Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 124(11): 2337-2346, 2018 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29579325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors such as veliparib are potent sensitizing agents and have been safely combined with DNA-damaging agents such as temozolomide. The sensitizing effects of PARP inhibitors are magnified when cells harbor DNA repair defects. METHODS: A single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study was performed to investigate the disease control rate (DCR) after 2 cycles of veliparib plus temozolomide in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to all standard therapies. Fifty patients received temozolomide (150 mg/m2 /d) on days 1 to 5 and veliparib (40 mg twice daily) on days 1 to 7 of each 28-day cycle. Another 5 patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors were also enrolled. Twenty additional patients were then treated with temozolomide at 200 mg/m2 /d. Archived tumor specimens were used for immunohistochemistry to assess mismatch repair, phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression levels. RESULTS: The combination was well tolerated, although some patients required dose reductions for myelosuppression. The primary endpoint was successfully met with a DCR of 24% and 2 confirmed partial responses. The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, and the median overall survival was 6.6 months. PTEN protein expression and MGMT protein expression were not predictors of DCR. There was also a suggestion of worse outcomes for patients with dMMR tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this heavily pretreated mCRC population, a combination of veliparib and temozolomide was well tolerated with temozolomide doses up to 200 mg/m2 /d, and it was clinically active. PARP inhibitor-based therapy merits further exploration in patients with mCRC. Cancer 2018;124:2337-46. © 2018 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Temozolomide/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Colectomy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proctectomy , Prospective Studies , Radiosurgery/methods , Temozolomide/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 76(5): 1073-9, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449224

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor efficacy and tolerability of combination temozolomide (TMZ) and veliparib (ABT-888) in patients with advanced, sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: This single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with pathologically confirmed, sorafenib-refractory HCC. All patients received 40 mg ABT-888 PO daily on days 1-7 and 150 mg/m(2) TMZ PO daily on days 1-5 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) at 2 months. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles using RECIST criteria, and toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v4.03. RESULTS: We enrolled 16 patients in the first phase of the trial, but the study was discontinued due to a poor ORR; only four patients (25 %) had SD after 2 cycles. Twelve patients (75 %) were taken off study after 2 months of treatment; 10 of these had disease progression. Two patients (13 %) were taken off study due to severe toxicity, and one patient (6 %) died from non-treatment-related liver failure. One patient had SD for 16 months, receiving 11 cycles of therapy before being taken off study. The most common grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included vomiting (n = 2), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), nausea (n = 1), and anemia (n = 1). The median PFS was 1.9 months, and median OS was 13.1 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of TMZ and ABT-888 is well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC. However, the regimen failed to show survival benefit. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01205828.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Benzimidazoles/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics , DNA Methylation/drug effects , DNA Repair/drug effects , DNA Repair/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , DNA, Neoplasm/metabolism , Dacarbazine/administration & dosage , Dacarbazine/adverse effects , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Dacarbazine/pharmacology , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Niacinamide/pharmacology , Phenylurea Compounds/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Salvage Therapy , Sorafenib , Temozolomide , Treatment Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...