ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: RH molecular analysis has enabled the documentation of numerous variants of RHD and RHCE alleles, especially in individuals of African origin. The aim of the present study was to determine the type and frequency of D and/or RhCE variants among blood donors of African origin in France, by performing a systematic RH molecular analysis, in order to evaluate the implications for blood transfusion of patients of African origin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples from 316 African blood donors, whose origin was established by their Fy(a-b-) phenotype, were first analysed using the RHD and RHCE BeadChips Kit (BioArray Solutions, Immucor, Warren, NJ, USA). Sequencing was performed when necessary. RESULTS: RHD molecular analysis showed that 26.2% of donors had a variant RHD allele. It allowed the prediction of a partial D in 11% of cases. RHCE molecular analysis showed that 14.2% of donors had a variant RHCE allele or RH [RN or (C)ces] haplotype. A rare Rh phenotype associated with the loss of a high-prevalence antigen or partial RhCE antigens were predicted from RHCE molecular analysis in 1 (0.3%) and 17 (5%) cases, respectively. DISCUSSION: Systematic RHD and RHCE molecular analysis performed in blood donors of African origin provides transfusion-relevant information for individuals of African origin because of the frequency of variant RH alleles. RH molecular analysis may improve transfusion therapy of patients by allowing better donor and recipient matching, based not only on phenotypically matched red blood cell units, but also on units that are genetically matched with regards to RhCE variants.
Subject(s)
Black People/genetics , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/genetics , Africa/ethnology , Alleles , Female , France , Gene Frequency , Genetic Linkage , Genotyping Techniques , Haplotypes/genetics , Humans , Male , Phenotype , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/analysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The absence of expression of C/c and E/e antigens has been associated with rare variant RHCE alleles, referred to as silent RHCE alleles, classically identified among individuals with a rare D- - or Rhnull phenotype. This work reports on different molecular mechanisms identified in three novel silent RHCE alleles. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from D- - or Rhnull individuals and their family members, from families for whom Rh phenotype and/or serologic data were unexplained by inheritance of conventional RH alleles, were analyzed. Genomic DNA and transcripts were tested by sequencing analysis. RESULTS: The first silent allele was a RHCE*cE allele carrying an intronic IVS3+5G>A mutation. The second was a RHCE*ce allele carrying an intronic IVS7-2A>G mutation, whereas the third was a silent RHCE*ce allele carrying a 5-bp deletion (Nucleotides 679-683) in Exon 5. CONCLUSION: In addition to hybrid alleles and nucleotide deletion, intronic mutations may be associated with the nonexpression of RhCE antigens. Regarding the RH system, silent alleles may not be investigated among D- - or Rhnull individuals only. Rh phenotype and/or serologic data unexplained by inheritance of conventional RH alleles should lead to molecular investigations.
Subject(s)
Alleles , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/genetics , Adult , Child, Preschool , Family , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Gene Silencing , Heterozygote , Humans , Male , Mutation, Missense/physiology , Pedigree , Phenotype , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug-dependent antibodies have been associated with approximately 10% of acquired immune hemolytic anemia cases. These antibodies are a rare cause of interference in pretransfusion red blood cell (RBC) serologic testing. The aim of this work was to report three cases of subjects developing antibodies against co-trimoxazole, a combination of trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX). CASE REPORT AND METHODS: Blood samples of donor/patients were referred to our laboratory for the exploration of a positive antibody detection test. There was no recent history of drug taking. Antibody identification was performed by gel test using an indirect antiglobulin test, with reagent RBCs in low-ionic-strength solutions (LISS) containing co-trimoxazole or not. RESULTS: All three sera showed positive reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS containing co-trimoxazole, but negative reactions when RBCs were resuspended in LISS without antibiotic. We detected antibodies against co-trimoxazole showing three different antibody patterns: anti-TMP plus anti-SMX, anti-TMP alone, or anti-SMX alone. Anti-TMP showed an apparent anti-Ku specificity in the two cases where it was present. Anti-SMX showed an apparent anti-H specificity in one of the two cases described. The drug-dependent antibodies were not associated with acquired hemolytic anemia or other pathologies. CONCLUSION: Antibodies against co-trimoxazole may only be detected when using a diluent for reagent RBCs containing the drug in question. Antibody pattern (anti-TMP and/or anti-SMX) may vary according to individuals' immune response. Drug-dependent antibodies may react as antibodies against a high-prevalence antigen, supporting the hypothesis of antibodies to drug and membrane components. Drug-dependent antibodies such as anti-co-trimoxazole may be a serologic finding without clinical features.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/immunology , Antibodies/blood , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osmolar Concentration , SolutionsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: DNA testing has enabled the documenting of numerous variants of RHCE alleles, especially in individuals of African origin. The risk for production of clinically significant alloantibodies to Rh antigens of patients carrying variant RHCE alleles has led us to analyze the different RhCE variants investigated by molecular biology. Alloimmunization was analyzed regarding the RHCE genetic profile. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Samples from 806 individuals with altered expression of RhCE antigens and/or producing anti-RhCE in the presence of the corresponding antigen were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 572 individuals were shown to express RhCE variants. Variant RHCE*ce alleles and RH haplotypes were identified in 83% of cases, the most frequent ones being the R(N) haplotype, the ceMO allele, the (C)ce(s) haplotype/ce(s) 1006 allele, and the ceAR allele identified in 36, 23, 20, and 17% of the tested samples, respectively. The absence of a high-prevalence Rh antigen was documented in 93 individuals. Partial C and partial e were expressed by 53% of individuals with RhCE variants. Rh antibodies were identified in 127 (20%) of 623 patients. They were found to be alloantibodies in 48 (38%) of these 127 patients. Alloimmunization against a high-prevalence Rh antigen was detected in 25% of cases. CONCLUSION: The challenge in clinical red blood cell (RBC) transfusion of patients with sickle cell disease, notably, would be to provide not only phenotypically matched, but also genetically matched, RBC units regarding RhCE variants.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/blood , Anemia, Sickle Cell/genetics , Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/genetics , Transfusion Reaction , Alleles , Female , France , Haplotypes/genetics , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Sequence Analysis, DNAABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: DNA analysis for the prediction of blood group antigen expression has broad implications in transfusion medicine. It may be of particular interest especially to detect variants, when antigen expression is weak or altered. The use of high-throughput DNA analysis has never been applied to donors whose red blood cells (RBCs) are selected for reagent RBCs. The aim of this study was to analyze the concordance between the serologic phenotype and that predicted from DNA analysis in panel donors, to determine the benefit of the use of DNA analysis in reagent RBC selection strategy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The "Panel National de Référence du Centre National de Référence sur les Groupes Sanguins" is a reference reagent mainly used for antibody identification. DNA genotyping of 356 panel donors was performed with BeadChips (human erythrocyte antigen v1.2 BeadChips, BioArray Solutions). The comparison between serologic phenotype and that predicted from DNA analysis held on 8876 paired results obtained from 10 blood group systems and 25 antigens. RESULTS: A 99.95% concordance was observed. Discrepancies in four cases (RH, KEL, LU, and DO systems) were analyzed. Genotyping precisions on the Duffy system were of particular interest. No new rare blood group was observed. CONCLUSION: Systematic DNA analysis of panel donors should unquestionably change the management of reagent RBC selection. The notion of "antigens in double dose" should evolve regarding data obtained from DNA analysis, allowing an improved quality of reagent RBCs for antibody screening and identification.
Subject(s)
Blood Group Antigens/genetics , Blood Group Antigens/immunology , Erythrocytes/immunology , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Genotype , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The rare Hr(B)- phenotype is encoded by the (C)ce(s) haplotype when present at the homozygous state. This haplotype contains two altered genes: a hybrid RHD-CE-D(s) gene segregated with a ce(s) allele of RHCE (733C>G and 1006G>T substitutions in Exon 5 and Exon 7 respectively). The aim of this study was to further investigate the molecular background of the (C)ce(s) haplotype. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve individuals with depressed C and/or depressed e phenotype were selected from their genomic DNA analysis showing both 733C>G and 1006G>T substitutions. Phenotypic expression of low- and high-prevalence Rh antigens was studied. Complete sequences of RHD and RHCE transcripts were analyzed when obtained. RESULTS: A new hybrid RHD-CE-D(s) gene (Exons 1 and 2; complete Exon 3; Exons 8, 9, and 10 from RHD; and Exons 4 through 7 from RHCE) segregated with a ce(s) allele, which genomic organization was almost identical to that of the classical (C)ce(s) haplotype, is described. The two different (C)ce(s) haplotypes encoded two different patterns of Rh antigen expression. Although both encoded weak e, VS, and did not produce D, V, hr(B), or Hr(B) antigens, the new haplotype encoded a much weaker C antigen and red blood cells lacked expression of Rh42, in contrast to the classic (C)ce(s) haplotype. CONCLUSION: The study showed the heterogeneity of the molecular background of the weak C, VS+, hr(B)-, Hr(B)- phenotype in the black population. The screening of blood donors in this population for hr(B)- or Hr(B)- phenotype should implement the molecular characterization of Rh genes.