Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(8): 1382-1390, 2023 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36571112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Louse-borne trench fever caused by Bartonella quintana is a neglected public health concern, known to be transmitted from body louse feces via scratching. No viable B. quintana have ever been isolated from head lice before; therefore, their role as a vector is still poorly understood. METHODS: In Senegal, the implementation of a permanent local surveillance system in a point-of-care laboratory (POC) allows the monitoring of emerging diseases. Here we used culture as well as molecular and genomic approaches to document an outbreak of trench fever associated with head lice in the village of Ndiop. Head lice and blood samples were collected from febrile patients between November 2010 and April 2015. Genomes of 2 isolated strains of B. quintana were sequenced and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 2289 blood samples were collected in the 2010-2015 period. From 2010-2013, B. quintana DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 0.25% (4/1580). In 2014, 228 blood samples were collected, along with 161 head lice from 5 individuals. B. quintana DNA was detected in 4.4% (10/228) of blood samples, and in lice specimens collected from febrile patients (61.7%, 50/81) and non-febrile patients (61.4%, 43/70). Two B. quintana strains were isolated from blood and head lice from 2 different patients. Genomic sequence analysis showed 99.98% overall similarity between both strains. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of live B. quintana in head lice, and the genetic identity of strains from patients' blood and head lice during a localized outbreak in Senegal, supports the evidence of head lice vectorial capacity.


Subject(s)
Bartonella quintana , Lice Infestations , Pediculus , Trench Fever , Animals , Humans , Bartonella quintana/genetics , Pediculus/genetics , Trench Fever/epidemiology , Senegal/epidemiology , Lice Infestations/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , DNA
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(3): 477-484, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389257

ABSTRACT

The emergence of COVID-19 disease due to SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2019 was rapidly associated with the isolation of the strain from co-culture onto VERO cells. These isolations quickly made it possible to carry out the first tests for antiviral agents' susceptibility and drug repurposing. However, it seems important to make an inventory of all the cells that can support the growth of this virus and evaluate possible differences between isolates. In the present work, we tested 4 strains of SARS-CoV-2 locally isolated on a panel of 34 cell lines present in our laboratory and commonly used for the isolation of human pathogenic microorganism. After inoculation, cells were observed for cytopathic effects and quantitative real-time polymerase reaction was used to measure the virus replication on the cells. We were able to obtain growth on 7 cell lines, 6 simian, and the human Caco-2. The cytopathogenic effects are variable, ranging from lysis of the cell monolayer in 48-72 h to no cytopathic effect in spite of intense multiplication, as in Caco-2 cells. Interestingly, effect and multiplication varied widely according to the strain tested. In this paper, we explored the species specificity and tissue tropism of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro on a panel of cells available in our laboratory and identified human and animal cell lines susceptible to support SARS-CoV-2 replication. Our work highlights the importance of testing multiple strains when testing antiviral molecules and performing patho-physiological analyzes.


Subject(s)
SARS-CoV-2/growth & development , Animals , COVID-19/virology , Cell Line , Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral , Host Specificity , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL