Retraction speed and chronic poststernotomy pain: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 30% of patients develop chronic poststernotomy pain (CPSP) following cardiac surgery with sternal retraction. Risk factors have been described but no causal determinants identified. Investigators hypothesized that opening the sternum slowly would impart less force (and thereby less nerve/tissue damage) and translate to a reduced incidence of CPSP. The main objectives were to determine whether or not slower sternal retraction would reduce the incidence of CPSP and improve health-related quality of life. METHODS: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery were recruited to this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to slow or standard retraction (ie, sternum opened over 15 minutes vs 30 seconds, respectively). Although the anesthesiologist and surgeon were aware of the randomization, the patients, assessors, and postoperative nursing staff remained blinded. Sternotomy pain and analgesics were measured in hospital. At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, all patients completed the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form and reported on CPSP and complications requiring rehospitalization. Thirty-day rehospitalizations and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 326 patients consented to participate and 313 were randomized to slow (n = 159) versus standard retraction (n = 154). No clinically relevant differences were detected in acute pain, analgesic consumption, or the incidence of CPSP or health-related quality of life. Although the slow group had significantly more hospitalizations at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, the reasons were unrelated to retraction speed. No differences were observed in 30-day rehospitalizations or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: All outcomes were consistent with previous reports, but no clinically significant differences were observed with retraction speed.

Dobutamine and Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy for Improving Tissue Oxygenation in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer care. There are 2 main types of breast reconstruction: alloplastic (using implants) and autologous (using the patient's own tissue). The latter creates a more natural breast mound and avoids the long-term need for surgical revision-more often associated with implant-based surgery. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is considered the gold standard approach in autologous breast reconstruction. However, complications do occur with DIEP flap surgery and can stem from poor flap tissue perfusion/oxygenation. Hence, the development of strategies to enhance flap perfusion (eg, goal-directed perioperative fluid therapy) is essential. Current perioperative fluid therapy is traditionally guided by subjective criteria, which leads to wide variations in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this trial is to determine whether the use of minimally invasive cardiac output (CO) monitoring for guiding intravenous fluid administration, combined with low-dose dobutamine infusion (via a treatment algorithm), will increase tissue oxygenation in patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery. METHODS: With appropriate institutional ethics board and Health Canada approval, patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery are randomly assigned to receive CO monitoring for the guidance of intraoperative fluid therapy in addition to a low-dose dobutamine infusion (which potentially improves flap oxygenation) versus the current standard of care. The primary outcome is tissue oxygenation measured via near-infrared spectroscopy at the perfusion zone furthest from the perforator vessels 45 minutes after vascular reanastomosis of the DIEP flap. Low dose (2.5 µg/kg/hr) dobutamine infusion continues for up to 4 hours postoperatively, provided there are no associated complications (ie, persistent tachycardia). Flap oxygenation, hemodynamic parameters, and any medication-associated side effects/complications are monitored for up to 48 hours postoperatively. Complications, rehospitalizations, and patient satisfaction are also collected until 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Funding and regulatory approvals were obtained in 2019, but the study recruitment was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. As of October 4, 2023, 34 participants have been recruited. Because of the significant delays associated with the pandemic, the expected completion date was extended. We expect the study to be completed and ready for potential news release (as appropriate) and publication by July 2024. No patients have suffered any adverse effects/complications from participating in this study, and none have been lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CO-directed fluid therapy in combination with a low-dose dobutamine infusion via a treatment algorithm has the potential to improve DIEP flap tissue oxygenation and reduce complications following DIEP flap breast reconstruction surgery. However, given that the investigators remain blinded to group randomization, no comment can be made regarding the efficacy of this intervention for improving tissue oxygenation at this time. Nevertheless, no patients have been withdrawn for safety concerns thus far, and compliance remains high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04020172; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04020172.

Effect of colchicine on perioperative atrial fibrillation and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients undergoing major thoracic surgery (COP-AF): an international randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers are associated with an increased risk of perioperative atrial fibrillation and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that might reduce the incidence of these complications. METHODS: COP-AF was a randomised trial conducted at 45 sites in 11 countries. Patients aged 55 years or older and undergoing major non-cardiac thoracic surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral colchicine 0·5 mg twice daily or matching placebo, starting within 4 h before surgery and continuing for 10 days. Randomisation was done with use of a computerised, web-based system, and was stratified by centre. Health-care providers, patients, data collectors, and adjudicators were masked to treatment assignment. The coprimary outcomes were clinically important perioperative atrial fibrillation and MINS during 14 days of follow-up. The main safety outcomes were a composite of sepsis or infection, and non-infectious diarrhoea. The intention-to-treat principle was used for all analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03310125. FINDINGS: Between Feb 14, 2018, and June 27, 2023, we enrolled 3209 patients (mean age 68 years [SD 7], 1656 [51·6%] male). Clinically important atrial fibrillation occurred in 103 (6·4%) of 1608 patients assigned to colchicine, and 120 (7·5%) of 1601 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·65 to 1·10; absolute risk reduction [ARR] 1·1%, 95% CI -0·7 to 2·8; p=0·22). MINS occurred in 295 (18·3%) patients assigned to colchicine and 325 (20·3%) patients assigned to placebo (HR 0·89, 0·76 to 1·05; ARR 2·0%, -0·8 to 4·7; p=0·16). The composite outcome of sepsis or infection occurred in 103 (6·4%) patients in the colchicine group and 83 (5·2%) patients in the placebo group (HR 1·24, 0·93-1·66). Non-infectious diarrhoea was more common in the colchicine group (134 [8·3%] events) than the placebo group (38 [2·4%]; HR 3·64, 2·54-5·22). INTERPRETATION: In patients undergoing major non-cardiac thoracic surgery, administration of colchicine did not significantly reduce the incidence of clinically important atrial fibrillation or MINS but increased the risk of mostly benign non-infectious diarrhoea. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Accelerating Clinical Trials Consortium, Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan for the Academic Health Sciences Centres of Ontario, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Division of Cardiology at McMaster University, Canada; Hanela Foundation, Switzerland; and General Research Fund, Research Grants Council, Hong Kong.

Conversion between B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide in perioperative risk assessment: protocol for a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Both B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP) are used to identify patients at risk of perioperative vascular events, but prognostic thresholds have been established in a large prospective cohort for NT-pro-BNP only. We designed this study to inform perioperative risk interpretation of BNP values. Our primary objective is to validate a formula to convert BNP to NT-pro-BNP concentrations before non-cardiac surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the association between BNP categories (established based on conversion from NT-pro-BNP categories) and a composite outcome of myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) and vascular death. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, prospective cohort study in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery who are >65 years old, Revised Cardiac Risk Index ≥1 or >45 years old with significant cardiovascular disease. BNP and NT-pro-BNP will be measured preoperatively, and troponin measurements will be analysed on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. MINS and vascular death will be ascertained up to 30 days after surgery. The primary analyses will compare measured NT-pro-BNP values to those predicted by an existing formula (from a non-surgical population) based on BNP concentrations and patient characteristics, and recalibrate and update the formula with additional variables. Secondary analyses will estimate the relationship between categories of measured BNP (corresponding to established NT-pro-BNP thresholds) and the composite of MINS and vascular death. The target sample size of 431 patients is based on our primary analysis (assessing the conversion formula). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained by the Queen's University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, and all participants will provide informed consent for participation in the study. The results will be submitted for publication in conferences and in a peer-reviewed journal, and will inform perioperative vascular risk interpretation of preoperative BNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05352698.

Rationale and design of the colchicine for the prevention of perioperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing major noncardiac thoracic surgery (COP-AF) trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) are common complications after noncardiac surgery. Inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of both disorders. The COP-AF trial tests the hypothesis that colchicine reduces the incidence of perioperative AF and MINS in patients undergoing major noncardiac thoracic surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 'COlchicine for the Prevention of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation' (COP-AF) trial is an international, blinded, randomized trial that compares colchicine to placebo in patients aged at least 55 years and undergoing major noncardiac thoracic surgery with general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria include a history of AF and a contraindication to colchicine (eg, severe renal dysfunction). Oral colchicine at a dose of 0.5 mg or matching placebo is given within 4 hours before surgery. Thereafter, patients receive colchicine 0.5 mg or placebo twice daily for a total of 10 days. The 2 independent co-primary outcomes are clinically important perioperative AF (including atrial flutter) and MINS during 14 days of follow-up. The main safety outcomes are sepsis or infection and non-infectious diarrhea. We aim to enroll 3,200 patients from approximately 40 sites across 11 countries to have at least 80% power for the independent evaluation of the 2 co-primary outcomes. The COP-AF main results are expected in 2023. CONCLUSIONS: COP-AF is a large randomized and blinded trial designed to determine whether colchicine reduces the risk of perioperative AF or MINS in patients who have major noncardiac thoracic surgery.

Post-discharge after surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring-1 (PVC-RAM-1) technology versus standard care: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if virtual care with remote automated monitoring (RAM) technology versus standard care increases days alive at home among adults discharged after non-elective surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 8 acute care hospitals in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 905 adults (≥40 years) who resided in areas with mobile phone coverage and were to be discharged from hospital after non-elective surgery were randomised either to virtual care and RAM (n=451) or to standard care (n=454). 903 participants (99.8%) completed the 31 day follow-up. INTERVENTION: Participants in the experimental group received a tablet computer and RAM technology that measured blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and body weight. For 30 days the participants took daily biophysical measurements and photographs of their wound and interacted with nurses virtually. Participants in the standard care group received post-hospital discharge management according to the centre's usual care. Patients, healthcare providers, and data collectors were aware of patients' group allocations. Outcome adjudicators were blinded to group allocation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was days alive at home during 31 days of follow-up. The 12 secondary outcomes included acute hospital care, detection and correction of drug errors, and pain at 7, 15, and 30 days after randomisation. RESULTS: All 905 participants (mean age 63.1 years) were analysed in the groups to which they were randomised. Days alive at home during 31 days of follow-up were 29.7 in the virtual care group and 29.5 in the standard care group: relative risk 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.02); absolute difference 0.2% (95% confidence interval -0.5% to 0.9%). 99 participants (22.0%) in the virtual care group and 124 (27.3%) in the standard care group required acute hospital care: relative risk 0.80 (0.64 to 1.01); absolute difference 5.3% (-0.3% to 10.9%). More participants in the virtual care group than standard care group had a drug error detected (134 (29.7%) v 25 (5.5%); absolute difference 24.2%, 19.5% to 28.9%) and a drug error corrected (absolute difference 24.4%, 19.9% to 28.9%). Fewer participants in the virtual care group than standard care group reported pain at 7, 15, and 30 days after randomisation: absolute differences 13.9% (7.4% to 20.4%), 11.9% (5.1% to 18.7%), and 9.6% (2.9% to 16.3%), respectively. Beneficial effects proved substantially larger in centres with a higher rate of care escalation. CONCLUSION: Virtual care with RAM shows promise in improving outcomes important to patients and to optimal health system function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344665.

Adductor canal block with or without added magnesium sulfate following total knee arthroplasty: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) often includes intrathecal opioids, periarticular injection (PAI) of local anesthetic, systemic multimodal analgesia, and/or peripheral nerve blockade. The adductor canal block (ACB) provides analgesia without muscle weakness and magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) may extend its duration. The purpose of this trial was to compare the duration and quality of early post-TKA analgesia in patients receiving postoperative ACB (± MgSO4) in addition to standard care. METHODS: Elective TKA patients were randomized to: 1) sham ACB, 2) ropivacaine ACB, or 3) ropivacaine ACB with added MgSO4. All received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, intraoperative PAI, and multimodal systemic analgesia. Patients and assessors remained blinded to allocation. Anesthesiologists knew whether patients had received sham or ACB but were blinded to MgSO4. The primary outcome was time to first analgesic (via patient-controlled analgesia [PCA] with iv morphine) following ACB. Secondary outcomes were morphine consumption, side effects, visual analogue scale pain scores, satisfaction until 24 hr postoperatively, and length of stay. RESULTS: Of 130 patients, 121 were included. Nine were excluded post randomization: four were protocol violations, three did not meet inclusion criteria, and two had severe pain requiring open label blockade. There were no differences in the median [interquartile range] time to first PCA request: sham, 310 min [165-550]; ropivacaine ACB, 298 min [120-776]; and ropivacaine ACB with MgSO4, 270 min [113-780] (P = 0.96). Similarly, we detected no differences in resting pain, opioid consumption, length of stay, or associated side effects until 24 hr postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We found no analgesic benefit of a postoperative ACB, with or without added MgSO4, in TKA patients undergoing spinal anesthesia and receiving intrathecal morphine, an intraoperative PAI, and multimodal systemic analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02581683); registered 21 October 2015.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'analgésie postopératoire suivant une arthroplastie totale du genou (ATG) inclut souvent des opioïdes intrathécaux, une injection périarticulaire (IPA) d'anesthésique local, une analgésie multimodale systémique, et/ou des blocs des nerfs périphériques. Le bloc du canal des adducteurs (BCA) permet une analgésie sans faiblesse musculaire et le sulfate de magnésium (MgSO4) pourrait prolonger sa durée. L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer la durée et la qualité de l'analgésie post-ATG précoce chez les patients recevant un BCA postopératoire (± MgSO4) en plus des soins standard. MéTHODE: Des patients devant subir une ATG non urgente ont été randomisés à recevoir : 1) un BCA placebo (groupe témoin), 2) un BCA avec ropivacaïne, ou 3) un BCA avec ropivacaïne et MgSO4. Tous ont reçu une rachianesthésie avec morphine intrathécale, une IPA peropératoire, et une analgésie multimodale systémique. L'allocation a été faite à l'insu des patients et des évaluateurs. Les anesthésiologistes savaient si les patients avaient reçu un placebo ou un BCA, mais n'étaient pas informés de l'ajout ou non de MgSO4. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le temps jusqu'à la première prise d'analgésique (via une analgésie contrôlée par le patient [ACP] avec de la morphine iv) après le BCA. Les critères secondaires comprenaient la consommation de morphine, les effets secondaires, les scores de douleur sur l'échelle visuelle analogue, la satisfaction jusqu'à 24 heures postopératoires, et la durée de séjour. RéSULTATS: Sur 130 patients, 121 ont été inclus. Neuf ont été exclus après la randomisation : quatre l'ont été en raison de violations du protocole, trois ne répondaient pas aux critères d'inclusion, et deux ont ressenti des douleurs graves nécessitant un bloc sans insu. Aucune différence n'a été observée dans le temps médian [écart interquartile] jusqu'à la première demande d'ACP : placebo, 310 min [165-550]; BCA ropivacaïne, 298 min [120-776]; et BCA ropivacaïne avec MgSO4, 270 min [113-780] (P = 0,96). De la même manière, nous n'avons détecté aucune différence dans la douleur au repos, la consommation d'opioïdes, la durée de séjour, ou les effets secondaires associés jusqu'à 24 heures postopératoires. CONCLUSION: Nous n'avons trouvé aucun avantage analgésique à un BCA postopératoire, avec ou sans ajout de MgSO4, chez les patients subissant une ATG sous rachianesthésie et recevant de la morphine intrathécale, une IPA peropératoire, et une analgésie multimodale systémique. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02581683); enregistrée le 21 octobre 2015.

A Case Study of Two Emerging Nurse Leaders Specializing in Virtual Health during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic.

In the field of digital health research, nurse leaders have an opportunity to be integral to the design, implementation and evaluation of virtual care interventions. This case study details the experiences of two emerging nurse leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic in providing research and clinical leadership for a national virtual health trial. These nurse leaders trained and led a national team of 70 nurses across eight participating centres delivering the virtual care and remote monitoring intervention, using the normalization process theory. This case study presents a theoretically informed approach to training and leadership and discusses the experiences and lessons learned.

Post Discharge after Surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring Technology (PVC-RAM): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: After nonelective (i.e., semiurgent, urgent and emergent) surgeries, patients discharged from hospitals are at risk of readmissions, emergency department visits or death. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we are undertaking the Post Discharge after Surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring Technology (PVC-RAM) trial to determine if virtual care with remote automated monitoring (RAM) compared with standard care will increase the number of days adult patients remain alive at home after being discharged following nonelective surgery. METHODS: We are conducting a randomized controlled trial in which 900 adults who are being discharged after nonelective surgery from 8 Canadian hospitals are randomly assigned to receive virtual care with RAM or standard care. Outcome adjudicators are masked to group allocations. Patients in the experimental group learn how to use the study's tablet computer and RAM technology, which will measure their vital signs. For 30 days, patients take daily biophysical measurements and complete a recovery survey. Patients interact with nurses via the cellular modem-enabled tablet, who escalate care to preassigned and available physicians if RAM measurements exceed predetermined thresholds, patients report symptoms, a medication error is identified or the nurses have concerns they cannot resolve. The primary outcome is number of days alive at home during the 30 days after randomization. INTERPRETATION: This trial will inform management of patients after discharge following surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic and offer insights for management of patients who undergo nonelective surgery in a nonpandemic setting. Knowledge dissemination will be supported through an online multimedia resource centre, policy briefs, presentations, peer-reviewed journal publications and media engagement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04344665.