Prognostic Assessment of Interim F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Esophageal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation With or Without Surgery.

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate if the F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F18-FDG PET) response after two weeks of chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer (staged Tumor (T) 3 and/or Nodes (N)+ Metastases (M) 0) was linked to the pathologic response for patients undergoing surgery, to disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods Between March 2006 and September 2017, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled in our study, gave written consent, and had PET scans performed before treatment and after two weeks of chemoradiation. One patient did not undergo his two-week PET without informing study coordinators and was excluded from analyses. Results The median age at diagnosis was 62 years. Seventy-two percent of patients had N+ disease. Median OS for the entire group was 24 months. Five-year overall survival was 17%. Survival curves for patients with no PET response, minor PET response, or good PET response overlapped and were not statistically different. For the 25 patients who underwent surgery, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the PET response relative to the pathologic response was 75% and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 62%. In study patients, the crude recurrence rate was 68% and there was no correlation between PET response and DFS. Conclusion In our study, interim PET response after two weeks of chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer was not predictive of outcome or pathologic response. Based on our data and current literature, interim PET should not be used to alter treatment (whether to escalate neo-adjuvant treatment or omit surgery).

Fusion of Intraoperative Transrectal Ultrasound Images with Post-implant Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Purpose To compare the impact of the fusion of intraoperative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images with day 30 computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on prostate volume and dosimetry. Methods and materials Seventy-five consecutive patients with CT and MRI obtained on day 30 with a Fast Spin Echo T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequence were analyzed. A rigid manual registration was performed between the intraoperative TRUS and day-30 CT based on the prostate volume. A second manual rigid registration was performed between the intraoperative TRUS and the day-30 MRI. The prostate contours were manually modified on CT and MRI. The difference in prostate volume and dosimetry between CT and MRI were compared. Results Prostate volume was on average 8% (standard deviation (SD) ± 16%) larger on intraoperative TRUS than on CT and 6% (18%) larger than on MRI. In 48% of the cases, the difference in volume on CT was > 10% compared to MRI. The difference in prostate volume between CT and MRI was inversely correlated to the difference in D90 (minimum dose that covers 90% of the prostate volume) between CT and MRI (r = -0.58, P < .001). A D90 < 90% was found in 5% (n = 4) on MRI and in 10% (n = 7) on CT (Fisher exact test one-sided P = .59), but in no patient was the D90 < 90% on both MRI and CT. Conclusions When fusing TRUS images with CT and MRI, the differences in prostate volume between those modalities remain clinically important in nearly half of the patients, and this has a direct influence on how implant quality is evaluated.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in treatment, notably in systemic therapy, the prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PADC) remains dismal. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging tool in the complex management of PADC. We review outcomes of SBRT for PADC at our institution. METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with SBRT for either unresectable PADC or locally recurrent PADC after surgery. Treatment was delivered using a robotic radiosurgery system with respiratory tracking. The median prescribed dose was 30 Gy (30-35 Gy), delivered in 5-6 fractions. Toxicities were reported as per CTCAE v4.0. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Between October 2010 and March 2016, 21 patients were treated at our institution. The median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-28). The 1-year local control rate was 57%. The 1-year overall survival was 25% for locally advanced patients and 67% for those with local recurrences (p = 0.27). Eighty percent of cancer related deaths were due to metastatic progression. Five patients (24%) had Grade I-II gastrointestinal acute toxicity; one patient had fatal gastrointestinal bleeding 6 months after SBRT. CONCLUSION: In PADC, fractionated SBRT dose schedules near 30 Gy may strike the best balance of local control and bowel toxicity. More work is required to integrate pancreatic SBRT with modern systemic therapy.

Is intraoperative real-time dosimetry in prostate seed brachytherapy predictive of biochemical outcome?

PURPOSE: To analyze intraoperative (IO) dosimetry using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), performed before and after prostate low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), and compare it to dosimetry performed 30 days following the LDR-BT implant (Day 30). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 236 patients underwent prostate LDR-BT using 125I that was performed with a three-dimensional TRUS-guided interactive inverse preplanning system (preimplant dosimetry). After the implant procedure, the TRUS was repeated in the operating room, and the dosimetry was recalculated (postimplant dosimetry) and compared to dosimetry on Day 30 computed tomography (CT) scans. Area under curve (AUC) statistics was used for models predictive of dosimetric parameters at Day 30. RESULTS: The median follow-up for patients without BF was 96 months, the 5-year and 8-year biochemical recurrence (BR)-free rate was 96% and 90%, respectively. The postimplant median D90 was 3.8 Gy lower (interquartile range [IQR], 12.4-0.9), and the V100 only 1% less (IQR, 2.9-0.2%) than the preimplant dosimetry. When comparing the postimplant and the Day 30 dosimetries, the postimplant median D90 was 9.6 Gy higher (IQR [-] 9.5-30.3 Gy), and the V100 was 3.2% greater (0.2-8.9%) than Day 30 postimplant dosimetry. The variables that best predicted the D90 of Day 30 was the postimplant D90 (AUC = 0.62, p = 0.038). None of the analyzed values for IO or Day 30 dosimetry showed any predictive value for BR. CONCLUSIONS: Although improving the IO preimplant and postimplant dosimetry improved dosimetry on Day 30, the BR-free rate was not dependent on any dosimetric parameter. Unpredictable factors such as intraprostatic seed migration and IO factors, prevented the accurate prediction of Day 30 dosimetry.

A Study of Pseudoprogression After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of pseudoprogression (PP) after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy based on a detailed and quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphologic tumor alterations, and to identify predictive factors distinguishing PP from local recurrence (LR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of 35 patients with 49 spinal segments treated with spine stereotactic body radiation therapy, from 2009 to 2014, was conducted. The median number of follow-up MRI studies was 4 (range, 2-7). The gross tumor volumes (GTVs) within each of the 49 spinal segments were contoured on the pretreatment and each subsequent follow-up T1- and T2-weighted MRI sagittal sequence. T2 signal intensity was reported as the mean intensity of voxels constituting each volume. LR was defined as persistent GTV enlargement on ≥2 serial MRI studies for ≥6 months or on pathologic confirmation. PP was defined as a GTV enlargement followed by stability or regression on subsequent imaging within 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for estimation of actuarial local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 23 months (range, 1-39 months). PP was identified in 18% of treated segments (9 of 49) and LR in 29% (14 of 49). Earlier volume enlargement (5 months for PP vs 15 months for LR, P=.005), greater GTV to reference nonirradiated vertebral body T2 intensity ratio (+30% for PP vs -10% for LR, P=.005), and growth confined to 80% of the prescription isodose line (80% IDL) (8 of 9 PP cases vs 1 of 14 LR cases, P=.002) were associated with PP on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed an earlier time to volume enlargement and growth within the 80% IDL as significant predictors of PP. LR involved the epidural space in all but 1 lesion, whereas PP was confined to the vertebral body in 7 of 9 cases. CONCLUSIONS: PP was observed in 18% of treated spinal segments. Tumor growth confined to the 80% IDL and earlier time to tumor enlargement were predictive for PP.

Results of a randomized clinical trial of external beam radiation to prevent restenosis after superficial femoral artery stenting.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of external beam radiation (EBR) in preventing restenosis after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting in comparison with a control group treated with SFA stenting only. METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board-approved study, patients who provided written informed consent were randomly assigned to 0 Gy or 14 Gy of EBR to the stent site 24 hours after SFA stenting. The primary end point was the angiographic binary restenosis rate 2 years after stenting. Categorical and continuous end points were respectively analyzed using logistic regression models and Wilcoxon tests. End points expressed as time to event were analyzed using a log-rank test. RESULTS: The study included 155 patients, 46 women and 109 men (mean age, 66 years; range, 45-85 years). In the 0 and 14 Gy groups, binary restenosis was present, respectively, in 44% (34/77) and 68% (52/76; P = .003) 2 years after stenting. Stent thrombosis occurred in 13% (10/78) of the 0 Gy group and in 33% (25/77) of the 14 Gy group (P = .003). Target lesion revascularization at 2 years was 26% (25/78) in the 0 Gy group and 30% (23/77) in the 14 Gy group (P = .56). There were no significant differences in total walking distances change from baseline to 2 years (46 ± 100 and 26 ± 79 m, respectively, in the 0 Gy and 14 Gy group; P = .25). There were no procedure-related deaths and no major amputations. CONCLUSIONS: A single 14 Gy dose of EBR to the SFA stenting site did not prevent in-stent restenosis.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Inoperable Liver Tumors: Results of a Single Institutional Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for liver tumors unsuitable for ablation or surgery. We report our experience with SBRT in the treatment of liver tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with primary or secondary liver cancer were identified in our local SBRT database. Patients were included irrespective of prior liver-directed therapies. The primary endpoint of our review was in-field local control (LC). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2015, a total of 71 liver lesions in 68 patients were treated with SBRT (three patients had two liver lesions treated). The median age was 71 years (27-89 years). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the diagnosis in 23 patients (34%), with the grade of Child-Pugh A (52%), B (39%), or C (nine percent) cirrhosis. Six patients (nine percent) had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). The remaining 39 patients (57%) had metastatic liver lesions. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was the most common primary tumor type (81%). The median size for HCC, IHC, and metastatic lesions was 5 cm (2-9 cm), 3.6 cm (2-4.9 cm), and 4 cm (1-8 cm), respectively. The median prescribed dose was 45 Gy (16-50 Gy). Median follow-up was 11.5 months (1-45 months). Actuarial one-year in-field LC for HCC and metastatic lesions was 85% and 64% respectively (p= 0.66). At one year, the actuarial rate of new liver lesions was 40% and 26%, respectively, (p=0.58) for HCC and metastases. Only six patients with IHC were treated with SBRT in this study - in these patients, one-year LC was 78% with new liver lesions in 53%. The SBRT treatments were well tolerated. The side effects included common criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4 grade 1 acute gastrointestinal toxicity in three patients, grade 3 nausea in one patient, and grade 3 acute dermatitis in another patient. Two patients had grade 5 toxicity. Radiation pneumonitis was observed in one patient two months post-SBRT treatment, and another patient was suspected to have had radio-induced liver disease (RILD) two months after SBRT. No late toxicity was seen. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a well-tolerated and effective alternative treatment option for selected patients with primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Refining prostate seed brachytherapy: Comparing high-, intermediate-, and low-activity seeds for I-125 permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the difference in prostate coverage and dose to the rectum in men with prostate carcinoma treated with permanent seed brachytherapy with different seed activities. METHODS: Forty-nine patients treated with iodine-125 permanent seed prostate brachytherapy with low-activity seeds of 0.30-0.37 mCi were identified. For each of these patients, 2 patients with similar prostate volume (±2 cc) were paired: one treated with intermediate seed activity (0.44-0.46 mCi) and one with high seed activity (0.60-0.66 mCi). The doses to prostate and rectum were compared using CT on Day 30. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients divided into the three seed activity groups were analyzed. Mean prostate volume was 35.7 cc (standard deviation [SD], 11.70). Compared with low-activity seeds, implants with high-activity seeds consisted of an average of 22 seeds and 4.7 needles less. The dose to the prostate (prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose [V100], prostate volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose, and minimal dose covering 90% of the prostate volume expressed in Gy) was not higher on Day 30 (p = 0.58-0.97). The mean volume (in cubic centimeters) of rectal wall receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) increased with activity: low activity, 0.34 cc (SD, 0.49), intermediate activity, 0.47 cc (SD, 0.48), and high activity, 0.72 cc (SD, 0.79) (p = 0.009). There was a trend (p = 0.073) toward a higher frequency of clinically unfavorable rectal dosimetry (V100 > 1.3 cc) in patients with high-activity seeds (16.7%) compared with low-activity (6.3%) or intermediate-activity (4.2%) seeds. CONCLUSION: High-activity seeds do not result in a higher dose to the prostate but in a higher dose to the rectum.

Risk factors for PSA bounce following radiotherapy: outcomes from a multi-modal therapy analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To identify risk factors for PSA bounce (PSAb) and compare characteristics of prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 362 patients treated for low risk prostate adenocarcinoma (D'Amico criteria) with a follow up time of at least 36 months. Patients received either: 1) EBRT 76 Gy in 38 fractions (n = 58); 2) hypofractionated EBRT, 45 Gy in 9 once-weekly fractions (n = 74); 3) seed brachytherapy (n = 230). PSAb was defined as a rise >= 0.2 ng/mL with subsequent return to baseline within the first 3 years after treatment. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were estimated to assess the association between clinical factors and occurrence of PSAb. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between treatment groups (p = 0.349), with an overall PSAb rate of 28.5%. Upon univariate analysis, the following were predictive of a lower PSAb rate: older age (OR = 0.96), higher PSA at diagnosis (OR = 0.87), more positive biopsy cores (OR = 0.98), and a higher Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score (CAPRA of 3 versus 1: OR = 0.33). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significance of fewer positive biopsy cores (OR = 0.99) and a lower CAPRA score (CAPRA 3 versus 1: OR = 0.34). These factors also predicted a shorter time to first PSAb. CONCLUSIONS: We found comparable rates of PSAb after different regimens of radiotherapy. We hypothesize that it results from late damage to healthy prostatic tissue. This idea is supported by the fact that we found that clinical factors indicative of a lower tumor burden were predictive of a PSAb.

Preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

The use of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has allowed for the administration of high doses to retroperitoneal sarcomas (RSTS) while limiting toxicity to adjacent organs. The purpose of our study is to assess the outcome and toxicities of patients with RSTS treated with neo-adjuvant external beam radiation (EBRT) therapy using IMRT. This is a retrospective study of 21 patients treated with preoperative IMRT for primary or recurrent RSTS between 2005 and 2011. Overall survival (OS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). Acute and chronic toxicities were assessed using the CTCAE v. 3 criteria. The actuarial 2 and 3-year OS was 66% for both and the 5-year OS was 51%. As for LRFS it was 57% at 2 and 3-year and 51% for the 5-year LRFS. Factors predictive for local control were microscopically negative margins (p = 0.022), a median tumor diameter <15 cm (p = 0.007) and pathology of liposarcoma (p = 0.021). Furthermore, patients treated for recurrent disease fared worse (p = 0.04) in local control than patients treated for primary disease. As for OS, patients treated for Grade 1 histology had a better outcome (p 5 0.05). EBRT was generally well tolerated. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) Grade 1 or 2 toxicities occurred in 33% of patients and one patient had unexplained post-radiation Grade 2 fever that resolved after tumor resection. As for chronic toxicities 24% of our patients presented Grade 1 GI toxicity and one patient presented Grade 3 small bowel stenosis not clearly due to radiation toxicity. Despite the location and volume of the tumors treated, preoperative IMRT was very well tolerated in our patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Unfortunately local recurrences remain common and dose escalation is to be considered.

Deferred permanent prostate seed brachytherapy does not affect PSA outcome: results from a large retrospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: To examine the outcome of deferred permanent seed brachytherapy (BT) for localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer in order to identify predictors of delayed therapy (DT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 714 patients treated with BT with or without external radiotherapy. DT was defined as no treatment for > 350 days after the first biopsy with cancer. Factors influencing DT were analyzed. PSA outcome was assessed only in patients with a follow up ≥ 24 months. Patients with DT were compared to patients treated < 350 days using non-parametric tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using linear-regression analysis. RESULTS: BT was deferred in 125 patients (17.5%) for a median of 607 days (IQR 445-926). Patients with DT were older (71 years versus 69 years, p = 0.04) and had significantly less aggressive disease (percentage of positive biopsies, T1 disease, Gleason 6) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.01) and Gleason score (p = 0.05) were predictive for DT. Median (range) PSA follow up for DT patients was 36 months (24-78). The rate of patients with DT attaining a PSA at last follow up of < 0.2 ng/mL, < 0.5 ng/mL and ≤ 1 ng/mL was 53%, 73 % and 95%, respectively; only one patient (1.6 %) had biochemical failure (p = 0.61 compared to immediate BT). Multivariate analysis showed that age was predictive (p = 0.02) for a nadir of < 0.5 ng/mL and < 0.2 ng/mL (p = 0.017) and T-stage for a PSA < 0.2 ng/mL (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest analysis of the effects of deferred BT showing a promising rate of early PSA response.

Unusually high prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate brachytherapy: Searching for etiologic factors.

PURPOSE: Determine whether fat distribution, body mass index, or clinical and dosimetric factors are associated with prostate specific antigen (PSA) bounce (PSAb) of ≥1.6 ng/mL in patients treated with permanent seed (125)I prostate brachytherapy (PB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 23 patients with a PSAb of ≥1.6 ng/mL. For each patient with a bounce, at least one control with similar age (age ± 2 years, n=31) was identified. Control patients had to have no bounce (≤0.2 ng/mL) and a most recent PSA of <1 ng/mL. CT at Day 30 after PB was used to determine the volume of subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and peri-prostatic fat. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between PSAb and adipose tissue distribution and clinical and dosimetric factors. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 62.3 ± 5.3 years. Mean PSAb height was 2.7 ± 0.8 ng/mL, and mean time to bounce was 9.6 ± 4 months. More than 90% of the patients reached a PSA nadir before PSAb within 12 months post-PB. Patients showing PSAb were more likely to have a T1c disease vs. T2a (odds ratio = 18.87; 95% confidence interval: 2.32-454.55; p=0.019) and a lower seed activity per cc of prostate volume (odds ratio=0.02; 95% confidence interval=0.42-2.22; p=0.026). Neither fat distribution nor body mass index was associated with PSAb (p=0.11-0.597). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and dosimetric factors play a role in PSAb of ≥1.6 ng/mL. Fat distribution is not associated with a PSAb. There is presently no satisfactory theory to explain the etiology of PSAb.

Seed migration in prostate brachytherapy depends on experience and technique.

PURPOSE: To determine seed loss and pulmonary migration rate over time in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed the first 495 patients treated in our department. All patients were treated with loose (125)I seeds with automated seed delivery system and real-time intraoperative planning. Pelvic fluoroscopic imaging was done 30 days after the implant. Patients were divided into five groups of 100 patients according to the order they were treated, and groups were compared using χ(2) test and one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 22.8% of patients lost at least one seed. The highest percentage of patients losing any number of seeds was in the first 100. Thirty-eight percent lost at least one seed. This number decreased gradually and was only 9% in Patients 400-499. The mean total seed loss rate (number of seeds lost/number seeds implanted) changed significantly over time (p<0.001). There was a continuous significant (p<0.001) decline after the first 100 patients (1.25% for the first 100 patients) followed by a rise in Patients 300-399, followed by another decline (0.21% for the last 100 patients). The seed loss rate to the thorax changed significantly over time (p=0.009). It rose after an initial rate of 0.25-0.42% in Patients 200-299 and 300-399 and declined later to a rate of 0.21% in the last 100 patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found a learning curve for seed migration. Avoiding implanting seeds outside of the capsule and modern transrectal ultrasound imaging can help decrease migration.

Simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy compared with conventional radiotherapy in patients treated with concurrent carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare, in a retrospective study, the toxicity and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. conventional radiotherapy (CRT) in patients treated with concomitant carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2000 and December 2007, 249 patients were treated with definitive chemoradiation. One hundred patients had 70 Gy in 33 fractions using IMRT, and 149 received CRT at 70 Gy in 35 fractions. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 42 months. Three-year actuarial rates for locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 95.1% vs. 84.4% (p = 0.005), 85.3% vs. 69.3% (p = 0.001), and 92.1% vs. 75.2% (p < 0.001) for IMRT and CRT, respectively. The benefit of the radiotherapy regimen on outcomes was also observed with a Cox multivariate analysis. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was associated with less acute dermatitis and less xerostomia at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that simultaneous integrated boost using IMRT is associated with favorable locoregional control and survival rates with less xerostomia and acute dermatitis than CRT when both are given concurrently with chemotherapy.

Relationship between prostate-specific antigen bounce body fat distribution and body mass index in permanent seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of body mass index (BMI) and adipose tissue distribution on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We studied 20 patients who had PSA bounce (≥0.50ng/mL) after exclusive prostate brachytherapy. These patients were compared with 48 patients without a bounce (<0.50ng/mL). All patients in the comparison group had a followup of ≥24 months and a last PSA ≤0.5ng/mL. Within these 48 patients, there was a group matched for age (n=20). Univariate and multivariate logistic models were estimated to assess the association between age, baseline PSA, prostate volume, D(90), visceral fat (VF) volume, and BMI on PSA-bouncing status. RESULTS: When comparing the patients with a bounce to those without, only BMI showed a significantly different distribution (mean, 25.18 vs. 27.47kg/m(2); p=0.0342). On a multivariate analysis, BMI had an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.99, p=0.049), indicating that an increase of 1kg/m(2) in BMI is associated with a 15% reduction in the odds of having a bounce. In the univariate analysis with the matching patients, BMI was a significant predictor of a bounce (p=0.0147). In the multivariate conditional logistic model, BMI showed a trend toward an influence on a bounce (p=0.0615). All other factors, including VF, did not have any influence on a PSA bounce. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a lower BMI are more likely to experience a PSA bounce ≥0.50ng/mL. VF did not have an influence on a PSA bounce.

Cervical lymph node metastases from unknown primary cancer: a single-institution experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and rate of complications of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of cervical lymph node metastases from unknown primary cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 2005 and November 2008, 25 patients with an unknown primary cancer underwent IMRT, with a median radiation dose of 70 Gy. The bilateral neck and ipsilateral putative pharyngeal mucosa were included in the target volume. All patients had squamous cell carcinoma, except for 1 patient who had adenosquamous differentiation. They were all treated with curative intent. Of the 25 included patients, 20 were men and 5 were women, with a median age of 54 years. Of these patients, 3 had Stage III, 18 had Stage IVa, and 4 had Stage IVb. Of the 25 patients, 18 (72%) received platinum-based chemotherapy in a combined-modality setting. Neck dissection was reserved for residual disease after definitive IMRT. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 38 months, the overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control rates were all 100% at 3 years. No occurrence of primary cancer was observed during the follow-up period. The reported rates of xerostomia reduced with the interval from the completion of treatment. Nine patients (36%) reported Grade 2 or greater xerostomia at 6 months, and only 2 (8%) of them reported the same grade of salivary function toxicity after 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our institution, IMRT for unknown primary cancer has provided good overall and disease-free survival in all the patients with an acceptable rate of complications. IMRT allowed us to address the bilateral neck and ipsilateral putative pharyngeal mucosa with minimal late salivary function toxicity. The use of concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT for more advanced disease led to good clinical results with reasonable toxicities.

Urethra-sparing, intraoperative, real-time planned, permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy: toxicity analysis.

PURPOSE: To report the toxicity outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing (125)I permanent-seed brachytherapy (BT) according to a urethra-sparing, intraoperative (IO), real-time planned conformal technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were analyzed on 250 patients treated consecutively for low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer between 2005 and 2009. The planned goal was urethral V(150) = 0. Acute and late genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), and erectile toxicities were scored with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). Median follow-up time for patients with at least 2 years of follow-up (n = 130) was 34.4 months (range, 24-56.9 months). RESULTS: Mean IO urethra V(150) was 0.018% ± 0.08%. Mean prostate D(90) and V(100) on day-30 computed tomography scan were 158.0 ± 27.0 Gy and 92.1% ± 7.2%, respectively. Mean IPSS peak was 9.5 ± 6.3 1 month after BT (mean difference from baseline IPSS, 5.3). No acute GI toxicity was observed in 86.8% of patients. The 3-year probability of Grade ≥2 late GU toxicity-free survival was 77.4% ± 4.0%, with Grade 3 late GU toxicity encountered in only 3 patients. Three-year Grade 1 late GI toxicity-free survival was 86.1% ± 3.2%. No patient presented Grade ≥2 late GI toxicity. Of patients with normal sexual status at baseline, 20.7% manifested Grade ≥2 erectile dysfunction after BT. On multivariate analysis, elevated baseline IPSS (p = 0.016) and high-activity sources (median 0.61 mCi) (p = 0.033) predicted increased Grade ≥2 late GU toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Urethra-sparing IO BT results in low acute and late GU toxicity compared with the literature. High seed activity and elevated IPSS at baseline increased long-term GU toxicity.

Combined intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs. three-dimensional highly conformal radiotherapy after (125)I prostate permanent seed brachytherapy: a comparative treatment planning study.

PURPOSE: A comparative treatment planning study was conducted to analyze combined intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. three-dimensional highly conformal radiotherapy (3D-hCRT) after (125)I permanent seed brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We optimized an IMRT and a 3D-hCRT treatment plan to 45Gy in 9 patients 2 months after (125)I seed brachytherapy (110Gy) implant. IMRT and 3D-hCRT were planned using eight and seven nonopposed coplanar fields of 6- and 23-MV. Dose-volume histograms for target volume and organs at risk were compared for both techniques. RESULTS: IMRT provided similar conformality but better homogeneity (p=0.021) than 3D-hCRT plans, despite slightly higher maximal point dose rates (101.9% vs. 100.9%, p=0.050). 3D-hCRT plans required fewer monitor units than did IMRT (289 vs. 607, p=0.008). Dose to bladder, penile bulb, and femoral heads were lower with IMRT than with 3D-hCRT (p=0.008-0.028). No differences were observed for dose to urethra and the entire rectum. Mean dose to rectal wall was lower with IMRT than with 3D-hCRT (25.1 vs. 26.5Gy, p=0.028). CONCLUSION: IMRT plans result in more homogeneous dose distribution and in reduced doses to most organs at risk at the expense of needing more than twice the monitor units compared with 3D-hCRT.

Enteral feeding during chemoradiotherapy for advanced head-and-neck cancer: a single-institution experience using a reactive approach.

PURPOSE: The optimal method for providing enteral nutrition to patients with head-and-neck cancer is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of our reactive policy, which consists of the installation of a nasogastric (NG) feeding tube only when required by the patient's nutritional status. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of all patients with Stage III and IV head-and-neck cancer treated with concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy between January 2003 and December 2006 were reviewed. The overall and disease-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The present study included 253 patients, and the median follow-up was 33 months. At 3 years, the estimated overall survival and disease-free survival rate was 82.8% and 77.8%, respectively, for the whole population. No survival difference was observed when the patients were compared according to the presence and absence of a NG tube or stratified by weight loss quartile. The mean weight loss during treatment for all patients was 10.4%. The proportion of patients requiring a NG tube was 49.8%, and the NG tube remained in place for a median duration of 40 days. No major complications were associated with NG tube installation. Only 3% of the patients were still dependent on enteral feeding at 6 months. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the use of a reactive NG tube with an interdisciplinary team approach is a safe and effective method to manage malnutrition in patients treated with concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer.