Access to nutrition services and information after active cancer treatment: a mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: Evidence-based guidelines for cancer strongly support nutrition and dietetic services for people with cancer and carers in order to improve patient-centred and health service outcomes. Access to nutrition services and information after completing active cancer treatment is relatively unknown in Australia. This study aimed to determine the availability, accessibility, barriers, and preferences to nutrition services and information after cancer treatment in Australia. METHODS: Utilising mixed methods, people with cancer and carers completed a cross-sectional survey, and a sub-group of participants completed a semi-structured interview. The survey evaluated the availability of nutrition services, nutrition information searched, barriers, and preferences for nutrition information. Semi-structured interviews explored participant experience with nutrition services and information. RESULTS: The 149 participants (including 10 carers) were predominately male and with a diagnosis of prostate cancer (63%). Overall, 23% of participants received nutrition information from a dietitian after cancer treatment. Participants (78%) indicated that accessing a nutrition specialist is the main barrier to receiving nutrition care after treatment. Most searched nutrition information on the internet (55%) and found the information easy to understand (89%), but conflicting (52%). Thematic analysis of interviews in fourteen cancer patients revealed three key themes pertaining to (1) preferred referral and timing of nutrition services, (2) lack of confidence in publicly available nutrition information, and (3) streamlining nutrition services for greater access. CONCLUSION: Access to a dietitian and evidence-based information after cancer treatment is limited for people with cancer and carers in Australia, despite the high interest and need for ongoing nutrition care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Models of care evaluating the provision of appropriate nutrition care and information provision after cancer treatment are needed to address this unmet survivorship need.

Beverage Policy Implementation by Child and Adult Care Food Program Participation and Program Type: A Statewide Examination in Georgia.

BACKGROUND: The child care setting is a promising venue to establish healthy habits and promote obesity prevention. One major contributor to weight gain among young children is high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Increasing access to water and other healthy beverages is a viable strategy to reduce childhood obesity. The goal of our study was to investigate implementation of the beverage policies in child care programs in Georgia (GA) by Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) participation and program type. METHODS: The study employed a cross-sectional design. A statewide survey was conducted using the GA Child Care Wellness Survey. A random sample of 3054 child care programs was obtained. Programs were stratified by six state regions to acquire a representative sample. RESULTS: A total of 974 surveys were returned. Sixty-seven percent of the respondents were enrolled in CACFP. Programs participating in CACFP (96%) were less likely to serve SSBs (x2(2) = 15.309, p < 0.001), than non-CACFP programs (90%). CACFP programs were more likely to serve low-fat or fat-free milk to 2-5-year olds than non-CACFP programs (87% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). Family child care homes were significantly more likely to comply with serving only whole milk to 1 year olds (66%; p < 0.001) than other program types. All program types had low compliance with implementing water policies. CONCLUSIONS: Study outcomes provide vital information on the implementation of beverage policies that can inform beverage policy training, with the ultimate goal of reducing obesity risk and promoting healthier diets among preschool children in GA.