Laboratory performance in albumin and total protein measurement using a commutable specimen: results of a College of American Pathologists study.

CONTEXT: Discrepant results for serum constituents were observed among peer groups in the College of American Pathologists Comprehensive Chemistry Survey. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of serum albumin and total protein measurement procedures and to evaluate the commutability of the conventional survey specimens. DESIGN: A fresh frozen, off-the-clot serum sample was included along with 4 conventional survey specimens. The fresh frozen, off-the-clot serum sample was prepared in a manner expected to confer commutability with native clinical samples. RESULTS: For the fresh frozen, off-the-clot serum sample, the mean values for 17 peer-groups were -0.07 to 0.32 g/dL from the bromocresol green albumin designated comparison method, whereas 4 VITROS (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, New York) peer groups differed by -0.29 to -0.37 g/dL (15 of 21 differences [71%] had P < .001). For bromocresol purple albumin methods, the mean differences from the designated comparison method from 8 peer groups were 0.25 to 0.47 g/dL (all had P < .001). For total protein methods, 23 peer group mean values were -0.07 to 0.15 g/dL from the reference measurement procedure (12 of 24 [50%] had P < .001). The Beckman (Fullerton, California) Synchron LX20 had a bias of -0.30 g/dL (P <.001). The commutability of the conventional specimens was acceptable for 23 of 24 bromocresol green method-material combinations (96%) and 13 of 16 bromocresol purple albumin method-material combinations (81%). All (100%) of the 36 method-material combinations had acceptable commutability for total protein. CONCLUSIONS: One (2.2%) of the instrument systems (Synchron) using bromocresol green and none (0%) of the instrument systems using bromocresol purple had satisfactory total-error performance for albumin measurement. Differences in results between bromocresol green and bromocresol purple methods precluded using common reference intervals for interpreting results for serum albumin. Eight of 9 instrument systems (86.5%) had satisfactory total-error performance for total protein measurement.

The status of bilirubin measurements in U.S. laboratories: why is accuracy elusive?

In 2003, the Chemistry Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists introduced a new specimen in the Neonatal Bilirubin Survey. The specimen, consisting of human serum enriched with unconjugated bilirubin and thus resembling a clinical specimen, brought about an improvement in the accuracy of the measurement of bilirubin by laboratories participating in the Neonatal Bilirubin Survey. There was also an improvement in the specificity of methods measuring direct bilirubin. However, persisting inaccuracies and variability in laboratory performance have been traced to calibrators consisting of bovine serum spiked with unconjugated bilirubin and ditaurobilirubin; bovine serum causes underestimation of both bilirubins by 8 major chemical analyzers. To eradicate inaccuracy calibrators and Survey specimens should be made in human instead of bovine serum.

Interlaboratory comparison of the Doumas bilirubin reference method.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance of the Doumas bilirubin reference method. DESIGN AND METHODS: Ring trails using pooled patient specimens, a calibrator and human sera enriched with unconjugated bilirubin were analyzed in five laboratories using the Doumas bilirubin reference method. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation for the linear measurement range between laboratories ranged from 1-3%. CONCLUSIONS: The Doumas bilirubin reference method is robust and reproducible. Bilirubin results using this method may be used in the development of more accurate and reliable calibrators.

Laboratory performance in neonatal bilirubin testing using commutable specimens: a progress report on a College of American Pathologists study.

CONTEXT: In 2003 the Chemistry Resource Committee of the College of American Pathologists introduced a commutable specimen in the Neonatal Bilirubin Surveys. This specimen was intended to help evaluate all bilirubin methods. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of commutable specimens on the performance of selected clinical analyzers in measuring neonatal bilirubin from 2003 through 2006. DESIGN: A human serum-based specimen enriched with unconjugated bilirubin in human serum has been included since 2003 in the Neonatal Bilirubin Surveys. The bilirubin values of these specimens were determined by the reference method and used to evaluate results reported by various chemistry analyzers. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation for College of American Pathologists All Data ranged from 4.9% to 6.2% for the Neonatal Bilirubin Survey. However, coefficients of variation for the 4 major instrument groups (Dimension, Olympus, Synchron, and Vitros), which report 65% of all results, varied from 2% to 3%. College of American Pathologists All Data mean bilirubin values were within 0.46 mg/dL (7.8 micromol/L) of the reference method mean in 2003; in subsequent years these differences became larger, peaking at 1.87 mg/dL (32 micromol/L) in 2005. CONCLUSIONS: The large systematic error of bilirubin measurements is due primarily to failure of instrument manufacturers to produce reliable bilirubin calibrators. Primary calibrators should consist of human serum enriched with unconjugated bilirubin. Bilirubin values must be assigned by the reference method, the performance and robustness of which are reported in this article. Secondary calibrators distributed to users must be traceable to primary calibrators.

Bilirubin proficiency testing using specimens containing unconjugated bilirubin and human serum: results of a College of American Pathologists study.

CONTEXT: Specimens of the College of American Pathologists Neonatal Bilirubin and Chemistry surveys are inadequate for evaluating the performance of clinical laboratories in measuring serum bilirubin because they exhibit strong matrix interference. Recently published data indicate that at least 1 major clinical analyzer provided inaccurate bilirubin values for Neonatal Bilirubin Survey specimens. The composition of the specimens, bovine serum enriched with ditaurobilirubin, was responsible for the erroneous results. OBJECTIVE: This article evaluates the performance of major clinical analyzers using a survey specimen free of matrix interference. DESIGN: A human serum-based specimen enriched solely with unconjugated bilirubin was included in the 2003 Neonatal Bilirubin and Chemistry surveys. Its bilirubin concentration (19.4 mg/dL [332 micromol/L]) was determined by the reference method for total bilirubin. RESULTS: The coefficients of variation for the 4 major clinical analyzers (Dimension, Hitachi, Synchron, and Vitros) ranged from 1.9% to 3.7%. When compared to the bilirubin value measured by the reference method, mean bilirubin values of the 4 major clinical analyzers and College of American Pathologists (CAP) All Data (which refers to the grand mean and overall coefficient of variation of all method principles, all instruments according to CAP terminology) ranged from -3.5% to 5.1%. Direct bilirubin results from most field methods showed good specificity overall. CONCLUSION: Human serum-based survey specimens, having their bilirubin concentrations determined by the reference method, should be included as frequently as feasible in the Neonatal Bilirubin Survey. Such specimens may be used by instrument manufacturers as standards for calibrating bilirubin methods and for assigning values to calibrators provided to instrument users. A substantial improvement in bilirubin measurements due to the reduction of systematic error is expected.

Performance of bilirubin determinations in US laboratories--revisited.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis and management of hyperbilirubinemia in the newborn requires accurate and precise bilirubin determinations. We evaluated the current status of bilirubin measurements in US laboratories by examining data submitted by laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Neonatal Bilirubin (NB) and Chemistry (C) Surveys. METHODS: We analyzed specimens from the CAP NB and C Surveys by the reference method for total bilirubin in three laboratories. The reference method bilirubin values were compared with bilirubin values reported by Survey participants. RESULTS: The imprecision (CV) for all instruments combined (CAP-All Instruments) ranged from 4.7% to 5.6% at the bilirubin concentrations tested. The CVs of the four most commonly used instruments were smaller, ranging from 1.9% to 4.5%. Differences between bilirubin values by the reference method and mean values from the four most common instruments ranged from -21.6% to 10.9%. When the same specimens from the NB Surveys were used in the C Surveys, the Vitros values were strikingly different from those of the NB Surveys. The use of different methods in the NB and C Surveys coupled with the presence of a nonhuman protein base and ditaurobilirubin (DTB) in the Survey specimens accounted for the discrepant results. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of accuracy is impossible from the CAP Surveys because the specimens consist of bovine serum containing a mixture of unconjugated bilirubin and DTB. For the evaluation of accuracy, we recommend that Survey specimens consist of human serum enriched with unconjugated bilirubin.