Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Antimicrobials in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is critical to properly treat infections and limit development of resistance and adverse effects. Limited guidance exist for antimicrobial dosing adjustments in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy, particularly in the pediatric population. A systematic review was conducted to delineate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antimicrobials in critically ill neonates and children requiring ECMO therapy. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Global Health and All EBM Reviews databases were queried. Grey literature was examined. All clinical studies reporting PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials in critically ill pediatric patients treated with ECMO were included, except for case reports and congress abstracts. Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Reviewers were then paired to independently extract data and evaluate the methodological quality of studies using the ROBINS-I tool and the compliance with ClinPK reporting guidelines. Patient and study characteristics, key PK/PD findings, details of ECMO circuits and co-treatments were summarized qualitatively. Broad dosing recommendations were formulated based on the available data for specific antimicrobials. RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical studies were included; most were observational and uncontrolled. Patient characteristics and co-treatments were often missing. The effect of ECMO on PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials varied depending on the drugs and population studied. It was only possible to formulate dosing recommendations for a few antimicrobials given the paucity of data, its overall low quality and heterogeneity in reporting. CONCLUSION: Limited data exists on the PK/PD of antimicrobials during ECMO therapy in the pediatric population. Rigorously designed population PK studies are required to establish empiric dosing guidelines for antimicrobials in patients requiring this therapeutic modality. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring for antimicrobials in pediatric patients on ECMO should be encouraged to optimize dosing. TRIAL REGISTRY: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018099992 (Registered: July 24th 2018).

Risk factors associated with augmented renal clearance in a mixed intensive care unit population: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Augmented renal clearance is increasingly recognized in critically ill patients. This condition may lead to suboptimal dosing of renally excreted medications. AIM: Our primary objective was to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with augmented renal clearance in a mixed critically ill population. METHOD: This retrospective single center observational cohort study evaluated patients admitted in a mixed adult intensive care unit for augmented renal clearance, defined as a creatinine clearance of ≥ 130 ml/min/1.73m2, through weekly 24-h urine collection. Variables associated with augmented renal clearance were identified using univariate analysis, then served as covariates in a backward stepwise logistic regression. Goodness-of-fit of the model was assessed and receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. RESULTS: Augmented renal clearance was observed in 25.3% of the study cohort (n = 324). Age below 50 years (adjusted odds ratio 7.32; 95% CI 4.03-13.29, p < 0.001), lower serum creatinine at intensive care admission (adjusted odds ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p < 0.001) and trauma admission (adjusted odds ratio 2.26; 95% CI 1.12-4.54, p = 0.022) were identified as independent risk factors. Our model showed acceptable discrimination in predicting augmented renal clearance (Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (0.810; 95% CI 0.756-0.864, p < 0.001)). CONCLUSION: We identified age below 50 years, lower serum creatinine upon intensive care admission and trauma as independent risk factors for augmented renal clearance, consistent with the literature suggesting that patients with low serum creatinine upon admission could have a higher risk of developing augmented renal clearance.

Validation of the Augmented Renal Clearance in Trauma Intensive Care scoring system for augmented renal clearance prediction in a trauma subgroup of a mixed ICU population.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Augmented renal clearance is prevalent in trauma patients and leads to subtherapeutic levels of renally eliminated medications with potentially unfavourable clinical outcomes. The Augmented Renal Clearance of Trauma in Intensive Care (ARCTIC) score has been developed to predict augmented renal clearance in critically ill trauma patients. Our primary objective was to validate this score among the trauma subgroup of a mixed intensive care patient cohort. METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study assessed augmented renal clearance using a timed 24-h urine collection performed weekly. ARC was defined as a measured creatinine clearance of ≥130 ml/min/1.73 m2 . ARCTIC score performance was evaluated through a receiver operator characteristic curves and analysis of sensitivities and specificities for the trauma subgroup, the medical/surgical subgroup and the pooled cohort. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Augmented renal clearance was observed in 33.9% (n = 58) of trauma patients (n = 171) and 15.7% (n = 24) of medical/surgical patients (n = 153). Examination of different cutoffs for the ARCTIC score in our trauma population confirmed that the optimal cutoff score was ≥6. Comparison between ROC curves for ARCTIC score and for regression model based upon our data in trauma patients indicated validation of the score in this subgroup. Comparison of sensitivities and specificities for ARCTIC score between trauma (93.1% and 41.6%, respectively) and medical/surgical subjects (87.5% and 49.6%, respectively) showed no clinical nor statistical difference, suggesting validation for the medical/surgical subgroup as well. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In our mixed ICU population, the ARCTIC score was validated in the trauma subgroup. We also found that the score performed well in the medical/surgical population. Future studies should assess the performance of the ARCTIC score prospectively.

Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Antimicrobials in Critically Ill Adults During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Adequate dosing of antimicrobials is critical to properly treat infections and limit development of resistance and adverse effects. Limited guidance exists for antimicrobial dosing adjustments in patients requiring extracorporporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. A systematic review was conducted to delineate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of antimicrobials in critically ill adult patients requiring ECMO. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, Global Health, and All EBM Reviews databases were searched. Grey literature was examined. All studies reporting PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials in critically ill adults treated with ECMO were included, except for case reports and congress abstracts. Ex vivo studies were included. Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Reviewers were then paired to independently abstract data and evaluate methodological quality of studies using the ROBINS-I tool and the compliance with ClinPK guidelines. Patients' and studies' characteristics, key PK/PD findings, details of ECMO circuits and co-treatments were summarized qualitatively. Dosing recommendations were formulated based on data from controlled studies. RESULTS: Thirty-two clinical studies were included; most were observational and uncontrolled. Fourteen ex vivo studies were analysed. Information on patient characteristics and co-treatments was often missing. The effect of ECMO on PK/PD parameters of antimicrobials varied depending on the studied drugs. Few dosing recommendations could be formulated given the lack of good quality data. CONCLUSION: Limited data exist on the PK/PD of antimicrobials during ECMO therapy. Rigorously designed and well powered populational PK studies are required to establish empiric dosing guidelines for antimicrobials in patients requiring ECMO support. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018099992 (Registered: July 24th 2018).

Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Iatrogenic Withdrawal from Opioids and Benzodiazepines in Critically Ill Neonates, Children and Adults: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients are at high risk of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS), due to exposure to high doses or prolonged periods of opioids and benzodiazepines. PURPOSE: To examine pharmacological management strategies designed to prevent and/or treat IWS from opioids and/or benzodiazepines in critically ill neonates, children and adults. METHODS: We included non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI) and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), reporting on interventions to prevent or manage IWS in critically ill neonatal, paediatric and adult patients. Database searching included: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane databases, TRIP, CMA Infobase and NICE evidence. Additional grey literature was examined. Study selection and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data collected included: population, definition of opioid, benzodiazepine or mixed IWS, its assessment and management (drug or strategy, route of administration, dosage and titration), previous drug exposures and outcomes measures. Methodological quality assessment was performed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and the ROBINS-I tool for NRSI. A qualitative synthesis of the results is provided. For the subset of studies evaluating multifaceted protocolised care, we meta-analysed results for 4 outcomes and examined the quality of evidence using GRADE post hoc. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were eligible, including 10 NRSI and 3 RCTs; 11 of these included neonatal and paediatric patients exclusively. Eight studies evaluated multifaceted protocolised interventions, while 5 evaluated individual components of IWS management (e.g. clonidine or methadone at varying dosages, routes of administration and duration of tapering). IWS was measured using an appropriate tool in 6 studies. Ten studies reported upon occurrence of IWS, showing significant reductions (n = 4) or no differences (n = 6). Interventions failed to impact duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and adverse effects. Impact on opioid and/or benzodiazepine total doses and duration showed no differences in 4 studies, while 3 showed opioid and benzodiazepine cumulative doses were significantly reduced by 20-35% and 32-66%, and treatment durations by 1.5-11 and 19 days, respectively. Variable effects on intervention drug exposures were found. Weaning durations were reduced by 6-12 days (n = 4) for opioids and/or methadone and by 13 days (n = 1) for benzodiazepines. In contrast, two studies using interventions centred on transition to enteral routes or longer tapering durations found significant increases in intervention drug exposures. Interventions had overall non-significant effects on additional drug requirements (except for one study). Included studies were at high risk of bias, relating to selection, detection and reporting bias. CONCLUSION: Interventions for IWS management fail to impact duration of mechanical ventilation or ICU length of stay, while effect on occurrence of IWS and drug exposures is inconsistent. Heterogeneity in the interventions used and methodological issues, including inappropriate and/or subjective identification of IWS and bias due to study design, limited the conclusions.

Modifiable Risk Factors for Delirium in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE:: Intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired delirium has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Prevention strategies including modification of delirium risk factors are emphasized by practice guidelines. No study has specifically evaluated modifiable delirium risk factors in trauma ICU patients. Our goal was to evaluate modifiable risk factors for delirium among trauma patients admitted to the ICU. DESIGN:: Prospective observational study. SETTING:: Two level 1 trauma ICU centers. PATIENTS:: Patients 18 years of age or older admitted for trauma including mild to moderate traumatic brain injury were eligible for the study. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS:: Delirium was assessed daily using the confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). The effect of modifiable risk factors was assessed using multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for severity of illness and significant nonmodifiable risk factors. MAIN RESULTS:: A total of 58 of 150 recruited patients (38.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 30.9-46.5) screened positive for delirium during ICU stay. When adjusting for significant nonmodifiable risk factors, physical restraints (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.07-4.24) and active infection or sepsis (HR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.18-3.81) significantly increased the risk of delirium, whereas opioids (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13-0.98), episodes of hypoxia (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31-0.95), access to a television/radio in the room (HR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.11-0.62), and number of hours mobilized per day (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.88) were associated with significantly less risk of delirium. CONCLUSION:: We have identified modifiable risk factors for delirium. Future studies should aim at implementing strategies to modify these risk factors and evaluate their impact on the risk of delirium.

Frequency, risk factors and symptomatology of iatrogenic withdrawal from opioids and benzodiazepines in critically Ill neonates, children and adults: A systematic review of clinical studies.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Many critically ill patients are exposed to opioids and benzodiazepines at high doses for prolonged periods, and upon discontinuation of these drugs, they may be at risk for iatrogenic withdrawal. Although this syndrome was associated with worse outcomes in the critically ill, limited guidance exists regarding its evaluation, prevention and treatment. This systematic review examined the frequency, risk factors and symptomatology of iatrogenic withdrawal from opioids and/or benzodiazepines in critically ill neonates, children and adults. METHODS: The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane register of systematic reviews, DARE, CINAHL, Trip database, CMA infobase and NICE evidence from inception to February 2018. Grey literature was examined. We included studies reporting frequency, risk factors or symptomatology of iatrogenic withdrawal of opioids, benzodiazepines (or both) in critically ill patients. We considered all study designs except case reports and case series. We excluded studies on neonatal abstinence syndrome, alcohol withdrawal, studies on chronic opioid and/or benzodiazepine users and studies on prevention or treatment of withdrawal in critical care patients. Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pairs of reviewers independently abstracted data and evaluated methodological quality using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool, Newcastle-Ottawa or QUADAS-2. Details regarding study design, outcomes, definition, evaluation and type of withdrawal (opioid, benzodiazepine or mixed) were collected. Cumulative doses and duration of opioids and benzodiazepines were collected. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We identified 21 866 unique citations and 153 full texts were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-four studies were included; the majority were observational and few included adults. In prospective studies, mixed withdrawal was observed in 7.5%-100% of patients in paediatric studies and ranged from 16.7% to 55% in adults. Symptomatology of withdrawal was not well described. Risk factors included higher cumulative dose and prolonged administration of opioids and benzodiazepines. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic withdrawal appears to be a frequent syndrome in critical care patients who received regular doses of opioids and/or benzodiazepines for ≥72 hours. Larger studies are required, especially in critically ill adults, to better define the syndrome and its symptomatology.