The Effect of Smoking on Sternal Scar Healing: A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiothoracic surgery with a median sternotomy is an electing factor for the development of a hypertrophic scar. Hypertrophic scars, characterized by an increased vascularity, often result in aesthetic and functional problems. Smoking, due to its negative effects on vascularization, could therefore have an effect on scar healing. OBJECTIVE: A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the effect of smoking on scar healing after cardiothoracic surgery with a median sternotomy incision. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent cardiac surgery with a median sternotomy were divided into 3 groups: smokers, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers. Erythema values of the scar were measured with a colorimeter on 3 standardized parts of the scar. Scar evaluation was performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: During 1 year, a total of 90 patients were followed after a median sternotomy; 10 patients were lost to follow-up. There were 23 smokers, 52 ex-smokers, and 15 nonsmokers with an overall mean age of 61.5 ± 8.83 years. No significant difference in redness as a parameter for hypertrophic scarring was observed between the 3 groups. Nevertheless, a trend in favor of the smokers was seen, as they developed less hyperemic scars. The caudal part of the scar showed a significantly higher incidence of hypertrophy compared with the middle and cranial part of the scar at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: It is presumed that a large sample size with younger patients is needed to confirm the results herein. Furthermore, more caudally located skin, especially the subxiphoidal part, is prone to hypertrophic scarring and should, for that reason, be avoided in the incision.

Poly Implant Prothèse silicone breast implants: implant dynamics and capsular contracture.

BACKGROUND: The Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) implants were withdrawn from the market in 2010 due to the use of low-grade silicone, causing a high risk for implant rupture. The aim of this study was to investigate the implant dynamics of PIP breast implants, as well as to determine the rate and predictors of implant gel bleeding, rupture, and capsular contracture in PIP implants. METHODS: Eighty women with a total of 152 PIP implants who underwent a reoperation in 2012 were enrolled in this study. Physical investigation included assessing the Baker score and demographics were retrospectively traced in medical records. The pre- and post-operative volumes of the implants were calculated and their state was determined intraoperatively by the surgeon. RESULTS: The implants were removed after a mean implant duration of 11 ± 2.1 years. Gel bleed and implant rupture occurred in respectively 42 and 25% of the implants. Intact implants had post-operative volume increase as well as decrease. There was a correlation between gel bleeding and more post-operative implant volume increase (P ≤ 0.05). Capsular contracture had a protective effect against post-operative implant volume increase (P ≤ 0.05), while a post-operative implant volume increase provided a protective influence in developing capsular contracture (P ≤ 0.05). Additionally, implant rupture led to a higher risk of capsular contracture (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We managed to illustrate that PIP implant shells were too permeable and that there is a correlation between gel bleeding and the increase of the post-operative implant volume. Implant rupture led to a higher risk for developing capsular contracture.Level of evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study.

Smoking and its effect on scar healing.

Scar formation is influenced by several factors such as wound infection, tension, wound depth and anatomical localization. Hypertrophic scarring is often the result of an imbalance in the wound and scar healing process. The exact underlying pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear. Smoking has a higher risk of postoperative complications probably due to a diminished macrophage induction. Following our clinical impression that smokers without postoperative wound infections show esthetically better scars, we evaluated the scars after a reduction mammaplasty in smoking and nonsmoking patients in a prospective clinical trial. Between July 2006 and September 2007, 13 smokers and 30 non smokers with a reduction mammaplasty were included. They were recruited from Viecuri Medical Centre and Atrium Medical Centre in the Netherlands after written consent. Surgical data and data of the patients' condition were collected. Follow-up for erythema values of the scars was done with a colorimeter (The Minolta CR-300, Minolta Camera Co., Ltd., Osaka Japan) at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months postoperatively on four standardized postsurgical sites. ANOVA and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. In the smoking group, the scars were significantly less red compared to the nonsmoking group. No significant differences were found in BMI, resection weight and drain production between both groups. Although smoking is certainly not recommended as a preventive therapy to influence scar healing, this study confirms our assumption that smokers tend to have faster and less erythemateous scar healing to nonsmokers. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism of the effect of smoking on scars.