Cost-effective teaching of radiology with preclinical anatomy.

Graduating physicians in all subspecialties have an increased need for competency in radiology, particularly since the use of diagnostic imaging continues to grow. To integrate the teaching of radiology with anatomy during the first year of medical school at Howard University, a novel approach was developed to overcome the limitations of resources including funding, faculty, and curricular time. The resulting program relies on self-study and peer-to-peer interactions to develop proficiency at manipulating free versions of medical image viewer software (using the DICOM standard), identifying normal anatomy in medical images, and applying critical thinking skills to understand common clinical conditions. An effective collaborative relationship between a radiologist and anatomist was necessary to develop and implement the program of anatomic-radiographic instruction which consists of five tiers: (1) initial exposure to anatomy through dissection which provides a foundation of knowledge; (2) study of annotated radiographs from atlases; (3) a radiology quiz open to group discussions; (4) small group study of clinical cases with diagnostic images; and (5) radiographic tests. Students took all quizzes and tests by working from image datasets preloaded on their personal computers, mimicking the approach by which radiologists analyze medical images. In addition to stimulating student support of a new teaching initiative, the strengths of Howard's program are that it can be introduced into an existing preclinical curriculum in almost any medical school with minimal disruption, it requires few additional resources to implement and run, and its design is consistent with the principles of modern education theory. Anat Sci Educ 11: 196-206. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) white papers on teleradiology: patient primacy is paramount.

The ACR and European Society of Radiology white papers on teleradiology propose best practice guidelines for teleradiology, with each body focusing on its respective local situation, market, and legal regulations. The organizations have common viewpoints, the most important being patient primacy, maintenance of quality, and the "supplementary" position of teleradiology to local services. The major differences between the white papers are related mainly to the market situation, the use of teleradiology, teleradiologist credentialing and certification, the principles of "international" teleradiology, and the need to obtain "informed consent" from patients. The authors describe these similarities and differences by highlighting the background and context of teleradiology in Europe and the United States.

Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 2: challenges and recommendations.

The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. Part 2 of a 2-part position article from the commission addresses issues regarding diversity and inclusion in the context of career choices and professional advancement. Barriers to improving diversity and representation in RRO are reviewed. Discussion focuses on the development and implementation of concrete strategies designed to eliminate the current subspecialty disparity and highlights the need for the ACR to introduce programs and incentives with targeted and achievable goals with measurable outcomes. Recommendations are made aimed at fostering an environment of inclusion and diversity, so as to secure a successful future for all members of the RRO workforce. The future of radiology will be enhanced by increasing diversity and representation in the professional workforce, which will allow us to better address the varied needs of increasingly diverse patient populations, and to mitigate disparities in healthcare access, delivery, and outcomes. By leveraging diverse backgrounds, experiences, and skills of those in RRO, we will create new, effective ways to not only educate our trainees, medical colleagues, and patients but also improve delivery of health care and our service to society.

Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: why these matter.

The ACR Commission for Women and General Diversity is committed to identifying barriers to a diverse physician workforce in radiology and radiation oncology (RRO), and to offering policy recommendations to overcome these barriers. In Part 1 of a 2-part position article from the commission, diversity as a concept and its dimensions of personality, character, ethnicity, biology, biography, and organization are introduced. Terms commonly used to describe diverse individuals and groups are reviewed. The history of diversity and inclusion in US society and health care are addressed. The post-Civil Rights Era evolution of diversity in medicine is delineated: Diversity 1.0, with basic awareness, nondiscrimination, and recruitment; Diversity 2.0, with appreciation of the value of diversity but inclusion as peripheral or in opposition to other goals; and Diversity 3.0, which integrates diversity and inclusion into core missions of organizations and their leadership, and leverages its potential for innovation and contribution. The current states of diversity and inclusion in RRO are reviewed in regard to gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The lack of representation and unchanged demographics in these fields relative to other medical specialties are explored. The business case for diversity is discussed, with examples of successful models and potential application to the health care industry in general and to RRO. The moral, ethical, and public health imperative for diversity is also highlighted.

Absent infrarenal inferior vena cava.

Absence of an infrarenal inferior vena cava is an infrequent finding on computed tomography scans and is usually an unexpected, incidental finding. This report concerns a young patient with an absent infrarenal inferior vena cava who presented with abdominal and back pain.

Porcelain atrium: a case report with literature review.

Massive left atrial wall calcification, or porcelain atrium, is very rare. We describe a case of an unusual pattern of cardiac calcification demonstrated on routine preoperative chest X-ray for cataract surgery in a 71-year-old Nigerian woman. Past medical history was significant for mitral stenosis and atrial fibrillation. Radiographic imaging revealed curvilinear high density areas of calcification outlining the left atrium on the chest X-ray. Noncontrast CT scan of the thorax confirmed the left atrial distribution of calcification and, thus, the diagnosis of porcelain left atrium.

Accessory appendages of the left atrium as seen during 64-slice coronary CT angiography.

PURPOSE: To document the frequency and variations in number and anatomical shape of accessory appendages of the left atrium as seen on 64-slice cardiac CT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of the anatomy of the left atrium as depicted by cardiac CT using the acquisition protocol designed for coronary CT Angiography and performed in 166 patients over a 6-month period with a 64-slice ECG-gated CT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). The local IRB provided a waiver of informed consent for this retrospective study. Structures less than 5 mm in shape were excluded, as well as large accessory pulmonary veins. RESULTS: Seventeen (17) of 166 patients (10%) had 18 accessory left atrial appendages (only one patient had two). Fifteen (15) accessory appendages were located along the right upper atrial wall and measured 0.9 x 0.6 x 0.5 cm(3) +/- 0.2 x 0.2 x 0.1 (Type 1). Three (3) were located along the left lower atrial wall, and were larger (0.9-2.5 cm cross-section) (Type 2). The right upper accessory appendages were mostly shaped like small diverticuli and the left lower ones were shaped like flat cauliflower expansions. CONCLUSIONS: Accessory left atrial appendages were visualized in 10% of 166 patients during 64-slice coronary CT angiography.

Ethical considerations in CT angiography.

The rapid development and clinical deployment of CT angiography raises several important issues, including assurance of professional competence and technical quality, self-referral, the relative role of radiologists and cardiologists, appropriateness and proper indications, the detection and disposition of unexpected or incidental findings and the concern for the rapidly increasing costs of health care and imaging. These questions are properly addressed within the framework of medical ethics, including principles of beneficence, autonomy and justice.

Caseous calcification of the mitral annulus imaged with 64-slice multidetector CT and magnetic resonance imaging.

Caseous calcification of the mitral annulus is a rare entity in cardiac imaging. We present CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a patient evaluated for severe mitral valve regurgitation with such calcified cardiac mass in the thickened basal wall of the left ventricle. Despite good visualization of the mass both with 64-slice multidetector CT and MRI, the characterization of the lesion was difficult. The most critical finding was the presence of a hyperdense mass with an even denser peripheral rim on pre-contrast CT images. The mass did not enhance after X-ray contrast agent administration. We discuss the preoperative differential for calcified intramyocardial mass.

ACR clinical statement on noninvasive cardiac imaging.

Coronary artery disease and other acquired and congenital cardiac diseases are major medical and socio-economic problems. Historically, imaging has had a critical role in the diagnosis and evaluation of acquired and congenital cardiac disease. Advances in computed tomography (CT), with multidetector CT and electron beam CT technology, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, now make it possible to noninvasively image the coronary arteries, cardiac chambers, valves, myocardium, and pericardium and assess cardiac function, and CT and MR imaging are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of cardiac disease. Radiologists, because of their extensive experience in CT and MR imaging, have an important role in imaging cardiac patients using these modalities. This clinical statement of the ACR discusses various technical and patient safety issues related to cardiac CT and MR imaging, and it suggests appropriate qualifications for radiologists until such time as ACR practice guidelines for the performance of cardiac CT and cardiac MR imaging are written and approved through the usual ACR process. It stresses that the interpreting physician is responsible for examining not only the cardiac structures of interest but also all the visualized noncardiac structures and must report any clinically relevant abnormalities of these adjacent structures.

Plain film / MR imaging correlation in heart disease.

This article reviews common cardiovascular pathologies that can be noted first on plain film when previously unsuspected, and then illustrates how cross-sectional imaging can provide the follow-up information needed to make a diagnosis. First reviewed are the normal cardiac structures and contours as seen on the plain film of the chest, followed by specific types of pathologies as seen in older adults; patients with lung cancer invading the heart, pericardium, or large vessels; and postsurgical and posttraumatic findings. Also provided is a review of non-cardiac-related areas of plain film and cross-sectional imaging correlation. It is hoped that the reader gains a better understanding and appreciation for the great value of cross-sectional imaging, and the power of the plain film in helping detect and recognize thoracic pathology.

MR venography using an intravascular contrast agent: results from a multicenter phase 2 study of dosage.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the optimal dose of the iron oxide contrast agent feruglose for contrast-enhanced MR venography of the abdominopelvic and lower extremity veins and to evaluate its safety and tolerability in patients with deep venous thrombosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled in our study a total of 45 patients at six centers who had lower extremity deep venous thrombosis documented on radiographic venography. Forty-four patients received the study drug; 39 completed the study. Each patient received three sequential IV injections of feruglose at doses of 0.75, 1.25, and 3.0 mg Fe/kg body weight. MR venography at 1.5 T was repeated at three levels after each dose. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: The agreement between contrast-enhanced MR venography and radiographic venography with regard to deep venous thrombosis above the knee was zero at the lowest dose (0.75 mg Fe/kg body weight), 43% at the dose 2.0 mg Fe/kg body weight, and 49% at the dose 5.0 mg Fe/kg body weight. No significant difference was seen between the two highest doses. The highest cumulative dose provided the greatest diagnostic usefulness score. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: The two highest doses of feruglose showed the best agreement between contrast-enhanced MR venography and radiographic venography for deep venous thrombosis above the knee. The safety and tolerability of feruglose were confirmed.

Lower extremity MR angiography: universal retrofitting of high-field-strength systems with stepping kinematic imaging platforms initial experience.

In 15 volunteers and 84 patients with clinically suspected peripheral vascular disease, a stepping kinematic imaging platform, a manual retrofit stepping magnetic resonance (MR) imaging table, was used with three high-field-strength MR imaging systems to perform multistation peripheral contrast material-enhanced MR angiography in the lower extremity with the existing system phased-array coil. Each examination was performed in less than 45 minutes. Mounting of the stepping kinematic imaging platform was quick and simple and allowed rapid repositioning of a patient relative to the phased-array coil and acquisition of high-spatial-resolution MR angiograms of the peripheral vasculature with use of one injection of MR imaging contrast agent.