ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Leucocyte infiltration in the wall of varicose veins has been reported previously. This study was designed to investigate the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in control and in patients with varicose veins and to test the effect of treating varicose vein patients with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on cytokine expression prior to removal of varices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sections of vein were removed during operation from both patient groups, and ribonuclease protection assays (RPAs) were performed to assess the expression of chemokines. Group I included non-varicose saphenous veins from healthy patients undergoing amputation for trauma. Varicose veins were obtained from patients with primary varicose undergoing surgical treatment who received no drug (group II) or treatment with 300 mg day(-1) of ASA for 15 days before surgery (group III). RESULTS: Non-varicose veins constitutively expressed low levels of monocyte-chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) and interleukin (IL)-8 mRNA. Varicose veins had a distinct chemokine expression pattern, since significant up-regulation of MCP-1 and IL-8 and a marked expression of IP-10, RANTES, MIP-1alpha and MIP-1beta mRNA were detected. Removal of the endothelium did not alter this pattern. Varicose veins obtained from patients treated with ASA showed a consistent decrease in chemokine expression, although it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Varicose veins showed increased expression of several chemokines compared to control veins. A non-significant reduction of activation was observed following treatment with ASA for 15 days.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Chemokines/metabolism , Cytokines/metabolism , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Saphenous Vein/drug effects , Varicose Veins/drug therapy , Adult , Chemokines/genetics , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytokines/genetics , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Endothelium, Vascular/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Saphenous Vein/immunology , Saphenous Vein/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Up-Regulation , Varicose Veins/immunology , Varicose Veins/surgery , Vascular Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tularemia was practically unknown in Spain until the end of 1997, when an epidemic outbreak was declared. This paper presents the data on microbiological diagnosis of 55 patients who suffered from tularemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two samples from 19 patients and 151 serum samples from 55 patients were obtained for culture. Serologic diagnosis was performed by tube sero-agglutination and microagglutination. Three types of tests were performed on all sera: Wright sero-agglutination (WSA), Coombs test against Brucella spp. and sero-agglutination against Yersinia enterocolitica O:3, Yersinia enterocolitica O:3, and Proteus OX 19. RESULTS: F. tularensis was found in two samples (6.25%) of the 32 received. Titers > or = 1/160 were obtained in 78.2% and 74.5% of the initial sera by tube sero-agglutination and microagglutination, respectively. Correlation between the two tests was 0.80 (p < 0.001). Prozone phenomenon was observed in 59.9% of the sera, while crossed reactivity to Brucella spp. and Proteus spp. was found in 9.3% and 22.8%, respectively. No crossed reactivity was observed with Yersinia spp. CONCLUSIONS: Culture of F. tularensis has low sensitivity. The correlation obtained between tube sero-agglutination and microagglutination is good. Both techniques are useful in routine diagnosis of tularemia, although microagglutination has some advantages over tube agglutination.
