Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cytotherapy ; 23(9): 774-786, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34052112

ABSTRACT

The successful commercialization of cell therapies requires thorough planning and consideration of product quality, cost and scale of the manufacturing process. The implementation of automation can be central to a robust and reproducible manufacturing process at industrialized scales. There have been a number of wash-and-concentrate devices developed for cell manufacturing. These technologies have arisen from transfusion medicine, hematopoietic stem cell and biologics manufacturing where operating mechanisms are distinct from manual centrifugation. This review describes the historical origin and fundamental technologies underlying each currently available wash-and-concentrate device as well as their relative advantages and disadvantages in cell therapy applications. Understanding the specific attributes and limitations of these technologies is essential to optimizing cell therapy manufacturing.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Automation , Centrifugation
2.
Stem Cells Transl Med ; 6(8): 1723-1729, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28749065

ABSTRACT

Cellular therapies and other regenerative medicines are emerging as potentially transformative additions to modern medicine, but likely at a staggering financial cost. Public health care systems' budgets are already strained by growing and aging populations, and many private insurer's budgets are equally stretched. The current systems that most payers employ to manage their cash flow are not structured to absorb a sudden onslaught of very expensive prescriptions for a large portion of their covered population. Despite this, developers of new regenerative medicines tend to focus on the demands of regulators, not payers, in order to be compliant throughout the clinical trials phases, and to develop a product that ultimately will be approvable. It is not advisable to assume that an approved product will automatically become a reimbursed product, as examples from current practice in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the U.S. demonstrate; similarly, in Europe numerous Advanced-therapy Medicinal Products achieved market authorization but failed to secure reimbursement (e.g., Glybera, Provenge, ChondroCelect, MACI). There are however strategies and approaches that developers can employ throughout clinical development, in order to generate clinical and health economic data which will be necessary to demonstrate the value proposition of the new product and help ensure market access for patients; furthermore, performance based managed entry agreements coupled with post-launch evidence generation can help overcome challenges around product uncertainty at launch and reduce market access delays. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:1723-1729.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Technology, High-Cost/economics , Europe , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Humans , Technology, High-Cost/trends , United States
3.
Cell Stem Cell ; 8(6): 609-12, 2011 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21624804

ABSTRACT

As costly stem cell treatments progress from experimental concepts toward licensed products and routine procedures, governmental and private payers grapple with shrinking budgets to cover more lives. We describe efforts underway in the US to create mechanisms for reimbursement of cell therapies and discuss other reimbursement-related issues for the stem cell community.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/economics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economics , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
4.
Cytotherapy ; 12(7): 853-6, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20942603

ABSTRACT

The last decade has seen a dramatic rise in the development of new cellular therapeutics in a wide range of indications. There have been acceptable safety profiles reported in early studies using blood-derived and adherent stem cell products, but also an inconsistent efficacy record. Further expansion has been hindered in part by a lack of capital (both private and public) and delayed entry into the cell therapy space by large healthcare and pharmaceutical companies, those members of the industry most reliably able to initiate and maintain advanced-phase clinical trials. With recognition that the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) is uniquely positioned to serve the global translational regenerative medicine research community as a network hub for scientific standards and policy, the ISCT commissioned the establishment of an Industry Task Force (ITF) to address current and future roles for industry. The objectives of the ITF were to gather information and prioritize efforts for a new Commercialization Committee (CC) and to construct innovative platforms that would foster constructive and synergistic collaborations between industry and ISCT. Recommendations and conclusions of the ITF included that the new CC: (1) foster new relationships with therapeutic and stem cell societies, (2) foster educational workshops and forums to cross-educate and standardize practices, (3) create industry subcommittees to address priority initiatives, with clear benchmarks and global implementation, and (4) establish a framework for a greater industry community within ISCT, opening doors for industry to share the new vision for commercialization of cell therapy, emphasizing the regenerative medicine space.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Industry , Commerce , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Regenerative Medicine , Societies, Scientific , Translational Research, Biomedical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL