ABSTRACT
Echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation is challenging due to the varying heart rate. Thus, the topic of this expert proposal focuses on an obvious gap in the current recommendations about diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF)-the peculiarities and difficulties of echocardiographic imaging. The assessment of systolic and diastolic function-especially in combination with valvular heart diseases-by echocardiography can basically be done by averaging the results of echocardiographic measurements of the respective parameters or by the index beat approach, which uses a representative cardiac cycle for measurement. Therefore, a distinction must be made between the functionally relevant status, which is characterized by the averaging method, and the best possible hemodynamic status, which is achieved with the most optimal left ventricular (LV) filling according to the index beat method with longer previous RR intervals. This proposal focuses on left atrial and left ventricular function and deliberately excludes problems of echocardiography when assessing left atrial appendage in terms of its complexity. Echocardiography of the left atrial appendage is therefore reserved for its own expert proposal.
ABSTRACT
The left atrial appendage is a blind ending cardiac structure prone to blood stasis due to its morphology. This structure is a preferred region of thrombogenesis in relation to reduced myocardial contractility of the atrial wall. Blood stasis occurs primarily in low flow conditions. One of the tasks of echocardiography is the analysis of morphology and function of the left atrial appendage. The detection of thrombi by echocardiography is difficult and must be carried out thoroughly and carefully to avoid potential complications-especially in the context of rhythm control. The assessment of thromboembolic risk, especially in patients with unknown and presumed atrial fibrillation is a second challenge by characterizing atrial function and flow conditions in the left atrial appendage. Thus, this proposal focuses on the obvious problems of echocardiography when assessing left atrial appendage and the role of this method in planning a potential interventional closure of left atrial appendage.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and Fabry disease (FD) cause myocardial damage but may also affect the valvular and subvalvular apparatus. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of new echocardiographic indices including mitral valve thickness and papillary muscle (PM) hypertrophy to differentiate CA and FD. METHODS: In patients with confirmed CA and FD, a detailed assessment of valvular function, mitral valve leaflet thickness and PM area as well as PM left ventricular area ratio (PM/LV-ratio) was performed in offline analyses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were conducted to determine the diagnostic accuracy of mitral valve thickness, PM hypertrophy, and PM/LV-ratio to distinguish CA from FD. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 129 patients (FD n = 49, CA n = 80). CA patients showed significantly more thickened mitral valve leaflets (4.1 ± 1.3 mm vs. 2.9 ± 1.1 mm, p < 0.001) and a higher PM area [4.0 (3.1-4.6) mm2 vs. 2.8 (2.1-4.6) mm2, p = 0.009] with a comparable PM/LV-ratio in both groups. Mitral valve thickness showed the highest diagnostic accuracy to discriminate CA [AUC 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.87)]. The prevalence of aortic, tricuspid, and pulmonary valve regurgitation was significantly higher in CA (aortic regurgitation ≥ II° 13% vs. 4%, tricuspid regurgitation≥ II° 19% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the assessment of mitral valve thickness may be a new useful echocardiographic parameter to differentiate CA and FD, whereas papillary muscle hypertrophy and PM/LV-ratio showed a limited diagnostic performance to discriminate CA. German clinical trials registry: DRKS00027403.