for occiput/C1 during axial rotation and C1/C2 during lateral bending. The CTO reduced motion compared with the hard collar only at C6/C7 during flexion/extension and lateral bending. CONCLUSIONS: The soft collar was ineffective as a restraint to intervertebral motion during lateral bending, but it did reduce intervertebral motion during flexion/extension and axial rotation. The hard collar reduced intervertebral motion compared with the soft collar across all motion directions. The CTO provided a minimal reduction in intervertebral motion compared with the hard collar. The utility in using a CTO rather than a hard collar is questionable, given the cost and little or no additional motion restriction.

Dynamic Changes in Lumbar Spine Kinematics During Gait May Explain Improvement in Back Pain and Disability in Patients With Hip-Spine Syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Determine if total hip arthroplasty (THA) changes lumbar spine kinematics during gait in a manner that explains the improvements in back pain seen in patients with hip-spine syndrome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with hip-spine syndrome, improvements in both hip and back pain have been demonstrated after THA; however, the exact mechanism of improvement in back pain remains unknown, as no corresponding changes in lumbar spine static radiographic parameters have been identified. METHODS: Thirteen patients with severe, unilateral hip osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo THA with concomitant back pain and disability were tested at baseline and 6 months after THA. Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were completed; the static orientation of the spine and pelvis were measured on standing radiographs, and lumbar spine kinematics were measured during treadmill walking using a validated measurement system that matched subject-specific bone models created from CT scans to dynamic biplane radiographs. RESULTS: After THA, both the Oswestry Disability Index (36.3-11.3, P <0.001) and Harris Hip Score (55.7-77.9, P <0.001) improved; however, there were no changes in static intervertebral or pelvis orientation. During gait after THA, the overall lumbar spine (L1 to L5) was less lordotic from heel strike to contralateral toe off ( P <0.001), the L4 and L5 vertebra were less anteriorly tilted by 3.9° ( P =0.038) from midstance to contralateral heel strike and by 3.9° ( P =0.001) during stance, respectively. CONCLUSION: The decreased anterior tilt of the 2 lowest lumbar vertebrae and the corresponding loss of lumbar lordosis may reduce facet loading during the stance phase of gait after THA. This change in lumbar spine kinematics during gait is a potential mechanism to explain the observed improvements in back pain and disability after THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Functional range of motion of the cervical spine in cervical fusion patients during activities of daily living.

Following cervical spine fusion there is a reduction in maximum range of motion (ROM) but how this impacts activity of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life is unknown. This study's purpose is to quantify maximum and functional cervical spine ROM in patients with multi-level cervical fusion (>3 levels) compared to controls during ADLs and to correlate functional range of motion with scores from patient reported outcomes measures (PROs) including the Comparative Pain Scale (CPS), Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). An inertial measurement unit (IMU) system quantified ROM during ADLs in the extension/flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation directions of motion. The reliability of this system was compared to standard optical motion tracking. Fourteen participants (8 females, age = 60.0 years (18.7) (median, (interquartile range)) with a history of multi-level cervical fusion (years post-op 0.9 (0.7)) were compared to 16 controls (13 females, age = 52.1 years (15.8)). PROs were collected for each participant. Fusion participants had significantly decreased maximum ROM in all directions of motion. Fusion participants had decreased ROM for some ADLs (backing up a car, using a phone, donning socks, negotiating stairs). CPS, FABQ, and NDI scores were significantly increased in fusion participants. Reductions in two activities (backing up a car, stair negotiation) correlated with a combination of increased PRO scores. Cervical fusion decreases maximum ROM and is correlated with increased PROs in some ADLs, however there is minimal impact on functional ROM. Investigation into velocity and acceleration may yield categorization of pathologic movement.

Spine Fractures of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Fracture Severity and Injury-Related Mortality at a Level I Trauma Center.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected cohort. PURPOSE: To identify differences in treatment and mortality of spine fractures in patients with ankylosing conditions of the spine. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) are the two most common etiologies of ankylosing spinal disorder (ASD). However, studies on the treatment and outcomes of spine fractures in AS and DISH patients remain few. METHODS: Patients presenting with a spine fracture were diagnosed with AS or DISH at a single tertiary care center between 2010 and 2019. We excluded those who lacked cross-sectional imaging or fractures occurring at spinal segments affected by ankylosis, as well as polytraumatized patients. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture level, neurologic status, treatment, and 1-year mortality were recorded. Computed tomography imaging was reviewed by two independent readers and graded according to the indicated AO Spine Injury Classification System. Differences in fracture severity, treatment method, and mortality were examined using Student t -tests, chi-square tests, and two-proportion Z-tests with significance set to p <0.05. RESULTS: We identified 167 patients with spine fracture diagnosed with AS or DISH. Patients with AS had more severe fractures and more commonly had surgery than patients with DISH (p <0.001). Despite these differences, 1-year mortality did not significantly differ between AS and DISH patients (p =0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with AS suffered more severe fractures compared to DISH and more frequently underwent surgery for these injuries, outcomes and 1-year mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups. For patients with ASDs and fractures, outcomes appear similar regardless of treatment modality. Consequently, there may be an opportunity for critical reappraisal of operative indications in ASD and a larger role for nonoperative management in these challenging patients.

Pre-Operative Bariatric Surgery Imparts An Increased Risk of Infection, Re-Admission and Operative Intervention Following Elective Instrumented Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of bariatric surgery on patient outcomes following elective instrumented lumbar fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients who underwent a bariatric procedure prior to an elective instrumented lumbar fusion were evaluated. Lumbar procedures were performed at a large academic medical center from 1/1/2012 to 1/1/2018. The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI) requiring surgical debridement. Secondary outcomes were prolonged wound drainage requiring treatment, implant failure requiring revision, revision secondary to adjacent segment disease (ASD), and chronic pain states. A randomly selected, surgeon and comorbidity-matched group of 59 patients that underwent an elective lumbar fusion during that period was used as a control. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's two-way t-tests for continuous data, with significance defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified who underwent bariatric surgery prior to elective lumbar fusion. Mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.9 years in the bariatric group vs. 1.5 ± 1.3 years in the control group. Patients with a history of bariatric surgery had an increased incidence of SSI that required operative debridement, revision surgery due to ASD, and a higher incidence of chronic pain. Prolonged wound drainage and implant failure were equivalent between groups. CONCLUSION: In the present study, bariatric surgery prior to elective instrumented lumbar fusion was associated increased risk of surgical site infection, adjacent segment disease and chronic pain when compared to non-bariatric patients.

To Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction? Terminating Posterior Cervical Fusion Constructs Proximal to the Cervicothoracic Junction Does Not Impart Increased Risk of Reoperation in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of caudal instrumentation level on revision rates following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Minimum follow-up was one year. Patients were divided into two groups based on the caudal level of their index fusion construct (Group 1-cervical and Group 2- thoracic). Reoperation rates were compared between the two groups, and preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were compared between patients who required revision and those who did not. Multivariate binomial regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for revision surgery. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven (137/204) patients received fusion constructs that terminated at C7 (Group 1), while 67 (67/204) received fusion constructs that terminated at T1 or T2 (Group 2). The revision rate was 8.33% in the combined cohort, 7.3% in Group 1, and 10.4% in Group 2. There was no significant difference in revision rates between the 2 groups (P = .43). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for revision surgery. CONCLUSION: This study shows no evidence of increased risk of revision in patients with fusion constructs terminating in the cervical spine when compared to patients with constructs crossing the cervicothoracic junction. These findings support terminating the fusion construct proximal to the cervicothoracic junction when indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Changes in intervertebral sagittal alignment of the cervical spine from supine to upright.

Cervical sagittal alignment is a critical component of successful surgical outcomes. Unrecognized differences in intervertebral alignment between supine and upright positions may affect clinical outcomes; however, these differences have not been quantified. Sixty-four patients scheduled to undergo one or two-level cervical arthrodesis for symptomatic pathology from C4-C5 to C6-C7, and forty-seven controls were recruited. Upright sagittal alignment was obtained through biplane radiographic imaging and measured using a validated process with accuracy better than 1° in rotation. Supine alignment was obtained from computed tomography scans. Coordinate systems used to measure supine and upright alignment were identical. Distances between adjacent bony endplates were measured to calculate disc height in each position. For both patients and controls, the C1-C2, C2-C3, and C3-C4 motion segments were in more lordosis when upright as compared with supine (all p < 0.001). However, the C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 motion segments were in less lordosis when upright as compared with supine (all p ≤ 0.004). There was an interaction between group and position at the C1-C2 (p = 0.002) and C2-C3 (p = 0.001) motion segments, with the controls demonstrating a greater increase in lordosis at both motion segments when moving from supine to upright. The results indicate that cervical motion segment alignment changes between supine and upright positioning, those changes differ among motion segments, and cervical pathology affects the magnitude of these changes. Clinical Significance: Surgeons should be mindful of the differences in alignment between supine and upright imaging and the implications they may have on clinical outcomes.

In Vivo Evidence of Early Instability and Late Stabilization in Motion Segments Immediately Superior to Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify patient factors that affect adjacent segment kinematics after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as measured by biplane radiography. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The etiology of adjacent segment disease (ASD) may be multifactorial. Previous studies have investigated associations between patient factors and ASD, although few attempted to link patient factors with mechanical changes in the spine that may explain ASD development. Previous studies manually measured intervertebral motion from static flexion/extension radiographs, however, manual measurements are unreliable, and those studies failed to measure intervertebral motion during rotation. METHODS: Patients had continuous cervical spine flexion/extension and axial rotation movements captured at 30 images per second in a dynamic biplane radiography system preoperatively and 1 year after ACDF. Digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from subject-specific computed tomography scans were matched to the biplane radiographs using a validated tracking process. Dynamic kinematics and preoperative disc height were calculated from this tracking process. Preoperative magnetic resonance imagings were evaluated for disc bulge. Patient age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, diabetes, psychiatric history, presence of an inciting event, and length of symptoms were collected. Multivariate linear regression was performed to identify patient factors associated with 1-year postoperative changes in adjacent segment kinematics. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients completed preoperative and postoperative testing. Superior adjacent segment disc height and disc bulge predicted the change in superior adjacent segment range of motion after surgery. Inferior adjacent segment disc bulge, smoking history, and the use of psychiatric medications predicted the change in inferior adjacent segment flexion/extension range of motion after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preexisting adjacent segment disc degeneration, as indicated by disc height and disc bulge, was associated with reduced adjacent segment motion after ACDF, while lack of preexisting adjacent disc degeneration was associated with increased adjacent segment motion after ACDF. These findings provide in vivo evidence supporting early instability and late stabilization in the pathophysiology of disc degeneration.

In Vivo Changes in Dynamic Adjacent Segment Motion 1 Year After One and Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.

Biomechanical cadaver testing indicates adjacent segment motion increases after one-level anterior cervical spine arthrodesis, and two-level arthrodesis exacerbates these effects. There is little in vivo evidence to support those biomechanical studies. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of one- and two-level cervical arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion. Fifty patients received either one-level C56 arthrodesis or two-level C456 or C567 arthrodesis and were tested preoperatively (PRE) and 1 year postoperatively (1YR-POST) along with 23 asymptomatic controls. A validated CT model-based tracking technique was used to measure 3D vertebral motion from biplane radiographs collected during dynamic flexion-extension and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Head and adjacent segment intervertebral end-range range of motion (ROM) and mid-range ROM were compared between one-level and two-level arthrodesis patients and controls. Small (2.3° or less) but non-significant increases in adjacent segment end-range ROM were observed from PRE to 1YR-POST. Mid-range flexion-extension ROM in the C67 motion segment inferior to the arthrodesis and mid-range axial rotation ROM in the C45 motion segment superior to the arthrodesis increased from PRE to 1YR-POST (all p < 0.022). This study provides in vivo evidence that contradicts long-held beliefs that adjacent segment end-range ROM increases appreciably after anterior cervical arthrodesis and that two-level arthrodesis exacerbates these effects. Mid-range ROM appears to be more useful than end-range ROM for detecting early changes in adjacent segment motion after cervical spine arthrodesis.

The effects of pathology and one-level versus two-level arthrodesis on cervical spine intervertebral helical axis of motion.

The etiology of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains controversial. Range of motion (ROM) is typically used to infer the effects of arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion following ACDF, however, ROM only measures the total amount of motion. In contrast, the helical axis of motion (HAM) quantifies how the motion occurs and may provide additional insight into the etiology of adjacent segment pathology. Synchronized biplane radiographs of the cervical spine were acquired at 30 images per second while 62 ACDF patients and 38 control participants performed dynamic neck flexion/extension. A validated tracking process matched digitally reconstructed radiographs created from subject-specific bone models to the radiographs with sub-millimeter accuracy. The intervertebral HAM was then calculated and compared between pre and 1 year post surgery in patients, and between patients and controls at corresponding motion segments using linear mixed-effects analysis. Small differences in the anterior/posterior location of the HAM were found between the symptomatic motion segments before surgery and corresponding motion segments in controls. No changes in the HAM of motion segments adjacent to the arthrodesis were observed from pre to 1-year post-surgery. No differences in adjacent segment HAM were found between patients with one- versus two-level arthrodesis. Neither symptomatic pathology nor arthrodesis appear to change the way motion occurs in the cervical spine during flexion/extension one year after one or two-level arthrodesis. These results suggest ACDF does not alter short-term adjacent segment kinematics in a way that would contribute to the development of adjacent segment disease.

Residual Motion and Graft Type Do Not Influence Patient-reported Outcomes Following One- or Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of graft type on residual motion and the relationship among residual motion, smoking, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although most patients develop solid fusion based on static imaging following ACDF, dynamic imaging has revealed that many patients continue to have residual motion at the arthrodesis. METHODS: Forty-eight participants performed dynamic neck flexion/extension and axial rotation within a biplane radiography system 1 year following ACDF (21 one-level, 27 two-level). PRO scores included the Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, and Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire. An automated model-based tracking process matched subject-specific bone models to the biplane radiographs with sub-millimeter accuracy. Residual motion was measured across the entire arthrodesis site for both one- and two-level fusions in patients who received either allograft or autograft. Patients were divided into "pseudarthrosis" (>3° of flexion/extension residual motion) and "solid fusion" groups. Residual motion and PROs were compared between groups using Student t tests. RESULTS: Patients who received allograft showed more total flexion/extension residual motion (4.1° vs. 2.8°, P = 0.12), although this failed to reach significance. No differences were noted in PROs based on graft type (all P > 0.08) or the presence of pseudarthrosis (all P > 0.13). No differences were noted in residual motion between smokers and nonsmokers (all P > 0.15); however, smokers who received allograft reported worse outcomes than nonsmokers who received allograft and smokers who received autograft. CONCLUSION: Allograft may result in slightly more residual motion at the arthrodesis site 1 year after ACDF. However, there is minimal evidence that PROs are adversely affected by slightly increased residual motion, suggesting that the current definition of pseudarthrosis correlates poorly with clinically significant findings. Additionally, autograft appears to result in superior outcomes in patients who smoke.Level of Evidence: 2.

Surgery-related Factors Do Not Affect Short-term Adjacent Segment Kinematics After Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify surgical factors that affect adjacent segment kinematics after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as measured by biplane radiography. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies investigated the effect of surgical factors on spine kinematics as a potential etiology for adjacent segment disease (ASD). Those studies used static flexion-extension radiographs to evaluate range of motion. However, measurements from static radiographs are known to be unreliable. Furthermore, those studies were unable to evaluate the effect of ACDF on adjacent segment axial rotation. METHODS: Patients had continuous cervical spine flexion/exten- sion and axial rotation movements captured at 30 images per second in a dynamic biplane radiography system preoperatively and 1 year after ACDF. Digitally reconstructed radiographs generated from subject-specific CT scans were matched to biplane radiographs using a previously validated tracking process. Dynamic kinematics, postoperative segmental kyphosis, and disc distraction were calculated from this tracking process. Plate-to-disc distance was measured on postoperative radiographs. Graft type was collected from the medical record. Multivariate linear regression was performed to identify surgical factors associated with 1-year post-surgery changes in adjacent segment kinematics. A secondary analysis was also performed to compare adjacent segment kinematics between each of the surgical factors and previously defined thresholds believed to be associated with adjacent segment degeneration. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients completed preoperative and postoperative testing. No association was found between any of the surgical factors and change in adjacent segment flexion/exten- sion or axial rotation range of motion (all P > 0.09). The secondary analysis also did not identify differences between adjacent segment kinematics and surgical factors (all P > 0.07). CONCLUSION: Following ACDF for cervical spondylosis, factors related to surgical technique were not associated with short-term changes in adjacent segment kinematics that reflect the hypermobility hypothesized to lead to the development of ASD.Level of Evidence: 2.

Assessing the biofidelity of in vitro biomechanical testing of the human cervical spine.

In vitro biomechanical studies of the osteoligamentous spine are widely used to characterize normal biomechanics, identify injury mechanisms, and assess the effects of degeneration and surgical instrumentation on spine mechanics. The objective of this study was to determine how well four standards in vitro loading paradigms replicate in vivo kinematics with regards to the instantaneous center of rotation and arthrokinematics in relation to disc deformation. In vivo data were previously collected from 20 asymptomatic participants (45.5 ± 5.8 years) who performed full range of motion neck flexion-extension (FE) within a biplane x-ray system. Intervertebral kinematics were determined with sub-millimeter precision using a validated model-based tracking process. Ten cadaveric spines (51.8 ± 7.3 years) were tested in FE within a robotic testing system. Each specimen was tested under four loading conditions: pure moment, axial loading, follower loading, and combined loading. The in vivo and in vitro bone motion data were directly compared. The average in vitro instant center of rotation was significantly more anterior in all four loading paradigms for all levels. In general, the anterior and posterior disc heights were larger in the in vitro models than in vivo. However, after adjusting for gender, the observed differences in disc height were not statistically significant. This data suggests that in vitro biomechanical testing alone may fail to replicate in vivo conditions, with significant implications for novel motion preservation devices such as cervical disc arthroplasty implants.

The effects of age, pathology, and fusion on cervical neural foramen area.

Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common neurological disorder, often resulting from mechanical compression of the nerve root within the neural foramen. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common treatment for radicular symptoms that do not resolve after conservative treatment. One mechanism by which ACDF is believed to resolve symptoms is by replacing degenerated disc tissue with bone graft to increase the neural foramen area, however in vivo evidence demonstrating this is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of age, pathology, and fusion on bony neural foramen area. Participants included 30 young adult controls (<35 years old), 23 middle-aged controls (36 to 60 years old), and 36 cervical arthrodesis patients tested before and after ACDF surgery. Participants' cervical spines were imaged in the neutral, full flexion, and full extension positions while seated within a biplane radiography system. A validated model-based tracking technique determined three-dimensional vertebral position and orientation and automated software identified the neural foramen area in each head position. The neural foramen area decreased throughout the entire sub-axial cervical spine with age and pathology, however, no changes in neural foramen area were observed due solely to replacing degenerated disc tissue with bone graft. The neural foramen area was not associated with disc height in young adult controls, but moderate to strong associations were observed in middle-aged controls. The results provide evidence to inform the debate regarding localized versus systemic spinal degeneration and provide novel insight into the mechanism of pain relief after ACDF.

Severe pulmonary injury leading to death during thoracic rod removal: a case report.

PURPOSE: Removal of hardware procedures following posterior spinal fusion is most commonly performed for hardware irritation without overt infection. It is imperative that surgeons realize that serious complications may arise from this procedure. The purpose of this report is to report a case of a pneumothorax that developed in a thoracolumbar removal of hardware case that resulted in a patient death. METHODS: Retrospective review of a patient's medical record and imaging. RESULTS: A 74-year-old patient with a history of T4-10 anterior discectomy and fusion with rib autograft and T4-L2 posterior fusion underwent a removal of hardware procedure for delayed surgical site infection. During the procedure, the tip of the bolt cutter jaw broke and entered the pulmonary cavity leading to a pneumothorax. The patient developed pneumonia 1 month postoperatively and passed away. CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights one of the rare but potential complications of spinal removal of hardware surgery. It is essential that surgeons are aware of the possibility of pulmonary complications during thoracolumbar removal of hardware cases so that they may fully counsel their patients on the potential risks.

Undisclosed Conflict of Interest Is Prevalent in Spine Literature.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of accurate conflict of interest (COI) disclosure within three prominent subspecialty Spine journals during a 4-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Industry-physician relationships are crucial for technological advancement in spine surgery but serve as a source of bias in biomedical research. The Open Payments Database (OPD) was established after 2010 to increase financial transparency. METHODS: All research articles published from 2014 to 2017 in Spine, The Spine Journal (TSJ), and the Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine (JNS) were reviewed in this study. In these articles, all author's COI statements were recorded. The OPD was queried for all author entries within the disclose period of the journal. Discrepancies between the author's self-reported COIs and the documented COIs from OPD were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 6816 articles meeting inclusion criteria between 2014 and 2017 in Spine, TSJ, and JNS with 39,869 contributing authors. Overall, 15.8% of all authors were found to have an OPD financial relationship. Of 2633 authors in Spine with financial disclosures, 77.1% had accurate financial disclosures; 42.5% and 41.0% of authors with financial relationships in the OPD had accurate financial disclosures in TSJ and JNS, respectively. The total value of undisclosed conflicts of interest between 2014 and 2017 was $421 million with $1.48 billion in accurate disclosures. Of undisclosed payments, 68.7% were <$1000 and only 7.2% were >$10,000. Undisclosed payments included $180 million in research funding and $188 million in royalties. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that undisclosed COI is highly prevalent for authors in major Spine journals. This study indicates that there remains a need to standardize definitions and financial thresholds for significant COI as well as to shift the reporting burden for COI to journals who actively review potential COIs instead of relying on self-reporting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

In vivo changes in adjacent segment kinematics after lumbar decompression and fusion.

The pathogenesis of lumbar adjacent segment disease is thought to be secondary to altered biomechanics resulting from fusion. Direct in vivo evidence for altered biomechanics following lumbar fusion is lacking. This study's aim was to describe in vivo kinematics of the superior adjacent segment relative to the fused segment before and after lumbar fusion. This study analyzed seven patients with symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (5 M, 2F; age 65 ± 5.1 years) using a biplane radiographic imaging system. Each subject performed two to three trials of continuous flexion of their torso according to established protocols. Synchronized biplane radiographs were acquired at 20 images per second one month before and six months after single-level fusion at L4-L5 or L5-S1, or two-level fusion at L3-L5 or L4-S1. A previously validated volumetric model-based tracking process was used to track the position and orientation of vertebrae in the radiographic images. Intervertebral flexion/extension and AP translation (slip) at the superior adjacent segment were calculated over the entire dynamic flexion activity. Skin-mounted surface markers were tracked using conventional motion analysis and used to determine torso flexion. Change in adjacent segment kinematics after fusion was determined at corresponding angles of dynamic torso flexion. Changes in adjacent segment motion varied across patients, however, all patients maintained or increased the amount of adjacent segment slip or intervertebral flexion/extension. No patients demonstrated both decreased adjacent segment slip and decreased rotation. This study suggests that short-term changes in kinematics at the superior adjacent segment after lumbar fusion appear to be patient-specific.

Cervical Spine Fractures: Who Really Needs CT Angiography?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Compare a novel two-step algorithm for indicating a computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the setting of a cervical spine fracture with established gold standard criteria. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As CTA permits the rapid detection of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI), screening criteria for its use have broadened. However, more recent work warns of the potential for the overdiagnosis of BCVI, which must be considered with the adoption of broad criteria. METHODS: A novel two-step metric for indicating CTA screening was compared with the American College of Surgeons guidelines and the expanded Denver Criteria using patients who presented with cervical spine fractures to a tertiary-level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2016. The ability for each metric to identify BCVI and posterior circulation strokes that occurred during this period was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 721 patients with cervical fractures were included, of whom 417 underwent CTAs (57.8%). Sixty-eight BCVIs and seven strokes were diagnosed in this cohort. All algorithms detected an equivalent number of BCVIs (52 with the novel metric, 54 with the ACS and Denver Criteria, P = 0.84) and strokes (7/7, 100% with the novel metric, 6/7, 85.7% with the ACS and Denver Criteria, P = 1.0). However, 63% fewer scans would have been needed with the proposed screening algorithm compared with the ACS or Denver Criteria (261/721, 36.2% of all patients with our criteria vs. 413/721, 57.3% with the ACS standard and 417/721, 57.8%) with the Denver Criteria, P < 0.0002 for each). CONCLUSION: A two-step criterion based on mechanism of injury and patient factors is a potentially useful guide for identifying patients at risk of BCVI and stroke after cervical spine fractures. Further prospective analyses are required prior to widespread clinical adoption. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.