ABSTRACT
Maintaining the resilience of healthcare workers (HCWs) during the protracted COVID-19 pandemic is critical as chronic stress is associated with burnout, inability to provide high-quality care, and decreased attentiveness to infection prevention protocols. Between May and July 2020, we implemented the ICARE model of psychological first aid (PFA) in a novel online (i.e., telehealth) format to address the psychological support needs of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that HCWs needed psychological support related to obtaining clear information about pandemic policies and guidelines, navigating new rules and responsibilities, and processing overwhelming and conflicting emotions. The HCWs in our program repeatedly expressed appreciation for the support we provided. Future directions include establishing online discussion forums, increasing opportunities for individual support, and training HCWs to provide peer support using PFA. This program has far-reaching potential benefit to HCWs and to society at large in the context of a pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Psychological First Aid , Pandemics/prevention & control , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Karoli Lwanga Hospital and Global Emergency Care, a 501(c)(3) nongovernmental organization, operate an Emergency Department (ED) in Uganda's rural Rukungiri District. Despite available emergency care (EC), preventable death and disability persist due to delayed patient presentations. This study seeks to understand the emergency care seeking behavior of community members utilizing the established ED. METHODS: We purposefully sampled and interviewed patients and caregivers presenting to the ED more than 12 hours after onset of chief complaint in January-March 2017 to include various ages, genders, and complaints. Semistructured interviews addressing actions taken before seeking EC and delays to presentation once the need for EC was recognized were conducted until a diverse sample and theoretical saturation were obtained. An interdisciplinary and multicultural research team conducted thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. RESULTS: The 50 ED patients for whom care was sought (mean age 33) had approximately even distribution of gender, as well as occupation (none, subsistence farmers and small business owner). Interviews were conducted with 13 ED patients and 37 caregivers, on the behalf of patients when unavailable. The median duration of patients' chief complaint on ED presentation was 5.5 days. On average, participants identified severe symptoms necessitating EC 1 day before presentation. Four themes of treatment delay before and after severity were recognized were identified: 1) Cultural factors and limited knowledge of emergency signs and initial actions to take; 2) Use of local health facilities despite perception of inadequate services; 3) Lack of resources to cover the anticipated cost of obtaining EC; 4) Inadequate transportation options. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are warranted to address each of the four major reasons for treatment delay. The next stage of formative research will generate intervention strategies and assess the opportunities and challenges to implementation with community and health system stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Caregivers , Emergency Medical Services , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Rural Population , UgandaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Identify the impact of experiences in global health (GH) on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies in emergency medicine (EM) residents and describe the individual characteristics of EM residents with global health experience compared to those without. METHODS: From 2015 to 2018, 117 residents from 13 nationally accredited United States EM residency training programs were surveyed. Specifically, the survey gathered demographic data and information regarding timing, type, location and duration of short term experiences in global health (STEGH). The survey collected both qualitative and quantitative data regarding resident experiences, including number of procedures performed and self-assessment of the impact on their residency milestones. ACGME milestone data from survey respondents was collected from each resident's training program coordinators. Chi-squared analysis and t-tests were conducted to assess differences between residents with STEGH and those without. A generalized linear model (GLM) was utilized to assess the effects of time and experience with interaction on achieving milestones in each of the competency domains, to compare milestone achievement over time between residents with STEGH and those without. RESULTS: Out of 117 EM residents, 60 were female (44%), the mean age was 30 years (standard deviation = 3.1), and 84 (71.8%) reported STEGH in general, including prior to residency (64.5%). 33 (28.2%) reported having completed STEGH during residency. The results of the GLM analysis showed that residents with STEGH during residency had significantly higher scores compared to those without the experience or STEGH pre-residency across all six competencies. CONCLUSIONS: STEGH in EM residents was associated with higher milestone achievement in certain ACGME competency domains including medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, and professionalism. Participation in STEGH during residency appeared to show the strongest effect, with higher scores across all six competencies.
ABSTRACT
Large numbers of U.S. physicians and medical trainees engage in hands-on clinical global health experiences abroad, where they gain skills working across cultures with limited resources. Increasingly, these experiences are becoming bidirectional, with providers from low- and middle-income countries traveling to experience health care in the United States, yet the same hands-on experiences afforded stateside physicians are rarely available for foreign medical graduates or postgraduate trainees when they arrive. These physicians are typically limited to observership experiences where they cannot interact with patients in most U.S. institutions. In this article, the authors discuss this inequity in global medical education, highlighting the shortcomings of the observership training model and the legal and regulatory barriers prohibiting foreign physicians from engaging in short-term clinical training experiences. They provide concrete recommendations on regulatory modifications that would allow meaningful short-term clinical training experiences for foreign medical graduates, including the creation of a new visa category, the designation of a specific temporary licensure category by state medical boards, and guidance for U.S. host institutions supporting such experiences. By proposing this framework, the authors hope to improve equity in global health partnerships via improved access to meaningful and productive educational experiences, particularly for foreign medical graduates with commitment to using their new knowledge and training upon return to their home countries.
Subject(s)
Foreign Medical Graduates/legislation & jurisprudence , Global Health/education , Health Equity/trends , Education, Medical/methods , Education, Medical/standards , Emigrants and Immigrants/legislation & jurisprudence , Foreign Medical Graduates/supply & distribution , Foreign Medical Graduates/trends , Global Health/trends , Humans , Licensure/legislation & jurisprudence , Licensure/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In medical education and training, increasing numbers of institutions and learners are participating in global health experiences. Within the context of competency-based education and assessment methodologies, a standardized assessment tool may prove valuable to all of the aforementioned stakeholders. Milestones are now used as the standard for trainee assessment in graduate medical education. Thus, the development of a similar, milestone-based tool was undertaken, with learners in emergency medicine (EM) and global health in mind. METHODS: The Global Emergency Medicine Think Tank Education Working Group convened at the 2016 Society for Academic Medicine Annual Meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana. Using the Interprofessional Global Health Competencies published by the Consortium of Universities for Global Health's Education Committee as a foundation, the working group developed individual milestones based on the 11 stated domains. An iterative review process was implemented by teams focused on each domain to develop a final product. RESULTS: Milestones were developed in each of the 11 domains, with five competency levels for each domain. Specific learning resources were identified for each competency level and assessment methodologies were aligned with the milestones framework. The Global Health Milestones Tool for learners in EM is designed for continuous usage by learners and mentors across a career. CONCLUSIONS: This Global Health Milestones Tool for learners in EM may prove valuable to numerous stakeholders. The next steps include a formalized pilot program for testing the tool's validity and usability across training programs, as well as an assessment of perceived utility and applicability by collaborating colleagues working in training sites abroad.
ABSTRACT
Contemporary interest in in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) has led to important questions of ethics, responsibility, and potential harms to receiving communities. In addressing these issues, the role of local engagement through partnerships between external STEGH facilitating organization(s) and internal community organization(s) has been identified as crucial to mitigating potential pitfalls. This perspective piece offers a framework to categorize different models of local engagement in STEGH based on professional experiences and a review of the existing literature. This framework will encourage STEGH stakeholders to consider partnership models in the development and evaluation of new or existing programs.The proposed framework examines the community context in which STEGH may occur, and considers three broad categories: number of visiting external groups conducting STEGH (single/multiple), number of host entities that interact with the STEGH (none/single/multiple), and frequency of STEGH (continuous/intermittent). These factors culminate in a specific model that provides a description of opportunities and challenges presented by each model. Considering different models, single visiting partners, working without a local partner on an intermittent (or even one-time) basis provided the greatest flexibility to the STEGH participants, but represented the least integration locally and subsequently the greatest potential harm for the receiving community. Other models, such as multiple visiting teams continuously working with a single local partner, provided an opportunity for centralization of efforts and local input, but required investment in consensus-building and streamlining of processes across different groups. We conclude that involving host partners in the design, implementation, and evaluation of STEGH requires more effort on the part of visiting STEGH groups and facilitators, but has the greatest potential benefit for meaningful, locally-relevant improvements from STEGH for the receiving community. There are four key themes that underpin the application of the framework: 1. Meaningful impact to host communities requires some form of local engagement and measurement. 2. Single STEGH without local partner engagement is rarely ethically justified. 3. Models should be tailored to the health and resource context in which the STEGH occurs. 4. Sending institutions should employ a model that ultimately benefits local receiving communities first and STEGH participants second. Accounting for these themes in program planning for STEGH will lead to more equitable outcomes for both receiving communities and their sending partners.
Subject(s)
Capacity Building/methods , Global Health/education , International Educational Exchange , Program Development/methods , Public-Private Sector Partnerships , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes and curriculum components of an educational programme to train non-physician clinicians working in a rural, Ugandan emergency department in the use of POC ultrasound. METHODS: The use of point-of-care ultrasound was taught to emergency care providers through lectures, bedsides teaching and hands-on practical sessions. Lectures were tailored to care providers' knowledge base and available therapeutic means. Every ultrasound examination performed by these providers was recorded over 4.5 years. Findings of these examinations were categorised as positive, negative, indeterminate or procedural. Other radiologic studies ordered over this same time period were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 22,639 patients were evaluated in the emergency department by emergency care providers, and 2185 point-of-care ultrasound examinations were performed on 1886 patients. Most commonly used were the focused assessment with sonography in trauma examination (53.3%) and echocardiography (16.4%). Point-of-care ultrasound studies were performed more frequently than radiology department-performed studies. Positive findings were documented in 46% of all examinations. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel curriculum for point-of-care ultrasound education of non-physician emergency practitioners in a resource-limited setting. These non-physician clinicians integrated ultrasound into clinical practice and utilised this imaging modality more frequently than traditional radiology department imaging with a large proportion of positive findings.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Personnel/education , Health Resources , Point-of-Care Systems , Radiology/education , Rural Population , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Developing Countries , Echocardiography , Education , Emergency Medicine/methods , Humans , Radiology/methods , Teaching/methods , Uganda , Wounds and Injuries/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We present a series of adult patients treated under a protocol for severe lung failure (acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) that uses positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization and intermittent prone positioning (IPP) to reduce shunt, improve oxygen (O(2)) delivery, and reduce FiO(2). METHODS: Trauma, emergency vascular, and general surgical patients with PaO(2)/FiO)(2) (PF) ratio < 200 were entered into a protocol designed to maintain mixed venous saturation (SVO(2)) > 70% with FiO(2) < 0.50. Therapy involved a sequential algorithmic approach that included pulmonary artery oximetry, "best-PEEP" determination, optimization of cardiac function, limitation of VO(2), transfusion to hematocrit of 35%, frequent bronchoscopy, rational diuresis and, if the FiO(2) was > 0.50, a trial of IPP with every-6-hour rotations. Unstable spine fractures and pelvic external fixators were the only contraindications to IPP. We collected data prospectively and from the charts and trauma registry. RESULTS: Forty adults were treated by protocol, 29 were injured and 11 had vascular or general surgical primary problems. The patients were 46.3 +/- 3.1 years old (the trauma patients were 42.9 +/- 3.2, and the vascular/general patients were 62 +/- 7.5 years old). Average Injury Severity Score was 25.9 +/- 3.7 and the Murray lung injury score was 2.65 +/- 0.9. IPP was used in all patients including those with recent tracheostomy, open abdomens, laparotomy, thoracotomy, leg external fixators, central nervous system injury, continuous venovenous hemofiltration and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulae, vasopressor therapy, recent chest wall open reduction and internal fixation, and facial fractures. With the initiation of IPP therapy, the PF ratio increased from 132.1 +/- 8.5 to 231.6 +/- 14.2 (p < 0.001), the FiO(2) was decreased from 65.9 +/- 4.0% to 47.0 +/- 1.1% (p < 0.001), and the SVO(2) increased from 75.3 +/- 1.8% to 78.6 +/- 1.6% (p = 0.023). PEEP and static compliance were unchanged. The duration of IPP was 85.6 +/- 14.9 hours (median, 55 hours; range, 12 to 490 hours). Within 48 hours, all patients were on FiO(2) < or = 50. Mortality was 20% (14% for trauma) and none died of ARDS. The only complications of IPP were one case of partial-thickness skin loss from a malpositioned nasogastric tube and a case of transient lingual edema. CONCLUSION: IPP was independently responsible for an increase in PF ratio and SVO(2). We effectively and safely used IPP in our patients with ARDS, including many with issues generally considered to be contraindications. IPP and best-PEEP therapy enabled us to wean all of our patients' Fio2 to < or = 0.50 within 48 hours of ARDS onset.