Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Rep ; 42(5): 112437, 2023 05 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37097818

ABSTRACT

Apatinib has been shown to clinically enhance anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the complexity of GC immunosuppression remains a challenge for precision immunotherapy. Here, we profile the transcriptomes of 34,182 single cells from GC patient-derived xenografts of humanized mouse models treated with vehicle, nivolumab, or nivolumab plus apatinib. Notably, excessive expression of CXCL5 in the CellCycle malignant epithelium, induced by anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and blocked by combined apatinib treatment, is found to be a key driver of tumor-associated neutrophil (TAN) recruitment in the tumor microenvironment through the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis. We further show that the protumor TAN signature is associated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy-related progressive disease and poor cancer prognosis. Molecular and functional analyses in cell-derived xenograft models confirm the positive in vivo therapeutic effect of targeting the CXCL5/CXCR2 axis during anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Altogether, our study elucidates the GC immunosuppressive landscape in anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and highlights potential targets for overcoming checkpoint immunotherapy resistance.


Subject(s)
Nivolumab , Stomach Neoplasms , Animals , Mice , Humans , Nivolumab/pharmacology , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ecosystem , Immunotherapy , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Tumor Microenvironment
2.
Theranostics ; 10(19): 8633-8647, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32754268

ABSTRACT

Rationale: The prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients is poor, and there is limited therapeutic efficacy due to genetic heterogeneity and difficulty in early-stage screening. Here, we developed and validated an individualized gene set-based prognostic signature for gastric cancer (GPSGC) and further explored survival-related regulatory mechanisms as well as therapeutic targets in GC. Methods: By implementing machine learning, a prognostic model was established based on gastric cancer gene expression datasets from 1699 patients from five independent cohorts with reported full clinical annotations. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment, including stromal and immune subcomponents, cell types, panimmune gene sets, and immunomodulatory genes, was carried out in 834 GC patients from three independent cohorts to explore regulatory survival mechanisms and therapeutic targets related to the GPSGC. To prove the stability and reliability of the GPSGC model and therapeutic targets, multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry was conducted with tissue microarrays representing 186 GC patients. Based on multivariate Cox analysis, a nomogram that integrated the GPSGC and other clinical risk factors was constructed with two training cohorts and was verified by two validation cohorts. Results: Through machine learning, we obtained an optimal risk assessment model, the GPSGC, which showed higher accuracy in predicting survival than individual prognostic factors. The impact of the GPSGC score on poor survival of GC patients was probably correlated with the remodeling of stromal components in the tumor microenvironment. Specifically, TGFß and angiogenesis-related gene sets were significantly associated with the GPSGC risk score and poor outcome. Immunomodulatory gene analysis combined with experimental verification further revealed that TGFß1 and VEGFB may be developed as potential therapeutic targets of GC patients with poor prognosis according to the GPSGC. Furthermore, we developed a nomogram based on the GPSGC and other clinical variables to predict the 3-year and 5-year overall survival for GC patients, which showed improved prognostic accuracy than clinical characteristics only. Conclusion: As a tumor microenvironment-relevant gene set-based prognostic signature, the GPSGC model provides an effective approach to evaluate GC patient survival outcomes and may prolong overall survival by enabling the selection of individualized targeted therapy.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/genetics , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor B/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Middle Aged , Nomograms , Precision Medicine , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Survival Analysis , Tissue Array Analysis , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor B/metabolism , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL