Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
J Neurotrauma ; 39(1-2): 144-150, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787343

ABSTRACT

Children frequently present to an Emergency Department (ED) after concussion, and headache is the most commonly associated symptom. Recent guidelines emphasize the importance of analgesia for post-concussion headache (PCH), yet evidence to inform treatment is lacking. We sought to characterize abortive therapies used to manage refractory PCH in the pediatric ED and factors associated with treatment. A scenario-based survey was distributed to ED physicians at all 15 Canadian tertiary pediatric centers. Participants were asked questions regarding ED treatment of acute (48 h) and persistent (1 month) PCH refractory to appropriate doses of acetaminophen/ibuprofen. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with treatment. Response rate was 63% (137/219). Nearly all physicians (128/137, 93%) endorsed treatment in the ED for acute PCH of severe intensity, with most selecting intravenous treatments (116/137, 84.7%). Treatments were similar for acute and persistent PCH. The most common treatments were metoclopramide (72%), physiologic saline (47%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS; 35%). Second-line ED treatments were more variable. For acute PCH of moderate intensity, overall treatment was lower (102/137, 74%; p < 0.0001), and NSAIDS (48%) were most frequently selected. In multi-variable regression analyses, no physician- or ED-level factor was associated with receiving treatment, or treatment using metoclopramide specifically. Treatment for refractory PCH in the pediatric ED is highly variable. Importantly, patients with severe PCH are most likely to receive intravenous therapies, often with metoclopramide, despite a paucity of evidence supporting these choices. Further research is urgently needed to establish the comparative effectiveness of pharmacotherapeutic treatments for children with refractory PCH.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Post-Concussion Syndrome , Post-Traumatic Headache , Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Canada , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Headache , Humans
2.
J Patient Saf ; 17(8): e1166-e1170, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29432338

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems is a validated tool for the inpatient experience, it may not address features unique to the pediatric emergency department (PED). There is currently no publicly available validated patient-reported experience survey for the PED, and what matters most in this setting remains unknown. METHODS: Twelve semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of parents of children younger than 14 years at a Canadian PED. Data analysis was performed using inductive thematic analysis to identify aspects of patient-reported experiences that matter most to parents in the PED. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (1) making waiting a positive experience, (2) taking the time to provide care, (3) forging a positive partnership, (4) speak up for safe care, and (5) making the environment feel safer. Parents highlighted that while waiting for care is not desirable, it is made more acceptable through the communication of wait time estimates and the presence of child activities in the waiting room. Furthermore, although interactions with providers are brief, parents emphasized the importance of creating an environment of partnership with open communication, taking the time to examine their child, and actively demonstrating the provision of safe, quality care. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that a patient-reported experience survey in the PED may need to embed elements not currently captured in Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, such as waiting room experience, comprehensiveness of health assessments, and observations of safety measures. Future studies can use these findings to develop a patient-reported experience survey for use in the PED.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Quality of Health Care , Canada , Child , Humans , Parents , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
3.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(6): 519-525, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33141524

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility (safety and acceptability) of implementing early active rehabilitation (AR) for concussion management in youth with symptoms persisting 2 weeks after injury. A secondary and exploratory objective was to estimate the potential efficacy of early AR compared with standard AR. We hypothesize that AR at 2-weeks postconcussion will be safe and acceptable to patients. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The Montreal Children's Hospital of the McGill University Health Center (MCH-MUHC), a tertiary care pediatric teaching hospital affiliated with McGill University in Montreal, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty youth aged 9 to 17 years old with postconcussion symptoms for at least 2 weeks. INTERVENTION: Active rehabilitation (aerobic exercise, coordination drills, visualization, and education/reassurance) was administered by physiotherapists in-person, and then continued as a home program. METHODS: Twenty participants were randomized to either early AR (initiated 2 weeks after injury) or standard AR (initiated 4 weeks after injury). RESULTS: Two adverse events (one in each group) were identified through an online survey more than one-month postconcussion. Postconcussion symptoms decreased over time for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this pilot study indicate that a full clinical trial estimating the efficacy of early AR (starting 2 weeks after injury) is feasible. Further study is needed to determine the superiority of this strategy over current treatment approaches.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Exercise , Post-Concussion Syndrome/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Child , Exercise Therapy/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Selection , Pilot Projects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Patient ; 13(6): 729-743, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33078377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Decision aids are patient-focused tools that have the potential to reduce the overuse of head computed tomography (CT) scans. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to create a consensus among Canadian mild traumatic brain injury and emergency medicine experts on modifications required to adapt two American decision aids about head CT use for adult and paediatric mild traumatic brain injury to the Canadian context. METHODS: We invited 21 Canadian stakeholders and the two authors of the American decision aids to a Nominal Group Technique consensus meeting to generate suggestions for adapting the decision aids. This method encourages idea generation and sharing between team members. Each idea was discussed and then prioritised using a voting system. We collected data using videotaping, writing material and online collaborative writing tools. The modifications proposed were analysed using a qualitative thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants took part in the meeting, including researchers and clinician researchers (n = 9; 43%), patient partners (n = 3; 14%) and decision makers (n = 2; 10%). A total of 84 ideas were generated. Participants highlighted the need to clarify the purpose of the decision aids, the nature of the problem being addressed and the target population. The tools require sociocultural adaptations, better identification of their target population, better description of head CT utility, advantages and related risks, modification of the visual and written representation of the risk of brain injury and head CT use, and locally adapted, patient follow-up plans. CONCLUSIONS: This study based on a Nominal Group Technique identified several adaptations for two American decision aids about head CT use for mild traumatic brain injury to support their use in Canada's different healthcare, social, cultural and legal context. These adaptations concerned the target users of the decision aids, the information presented, and how the benefits and risks were communicated in the decision aids. Future steps include prototyping the two adapted decision aids, conducting formative evaluations with actual emergency department patients and clinicians, and measuring the impact of the adapted tools on CT scan use.


A mild traumatic brain injury (also called concussion) can happen when the brain moves around in the skull after an impact to the head. A concussion is not a brain bleed and you cannot see a concussion. Concussions do not show up on a computed tomography (CT) scan. Brain bleeds do. Computed tomography scans are specialised X-ray machines that can detect serious brain injuries. Unfortunately, CT scan use also exposes patients to radiation and a future increased risk of cancer.Shared decision making involves health professionals and patients making decisions together based on the best available evidence, health professionals' experience, and patients' values and preferences. Shared decision making improves appropriate diagnostic test use.Two decision aids created in the USA are available to facilitate shared decision making regarding the use of head CT scans for patients with concussion. These decision aids are not fully adapted for use in Canada because the healthcare, social and legal context is different. Our study brought together patients and experts in the field of concussion and shared decision making to analyse these decision aids and propose adaptations that would increase their acceptance in Canadian emergency departments. We used a technique called the Nominal Group Technique to create a consensus about the most important changes to make to both original decision aids. The main adaptations needed for the Canadian context concerned avoiding information about cost and removing any information that does not change clinical management. This project will help us adapt two decision aids for clinical use in Canada and support appropriate CT scan use for patients with concussion.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Adult , Canada , Child , Decision Support Techniques , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , United States
5.
Emerg Med J ; 37(6): 338-343, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139516

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the association between timing of presentation and postconcussive symptoms (PCS) at 1, 4 and 12 weeks after injury. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted in nine Canadian paediatric EDs in 2013-2015 (5P study). Participants were children who suffered a head injury within the preceding 48 hours and met Zurich consensus concussion diagnostic criteria. The exposure was the time between head injury and ED presentation. The primary outcome was the presence of PCS at 1 week defined by the presence of at least three symptoms on the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI). Secondary outcomes evaluated PCS at 4 and 12 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for ED PCSI and other potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 3041 patients with a concussion in which timing of the injury was known. 2287 (75%) participants sought care in the first 12 hours, 388 (13%) 12-24 hours after trauma and 366 (12%) between 24 and 48 hours. Compared with children who sought care >24 hours after trauma, children who sought care in the first 12 hours had a significantly lower incidence of PCS at 1 week (OR: 0.55 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.75)) and 4 weeks (OR: 0.74 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.99)) but not at 12 weeks (OR: 0.88 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.23)). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who present early after a concussion appear to have a shorter duration of PCS than those presenting more than 12 hours later. Patients/families should be informed of the higher probability of PCS in children with delayed presentation.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/complications , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Adolescent , Brain Concussion/classification , Canada , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/methods , Prospective Studies
6.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 25(4): 375-389, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31050335

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Concussion in children and adolescents is a prevalent problem with implications for subsequent physical, cognitive, behavioral, and psychological functioning, as well as quality of life. While these consequences warrant attention, most concussed children recover well. This study aimed to determine what pre-injury, demographic, and injury-related factors are associated with optimal outcome ("wellness") after pediatric concussion. METHOD: A total of 311 children 6-18 years of age with concussion participated in a longitudinal, prospective cohort study. Pre-morbid conditions and acute injury variables, including post-concussive symptoms (PCS) and cognitive screening (Standardized Assessment of Concussion, SAC), were collected in the emergency department, and a neuropsychological assessment was performed at 4 and 12 weeks post-injury. Wellness, defined by the absence of PCS and cognitive inefficiency and the presence of good quality of life, was the main outcome. Stepwise logistic regression was performed using 19 predictor variables. RESULTS: 41.5% and 52.2% of participants were classified as being well at 4 and 12 weeks post-injury, respectively. The final model indicated that children who were younger, who sustained sports/recreational injuries (vs. other types), who did not have a history of developmental problems, and who had better acute working memory (SAC concentration score) were significantly more likely to be well. CONCLUSIONS: Determining the variables associated with wellness after pediatric concussion has the potential to clarify which children are likely to show optimal recovery. Future work focusing on wellness and concussion should include appropriate control groups and document more extensively pre-injury and injury-related factors that could additionally contribute to wellness. (JINS, 2019, 25, 375-389).


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/physiopathology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Post-Concussion Syndrome/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Adolescent , Athletic Injuries/complications , Child , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Post-Concussion Syndrome/etiology
7.
J Pediatr ; 210: 20-25.e2, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30955787

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of pediatric patients with a concussion who received analgesia when presenting with pain to US emergency departments, and to describe the analgesics used. STUDY DESIGN: This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database of nationally representative emergency department visits from 2007 to 2015. We included children under 18 years old with isolated concussions. Survey weighting procedures were applied to generate population-level estimates and to perform multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with analgesic administration. RESULTS: There were an estimated 1.54 million isolated concussion visits during the 9-year study period. Pain at presentation was reported frequently (78%), with the majority rated as moderate (36%) or severe (27%). Among all children reporting pain, 42% received no analgesics, including 40% with moderate-to-severe pain intensity. Multivariable analysis found younger age, male sex, and treatment in a nonacademic hospital were all negatively associated with analgesic administration. The medications most frequently administered were acetaminophen (54%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (44%), and opioids (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Analgesic medications seem to be underused in the treatment of pediatric concussion-related pain. Following acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, opioids, which are not recommended for this condition, were the most frequently prescribed analgesics. Further research should establish optimal, consistent, and responsible pain management strategies for pediatric concussions.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Brain Concussion/complications , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Adolescent , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Time Factors , United States
8.
CJEM ; 21(2): 204-210, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29877168

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Ondansetron is increasingly administered to children suffering from concussion-associated nausea/vomiting. We examined the association between ondansetron administration and post-concussion symptoms in children at 1 week and 1 month following the concussion. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected prospectively in a cohort study conducted in nine pediatric emergency departments (EDs) (5P study). Participants were children ages between 5 and 17.99 years who sustained a concussion in the previous 48 hours. For the current study, only 5P participants who reported nausea and/or vomiting in the ED were eligible. The exposure of interest was ondansetron administration; the comparison group included all other participants. The primary outcome was an increase in at least three symptoms of the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory score at 1 week and 1 month following trauma. RESULTS: Among the 3,063 children included in the 5P study, 1805 (59%) reported nausea and provided data at 1 week and/or 1 month. Among them, 132 (7%) received ondansetron. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounders did not show an association between ondansetron use and the risk of persistent post-concussion symptoms at 1 week (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 0.86-1.49]), but it was associated with a higher risk at 1 month (OR: 1.33 [95% CI: 1.05-1.97]). CONCLUSION: In children presenting to the ED with an acute concussion, ondansetron use was associated with a higher risk of persistent post-concussion symptoms at 1 month. Although this may be related to the limitations of the design, it highlights the importance of evaluating this association using a randomized clinical trial.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Brain Concussion/epidemiology , Nausea/prevention & control , Ondansetron/therapeutic use , Post-Concussion Syndrome/epidemiology , Vomiting/prevention & control , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Nausea/epidemiology , Vomiting/epidemiology
9.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 30(6): 780-785, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407973

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headaches in children and adolescents are common, causing debilitating symptoms in many. Treatment of headache disorders can be complex and standard lifestyle changes as well as oral medications may offer inadequate relief. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanism of action, efficacy and technique of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and the role they play in treating paediatric headache disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence for the use of PNBs in youth is limited. However, available studies show evidence of benefit in both primary and secondary headache disorders. Variability exists in the type of block, medication choice, volume infused and frequency of this treatment. There are no serious side effects associated with PNBs. SUMMARY: PNBs are well tolerated and effective as adjunctive therapy for many disabling paediatric headache disorders. The technique can be easily learned by frontline and specialty practitioners. Prospective placebo-controlled studies are needed to determine how to best maximize PNBs for headache management (i.e. medication choice, timing and so on).


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Nerve Block , Adolescent , Child , Headache Disorders/physiopathology , Headache Disorders/psychology , Humans , Nerve Block/methods , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
10.
Paediatr Child Health ; 23(5): e85-e94, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30046273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In 2013, the TRAPPED-1 survey reported inconsistent availability of pain and distress management strategies across all 15 Canadian paediatric emergency department (PEDs). The objective of the TRAPPED-2 study was to utilize a procedural pain quality improvement collaborative (QIC) and evaluate the number of newly introduced pain and distress-reducing strategies in Canadian PEDs over a 2-year period. METHODS: A QIC was created to increase implementation of new strategies, through collaborative information sharing among PEDs. In 2015, 11 of the 15 Canadian PEDs participated in the TRAPPED QIC. At the end of the year, the TRAPPED-2 survey was electronically sent to a representative member at each of the 15 PEDs. The successful introduction of the chosen strategies by the QIC was assessed as well as the addition of new strategies per site. The number of new strategies introduced in the participating and nonparticipating QIC sites were described. RESULTS: All 15 PEDs (100%) completed the TRAPPED-2 survey. Overall, 10/11 of QIC-participating sites implemented the strategy they had initially identified. All 15 Canadian PEDs implemented some new strategies during the study period; participants in the QIC reported a mean of 5.2 (1-11) new strategies compared to 2.5 (1-4) in the nonactively participating sites. CONCLUSION: While all PEDs introduced new strategies during the study, QIC-participating sites successfully introduced the majority of their previously identified new strategies in a short time period. Sharing deadlines and information between centres may have contributed to this success.

11.
Neuropsychology ; 32(4): 495-508, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29809036

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests that neuropsychological outcome after pediatric concussion is determined by unmodifiable, preexisting factors. This study aimed to predict neuropsychological outcome after pediatric concussion by using a sufficiently large sample to explore a vast array of predictors. METHOD: A total of 311 children and adolescents (6-18 years old) with concussion were assessed in the emergency department to document acute symptomatology and to screen for cognitive functioning. At 4 and 12 weeks postinjury, they completed tests of intellectual functioning, attention/working memory, executive functions, verbal memory, processing speed, and fine motor abilities. Multiple hierarchical logistic and linear regressions were performed to assess the contribution of premorbid factors, acute symptoms, and acute cognitive screening (Standardized Assessment of Concussion-Child) to aspects of neuropsychological outcome: (a) cognitive inefficiency (defined using a modified Neuropsychological Impairment Rule; Beauchamp et al., 2015) and (b) neuropsychological performance (defined using principal component analysis). RESULTS: Neuropsychological impairment was present in 10.3% and 4.5% of participants at 4 and 12 weeks postinjury, respectively. At 4 weeks postinjury, cognitive inefficiency was predicted by premorbid factors and acute cognitive screening, whereas at 12 weeks it was predicted by acute symptoms. Neuropsychological performance at 4 weeks was predicted by a combination of premorbid factors, acute symptoms, and acute cognitive screening, whereas as at 12 weeks, only acute cognitive screening predicted performance. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological outcome after pediatric concussion is not attributable solely to preexisting problems but is instead associated with a combination of preexisting and injury-related variables. Acute cognitive screening appears to be particularly useful in predicting neuropsychological status after concussion. (PsycINFO Database Record


Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Brain Concussion/complications , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition/physiology , Executive Function/physiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Prognosis , Reaction Time/physiology
12.
JAMA Pediatr ; 172(7): 678-685, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29800944

ABSTRACT

Importance: It is not clear whether adherence to preprocedural fasting guidelines prevent pulmonary aspiration and associated adverse outcomes during emergency department (ED) sedation of children. Objective: To examine the association between preprocedural fasting duration and the incidence of sedation-related adverse outcomes in a large sample of children. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study of children aged 0 to 18 years who received procedural sedation for a painful procedure in 6 Canadian pediatric EDs from July 2010 to February 2015. The primary risk factor was preprocedural fasting duration. Secondary risk factors were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, preprocedural and sedation medications, and procedure type. Main Outcomes and Measures: Four outcomes were examined: (1) pulmonary aspiration, (2) the occurrence of any adverse event, (3) serious adverse events, and (4) vomiting. Results: A total of 6183 children with a median age of 8.0 years (interquartile range, 4.0-12.0 years), of whom 6166 (99.7%) had healthy or mild systemic disease (American Society of Anesthesiologists levels I or II), were included in the analysis. Of these, 2974 (48.1%) and 310 (5.0%) children did not meet American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines for solids and liquids, respectively. There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration. There were 717 adverse events (11.6%; 95% CI, 10.8%-12.4%), of which 68 (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.9%-1.3%) were serious adverse events and 315 (5.1%; 95% CI, 4.6%-5.7%) were vomiting. The odds ratio (OR) of occurrence of any adverse event, serious adverse events, and vomiting did not change significantly with each additional hour of fasting duration for both solids (any adverse event: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.02; serious adverse events, OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; vomiting: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03) and liquids (any adverse event: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.02; serious adverse events: 1.01, 95% CI, 0.95-1.07; vomiting: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, there was no association between fasting duration and any type of adverse event. These findings do not support delaying sedation to meet established fasting guidelines.


Subject(s)
Conscious Sedation/adverse effects , Emergency Service, Hospital/standards , Fasting , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Conscious Sedation/methods , Conscious Sedation/standards , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Aspiration/epidemiology , Respiratory Aspiration/etiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Vomiting/epidemiology , Vomiting/etiology
13.
J Emerg Med ; 54(6): 757-765, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The accurate identification of children with a concussion by emergency physicians is important to initiate appropriate anticipatory guidance and management. OBJECTIVES: We compared the frequency of persistent concussion symptoms in children who were provided the diagnosis of concussion by an emergency physician versus those who met Berlin/Zurich international criteria for this diagnosis. We also determined the clinical variables independently associated with a physician-diagnosed concussion. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter cohort study. Participants were 5-17 years of age and met the Zurich/Berlin International Consensus Statement criteria for concussion. RESULTS: There were 2946 enrolled children. In those with physician-diagnosed concussion vs. no concussion, the frequency of persistent symptoms was 62.5% vs. 38.8% (p < 0.0001) at 1 week, 46.3% vs. 25.8% (p < 0.0001) at 2 weeks, and 33.0% vs. 23.0% (p < 0.0001) at 4 weeks. Of those meeting international criteria, 2340 (79.4%) were diagnosed with a concussion by an emergency physician and 12 variables were associated with this diagnosis. Five had an odds ratio (OR) > 1.5: older age (13-17 vs. 5-7 years, OR 2.9), longer time to presentation (≥16 vs. <16 h, OR 2.1), nausea (OR 1.7), sport mechanism (OR 1.7), and amnesia (OR 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to international criteria, the more selective assignment of concussion by emergency physicians was associated with a greater frequency of persistent concussion symptoms. In addition, while most children meeting international criteria for concussion were also provided this diagnosis for concussion by an emergency physician, the presence of 5 specific variables made this diagnosis more likely.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion/diagnosis , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Consensus , Female , Humans , Male , Pediatric Emergency Medicine/methods , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis
14.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(12): 2225-2231, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29661668

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a lack of definitive pediatric literature on effective pharmacotherapy for persistent post-concussion headache symptoms. This study assessed whether acute metoclopramide treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) was associated with a reduction in persistent headache in children at 1- and 4-weeks post-concussion. METHODS: Children aged 8-17years with acute concussion presenting to 9-Canadian Pediatric EDs were enrolled in a prospective cohort study, from August 2013-June 2015. Primary and secondary outcomes were persistent headache at 1- and 4-week post-injury respectively. Headache persistence was based on the one and four-week headache scores minus recalled pre-injury score using the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory. The association between metoclopramide and headache persistence at 1- and 4-weeks were examined using unadjusted and adjusted regression and 1:4 propensity score matching model. RESULTS: Baseline assessments were completed in 2095 participants; 65 (3.1%) received metoclopramide within 48-hours of injury. At 1- and 4-weeks, 54% (963/1808) and 26% (456/1780) of participants had persistent headache relative to baseline respectively. In unadjusted analysis, no association between metoclopramide and headache persistence at 1-week was found [treated vs. untreated: 1-week (53% vs. 53%; relative risk (RR)=1.0 (95%CI: 0.8, 1.3); 4-weeks (27.3% vs. 25.6%; RR=1.0 (95% CI: 0.9, 1.2)]. Metoclopramide was not associated with lower headache risk on propensity score matching [treated vs. untreated: 1-week, n=220 (52% vs. 59.4%; RR=0.8 (95%CI: 0.6, 1.2) and 4-weeks, n=225 (27.1% vs. 32.8%; RR=0.9 (95%CI: 0.8, 1.1)]. CONCLUSION: Metoclopramide administration was not associated with a reduction in headache persistence in children seeking ED care due to a concussion. Further research is necessary to determine which pharmacotherapies may be effective for acute and persistent post-concussive headache.


Subject(s)
Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Metoclopramide/administration & dosage , Post-Concussion Syndrome/complications , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Administration, Intravenous , Adolescent , Canada , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Pain Measurement , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 21(12): 50, 2017 Nov 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29124490

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Peripheral nerve blocks of the scalp, mainly greater occipital nerve blocks, have received a renewed interest amongst pediatric providers as they offer an alternate option to provide both acute and chronic relief from the suffering of children with difficult to treat headaches. This narrative review will provide an in-depth discussion of the published pediatric-specific studies exploring the utility of nerve blocks for pediatric headache disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: A total of seven pediatric publications have been reported to date and reveal excellent therapeutic effectiveness of bilateral greater occipital nerve blocks on primary chronic headaches and post-traumatic headaches. Lidocaine is the preferred anesthetic choice and the value-added of concomitant steroids remains to be elucidated. It is important to ensure complete paresthesia of the blocked nerves to maximize effectiveness. The available studies suggest that peripheral nerve blocks of the scalp are an excellent tool that frontline clinicians can add to their armamentarium in treating pediatric headaches.


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders/surgery , Nerve Block/methods , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male
16.
JAMA Pediatr ; 171(10): 957-964, 2017 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828486

ABSTRACT

Importance: Procedural sedation for children undergoing painful procedures is standard practice in emergency departments worldwide. Previous studies of emergency department sedation are limited by their single-center design and are underpowered to identify risk factors for serious adverse events (SAEs), thereby limiting their influence on sedation practice and patient outcomes. Objective: To examine the incidence and risk factors associated with sedation-related SAEs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted in 6 pediatric emergency departments in Canada between July 10, 2010, and February 28, 2015. Children 18 years or younger who received sedation for a painful emergency department procedure were enrolled in the study. Of the 9657 patients eligible for inclusion, 6760 (70.0%) were enrolled and 6295 (65.1%) were included in the final analysis. Exposures: The primary risk factor was receipt of sedation medication. The secondary risk factors were demographic characteristics, preprocedural medications and fasting status, current or underlying health risks, and procedure type. Main Outcomes and Measures: Four outcomes were examined: SAEs, significant interventions performed in response to an adverse event, oxygen desaturation, and vomiting. Results: Of the 6295 children included in this study, 4190 (66.6%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 8.0 (4.6) years. Adverse events occurred in 736 patients (11.7%; 95% CI, 6.4%-16.9%). Oxygen desaturation (353 patients [5.6%]) and vomiting (328 [5.2%]) were the most common of these adverse events. There were 69 SAEs (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.5%-1.7%), and 86 patients (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.7%-2.1%) had a significant intervention. Use of ketamine hydrochloride alone resulted in the lowest incidence of SAEs (17 [0.4%]) and significant interventions (37 [0.9%]). The incidence of adverse sedation outcomes varied significantly with the type of sedation medication. Compared with ketamine alone, propofol alone (3.7%; odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% CI, 2.3-13.1) and the combinations of ketamine and fentanyl citrate (3.2%; OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.5-15.2) and ketamine and propofol (2.1%; OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.3-8.7) had the highest incidence of SAEs. The combinations of ketamine and fentanyl (4.1%; OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.8-8.1) and ketamine and propofol (2.5%; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.8) had the highest incidence of significant interventions. Conclusions and Relevance: The incidence of adverse sedation outcomes varied significantly with type of sedation medication. Use of ketamine only was associated with the best outcomes, resulting in significantly fewer SAEs and interventions than ketamine combined with propofol or fentanyl.


Subject(s)
Deep Sedation/adverse effects , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
18.
Acad Emerg Med ; 24(5): 607-616, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27976448

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Distal forearm fractures are the most common fracture type in children. Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly being used, and preliminary studies suggest that it offers an accurate approach to diagnosis. However, outcomes such as pain, satisfaction, and procedure duration have not been explored but may be salient to the widespread acceptance of this technology by caregivers and children. Our objectives were to examine the test performance characteristics of POCUS for nonangulated distal forearm injuries in children and compare POCUS to x-ray with respect to pain, caregiver satisfaction, and procedure duration. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving children aged 4-17 years with a suspected nonangulated distal forearm fracture. Participants underwent both x-ray and POCUS assessment. The primary outcome was sensitivity between POCUS and x-ray, the reference standard. Secondary outcomes included self-reported pain using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, caregiver satisfaction using a five-item Likert scale, and procedure duration. RESULTS: POCUS was performed in 169 children of whom 76 were diagnosed with a fracture including 61 buckle fractures. Sensitivity of POCUS for distal forearm fractures was 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 89.7-99.8) and specificity was 93.5% (95% CI = 88.6-98.5). POCUS was associated with a significantly lower median (interquartile range [IQR]) pain score compared to x-ray: 1 (0-2) versus 2 (1-3), respectively (median difference = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.5-1; p < 0.001) and no significant difference in median (IQR) caregiver satisfaction score: 5 (0) versus 5 (4-5), respectively (median difference = 0, 95% CI = 0, p = 1.0). POCUS was associated with a significantly lower median (IQR) procedure duration versus x-ray: 1.5 (0.8-2.2) minutes versus 27 (15-58) minutes, respectively (median difference = 34.1, 95% CI = 26.8-41.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that POCUS assessment of distal forearm injuries in children is accurate, timely, and associated with low levels of pain and high caregiver satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Point-of-Care Systems , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Ulna Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pain Measurement , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography
19.
Healthc Manage Forum ; 29(4): 141-5, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27269815

ABSTRACT

Innovation in patient engagement and empowerment has been identified as a priority area in the Canadian healthcare system. This article describes the development and implementation of the We Should Talk campaign at an academic pediatric hospital. Through the use of a guiding theoretical framework and a multidisciplinary project team, a multimedia campaign was designed to inspire staff, patients and families to effectively communicate to improve patient safety. The We Should Talk campaign provides a case study for how an organization can foster frontline improvement through the engagement of patient, families, and healthcare providers.


Subject(s)
Communication , Health Personnel/organization & administration , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Safety , Canada , Humans , Learning , Patient Participation
20.
Hosp Pediatr ; 6(4): 226-33, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27005580

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Well-appearing febrile infants with viral illnesses cannot be distinguished from those with occult life-threatening infections. Infants with respiratory viruses are less likely to have serious bacterial infections; however, current risk-stratification criteria predate widespread viral testing and there are limited data to safely inform physician management with this now common diagnostic tool. This study sought to explore the possible impact of respiratory virus testing on clinical decision-making for the management of febrile young infants<6 weeks old. METHODS: A scenario-based survey was sent to emergency department (ED) and inpatient physicians at all 16 Canadian tertiary pediatric centers. Participants were asked questions regarding management decisions with and without results of respiratory virus testing. RESULTS: Response rate was 78% (n=330; 190 ED, 140 inpatient). Detection of a respiratory virus reduced admission rates among 3-week-old (83% vs 95%, P<.001) and 5-week-old infants (36% vs 52%, P<.001). Similarly, empirical antibiotic treatment was decreased by detection of a respiratory virus for 3-week-old (65% vs 92%, P<.001) and 5-week-old infants (25% vs 39%, P<.001). Management of 5-week-old infants differed between ED and inpatient physicians, both in the presence and absence of a respiratory virus. There was no consensus among inpatient physicians regarding admission duration for well infants with a detectable respiratory virus and otherwise negative workup. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory virus testing appears to influence clinical decision-making for febrile infants<6 weeks, reducing both rates of admission and antimicrobial treatment. Important work is needed to better understand how to safely incorporate viral testing for the management of this vulnerable patient population.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections , Fever , Respiratory Tract Infections , Virus Diseases , Attitude of Health Personnel , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Bacterial Infections/therapy , Canada , Clinical Decision-Making , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Fever/diagnosis , Fever/etiology , Fever/virology , Health Care Surveys , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Virus Diseases/complications , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...