ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although mortality due to acute heart failure has decreased, its prevalence in France is still high. The aim of this study was to examine the quality of acute heart failure treatment in French emergency departments (EDs) with reference to subsequently published European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations. METHODS: The medical records of patients with acute pulmonary oedema (as a marker for acute heart failure) admitted to the EDs of 11 French hospitals in 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 834 patients were included (median [interquartile range] age 84 [78-89] years; 48.6% male). Rates of compliance of initial management in 2013 to subsequently published 2015 recommendations were as follows: (1) thoracic ultrasound was performed in 17.3%; (2) loop diuretics were given in 75.9%; at a correct dose (among those for whom this was calculable) in 40.0% (3); intravenous nitrates were given in 21.7% of patients with systolic blood pressure>110mmHg; (4) non-invasive ventilation was initiated in 22.0% of patients with respiratory distress. Discharge summaries most often lacked a scheduled cardiologist follow-up (89.4%) and discharge patient weight (78.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The early management of patients with acute pulmonary oedema (as a marker of acute heart failure) in France in 2013 was quite different to recommendations published in 2015. A programme to implement the new recommendations is in place, and a repeat evaluation will be conducted in 2017.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Quality of Health Care , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , France , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/complications , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Edema/etiology , Pulmonary Edema/therapy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification allows outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). Here, we carry out an evaluation of the professional practices on the emergency management of low-risk PE, after selection with the sPESI score. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All patients admitted to the emergency department of Chambéry hospital, with a final diagnosis of PE are analyzed. The PE of score sPESI at 0 are included, in the absence of contraindications. Ninety-day follow-up is done. The objective is to evaluate the proportion of ambulatory care for low-risk patients. RESULTS: Eighty PE were diagnosed in 2016, 28 with sPESI score at 0 and 3 patients excluded. Of the 25 inclusions, 6 patients had signs of right ventricular dysfunction and were therefore hospitalized. The remaining 19 were eligible for outpatient care but only 8 of them stayed less than 24hours in the hospital. DISCUSSION: The sPESI score is a decision support tool for outpatient management but should not be used alone. The search for right ventricular dysfunction seems important here.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Decision Support Techniques , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Risk Assessment , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/diagnosisABSTRACT
In the emergency department, the management of patients with pulmonary embolism depends on the early mortality risk. Outpatient care is possible in low-risk patients. We present the existing scores and the strategy proposed by the North Alps Emergency Network, which uses the simplified PESI score (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index) to select those low-risk patients, candidates for early discharge.
