Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Thromb Haemost ; 14(1): 105-13, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26469193

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: ESSENTIALS: We performed a pooled analysis of 926 patients with cancer-associated incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage. Recurrence risk is comparable after subsegmental and more proximally localized IPE. Our results support low molecular weight heparins over VKA and similar management of subsegmental IPE. BACKGROUND: Incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE) is defined as pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosed on computed tomography scanning not performed for suspected PE. IPE has been estimated to occur in 3.1% of all cancer patients and is a growing challenge for clinicians and patients. Nevertheless, knowledge about the treatment and prognosis of cancer-associated IPE is scarce. We aimed to provide the best available evidence on IPE management. METHODS: Incidence rates of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major hemorrhage, and mortality during 6-month follow-up were pooled using individual patient data from studies identified by a systematic literature search. Subgroup analyses based on cancer stage, thrombus localization, and management were performed. RESULTS: In 926 cancer patients with IPE from 11 cohorts, weighted pooled 6-month risks of recurrent VTE, major hemorrhage and mortality were 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-8.3%), 4.7% (95% CI 3.0-6.8%), and 37% (95% CI 28-47%). VTE recurrence risk was comparable under low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (6.2% vs. 6.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95% CI 0.3-3.1), while 12% in untreated patients (HR 2.6; 95% CI 0.91-7.3). Risk of major hemorrhage was higher under VKAs than under LMWH (13% vs. 3.9%; HR 3.9; 95% CI 1.6-10). VTE recurrence risk was comparable in patients with an subsegmental IPE and those with a more proximally localized IPE (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.50-2.4). CONCLUSION: These results support the current recommendation to anticoagulate cancer-associated IPE with LMWH and argue against different management of subsegmental IPE.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/complications , Neoplasms/complications , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Recurrence , Registries , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thromboembolism/diagnosis , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Young Adult
2.
Gene Ther ; 20(1): 7-15, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22170342

ABSTRACT

Oncolytic viruses (OV) are promising treatments for cancer, with several currently undergoing testing in randomised clinical trials. Measles virus (MV) has not yet been tested in models of human melanoma. This study demonstrates the efficacy of MV against human melanoma. It is increasingly recognised that an essential component of therapy with OV is the recruitment of host antitumour immune responses, both innate and adaptive. MV-mediated melanoma cell death is an inflammatory process, causing the release of inflammatory cytokines including type-1 interferons and the potent danger signal HMGB1. Here, using human in vitro models, we demonstrate that MV enhances innate antitumour activity, and that MV-mediated melanoma cell death is capable of stimulating a melanoma-specific adaptive immune response.


Subject(s)
Measles virus/immunology , Melanoma/immunology , Oncolytic Viruses/immunology , Cell Death/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , HMGB1 Protein/genetics , HMGB1 Protein/metabolism , Humans , Interferon Type I/genetics , Interferon Type I/metabolism , Measles virus/pathogenicity , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/virology , Oncolytic Viruses/pathogenicity , Up-Regulation
3.
Curr Pharm Biotechnol ; 13(9): 1834-41, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21740364

ABSTRACT

There has been interest in using viruses to treat cancer for over a century. Recent clinical efforts, driven on by significant preclinical advances, have focussed on the safety of using replication-competent viruses. Recently published clinical trials of six oncolytic viruses (adenovirus, reovirus, measles, herpes simplex, Newcastle disease virus and vaccinia) have added to the accumulating data that endorse oncolytic viruses as a safe and well tolerated treatment approach. Conclusive evidence of efficacy remains to be demonstrated, but randomised clinical trials are now underway.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/virology , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Oncolytic Viruses/physiology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Humans , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL