Factors associated with delayed referral and hearing rehabilitation for congenital sensorineural hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of social determinants of health and clinical status on referral and intervention for congenital sensorineural hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of children with confirmed sensorineural or mixed hearing loss between 2013 and 2021 at a single academic medical institution. METHODS: Referral rates and timing for hearing rehabilitation, rates and timing of completed evaluation, and rate and timing of amplification were recorded. Patient demographics included gestational age, race, ethnicity, sex, hearing loss severity, and CMV status. RESULTS: There were 216 children with confirmed sensorineural or mixed hearing loss, of which 77 had a unilateral hearing loss and 89 a severe or profound hearing loss. Delayed referral for hearing aid evaluation was noted in premature patients (median 375 days premature, median 147 term; p < 0.01) and publicly insured patients (median 215 days, median 123 private; p = 0.04). Delayed time to hearing aid fitting was noted for non-white patients (median 325 days, median 203 white patients; p < 0.01), publicly insured patients (median 309 days, median 212 private insurance; p < 0.02), and premature patients (median 462 days, median 224 term; p = 0.03). White patients were more likely to be referred for cochlear implant (p = 0.03).Privately insured patients and patients with a positive CMV test were more likely to be referred for cochlear implant evaluation, be seen in the cochlear implant clinic, and undergo implantation (p < 0.05). Non-white patients had a delay in cochlear implantation referral (median 928 days, median 398 days white patients; p = 0.05). Prolonged interval between evaluation in cochlear implant clinic to implantation was noted for privately insured patients (median 125 days; median 78 days publicly insured; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with hearing amplification referral rates and time until amplification for children with identified congenital sensorineural hearing loss. For cochlear implantation, insurance type, CMV status were significantly associated with rate and timing of cochlear implant pathway.

Cost of pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction: Differences between single-versus double-stage procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Examine differences in cost between single stage (ss) versus double stage (ds) laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) for pediatric subglottic stenosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of children who underwent ssLTR or dsLTR from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution. METHODS: Costs related to LTR and post-operative care up to one year after tracheostomy decannulation were extrapolated from charges billed to the patient. Charges were obtained from the hospital finance department and the local medical supplies company. Patient demographics including baseline severity of subglottic stenosis and co-morbidities were noted. Variables assessed include duration of hospital admission, number of ancillary procedures, duration of sedation wean, cost of tracheostomy maintenance, and time to tracheostomy decannulation. RESULTS: Fifteen children underwent LTR for subglottic stenosis. D Ten patients underwent ssLTR, while five underwent dsLTR. Grade 3 subglottic stenosis was more prevalent in patients who underwent dsLTR (100%) than ssLTR (50%). The average per-patient hospital charges for ssLTR was $314,383 versus $183,638 for dsLTR. When estimated mean cost of tracheostomy supplies and nursing care until tracheostomy decannulation was included, the mean total charges associated with dsLTR patients was $269,456. Average hospital stay after initial surgery was 22 days for ssLTR versus 6 days for dsLTR. Average time to tracheostomy decannulation for dsLTR was 297 days. Average number of ancillary procedures needed was 3 versus 8 for ssLTR versus dsLTR. CONCLUSION: For pediatric patients with subglottic stenosis, dsLTR may have a lower cost than ssLTR. Although ssLTR has the benefit of immediate decannulation, it is associated with higher patient charges, as well as longer initial hospitalization and sedation. For both patient groups, fees associated with nursing care comprised the majority of charges. Recognizing the factors that contribute to cost differences between ssLTR and dsLTR may be useful when performing cost-benefit analyses and assessing value in health care delivery.

Perceptions of Otolaryngology Residency Among Students Underrepresented in Medicine.

OBJECTIVE: Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) has historically been one of the least diverse surgical subspecialties. The objective of this study was to better understand perceptions of OHNS from underrepresented students in medicine (URiM) and identify factors affecting URiM application to the specialty. STUDY DESIGN: Survey via electronic questionnaire. METHODS: An anonymous, 22-question electronic survey was administered nationally to URiM medical students (N = 388) regarding factors that play a role in developing an interest in applying to OHNS. Responses to questions were compared between URiMs applying to OHNS and those applying to other fields. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of respondents identified as African American and 26% as Latino. Students completed the survey in all years of medical school. Research opportunities (H(2) = 18.58, P < .001) and having a race-concordant role model were the most important factors for those pursing OHNS residency. Personality fit and interactions with OHNS faculty had the greatest influence on their decision to pursue OHNS residency. Board scores (e.g., USMLE Step 1/2CK Scores), competitiveness, lifestyle during residency, the influence of application costs, and racial/ethnic and gender distributions did not reach statistical significance or were noninfluential. CONCLUSION: URiMs applying to OHNS value race-concordant mentorship, are involved in research, and have meaningful relationships with their respective OHNS department. We found that establishing meaningful connections with URiM mentors significantly impacts URiM students considering OHNS. While this cohort was not influenced by overemphasis of board scores within the OHNS match process, the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted this aspect of their application, along with away rotations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:2335-2343, 2022.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.

The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and the impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the adult with congenital heart disease (ACHD). One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients seen in our ACHD program were screened for OSA using the Berlin Questionnaire. Demographic and clinical details on subjects were collected through a chart review. Clinical variables were analyzed to determine risk factors for positive OSA screen, as well as associated outcomes. Seventy-seven (52%) of our cohort were females. The median age of the cohort was 33 years (range = 18-74) and median weight was 79 kg (range = 50-145 kg). Overall, 47 (31%) of our cohort were found to have a positive OSA screen using the Berlin questionnaire. Median age of the patients whom tested positive was 34 years. Compared to patients with a negative screen, patients with a positive OSA screen were more likely to be heavier with a median weight of 99 kg vs 71 kg (p < 0.01) and a larger BMI (31 vs 25 kg/m2, p < 0.01). Overall, 55% of patients whom screened positive were obese (defined as a BMI > 30) compared to 15% in the negative group (p < 0.02). Patients with a positive screen were more likely to have other co-morbidities including diabetes (p < 0.04), hypertension (p < 0.05), depression (p < 0.002), and were more likely to have decreased exercise capacity (p < 0.01) and a defibrillator (p < 0.007). Our data demonstrates that OSA is common in the ACHD patient and is associated with increasing weight and BMI. Patients with a positive screen are at increased risk for multiple co morbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and depression. We believe our data supports the use of screening protocols for OSA in the ACHD population in effort to identify early, treat, and potentially prevent late complications.