Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Med J Aust ; 219(11): 542-548, 2023 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37992722

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the population health impact of high temperatures on workplace health and safety by estimating the burden of heat-attributable occupational injury in Australia. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING: Retrospective observational study; estimation of burden of occupational injury in Australia attributable to high temperatures during 2014-19, based on Safe Work Australia (work-related traumatic injury fatalities and workers' compensation databases) and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data (Australian Burden of Disease Study and National Hospital Morbidity databases), and a meta-analysis of climate zone-specific risk data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Burden of heat-attributable occupational injuries as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), comprising the numbers of years of life lived with disability (YLDs) and years of life lost (YLLs), nationally, by Köppen-Geiger climate zone, and by state and territory. RESULTS: During 2014-19, an estimated 42 884 years of healthy life were lost to occupational injury, comprising 39 485 YLLs (92.1%) and 3399 YLDs (7.9%), at a rate of 0.80 DALYs per 1000 workers per year. A total of 967 occupational injury-related DALYs were attributable to heat (2.3% of occupational injury-related DALYs), comprising 890 YLLs (92%) and 77 YLDs (8%). By climate zone, the heat-attributable proportion was largest in the tropical Am (12 DALYs; 3.5%) and Aw zones (34 DALYs; 3.5%); by state and territory, the proportion was largest in New South Wales and Queensland (each 2.9%), which also included the largest numbers of heat-attributable occupational injury-related DALYs (NSW: 379 DALYs, 39% of national total; Queensland: 308 DALYs; 32%). CONCLUSION: An estimated 2.3% of the occupational injury burden in Australia is attributable to high ambient temperatures. To prevent this burden increasing with global warming, adaptive measures and industry-based policies are needed to safeguard workplace health and safety, particularly in heat-exposed industries, such as agriculture, transport, and construction.


Subject(s)
Life Expectancy , Occupational Injuries , Humans , Australia/epidemiology , Global Burden of Disease , Observational Studies as Topic , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Temperature
2.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(4): 186-191, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36754595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon cancer associated with asbestos exposure, predominantly occupational. Asbestos has been banned in Australia since 2003 but mesothelioma has a long latency and incident cases continue to present. The Australian Mesothelioma Registry was incepted to collect systematic data about incidence and mortality alongside asbestos exposure. METHODS: Benefiting from the Australian national system of cancer notification, all incident cases of mesothelioma in all states and territories are fast-tracked and notified regularly. Notified patients are contacted asking for consent to collect exposure information, initially by postal questionnaire and subsequently by telephone interview. Age-standardised annual incidence rates and mortality rates were calculated. Asbestos exposure was categorised as occupational, non-occupational, neither or, both; and as low, or high, probability of exposure. RESULTS: Mesothelioma incidence appears to have peaked. The age-standardised incidence rates have declined steadily since the early 2000s (peaking in males at 5.9/100 000 and in all-persons at 3.2/100 000), driven by rates in males, who comprise the majority of diagnosed cases. Rates in women have remained fairly stable since that time. Age-standardised mortality rates have followed similar trends. Mesothelioma remains the most common in those aged over 80 years. Nearly all (94%) cases were linked with asbestos exposure (78% occupational in men; 6.8% in women). CONCLUSIONS: With effective control of occupational asbestos use, the decline in age-standardised incidence and death rates has occurred. Incidence rates among women, in whom occupational asbestos exposure is rarely detectable, remain unchanged, pointing to the role of household and /or environmental asbestos exposure.


Subject(s)
Asbestos , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Mesothelioma , Occupational Exposure , Male , Humans , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Mesothelioma, Malignant/chemically induced , Mesothelioma, Malignant/complications , Incidence , Australia/epidemiology , Mesothelioma/etiology , Asbestos/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Registries
3.
Front Public Health ; 10: 739746, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35619818

ABSTRACT

Presumptive condition lists formally accept connections between military factors and veteran health conditions. An environmental scan of such lists and their evidentiary basis was conducted across four veterans' administrations to inform other administrations considering the development of such lists. Information on included conditions, qualifying military factors, and scientific processes was obtained through targeted internet searches and correspondence with veterans' administrations. The content of presumptive condition lists across jurisdictions varied by conditions included, as well as military eligibility requirements (e.g., service in particular conflict, context, or time period). Scientific review processes to develop lists also varied across jurisdictions. Findings indicate that evidence and experience may be leveraged across compensation systems (veteran and civilian). Ongoing research to understand links between military exposures and veteran health is recommended.


Subject(s)
Veterans , Humans
4.
Occup Environ Med ; 2022 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35301262

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of major legislative changes to New Zealand's Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) legislation with the adoption of the Robens model as a means to control occupational risks on the burden and risk of work-related fatal injury (WRFI). METHODS: Population-based comparison of WRFI to workers aged 15-84 years occurring during three periods: before (pre:1985-1992), after legislative reform (post-1:1993-2002) and after subsequent amendment (post-2:2003-2014). Annual age-industry standardised rates were calculated with 95% CI. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate age-adjusted annual percentage changes (APC) for each period, overall and stratified by high-risk industry and occupational groups. RESULTS: Over the 30-year period, 2053 worker deaths met the eligibility criteria. Age-adjusted APC in rates of worker WRFI changed little between periods: pre (-2.8%, 95% CI 0.0% to -5.5%); post-1 (-2.9%, 95% CI -1.3% to -4.5%) and post-2 (-2.9%, 95% CI -1.3% to -4.4%). There was no evidence of differences in slope. Variable trends in worker WRFI were observed for historically high-risk industry and occupational groups. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of worker WRFI decreased steadily over the 30-year period under examination and there was no evidence that this pattern of declining WRFI was substantially altered with the introduction of Robens-styled OHS legislative reforms. Beyond headline figures, historically high-risk groups had highly variable progress in reducing worker WRFI following legislative reform. This study demonstrates the value in including prereform data and high-risk subgroup analysis when assessing the performance of OHS legislative reforms to control occupational risks.

5.
Occup Environ Med ; 2020 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33106350

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Analyses of secular trends in work-related fatal injury in New Zealand have previously only considered the total working population, potentially hiding trends for important subgroups of workers. This paper examines trends in work-related fatalities in worker subgroups between 2005 and 2014 to indicate where workplace safety action should be prioritised. METHODS: A dataset of fatally injured workers was created; all persons aged 15-84 years, fatally injured in the period 2005-2014, were identified from mortality records, linked to coronial records which were then reviewed for work relatedness. Poisson regression modelling was used to estimate annual percentage change in rates by age, sex, ethnicity, employment status, industry and occupation. RESULTS: Overall, worker fatalities decreased by 2.4% (95% CI 0.0% to 4.6%) annually; an average reduction of 18 deaths per year from baseline (2005). Significant declines in annual rates were observed for younger workers (15-29 and 30-49 years), indigenous Maori, those in the public administration and service sector, and those in community and personal service occupations. Increases in annual rates occurred for workers in agriculture and forestry and fisheries sectors and for labourers. Rates of worker deaths in work-traffic settings declined faster than in workplace settings. DISCUSSION: Although overall age-standardised rates of work-related fatal injury have been declining, these trends were variable. Sources of injury risk in identifiable subgroups with increases in annual rates need to be urgently addressed. This study demonstrates the need for regular, detailed examination of the secular trends to identify those subgroups of workers requiring further workplace safety attention.

7.
Am J Ind Med ; 61(10): 824-830, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168149

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on exposure to high molecular weight (HMW) asthmagens derived from plants and on the main occupations and tasks that result in such exposure among workers. METHODS: Data were collected as part of the Australian Work Exposures Study-Asthma. We estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) using modified Poisson regression models to determine which factors were associated with exposure. RESULTS: A 12.8% of 4878 workers were exposed to HMW asthmagens derived from plants. The highest prevalence of exposure was found among farmers/animal workers, education workers, and food processing workers. The main circumstances of exposure were through handling flour, freesias, or through raising livestock. Exposure was more common among female workers (aPR = 1.26, 1.10-1.43) than males, while it was lower among workers born overseas (aPR = 0.70, 0.57-0.86) than those born in Australia. CONCLUSION: Prevention of exposure to HMW asthmagens derived from plants requires a broad strategy targeting different tasks and occupations.


Subject(s)
Asthma, Occupational/chemically induced , Dust , Flour , Flowers , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Agriculture , Animal Husbandry , Asthma, Occupational/epidemiology , Australia/epidemiology , Educational Personnel , Female , Food-Processing Industry , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Weight , Plants , Prevalence , Young Adult
8.
JAMA Oncol ; 4(11): 1553-1568, 2018 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29860482

ABSTRACT

Importance: The increasing burden due to cancer and other noncommunicable diseases poses a threat to human development, which has resulted in global political commitments reflected in the Sustainable Development Goals as well as the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Action Plan on Non-Communicable Diseases. To determine if these commitments have resulted in improved cancer control, quantitative assessments of the cancer burden are required. Objective: To assess the burden for 29 cancer groups over time to provide a framework for policy discussion, resource allocation, and research focus. Evidence Review: Cancer incidence, mortality, years lived with disability, years of life lost, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were evaluated for 195 countries and territories by age and sex using the Global Burden of Disease study estimation methods. Levels and trends were analyzed over time, as well as by the Sociodemographic Index (SDI). Changes in incident cases were categorized by changes due to epidemiological vs demographic transition. Findings: In 2016, there were 17.2 million cancer cases worldwide and 8.9 million deaths. Cancer cases increased by 28% between 2006 and 2016. The smallest increase was seen in high SDI countries. Globally, population aging contributed 17%; population growth, 12%; and changes in age-specific rates, -1% to this change. The most common incident cancer globally for men was prostate cancer (1.4 million cases). The leading cause of cancer deaths and DALYs was tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer (1.2 million deaths and 25.4 million DALYs). For women, the most common incident cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths and DALYs was breast cancer (1.7 million incident cases, 535 000 deaths, and 14.9 million DALYs). In 2016, cancer caused 213.2 million DALYs globally for both sexes combined. Between 2006 and 2016, the average annual age-standardized incidence rates for all cancers combined increased in 130 of 195 countries or territories, and the average annual age-standardized death rates decreased within that timeframe in 143 of 195 countries or territories. Conclusions and Relevance: Large disparities exist between countries in cancer incidence, deaths, and associated disability. Scaling up cancer prevention and ensuring universal access to cancer care are required for health equity and to fulfill the global commitments for noncommunicable disease and cancer control.


Subject(s)
Global Burden of Disease/trends , Global Health/standards , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Female , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Incidence , Male , Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis
9.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(4): 310-316, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29175990

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several animal, fish and/or shellfish derived substances encountered in the workplace can initiate or exacerbate asthma. The aims of this study were: to produce a population-based estimate of the current prevalence of occupational exposure to animal, fish and/or shellfish derived asthmagens, to identify the main circumstances of exposures and to identify occupations with the highest proportions of exposed respondents. METHODS: We used data from the Australian Work Exposure Study-Asthma, a national telephone survey that investigated the current prevalence of occupational exposure to asthmagens among Australian workers. A web-based tool was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to asthmagens, including animal, fish and/or shellfish derived asthmagens. Prevalence ratios to determine risk factors for exposure were estimated using modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Of the 4878 respondents, 12.4% were exposed to asthmagens derived from animals, fish and/or shellfish. Exposure to these asthmagens was significantly higher in workers residing in regional and remote areas, compared with major cities. The main circumstance of exposure to animal derived asthmagens was through cleaning up rat/mice infestations, while the main circumstance of exposure to fish and/or shellfish derived asthmagens was through preparing and cooking salmon. Occupational groups with the highest proportion of exposure to animal or fish and/or shellfish derived asthmagens were farmers/animal workers and food workers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating occupational exposure to animal, fish and/or shellfish derived asthmagens in a nationwide working population. The results of this study can be used to inform the direction of occupational interventions and policies to reduce work-related asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Fishes , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Inhalation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Shellfish/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
10.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD010641, 2016 Aug 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27549931

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shift work is often associated with sleepiness and sleep disorders. Person-directed, non-pharmacological interventions may positively influence the impact of shift work on sleep, thereby improving workers' well-being, safety, and health. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of person-directed, non-pharmacological interventions for reducing sleepiness at work and improving the length and quality of sleep between shifts for shift workers. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase, Web of Knowledge, ProQuest, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, and OSH-UPDATE from inception to August 2015. We also screened reference lists and conference proceedings and searched the World Health Organization (WHO) Trial register. We contacted experts to obtain unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cross-over designs) that investigated the effect of any person-directed, non-pharmacological intervention on sleepiness on-shift or sleep length and sleep quality off-shift in shift workers who also work nights. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two authors screened titles and abstracts for relevant studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We contacted authors to obtain missing information. We conducted meta-analyses when pooling of studies was possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 relevant trials (with 556 review-relevant participants) which we categorised into three types of interventions: (1) various exposures to bright light (n = 10); (2) various opportunities for napping (n = 4); and (3) other interventions, such as physical exercise or sleep education (n = 3). In most instances, the studies were too heterogeneous to pool. Most of the comparisons yielded low to very low quality evidence. Only one comparison provided moderate quality evidence. Overall, the included studies' results were inconclusive. We present the results regarding sleepiness below. Bright light Combining two comparable studies (with 184 participants altogether) that investigated the effect of bright light during the night on sleepiness during a shift, revealed a mean reduction 0.83 score points of sleepiness (measured via the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.3 to -0.36, very low quality evidence). Another trial did not find a significant difference in overall sleepiness on another sleepiness scale (16 participants, low quality evidence).Bright light during the night plus sunglasses at dawn did not significantly influence sleepiness compared to normal light (1 study, 17 participants, assessment via reaction time, very low quality evidence).Bright light during the day shift did not significantly reduce sleepiness during the day compared to normal light (1 trial, 61 participants, subjective assessment, low quality evidence) or compared to normal light plus placebo capsule (1 trial, 12 participants, assessment via reaction time, very low quality evidence). Napping during the night shiftA meta-analysis on a single nap opportunity and the effect on the mean reaction time as a surrogate for sleepiness, resulted in a 11.87 ms reduction (95% CI 31.94 to -8.2, very low quality evidence). Two other studies also reported statistically non-significant decreases in reaction time (1 study seven participants; 1 study 49 participants, very low quality evidence).A two-nap opportunity resulted in a statistically non-significant increase of sleepiness (subjective assessment) in one study (mean difference (MD) 2.32, 95% CI -24.74 to 29.38, 1 study, 15 participants, low quality evidence). Other interventionsPhysical exercise and sleep education interventions showed promise, but sufficient data to draw conclusions are lacking. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Given the methodological diversity of the included studies, in terms of interventions, settings, and assessment tools, their limited reporting and the very low to low quality of the evidence they present, it is not possible to determine whether shift workers' sleepiness can be reduced or if their sleep length or quality can be improved with these interventions.We need better and adequately powered RCTs of the effect of bright light, and naps, either on their own or together and other non-pharmacological interventions that also consider shift workers' chronobiology on the investigated sleep parameters.


Subject(s)
Bed Rest , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/therapy , Exercise , Phototherapy/methods , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/therapy , Work Schedule Tolerance , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors
11.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 386, 2016 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27169472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the burden of disease caused by a particular agent are used to assist in making policy and prioritizing actions. Most estimations have employed the attributable fraction approach, which estimates the proportion of disease cases or deaths in a specific year which are attributable to past exposure to a particular agent. While this approach has proven extremely useful in quantifying health effects, it requires historical data on exposures which are not always available. METHODS: We present an alternative method, the future excess fraction method, which is based on the lifetime risk approach, and which requires current rather than historical exposure data. This method estimates the future number of exposure-related disease cases or deaths occurring in the subgroup of the population who were exposed to the particular agent in a specific year. We explain this method and use publically-available data on current asbestos exposure and mesothelioma incidence to demonstrate the use of the method. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach to modelling burden of disease is useful when there are no historical measures of exposure and where future disease rates can be projected on person years at risk.


Subject(s)
Asbestos/poisoning , Cost of Illness , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Young Adult
12.
Inj Prev ; 22(1): 3-18, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26635210

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Global Burden of Diseases (GBD), Injuries, and Risk Factors study used the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) to quantify the burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. This paper provides an overview of injury estimates from the 2013 update of GBD, with detailed information on incidence, mortality, DALYs and rates of change from 1990 to 2013 for 26 causes of injury, globally, by region and by country. METHODS: Injury mortality was estimated using the extensive GBD mortality database, corrections for ill-defined cause of death and the cause of death ensemble modelling tool. Morbidity estimation was based on inpatient and outpatient data sets, 26 cause-of-injury and 47 nature-of-injury categories, and seven follow-up studies with patient-reported long-term outcome measures. RESULTS: In 2013, 973 million (uncertainty interval (UI) 942 to 993) people sustained injuries that warranted some type of healthcare and 4.8 million (UI 4.5 to 5.1) people died from injuries. Between 1990 and 2013 the global age-standardised injury DALY rate decreased by 31% (UI 26% to 35%). The rate of decline in DALY rates was significant for 22 cause-of-injury categories, including all the major injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Injuries continue to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed and developing world. The decline in rates for almost all injuries is so prominent that it warrants a general statement that the world is becoming a safer place to live in. However, the patterns vary widely by cause, age, sex, region and time and there are still large improvements that need to be made.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Global Health , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death/trends , Child , Child, Preschool , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Factors , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Young Adult
13.
São Paulo med. j ; 133(1): 67-67, Jan-Fev/2015.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-733005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shift work results in sleep-wake disturbances, which cause sleepiness during night shifts and reduce sleep length and quality in daytime sleep after the night shift. In its serious form it is also called shift work sleep disorder. Various pharmacological products are used to ameliorate symptoms of sleepiness or poor sleep length and quality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions to reduce sleepiness or to improve alertness at work and decrease sleep disturbances whilst of work, or both, in workers undertaking shift work. METHODS: Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and PsycINFO up to 20 September 2013 and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 2013. We also screened reference lists of included trials and relevant reviews. Selection criteria: We included all eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cross-over RCTs, of pharmacological products among workers who were engaged in shift work (including night shifts) in their present jobs and who may or may not have had sleep problems. Primary outcomes were sleep length and sleep quality while of work, alertness and sleepiness, or fatigue at work. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in included trials. We performed meta-analyses where appropriate. ...


Subject(s)
Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Wakefulness-Promoting Agents/therapeutic use
14.
Sao Paulo Med J ; 133(1): 67, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25626854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shift work results in sleep-wake disturbances, which cause sleepiness during night shifts and reduce sleep length and quality in daytime sleep after the night shift. In its serious form it is also called shift work sleep disorder. Various pharmacological products are used to ameliorate symptoms of sleepiness or poor sleep length and quality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions to reduce sleepiness or to improve alertness at work and decrease sleep disturbances whilst of work, or both, in workers undertaking shift work. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and PsycINFO up to 20 September 2013 and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 2013. We also screened reference lists of included trials and relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cross-over RCTs, of pharmacological products among workers who were engaged in shift work (including night shifts) in their present jobs and who may or may not have had sleep problems. Primary outcomes were sleep length and sleep quality while of work, alertness and sleepiness, or fatigue at work. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in included trials. We performed meta-analyses where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 randomised placebo-controlled trials with 718 participants. Nine trials evaluated the effect of melatonin and two the effect of hypnotics for improving sleep problems. One trial assessed the effect of modafinil, two of armodafinil and one examined caffeine plus naps to decrease sleepiness or to increase alertness.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Wakefulness-Promoting Agents/therapeutic use , Humans
15.
Front Psychol ; 5: 973, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25249990

ABSTRACT

The Sound Practice Project is a 5-year study involving baseline evaluation, development, and implementation of musician-specific work health and safety initiatives. A cross-sectional population physical and psychological survey and physical assessment were conducted at the same time, with an auditory health assessment conducted later. The results were used to guide the development of a series of targeted interventions, encompassing physical, psychological, and auditory health components. This paper provides an overview of the project but focuses on the health findings arising from the cross-sectional survey. Three hundred and seventy-seven musicians from the eight professional symphony orchestras in Australia took part in the cross-sectional study (about 70% of eligible musicians). Eighty-four percent (84%) of musicians reported past performance-related musculoskeletal disorder (PRMD) episodes; 50% were suffering a current PRMD. Of the 63% who returned hearing surveys, 43% believed they had hearing loss, and 64% used earplugs at least intermittently. Noise exposure was found to be high in private practice, although awareness of risk and earplug use in this environment was lower than in orchestral settings. Improved strategic approaches, acoustic screens and recently developed active earplugs were found to provide effective new options for hearing protection. With respect to psychosocial screening, female musicians reported significantly more trait anxiety, music performance anxiety, social anxiety, and other forms of anxiety and depression than male musicians. The youngest musicians were significantly more anxious compared with the oldest musicians. Thirty-three percent (33%) of musicians may meet criteria for a diagnosis of social phobia; 32% returned a positive depression screen and 22% for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PRMDs and trigger point discomfort levels were strongly associated with increasing severity of psychological issues such as depression and music performance anxiety.

16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD009776, 2014 Aug 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25113164

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shift work results in sleep-wake disturbances, which cause sleepiness during night shifts and reduce sleep length and quality in daytime sleep after the night shift. In its serious form it is also called shift work sleep disorder. Various pharmacological products are used to ameliorate symptoms of sleepiness or poor sleep length and quality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions to reduce sleepiness or to improve alertness at work and decrease sleep disturbances whilst off work, or both, in workers undertaking shift work in their present job and to assess their cost-effectiveness. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and PsycINFO up to 20 September 2013 and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 2013. We also screened reference lists of included trials and relevant reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cross-over RCTs, of pharmacological products among workers who were engaged in shift work (including night shifts) in their present jobs and who may or may not have had sleep problems. Primary outcomes were sleep length and sleep quality while off work, alertness and sleepiness, or fatigue at work. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in included trials. We performed meta-analyses where appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 randomised placebo-controlled trials with 718 participants. Nine trials evaluated the effect of melatonin and two the effect of hypnotics for improving sleep problems. One trial assessed the effect of modafinil, two of armodafinil and one examined caffeine plus naps to decrease sleepiness or to increase alertness.Melatonin (1 to 10 mg) after the night shift may increase sleep length during daytime sleep (mean difference (MD) 24 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.8 to 38.9; seven trials, 263 participants, low quality evidence) and night-time sleep (MD 17 minutes, 95% CI 3.71 to 30.22; three trials, 234 participants, low quality evidence) compared to placebo. We did not find a dose-response effect. Melatonin may lead to similar sleep latency times as placebo (MD 0.37minutes, 95% CI - 1.55 to 2.29; five trials, 74 participants, low quality evidence).Hypnotic medication, zopiclone, did not result in significantly longer daytime sleep length compared to placebo in one low quality trial and we could not use the data from the study on lormetazepam.Armodafinil taken before the night shift probably reduces sleepiness by one point on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) (MD -0.99, 95% CI -1.32 to -0.67; range 1 to 10; two trials, 572 participants, moderate quality evidence) and increases alertness by 50 ms in a simple reaction time test (MD -50.0, 95% CI -85.5 to -15.5) at three months' follow-up in shift work sleep disorder patients. Modafinil probably has similar effects on sleepiness (KSS) (MD -0.90, 95% CI -1.45 to -0.35; one trial, 183 participants, moderate quality evidence) and alertness in the psychomotor vigilance test in the same patient group. Post-marketing, severe skin reactions have been reported. Adverse effects reported by trial participants were headache, nausea and a rise in blood pressure. There were no trials in non-patient shift workers.Based on one trial, caffeine plus pre-shift naps taken before the night shift decreased sleepiness (KSS) (MD -0.63, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.17).We judged most trials to have a low risk of bias even though the randomisation method and allocation concealment were often not described. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is low quality evidence that melatonin improves sleep length after a night shift but not other sleep quality parameters. Both modafinil and armodafinil increase alertness and reduce sleepiness to some extent in employees who suffer from shift work sleep disorder but they are associated with adverse events. Caffeine plus naps reduces sleepiness during the night shift, but the quality of evidence is low. Based on one low quality trial, hypnotics did not improve sleep length and quality after a night shift.We need more and better quality trials on the beneficial and adverse effects and costs of all pharmacological agents that induce sleep or promote alertness in shift workers both with and without a diagnosis of shift work sleep disorder. We also need systematic reviews of their adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/drug therapy , Sleep/drug effects , Wakefulness-Promoting Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Benzhydryl Compounds/therapeutic use , Caffeine/therapeutic use , Humans , Modafinil , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sleep/physiology , Wakefulness/drug effects , Wakefulness/physiology
18.
Inj Control Saf Promot ; 11(3): 175-81, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15764104

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the contribution of alcohol to drowning deaths in Australia. METHODS: Drowning deaths that occurred in Australia (excluding Queensland) from 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2001 were identified using the National Coroners Information System (NCIS). The current analysis was based on those deaths for which the Coronial process was completed by March 2003 ('Closed' cases). Comparison was made with the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) national deaths data and with currently used values of attributable fractions for alcohol and drowning in Australia (these values are based on USA data on drownings from 1980 to 1984). RESULTS: 289 drowning deaths were identified, 5% less than comparable ABS data. Of these deaths, 240 were 'Closed' cases, and valid blood alcohol measurements were available for 137 (58%) of these. Alcohol appeared to contribute to approximately 19% of these fatal drowning incidents (25% for recreational aquatic activity; 16% for incidental falls into water; 12% for drowning due to suicide). Using > or = 0.10 g/100 ml as the cut-off, the estimated all-ages proportions of unintentional drowning attributed to alcohol was 17% in the current study, compared to the 34% currently used for Australia based on data from North America. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: A high level of alcohol appears to be present less frequently among recent drowning deaths in Australia than has been assumed to be the case to date. Nevertheless, many drowning victims have high levels of blood alcohol, and public health efforts to minimize the use of alcohol in association with activity on or near water should be continued. Despite some deficiencies, the NCIS appears to be a very useful source of information on public health issues, and to provide a better basis for assessing and monitoring alcohol-related drowning deaths in Australia than the published attributable fractions used to date.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholic Intoxication/complications , Drowning/mortality , Accidental Falls/mortality , Accidents/mortality , Alcohol Drinking/blood , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcoholic Intoxication/blood , Alcoholic Intoxication/psychology , Australia/epidemiology , Causality , Coroners and Medical Examiners , Drowning/etiology , Ethanol/blood , Humans , Public Health Informatics , Recreation/physiology , Recreation/psychology , Risk Factors
19.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 26(4): 346-51, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12233956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The focus of this paper is to compare the main findings regarding work-related problems managed in general practice with those of other data sources in the occupational and public health arenas that provide some information on work-related disorders in Australia, in order to examine the implications for surveillance and prevention. METHODS: Data on work-related disorders managed in general practice were obtained from a larger study of general practice activity that involved a cluster random sample of all significantly active general practitioners in Australia from 1998 to 2000. These data were compared with other Australian datasets containing information on work-related disorders. RESULTS: Despite a predominance of musculoskeletal conditions in all the data sources, general practitioner data provided a different picture of work-related disorders in the community to workers' compensation information from the National Data Set of Compensation-based Statistics (NDS) and the limited information on work-related disorders available from other studies of general practice and emergency departments. The mix of conditions was different in many aspects, and diseases were much less common in the NDS. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioner data supplement data provided by other sources, particularly the NDS, and make an important contribution to filling some of the gaps in information about work-related diseases and more minor work-related injuries. IMPLICATIONS: General practitioners could prove a useful supplementary source of data on work-related disorders, but the optimal content of, and method for obtaining, these data is not clear.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Accidents, Occupational/classification , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Australia/epidemiology , Data Collection , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Occupational Diseases/classification , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...